Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

We are here because people didn't fully understand why their votes counted. Why sitting out elections has consequences, and how voting based on excitement is harmful. Now here we are, with not only a conservative Supreme Court, but a Supreme Court hell-bent on taking away progress. Voting Rights Act...

LqLana's profile picture

LanaQuest aka RosaSparks

91,367 subscribers

16,730 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Meagan Hatcher-Mays of United For Democracy: ''The reason they attack our voting rights is because they know how important it is to vote. A lot of people get down on voting, like, 'Just vote harder.' But we should all be voting really hard. That is step one toward achieving a more just and equitable system. That's why the Supreme Court is constantly attacking our voting rights. They understand how important it is."
2:40

Meagan Hatcher-Mays of United For Democracy: ''The reason they attack our voting rights is because they know how important it is to vote. A lot of people get down on voting, like, 'Just vote harder.' But we should all be voting really hard. That is step one toward achieving a more just and equitable system. That's why the Supreme Court is constantly attacking our voting rights. They understand how important it is."

Aaron Rupar

20,210 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Harmeet Dhillon Says The Supreme Court Is Set To STRIKE DOWN Racial Gerrymandering Under The Voting Rights Act. "Among the first cases issued by the court of this term is going to be striking down the racial gerrymandering that previously the court has said was mandated under the Voting Rights Act." "If everyone has to compete for all the votes, which I think is frankly the American way, people are going to scramble. We will have a fairer regime where we are not segregating people based on race. Such an outdated and repugnant and un-American concept."
3:05

Harmeet Dhillon Says The Supreme Court Is Set To STRIKE DOWN Racial Gerrymandering Under The Voting Rights Act. "Among the first cases issued by the court of this term is going to be striking down the racial gerrymandering that previously the court has said was mandated under the Voting Rights Act." "If everyone has to compete for all the votes, which I think is frankly the American way, people are going to scramble. We will have a fairer regime where we are not segregating people based on race. Such an outdated and repugnant and un-American concept."

Benny Johnson

102,149 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

We must reform the Supreme Court. We need court expansion, a binding code of ethics, and term limits for justices. Because from voting rights to healthcare to immigrant justice, they are a threat to the progress that has been made in this country.
0:39

We must reform the Supreme Court. We need court expansion, a binding code of ethics, and term limits for justices. Because from voting rights to healthcare to immigrant justice, they are a threat to the progress that has been made in this country.

Ayanna Pressley

12,566 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The history of this country has been, from its founding, based on the belief that the people get to choose their leaders. The Voting Rights Act is under attack as this Supreme Court tries to take the vote away from so many people. We're not going to let them do that.
0:27

The history of this country has been, from its founding, based on the belief that the people get to choose their leaders. The Voting Rights Act is under attack as this Supreme Court tries to take the vote away from so many people. We're not going to let them do that.

Joe Morelle

14,655 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

When the Supreme Court repeatedly attacks voting rights and bends over backwards to a wannabe king, we should call it what it is. This Court is racist, corrupt….and the American people deserve better.
4:20

When the Supreme Court repeatedly attacks voting rights and bends over backwards to a wannabe king, we should call it what it is. This Court is racist, corrupt….and the American people deserve better.

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett

170,375 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We are not going back. The Supreme Court’s ruling is offensive, and Congress must respond with urgency. Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Reform this out-of-control Supreme Court. Organize like hell.
1:03

We are not going back. The Supreme Court’s ruling is offensive, and Congress must respond with urgency. Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Reform this out-of-control Supreme Court. Organize like hell.

Colin Allred

13,365 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court prepares to end voting rights as we know them
2:32

The Supreme Court prepares to end voting rights as we know them

Piyush Mittal 🇺🇸🇺🇦🟧🌊🌈

29,506 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

This Supreme Court just gutted the Voting Rights Act, opening the door to more racial gerrymandering. This is unacceptable, and Congress must act to protect it. If the Court won’t protect one of our most fundamental rights, we need a new Voting Rights Act strong enough to stop politicians from picking their voters and silencing communities of color.
1:00

This Supreme Court just gutted the Voting Rights Act, opening the door to more racial gerrymandering. This is unacceptable, and Congress must act to protect it. If the Court won’t protect one of our most fundamental rights, we need a new Voting Rights Act strong enough to stop politicians from picking their voters and silencing communities of color.

Colin Allred

15,878 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

After the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act last week, the pro-democracy movement is in for a long, hard fight. But Marc E. Elias is optimistic. “We are not going to restore the Voting Rights Act of 1965,” Marc says. “We are going to exceed that law with something new built for the current moment.” Join our fight for free and fair elections:
0:51

After the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act last week, the pro-democracy movement is in for a long, hard fight. But Marc E. Elias is optimistic. “We are not going to restore the Voting Rights Act of 1965,” Marc says. “We are going to exceed that law with something new built for the current moment.” Join our fight for free and fair elections:

Democracy Docket

72,565 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Kamala Harris: "We have to be honest about issues like xenophobia, racism, homophobia and sexism. I'm very concerned that the Supreme Court is going to revisit the issue of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which basically still gives us the ability to challenge voting laws that are racist in intent, that target specific communities to suppress their vote. And it should not have to fall on the people who have been the target of voter suppression to be the only ones talking about it."
2:12

Kamala Harris: "We have to be honest about issues like xenophobia, racism, homophobia and sexism. I'm very concerned that the Supreme Court is going to revisit the issue of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which basically still gives us the ability to challenge voting laws that are racist in intent, that target specific communities to suppress their vote. And it should not have to fall on the people who have been the target of voter suppression to be the only ones talking about it."

