Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Watching Matt Goodwin arguing with a special advisor to Boris Johnson is so frustrating. Meg Powell-Chandler says the right needs a vision. Matt makes the point that the Conservatives had a mandate after Brexit to reduce immigration, which is why the majority voted Leave. Meg provaricates about "Singapore-on-Thames", and...

47,911 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Stella Creasy, "What we are watching unfold here are the last gasps of the Brexit delusions that have fallen on hard contact with the paperwork reality" "It's about making it easier for British businesses who have been harmed by the approach of the previous Conservative government to their basic needs" "This is not about free trade, because there isn't free trade after Brexit, there's just mountains and mountains of paperwork" "British business needs us to clear up the mess created by the previous administration and their approach to Brexit" "We are talking about thousands of British businesses that are affected by regulation" "12% of all businesses will be affected by this legislation. If we diverge British businesses have to make a choice. Do they follow European legislation so they can sell into a larger market" "Or do they focus on UK legislation, EU legislation and maybe Japanese legislation as well and all the paperwork that comes with that" "I just think we need to stand up to those who puff and spout about Europe as if somehow it is a bad thing for British businesses to be able to do trade with our nearest neighbours post Brexit - this is not an argument about rejoining the EU" "My point is about divergence, about what happens when we ask businesses to run two different regulatory regimes out of a mistaken ideology that somehow that we can't find a way forward" "16,400 businesses have given exporting to the European Union because of the additional paperwork that is created" "If global trade disputes escalate to include 20% rises between the US and the rest of the world, it will reduce UK GDP by 1%" "In that environment we owe it to British businesses to reduce the Brexit red tape that they have to deal with"

Farrukh

44,690 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Keir Starmer, "The £5,000,000 question is, why did the Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, keep this donation secret?" "I see he is not here to answer" "And what did the crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne (who has lived in Thailand for over 20 years) who is lining his pockets ask for in return?" "Those questions need to be answered. That's why Nigel Farage is not here" #PMQs Previously, Nigel Farage said it was campaigning for Brexit for the past 27 years And Ben Habib said that both Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson first received £1,000,000 each for Brexit, and then this additional £5,000,000 to Farage for Brexit It begs the question, why has Nigel Farage spent so much time trying to reduce tax on crypto transactions, the very business that his Brexit donor Christopher Harborne is involved in? If the gift was for Brexit and not lobbying to reduce tax on crypto transactions? Is it just a coincidence? And what about Boris Johnson, why does he get a free pass from scrutiny? Unless he's already declared the £1,000,000 that Christopher Harborne gave him according to Ben Habib? Brexiters campaigned for get rid of foreign influence in British politics, and according to Ben Habib, both Farage and Johnson were paid by a foreign-based billionaire to deliver Brexit, which is literally, foreign interference in our democracy At what point to Brexiters acknowledge that they've all been conned; the country is poorer, while the architects of Brexit, Johnson and Farage, both got a 7 figure gift for their services

Farrukh

229,178 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Brexit was won by the worst abuses of democracy in modern British history. Here is one of them. The "Will of the People" was used to suppress democracy after the Brexit Referendum. Lord Sumption giving the Reith Lectures addressed the Brexiters' claim that Brexit is the will of the people. He said - "This is the authentic language of totalitarianism. It is the lowest point to which a political community can sink short of actual violence." This is not about percentages. It doesn't matter what percentage voted for Brexit. It is about a referendum being used to attack the fundamental democratic right to oppose, and to promote the totalitarian division of society into the people and its enemies, the subversives and saboteurs. In the period following the referendum the so-called "Will of the People" was used to create a climate of intimidation that silenced almost all political & media opponents of Brexit. During that period Britain was not functioning as a democracy, and we are still living with its effects, pro-European politicians are still cowed by the Brexit "Will of the People". In a democracy there is government and opposition, majority and minority, competing parties and dissenting voices. There is no totalitarian unity of the "Will of the People" which makes all opponents into the enemies of the people. Where the right to oppose ends, democracy dies, and that is exactly exactly why dictators like Hitler loved referendums.

Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE

23,497 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce