Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Watch this student’s wild accusation completely fall apart in real-time! 🚨 During a Turning Point USA event, a student claims a group of Trump supporters yelled racial slurs and threatened them with sexual assault. But when Charlie Kirk asks for a police report, witnesses, or security footage, the student...

283,392 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Caught RIGGING THE Q & A Event At GW University This Week - Student Says 3 Of Out The Person's Were PLANTED And Questions Were STAGED!😱 If you needed any more proof that Erika Kirk has completely abandoned the principles Charlie Kirk built his life on, here is the smoking gun. A student who just attended the Turning Point USA event at GW University featuring Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt just did an interview blowing the whistle on the entire operation. According to the students on the ground, the "Free Speech" event was a carefully orchestrated, heavily censored theater production. According to the student in the clip: The "Plants": At least 3 out of the 4 people who got to ask questions during the Q&A were literally affiliated with the event/organization. They were planted there. Not Even Students: Half of the people hand-picked to ask questions weren't even actual GW students! The Cut-Off: The organizers rigged the line so their "plants" could ask soft-ball, pro-administration questions. Then, the absolute second an actual student with a dissenting opinion stepped up to the mic, they magically "ran out of time" and shut the entire thing down. Because they can’t handle the heat. This student said it best: He respected Charlie because Charlie actually valued freedom of speech and talked to people who disagreed with him. This new regime is just creating a safe space bubble to protect themselves from real questions—like, perhaps, questions about the investigation into Charlie's death? Charlie Kirk built his entire legacy on the "Prove Me Wrong" table. He was fearless. He wanted to debate the other side, and he never backed down from a tough question from a hostile student. The "New" TPUSA? They are terrified of unscripted moments. The students are waking up. The movement sees right through the facade. Watch the clip for yourself. What happened to the fearless TPUSA we used to know? 👇 From: CALL TO ACTIVISM FOLLOW Them!

Project Constitution

307,036 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Charlie Kirk never got to see America’s 250th birthday. So, in his honor, watch him shut down the typical liberal “stolen land” argument. A college student confronts Kirk and says Americans are living on “stolen land” taken from the Mexicans. Kirk asks who the Mexicans stole it from, then expertly turns his own words against him. By the end, everyone is cheering for America. Watch how this one plays out. STUDENT: “I want to acknowledge the fact that we are right now on stolen land and that we are on indigenous land and that we are on original Mexican land right now.” KIRK: “I love this stolen land argument.” STUDENT: “…I really make it a point to notice that I’m on stolen land at all times, especially when we think about things like Manifest Destiny.” KIRK: “Who did the Mexicans steal the land from?” STUDENT: “Actually, the Mexicans were there originally in Texas…” KIRK: “Wrong. They stole it from lots of Indian tribes… Texas was not indigenously Mexican… there was the Cherokee. There were many different Native American tribes there. So Mexico was participating in Manifest Destiny at the behest of the Spanish crown.” [Student acknowledges Kirk is right] KIRK: “At some point, you have to believe in self-determination. If you can win the land, it’s yours. That is what built the West.” STUDENT: “I can agree with that.” KIRK: “So instead of a land acknowledgement… you should have a gratitude acknowledgement. ‘Praise God, I live in America! I’m glad!’ A gratitude acknowledgement would be nice.” [Crowd erupts] Charlie would have loved to experience America’s 250th birthday more than anyone. He defended America on campuses exactly like this one until the day he died. The least we can do is carry his message forward. Rest in Peace, Legend.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

