Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We asked Sushanth Raman about the GTM strategy for Pallet. "Cold calling, believe it or not, is still very popular." "All of these companies are a bit skeptical of Silicon Valley technology companies." "I tell my team, you have to earn the right to talk about the technology." "The... show more

TBPN

1,012,936 subscribers

48,909 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 Yorum

jason feng profil fotoğrafı

jason feng1 yıl önce

@SushanthRaman in the early days Sushanth helped a customer chase down his stolen truck to win a deal. that's the bar to win the right to talk about tech.

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple profil fotoğrafı

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 yıl önce

🚨A cyber breach at 40,000 feet isn’t just an IT issue. 🛑Millions trust the skies every day. Only our top cybersecurity experts can keep them safe. ✈️ Cybersecurity matters. Learn about it. Demand it. "Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone" on Amazon:

Benzer Videolar

Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire says Silicon Valley is undergoing a "Copernican" shift and waking up to the fact that it revolves around a set of much larger industries, not the other way around: "In Silicon Valley, [there's] almost this Copernican principle — where people used to believe that the world revolved around the Earth, then realized that it revolves around the sun." "There's a Silicon Valley parallel where people think that all of technology, all of industry, revolves around Silicon Valley, but it's actually kind of the opposite." "Silicon Valley is Earth, and there are these much bigger forces and bodies, which include energy, the chemical industry, these giant supply chains, and the semiconductor industry, which has been around for a very long time. It was pretty advanced, and people in Silicon Valley forgot about it." "I don't like the language of other industries pivoting into AI. I actually think it's the opposite." "I think it's like Silicon Valley is waking up from its toddlerhood and realizing that there were these giant industries that we underestimated, and they're actually really freaking good at what they do. And we can all benefit by working together."

Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire says Silicon Valley is undergoing a "Copernican" shift and waking up to the fact that it revolves around a set of much larger industries, not the other way around: "In Silicon Valley, [there's] almost this Copernican principle — where people used to believe that the world revolved around the Earth, then realized that it revolves around the sun." "There's a Silicon Valley parallel where people think that all of technology, all of industry, revolves around Silicon Valley, but it's actually kind of the opposite." "Silicon Valley is Earth, and there are these much bigger forces and bodies, which include energy, the chemical industry, these giant supply chains, and the semiconductor industry, which has been around for a very long time. It was pretty advanced, and people in Silicon Valley forgot about it." "I don't like the language of other industries pivoting into AI. I actually think it's the opposite." "I think it's like Silicon Valley is waking up from its toddlerhood and realizing that there were these giant industries that we underestimated, and they're actually really freaking good at what they do. And we can all benefit by working together."

TBPN

238,386 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

TBPN

21,055 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

We asked about the thesis of Durin. "Mining is a $2-3T industry, but the tech segment is difficult to break into." "Building a mine requires betting on technology for over a decade, so companies are risk-averse." "Our model is as a contractor/service provider." "We offer automated drilling, which is efficient, safe, and cost-effective with no risk to the customer."

We asked about the thesis of Durin. "Mining is a $2-3T industry, but the tech segment is difficult to break into." "Building a mine requires betting on technology for over a decade, so companies are risk-averse." "Our model is as a contractor/service provider." "We offer automated drilling, which is efficient, safe, and cost-effective with no risk to the customer."

TBPN

34,074 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

We asked Sean Liu, partner Founders Fund, about investing in hard tech companies. "The question we always debate a founder on is how many 'need to believe's do you have, to make the thesis work?" "The more 'and' statements there are, the worse it is. We don't like to make those bets." "The cleanest companies (like General Matter, Solugen, Neuralink, etc.) have 1-2 of these. You don't need to invent science with very little dependencies."

We asked Sean Liu, partner Founders Fund, about investing in hard tech companies. "The question we always debate a founder on is how many 'need to believe's do you have, to make the thesis work?" "The more 'and' statements there are, the worse it is. We don't like to make those bets." "The cleanest companies (like General Matter, Solugen, Neuralink, etc.) have 1-2 of these. You don't need to invent science with very little dependencies."

TBPN

24,826 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Talia Goldberg explains the concept of 'supernovas' in the AI industry. "The supernovas are out-of-nowhere growth stories that are mind-blowing. AI companies are accelerating and compressing growth into a very short period of time." "On average, the top cloud companies took about 6-7 years to get to about $100 million ARR." "In this cohort, the top percentile is getting to $100 million ARR in about one and a half years, and the top decile in about four years. There are some trade-offs like gross margins. Many of these companies have negative gross margins. Not all revenue is created equal, but nevertheless, the adoption is astounding."

.Talia Goldberg explains the concept of 'supernovas' in the AI industry. "The supernovas are out-of-nowhere growth stories that are mind-blowing. AI companies are accelerating and compressing growth into a very short period of time." "On average, the top cloud companies took about 6-7 years to get to about $100 million ARR." "In this cohort, the top percentile is getting to $100 million ARR in about one and a half years, and the top decile in about four years. There are some trade-offs like gross margins. Many of these companies have negative gross margins. Not all revenue is created equal, but nevertheless, the adoption is astounding."

TBPN

409,181 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

The president of the NYSE (Lynn Martin) told us about the right profile for a business to IPO today: "Companies that are rewarded have a very deliberate strategy with a track record of success, not just throwing spaghetti against the wall." "You don't have to be profitable to go public, but you need to have a path to profitability you can articulate to investors."