Fabi 🪷

12,286 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 NOW: Temu Obama and Democrats just got MIC DROPPED after they broke into a frenzy when the Supreme Court struck down their cheating ARI FLEISCHER: "Republicans for DECADES lived with federal Supreme Court rulings that they didn't like—Roe v. Wade, the Warren Court, measures on crime that made it easier to protect criminals than to protect victims of crime." "And Republicans didn't say, we need to jerry-rig the Supreme Court!" "They didn't go out and say, we need to expand or pack the Supreme Court!" "They worked within the system to change the way things worked." "That's what you have to do here. The Democrats in their now attempt to erase the existence of a Virginia Supreme Court show that they refuse to work within the system. Republicans proved we will listen to a court ruling. Democrats are showing they won't." This is why we need to PLAY HARDBALL, and NEVER let them obtain power!
0:52

🚨 NOW: Temu Obama and Democrats just got MIC DROPPED after they broke into a frenzy when the Supreme Court struck down their cheating ARI FLEISCHER: "Republicans for DECADES lived with federal Supreme Court rulings that they didn't like—Roe v. Wade, the Warren Court, measures on crime that made it easier to protect criminals than to protect victims of crime." "And Republicans didn't say, we need to jerry-rig the Supreme Court!" "They didn't go out and say, we need to expand or pack the Supreme Court!" "They worked within the system to change the way things worked." "That's what you have to do here. The Democrats in their now attempt to erase the existence of a Virginia Supreme Court show that they refuse to work within the system. Republicans proved we will listen to a court ruling. Democrats are showing they won't." This is why we need to PLAY HARDBALL, and NEVER let them obtain power!

Eric Daugherty

106,602 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."
5:46

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

ANI

73,840 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

On Tuesday, you have the opportunity to vote on the makeup of our State Supreme Court. This vote is part of our democratic process where you have a voice! I will be voting “no” on 3 Supreme Court justices. Here’s why ⤵️
1:28

On Tuesday, you have the opportunity to vote on the makeup of our State Supreme Court. This vote is part of our democratic process where you have a voice! I will be voting “no” on 3 Supreme Court justices. Here’s why ⤵️

Kevin Stitt

132,000 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Supreme Court just gutted the Voting Rights Act, allowing MAGA to slice and dice our communities for their own power. We can and will #StandTALL to fight back with everything we have.
1:28

The Supreme Court just gutted the Voting Rights Act, allowing MAGA to slice and dice our communities for their own power. We can and will #StandTALL to fight back with everything we have.

Garlin Gilchrist

10,285 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

You didn't give a damn about the Supreme Court or the Voting Rights Act when you and your kid got out in public and helped influence people not to vote for Hillary Clinton.
1:15

You didn't give a damn about the Supreme Court or the Voting Rights Act when you and your kid got out in public and helped influence people not to vote for Hillary Clinton.

𝕂𝔼𝕄𝔼𝕀𝕌ℕ 🪷 ℝ𝔼𝕏

414,890 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

AOC: In the time since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, we have seen exactly why it existed in the first place… I think this will be a moral stain on the Supreme Court for generations. It’s our obligation to check what is very clearly an abuse of power in the courts.
1:06

AOC: In the time since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, we have seen exactly why it existed in the first place… I think this will be a moral stain on the Supreme Court for generations. It’s our obligation to check what is very clearly an abuse of power in the courts.

Acyn

85,718 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Voting rights are workers’ rights. When working people have a real voice at the ballot box, we can elect leaders who protect our right to join a union, ensure safe workplaces, live free from discrimination and retire in dignity. The Supreme Court has undermined workers’ voices.
0:36

Voting rights are workers’ rights. When working people have a real voice at the ballot box, we can elect leaders who protect our right to join a union, ensure safe workplaces, live free from discrimination and retire in dignity. The Supreme Court has undermined workers’ voices.

AFL-CIO ✊

16,011 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨‼️I'm not going to vote for a single one of Donald Trump’s appointees to the United States Supreme Court. We are not seeing the Supreme Court do its job, and we need Congress to step up, do more, and fight for the people.
2:07

🚨‼️I'm not going to vote for a single one of Donald Trump’s appointees to the United States Supreme Court. We are not seeing the Supreme Court do its job, and we need Congress to step up, do more, and fight for the people.

Juliana Stratton

42,840 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court has gutted key protections against racial gerrymandering — a heartbreaking step backward that strips Black and Brown communities of political power and fair representation. The Voting Rights Act is sacred. Generations bled for it. We must not go backwards.
0:53

The Supreme Court has gutted key protections against racial gerrymandering — a heartbreaking step backward that strips Black and Brown communities of political power and fair representation. The Voting Rights Act is sacred. Generations bled for it. We must not go backwards.

Cory Booker

12,555 просмотров • 27 дней назад

The Supreme Court has weakened key voting rights protections. The Michigan Voting Rights Act would put those protections back in place at the state level. If the fall of Roe taught us anything, it’s that our rights are under attack. And we need to fight for them. In Michigan, we are.
1:54

The Supreme Court has weakened key voting rights protections. The Michigan Voting Rights Act would put those protections back in place at the state level. If the fall of Roe taught us anything, it’s that our rights are under attack. And we need to fight for them. In Michigan, we are.

Mallory McMorrow

15,811 просмотров • 14 дней назад