700,383 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Watch how Charlie Kirk engages with a college liberal who says life begins when a baby exits the mother’s womb. He didn’t yell. He didn’t call her names. Instead, he asked her a series of critical questions until her argument completely fell apart. KIRK: “We know deep down it’s wrong to murder a baby.” STUDENT: “You’re not murdering a baby. It’s not a baby.” KIRK: “What is it then?” STUDENT: “It is an embryo, which is not a baby.” KIRK: “So at what point does it become a baby?” STUDENT: “When it is born.” [Crowd groans] STUDENT: “I don’t agree with abortions up to full-term abortions.” KIRK: “Hold on. But you said it becomes a baby when it’s born. Then why would you have abortion limits before it’s born? I thought it’s just an embryo. So embryo rights?” STUDENT: “No, embryo rights aren’t a thing.” KIRK: “But then where would you draw a line for abortion then? And why? And under what moral standard?” STUDENT: “There are medical reasons.” KIRK: “No, that’s not the question.” STUDENT: “You just asked me why would I not have an abortion full term. For medical reasons.” KIRK: “Okay, so at 29 weeks, the baby is nearly fully developed, can recognize the mother’s voice, has a heartbeat, has brainwaves. Is it okay to abort that baby?” STUDENT: “It’s not okay… I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. It’s not okay to have an abortion ever? How about like three weeks in?” KIRK: “Correct. No abortion. Correct.” STUDENT: “Why?” KIRK: “Well, because your life started at conception.” STUDENT: “It did not, though.” KIRK: “Well, hold on. So let’s play this out. So who are you as an individual? From your skin color to your eye color, to your likes, your dislikes, from your temperament to your everything.” STUDENT: “I am not an embryo. I’m a person.” KIRK: “Hold on a second. But it started with something called deoxyribonucleic acid. And your own individual DNA started at the point of egg and sperm meeting. That’s where your journey started. And so from that point in particular, life begins not at birth, not at first words, not at first steps, but when your DNA [developed], which is who you actually are… That doesn’t happen at eight weeks or 10 weeks. It happens at conception.” STUDENT: “What happens if you need a medical abortion? If the mother will die if she does not get an abortion? What’s your stance on that?” KIRK: “The only place where medical abortion is necessary is before 20 weeks, which is incredibly rare.” STUDENT: “What if she will die? What if the mother will die?” KIRK: “This is a very important question. Let’s say it’s 27 weeks, okay? And the mother will die… Why don’t we just have the baby delivered by cesarean section? You know what a cesarean section is, right?” STUDENT: “A C-section.” KIRK: “Why wouldn’t we just put the baby up by C-section instead of terminating it?” STUDENT: “Because if the mother will die, it’s not safe to do that.” KIRK: “But it’s actually safer than an abortion. So every time they say… ‘Oh, you need to have abortion for medical reasons.’ Respond, ‘then have a C-section.’” STUDENT: “What if you’re not able to have a C-section? What if you are on your deathbed? You need to have an abortion right now?” KIRK: “First and foremost, C-section is safer, C-section is quicker. And a C-section saves both lives.” [Crowd erupts]

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

149,735 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here is the FULL body cam footage of the arrest and the events that led up to it. And here is a breakdown of what ACTUALLY happened. - On May 20th at approximately 12:34 p.m., a Fairfield Police Officer serving as a School Resource Officer responded to a large physical fight involving multiple students at Fairfield High School. During the altercation, one student physically fought with a school official who was attempting to break up the fight, prompting the officer to immediately request emergency assistance. - While trying to stop the fight, the officer observed a student attempting to retrieve an item from a backpack. Believing the student could be reaching for a weapon, the officer confiscated two backpacks and turned them over to school staff. - The officer escorted one involved student to the school office, while a large crowd of students followed behind and continued attempting to fight the detained student. - The officer then attempted to detain a second student who was actively trying to continue the fight. The student refused commands, ran into a crowd where additional fights were occurring, and then struck the officer in an attempt to avoid being detained. - As the officer escorted the second student toward the school office, the student repeatedly pulled away and continued resisting. Additional officers arrived to assist with the escalating situation. - The second student suddenly broke free and turned aggressively toward the officer after already assaulting him. Another responding officer immediately performed a takedown maneuver to stop the student before the situation escalated further and to protect the officer from additional harm. - Even after being taken to the ground, the second student continued resisting arrest by tensing his arms, covering his face, and refusing to place his hands behind his back while officers attempted to handcuff him. - Officers used distraction strikes to gain compliance after repeated failed attempts to secure the student’s hands. The student eventually complied and was placed under arrest. - Officers later located sharp objects, including a screwdriver, inside the confiscated backpacks. Both students were arrested for causing a disturbance on a school campus and resisting arrest. According to police, no officers or students were injured during the incident. Do I REALLY need to point out that the officer himself is black?

Sarah Fields

206,224 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад