Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Watching CONOR spin his absolute irrelevance into a grand conspiracy is hilarious. He is actively lying about the reason he didn't go to LibCon. He actually wants his audience to believe he was disinvited for criticizing Destiny, Destiny | Steven Bonnell II. This is the exact playbook of a...

60,427 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇮🇶🇮🇷|Grand Ayatollah Mohammad al-Yaqoubi has issued a fatwa: undermining Iran even with a single word is forbidden. In this confrontation, there is no room for neutrality. This is not a political statement. It is a religious ruling. It was issued by one of the most senior religious authorities in Najaf. It is addressed to all Iraqis especially those who remain silent. What did he say? The first point: Undermining the Islamic Republic, even with a single word, is forbidden. This means: You cannot criticize Iran. You cannot question Iran. You cannot spread doubt about Iran. You cannot aid the enemy's narrative. You cannot provide the enemy with ammunition. You cannot lend legitimacy to the siege. A single word. That is the threshold. You do not need to bomb Iran. You do not need to sanction Iran. You do not need to close airports. You need only utter a single word that weakens Iran. And that word is forbidden. The second point: We are facing a confrontation in which no neutrality is acceptable. This means: You cannot claim neutrality. You cannot claim detachment. You cannot claim equidistance. You cannot claim that both sides are the same. Because they are not the same. One side is the aggressor. One side is the victim. One side is an empire. One side is the resistance. To remain neutral in the face of aggression is complicity. To remain silent in the face of a siege is betrayal. To stand idly by while a Muslim nation is strangled is a sin. Why this is the ultimate argument against the silent The tradition of Najaf is quietism. Do not interfere in politics. Do not confront rulers. Do not take sides. Protect the seminary. Protect the institutions. Protect the community. Let politicians fight. Let rulers rule. Scholars pray, teach, and wait. Yaqoubi has just rejected that tradition. He says: This confrontation allows for no neutrality. You cannot sit on the fence. You cannot remain silent. You cannot claim to be above the fray. Because this is not a political dispute. This is an existential confrontation. This is a war against a Muslim nation. This is a blockade against a Muslim people. This is an attempt to strangle the Islamic Republic. If you do not stand with Iran, you stand against it. Who is he addressing? He is addressing those who remained silent when Iraqi airports were shut down. He is addressing those who say, "We do not meddle in politics." He is addressing those who submit to U.S. pressure and then pretend they are merely "obeying the law." He is addressing those who hold religious authority in Najaf, Karbala, Kufa, and Baghdad yet choose not to speak. He is saying: You have no right to remain silent. Your silence aids the enemy. Your silence allows the U.S. to turn Iraq into a base for besieging Iran. Your silence allows Muslims to be starved, blockaded, and isolated. Yet you are the heirs of Imam Ali. You are the followers of Hussein. You are the descendants of Karbala. You cannot remain silent. His fatwa states: ◽Undermining the Islamic Republic even with a single word is forbidden. ◽We face a confrontation in which no neutrality is acceptable. This is the ultimate argument for the silent. This is the final warning to the bystanders. This is the final call to Najaf. On the battlefield of truth versus falsehood, there is no room for bystanders.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

11,099 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen