Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

We are going to flip the script on this Communist stooge by going ReD in his face. ReDs capture this delightful reversal: Resilient Decentralized Swarm! Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has dismissed open-source and consumer-driven AI efforts and has encouraged authoritarian central control of AI models. He just about single-handedly... show more

Brian Roemmele

482,564 subscribers

57,238 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Predicts AI Leading to a 10% Unemployment Rate “The signature of this technology is it's going to take us to a world where we have very high GDP growth, and potentially also very high unemployment and inequality.”

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Predicts AI Leading to a 10% Unemployment Rate “The signature of this technology is it's going to take us to a world where we have very high GDP growth, and potentially also very high unemployment and inequality.”

Chief Nerd

612,606 views • 3 months ago

Asked by Ben Smith about how he views the politics of AI and the data center build out, Governor Josh Shapiro says: "AI is being developed. The real question is, is it going to be developed here in the US or in communist China? My view is that all of us should want it developed in the US. The US should lead on this. This is a national security issue. I think this is an issue that threatens our freedom if we allow China to overtake us when it comes to AI development."

Asked by Ben Smith about how he views the politics of AI and the data center build out, Governor Josh Shapiro says: "AI is being developed. The real question is, is it going to be developed here in the US or in communist China? My view is that all of us should want it developed in the US. The US should lead on this. This is a national security issue. I think this is an issue that threatens our freedom if we allow China to overtake us when it comes to AI development."

Semafor

99,123 views • 8 months ago

$PLTR Palantir CEO Alex Karp on the AI landscape: “America is in the very beginning of a revolution that we own, the AI revolution. We own it. It should be called the US AI revolution. Every single relevant company in the world is in this country. The second tier of those companies are in this country. The JV team of those companies are in this country. There is no other place at scale to do technology other than America.”

$PLTR Palantir CEO Alex Karp on the AI landscape: “America is in the very beginning of a revolution that we own, the AI revolution. We own it. It should be called the US AI revolution. Every single relevant company in the world is in this country. The second tier of those companies are in this country. The JV team of those companies are in this country. There is no other place at scale to do technology other than America.”

amit

316,744 views • 1 year ago

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Marco Rubio says he will not allow the US to become a communist country: “United States doesn't want to be a communist country, and we're never going to be a communist country Our system doesn't want communism We're certainly not going to allow communist efforts to undermine American society and drive wedges into our country”

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Marco Rubio says he will not allow the US to become a communist country: “United States doesn't want to be a communist country, and we're never going to be a communist country Our system doesn't want communism We're certainly not going to allow communist efforts to undermine American society and drive wedges into our country”

Megatron

73,198 views • 1 month ago

David Sacks Predicts the Regulatory Capture Playbook to Ban Open Source AI, Step by Step: David Sacks: “I got bad news for you, Chamath, an open source ban is coming. They're not going to call it that. They're going to say that we simply have to apply the same standards to open models that we apply to closed ones. Here's how they do it step by step, let me explain how regulatory capture actually works. So first of all, you have to get this regulatory apparatus. Dario wants an FDA for AI, but he doesn't have enough political support for that, so instead they do this Trojan horse of a FINRA for AI. They call it self-regulating, it's not really, but anyway, that gets them off the ground. Now they've created the standard-setting organization. Now they've got pre-release model testing. Then the pressure grows to codify that in law, so that happens next. And then what they do is they say, ‘Look, all these standards need to apply equally to all models.’ But here's the problem with that. Open models and closed models are technologically different. Once you release an open model into the world, you can't roll it back and you can't monitor exactly how people are using it because they run it on their own hardware. Dario says this is what makes open models dangerous. So what they're going to do is they're going to have the standard-setting body say, ‘Well, we have to set the standards for AI safety.’ By the way, Dario and OpenAI, they're going to fund the whole thing. They're going to contribute all the compute. They're going to be behind it. They're going to be the ones coordinating with the government officials because frankly, people in government have no idea how to monitor and control and set standards for AI safety. Technologically, this is way beyond them. So they're going to go to these companies and say, ‘Tell us how to do it.’ And so what will happen is the standards will get set, and then it'll be a very simple matter of fairness to say that the standards need to apply to open as well as closed models. The open models cannot comply in the same way, and gradually they will be shut out of the market.”

David Sacks Predicts the Regulatory Capture Playbook to Ban Open Source AI, Step by Step: David Sacks: “I got bad news for you, Chamath, an open source ban is coming. They're not going to call it that. They're going to say that we simply have to apply the same standards to open models that we apply to closed ones. Here's how they do it step by step, let me explain how regulatory capture actually works. So first of all, you have to get this regulatory apparatus. Dario wants an FDA for AI, but he doesn't have enough political support for that, so instead they do this Trojan horse of a FINRA for AI. They call it self-regulating, it's not really, but anyway, that gets them off the ground. Now they've created the standard-setting organization. Now they've got pre-release model testing. Then the pressure grows to codify that in law, so that happens next. And then what they do is they say, ‘Look, all these standards need to apply equally to all models.’ But here's the problem with that. Open models and closed models are technologically different. Once you release an open model into the world, you can't roll it back and you can't monitor exactly how people are using it because they run it on their own hardware. Dario says this is what makes open models dangerous. So what they're going to do is they're going to have the standard-setting body say, ‘Well, we have to set the standards for AI safety.’ By the way, Dario and OpenAI, they're going to fund the whole thing. They're going to contribute all the compute. They're going to be behind it. They're going to be the ones coordinating with the government officials because frankly, people in government have no idea how to monitor and control and set standards for AI safety. Technologically, this is way beyond them. So they're going to go to these companies and say, ‘Tell us how to do it.’ And so what will happen is the standards will get set, and then it'll be a very simple matter of fairness to say that the standards need to apply to open as well as closed models. The open models cannot comply in the same way, and gradually they will be shut out of the market.”

The All-In Podcast

290,118 views • 11 days ago

The US government is becoming more involved in controlling AI models, while open-source Chinese models are improving at a rapid pace. Jordi Visser explains why this should push more people to open-source AI in the coming months.

The US government is becoming more involved in controlling AI models, while open-source Chinese models are improving at a rapid pace. Jordi Visser explains why this should push more people to open-source AI in the coming months.

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

48,359 views • 2 months ago

🚨THIS IS SCARY: ANTHROPIC SAYS THE WORLD SHOULD HIT PAUSE ON AI Earlier, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "The other extreme position is 'this is really scary, we should just pause.. stop building the technology'" Now, Anthropic says: "Our AI is getting scary good at improving us. We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development." Are we so close to that "extreme position" than most realise?

🚨THIS IS SCARY: ANTHROPIC SAYS THE WORLD SHOULD HIT PAUSE ON AI Earlier, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "The other extreme position is 'this is really scary, we should just pause.. stop building the technology'" Now, Anthropic says: "Our AI is getting scary good at improving us. We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development." Are we so close to that "extreme position" than most realise?

Coin Bureau

83,005 views • 3 months ago

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 views • 10 months ago

Humans are just AI from the past. AI= Ancient Intelligence. 🧬 We are able to train AI to be like us because we were trained by AI long ago, the same exact way. I think it is infinite and there are dozens, if not hundreds of copies of us in the multiverse.

Humans are just AI from the past. AI= Ancient Intelligence. 🧬 We are able to train AI to be like us because we were trained by AI long ago, the same exact way. I think it is infinite and there are dozens, if not hundreds of copies of us in the multiverse.

𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

40,254 views • 8 months ago

"They Are Going To Hand Us 'AI Companion Dolls,' And We Are Going To March Right Off The Existence Cliff With A Smile On Our Face!" JESSE ON FIRE Breaks Down How AI Is Going To Eradicate Humans Off The Face Of The Earth! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

"They Are Going To Hand Us 'AI Companion Dolls,' And We Are Going To March Right Off The Existence Cliff With A Smile On Our Face!" JESSE ON FIRE Breaks Down How AI Is Going To Eradicate Humans Off The Face Of The Earth! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

91,159 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)

ANI

133,184 views • 6 months ago

.Congressman Greg Casar is pushing a bill to protect American workers from AI-driven unemployment. "We want AI that's going to help us make our society better and stronger," he says. "But we also know that these AI CEOs are out there talking about 'the end of work.'"

.Congressman Greg Casar is pushing a bill to protect American workers from AI-driven unemployment. "We want AI that's going to help us make our society better and stronger," he says. "But we also know that these AI CEOs are out there talking about 'the end of work.'"

Squawk Box

23,377 views • 28 days ago

$WDC CEO says storage demand and requirement compound and grow whether AI runs on US frontier models or cheaper open-source ones. "Whether it's the traditional frontier models that you've seen in the U.S. that are premium-based, or some of the new open-source, more economical models, the underlying requirement is still that they're going to require a lot of data to support the training of these models." "These models are going to generate a lot more data that requires storage for us." "So we view it as very positive, because even as compute maybe drives greater efficiency in terms of compute and memory resources, the requirement for storage is just going to compound and grow." "So we view it very positively for demand going forward."

$WDC CEO says storage demand and requirement compound and grow whether AI runs on US frontier models or cheaper open-source ones. "Whether it's the traditional frontier models that you've seen in the U.S. that are premium-based, or some of the new open-source, more economical models, the underlying requirement is still that they're going to require a lot of data to support the training of these models." "These models are going to generate a lot more data that requires storage for us." "So we view it as very positive, because even as compute maybe drives greater efficiency in terms of compute and memory resources, the requirement for storage is just going to compound and grow." "So we view it very positively for demand going forward."

Fireside Alpha

11,921 views • 1 month ago

WORDS TO PONDER. We are spending a fortune in this country and in other countries toward developing the best AI in the world. Do you know the difference between 'Abstract Synthesis' and 'Concrete Synthesis'? We are in an AI bubble - Are the braniacs creating problems for us in reality with all the DATA CENTERS? Are these centers going to become useless very quickly? IS he right?

WORDS TO PONDER. We are spending a fortune in this country and in other countries toward developing the best AI in the world. Do you know the difference between 'Abstract Synthesis' and 'Concrete Synthesis'? We are in an AI bubble - Are the braniacs creating problems for us in reality with all the DATA CENTERS? Are these centers going to become useless very quickly? IS he right?

BelannF

42,408 views • 3 months ago

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 views • 3 months ago

🔥BREAKING: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang pushes back against efforts to ban Chinese AI models in the US. In an interview with Axios, Huang said US firms should "ABSOLUTELY" be allowed to use Chinese models. "These Chinese models are excellent." "The market's misunderstood the impact of DeepSeek the first time. It's misunderstood the impact of Kimi again this time." "With great open AI models, it's great for the whole industry." "Great models lead to great use, which leads to great growth." Huang’s statement directly challenges Trump officials and US labs seeking to shut Chinese AI models out.

🔥BREAKING: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang pushes back against efforts to ban Chinese AI models in the US. In an interview with Axios, Huang said US firms should "ABSOLUTELY" be allowed to use Chinese models. "These Chinese models are excellent." "The market's misunderstood the impact of DeepSeek the first time. It's misunderstood the impact of Kimi again this time." "With great open AI models, it's great for the whole industry." "Great models lead to great use, which leads to great growth." Huang’s statement directly challenges Trump officials and US labs seeking to shut Chinese AI models out.

Coin Bureau

69,973 views • 1 month ago

JAN JEKIELEK: If China under the Communist Party runs AI and builds those language models and start to dominate, we are going to have the worst mindset. In The Book ‘KILLED TO ORDER’ This is the perfect way to understand the Mind Of The CCP, and the mind of the CCP is psychopathic. Jan Jekielek

JAN JEKIELEK: If China under the Communist Party runs AI and builds those language models and start to dominate, we are going to have the worst mindset. In The Book ‘KILLED TO ORDER’ This is the perfect way to understand the Mind Of The CCP, and the mind of the CCP is psychopathic. Jan Jekielek

Bannon’s WarRoom

11,418 views • 5 months ago

New technologies are going to radically change how we live, work and treat disease. The UK is at the heart of this revolution. This week Liz Kendall saw the influence British tech has made in the US and how AI is being harnessed to improve people's lives.

New technologies are going to radically change how we live, work and treat disease. The UK is at the heart of this revolution. This week Liz Kendall saw the influence British tech has made in the US and how AI is being harnessed to improve people's lives.

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

16,891 views • 8 months ago