正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

We also tested Sonnet 5 against Opus 4.8 on agentic prompting, specifically on dynamic scenes through Seedance 2.0 via Higgsfield MCP. Here is the result:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

241,839 subscribers

125,571 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both videos generated using Seedance 2.0.

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both videos generated using Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

65,134 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Sonnet 5 is live on Higgsfield. It plans and runs marketing asset pipelines on its own via Higgsfield MCP, at a level that used to need bigger, costlier models. It also makes agentic pipelines more efficient on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Claude Sonnet 5 is live on Higgsfield. It plans and runs marketing asset pipelines on its own via Higgsfield MCP, at a level that used to need bigger, costlier models. It also makes agentic pipelines more efficient on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

27,722 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on the same product ad. All three ran an agentic pipeline through eComrads MCP on Claude: read the product, write the creative direction, render the finished ad. Same brief, but each model directed it completely differently.

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on the same product ad. All three ran an agentic pipeline through eComrads MCP on Claude: read the product, write the creative direction, render the finished ad. Same brief, but each model directed it completely differently.

eComrads

296,527 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

117,073 次观看 • 4 个月前

I purchased the seedance 2 unlimited plan on Higgsfield, run the exact prompt across 4 different models at 720p, 10s: - Seedance 2 - Seedance 2 Fast - Seedance 2 Mini - Enhanced Seedance 2.0 Fast on Higgsfield Here are the results: 1. Enhanced Seedance 2.0 Fast on Higgs:

I purchased the seedance 2 unlimited plan on Higgsfield, run the exact prompt across 4 different models at 720p, 10s: - Seedance 2 - Seedance 2 Fast - Seedance 2 Mini - Enhanced Seedance 2.0 Fast on Higgsfield Here are the results: 1. Enhanced Seedance 2.0 Fast on Higgs:

ViralOps

23,474 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sonnet 5 is here. It's worse than Opus 4.8 on nearly every benchmark... Does that mean it's useless? Absolutely not. Use it with Claude Code Dynamic Workflows! 1. /model set to Sonnet 5 2. /effort set to Ultracode 3. Any complex task will kick off a dynamic workflow This will only become more powerful when Fable is back. You'll use Fable 5 as the superintelligent advisor and Sonnet 5 as the fast and efficient implementer.

Sonnet 5 is here. It's worse than Opus 4.8 on nearly every benchmark... Does that mean it's useless? Absolutely not. Use it with Claude Code Dynamic Workflows! 1. /model set to Sonnet 5 2. /effort set to Ultracode 3. Any complex task will kick off a dynamic workflow This will only become more powerful when Fable is back. You'll use Fable 5 as the superintelligent advisor and Sonnet 5 as the fast and efficient implementer.

Dan McAteer

666,124 次观看 • 3 个月前

Seedance 2.0 got its perfect match on Higgsfield. Grok Imagine and Seedance 2.0 - xAI's image model paired with the category-leading video model, natively inside the platform. Grok Imagine generates your reference image in 9+ styles, fast. Seedance 2.0 - ranked #1 in image-to-video - takes it further than any other model can. The best results out of Seedance 2.0 start here.

Seedance 2.0 got its perfect match on Higgsfield. Grok Imagine and Seedance 2.0 - xAI's image model paired with the category-leading video model, natively inside the platform. Grok Imagine generates your reference image in 9+ styles, fast. Seedance 2.0 - ranked #1 in image-to-video - takes it further than any other model can. The best results out of Seedance 2.0 start here.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

10,155,874 次观看 • 6 个月前

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

730,766 次观看 • 3 个月前

people: AI is expensive higgsfield: $0.35 per Seedance 2.0 video generation. literally cheapest on the market. just saying.

people: AI is expensive higgsfield: $0.35 per Seedance 2.0 video generation. literally cheapest on the market. just saying.

Tiffany Fong

128,811 次观看 • 6 个月前

Everyone is dunking on Sonnet 5 for losing to Opus 4.8 on benchmarks. They're all making the same mistake, judging a teammate by a solo test. Sonnet 5 was never built to win alone. Set the model to Sonnet 5, effort to Ultracode, and any complex task auto-kicks a dynamic workflow where it plans, spawns agents, executes and checks its own work, fast and cheap. When Fable 5 comes back, the setup gets stupid good. Fable 5 decides what to build, Sonnet 5 actually builds it. You stop paying flagship prices to do grunt work.

Everyone is dunking on Sonnet 5 for losing to Opus 4.8 on benchmarks. They're all making the same mistake, judging a teammate by a solo test. Sonnet 5 was never built to win alone. Set the model to Sonnet 5, effort to Ultracode, and any complex task auto-kicks a dynamic workflow where it plans, spawns agents, executes and checks its own work, fast and cheap. When Fable 5 comes back, the setup gets stupid good. Fable 5 decides what to build, Sonnet 5 actually builds it. You stop paying flagship prices to do grunt work.

0xMarioNawfal

98,313 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jensen says AGI is here. GPT6 Astra is already directing in Blender. Astra builds the scene, controls the camera, then calls Seedance 2.5 through WaveSpeed MCP to turn it cinematic. AI filmmaking is becoming agentic.

Jensen says AGI is here. GPT6 Astra is already directing in Blender. Astra builds the scene, controls the camera, then calls Seedance 2.5 through WaveSpeed MCP to turn it cinematic. AI filmmaking is becoming agentic.

WaveSpeedAI

18,821 次观看 • 1 个月前

It may look like just another AI tool today… But Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield AI 🧩 is laying the foundation for the future of content creation.

It may look like just another AI tool today… But Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield AI 🧩 is laying the foundation for the future of content creation.

Aneeza Ai

17,704 次观看 • 6 个月前

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

480,227 次观看 • 2 个月前

The level of photorealism and natural movement here is unbelievable. 😄 Look at the sunlight, the skin details, and how smooth the transitions are from stretching to tying her hair! GPT Image 2.0 x Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield is undoubtedly the best combination right now for creating ultra-realistic cinematic characters. Two SOTA models joining forces to change the game. 🎥✨ #ad #sponsored $HIGGS Higgsfield AI 🧩 #Higgsfield #AIVideo

The level of photorealism and natural movement here is unbelievable. 😄 Look at the sunlight, the skin details, and how smooth the transitions are from stretching to tying her hair! GPT Image 2.0 x Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield is undoubtedly the best combination right now for creating ultra-realistic cinematic characters. Two SOTA models joining forces to change the game. 🎥✨ #ad #sponsored $HIGGS Higgsfield AI 🧩 #Higgsfield #AIVideo

John

42,469 次观看 • 5 个月前

I always like seeing side-by-side comparisons because they leave very little to the imagination. Watching Seedance 2.0 next to Seedance 2.5, the improvements in motion, consistency, and overall cinematic quality really stand out. Seedance 2.5 is coming soon on Higgsfield.

I always like seeing side-by-side comparisons because they leave very little to the imagination. Watching Seedance 2.0 next to Seedance 2.5, the improvements in motion, consistency, and overall cinematic quality really stand out. Seedance 2.5 is coming soon on Higgsfield.

Johnn

36,288 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

AI/ML API

560,710 次观看 • 4 个月前

Opus 4.8 is solid... but ultracode is on another level Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code lets you orchestrate agents in parallel while your session stays free. One word: delegate Focus on governance, security guardrails, and skills. The code is already solved

Opus 4.8 is solid... but ultracode is on another level Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code lets you orchestrate agents in parallel while your session stays free. One word: delegate Focus on governance, security guardrails, and skills. The code is already solved

Daniel San

134,881 次观看 • 4 个月前

Create cinematic AI videos with Seedance 2.0 at a lower cost. With the Ultra Plan on BudgetPixel AI, Seedance 2.0 is 40% off — perfect for making more action scenes, ads, game clips, and story-driven videos.

Create cinematic AI videos with Seedance 2.0 at a lower cost. With the Ultra Plan on BudgetPixel AI, Seedance 2.0 is 40% off — perfect for making more action scenes, ads, game clips, and story-driven videos.

BudgetPixel AI

364,975 次观看 • 4 个月前

Same prompt. Same product. Two Seedance models. Which style would you choose? I tested Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 side by side in 1080p to see how each model would interpret the same creative direction. Seedance 2.5 gets the headlines. Seedance 2.0 gets my work done. Both 2.0 & 2.0 Fast, only on Dreamina: a 30-second clip costs $0.78 — vs $3.21 elsewhere. 76% less. Prompt is in the comments.

Same prompt. Same product. Two Seedance models. Which style would you choose? I tested Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 side by side in 1080p to see how each model would interpret the same creative direction. Seedance 2.5 gets the headlines. Seedance 2.0 gets my work done. Both 2.0 & 2.0 Fast, only on Dreamina: a 30-second clip costs $0.78 — vs $3.21 elsewhere. 76% less. Prompt is in the comments.

haytam

67,870 次观看 • 1 个月前

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

atomic.chat

105,523 次观看 • 3 个月前