TBPN

17,513 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

After an Italian regulatory body handed down a $17M fine to his company, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince refuses to back down: "I spent the beginning of this week in DC meeting with a number of officials... I don't think the Italians quite understand the hornet's nest they've stirred up." "The crazy stat is that Europe makes more from fining US tech companies than they do from taxing their own technology companies." "Something has to change... this is now the cause célèbre for Europe using US tech companies as their piggy bank." "We can't have Europeans, let alone this Italian cabal, being able to dictate what is and is not online."

After an Italian regulatory body handed down a $17M fine to his company, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince refuses to back down: "I spent the beginning of this week in DC meeting with a number of officials... I don't think the Italians quite understand the hornet's nest they've stirred up." "The crazy stat is that Europe makes more from fining US tech companies than they do from taxing their own technology companies." "Something has to change... this is now the cause célèbre for Europe using US tech companies as their piggy bank." "We can't have Europeans, let alone this Italian cabal, being able to dictate what is and is not online."

TBPN

116,607 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

.tobi lutke says most companies think about recruiting backwards: “My job is to make a company worthy for the best and brightest to work for. This is the part everyone skips. Everyone is like “We need a better recruiting team.” When you just need to be worthy of the kind of talent you would like to have. Talent eventually takes care of itself. There are not that many good companies to work for. There are not many companies that deserve the attention of people who are the most capable people, because those people have the option to start their own companies.”

.tobi lutke says most companies think about recruiting backwards: “My job is to make a company worthy for the best and brightest to work for. This is the part everyone skips. Everyone is like “We need a better recruiting team.” When you just need to be worthy of the kind of talent you would like to have. Talent eventually takes care of itself. There are not that many good companies to work for. There are not many companies that deserve the attention of people who are the most capable people, because those people have the option to start their own companies.”

David Senra

104,661 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We asked Paul Graham about ragebait marketing. "That sort of technique sounds like the technique that would be popular with someone you'd describe as a bit of a scammer." "And the thing about these scammers is that they don't make the giant companies. They don't have a long-term focus... They're thinking about what gimmick they can use to get ahead." "So long-term they don't matter. You can skip the companies that do random **** like that because they're never going to be that big."

We asked Paul Graham about ragebait marketing. "That sort of technique sounds like the technique that would be popular with someone you'd describe as a bit of a scammer." "And the thing about these scammers is that they don't make the giant companies. They don't have a long-term focus... They're thinking about what gimmick they can use to get ahead." "So long-term they don't matter. You can skip the companies that do random **** like that because they're never going to be that big."

TBPN

180,088 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

The SCIF

20,292 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Anduril’s Palmer Luckey on AI and defense: It’s not up to unelected Silicon Valley executives to decide US policy. “Don’t try to control policy by refusing to give the government the best tools.” “You’ll see a lot of companies saying, ‘Here’s where we draw the line. This is what policy should be. This is what we’re going to allow the government to do and not do.’” “That’s not the place of Silicon Valley companies. They shouldn’t be telling what their policy is.” “Build the technology, advocate for policy.” “The US government and military makes better decisions when they have better information.” “It’s not up to us.”

Anduril’s Palmer Luckey on AI and defense: It’s not up to unelected Silicon Valley executives to decide US policy. “Don’t try to control policy by refusing to give the government the best tools.” “You’ll see a lot of companies saying, ‘Here’s where we draw the line. This is what policy should be. This is what we’re going to allow the government to do and not do.’” “That’s not the place of Silicon Valley companies. They shouldn’t be telling what their policy is.” “Build the technology, advocate for policy.” “The US government and military makes better decisions when they have better information.” “It’s not up to us.”

Jawwwn

719,615 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Jordi asks Silicon Valley congressman Ro Khanna about his post calling for regulation in the trucking industry, and that AI "should not be used for mass layoffs that drive up short term profits w/ no productivity gains." "Have a human in the loop." "We can reimagine what the role of a truck driver is going to be..." "It doesn't seem unreasonable to say that for five years we want a driver in the loop, and let's rethink the types of jobs that [truckers will do]."

Jordi asks Silicon Valley congressman Ro Khanna about his post calling for regulation in the trucking industry, and that AI "should not be used for mass layoffs that drive up short term profits w/ no productivity gains." "Have a human in the loop." "We can reimagine what the role of a truck driver is going to be..." "It doesn't seem unreasonable to say that for five years we want a driver in the loop, and let's rethink the types of jobs that [truckers will do]."

TBPN

52,422 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The technology companies that make friendship chatbots are predatory. And they make more money the more predatory their technology is. Yesterday, a group of Democrats and Republicans introduced legislation to say these chatbots are not appropriate for our kids.

The technology companies that make friendship chatbots are predatory. And they make more money the more predatory their technology is. Yesterday, a group of Democrats and Republicans introduced legislation to say these chatbots are not appropriate for our kids.

Chris Murphy 🟧

22,554 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

President Zelenskyy: We have around 200 very strong [military] companies today. Of these, about 30 are top-tier. They produce drones, artillery, and armored vehicles. Most of them are MilTech - including highly advanced demining drones and unmanned ground vehicles. My task is not to damage Ukraine’s reputation or that of the industry. That is priority number one. That is why, when we talk about G2G - government-to-government - we start with a framework agreement. Then companies come in and conduct negotiations. We must plan Ukraine’s future economy not only with agriculture in mind. With all due respect, it is a very important sector. But we have built such a strong defense industry - why shouldn’t it stand on the same level as agriculture?

President Zelenskyy: We have around 200 very strong [military] companies today. Of these, about 30 are top-tier. They produce drones, artillery, and armored vehicles. Most of them are MilTech - including highly advanced demining drones and unmanned ground vehicles. My task is not to damage Ukraine’s reputation or that of the industry. That is priority number one. That is why, when we talk about G2G - government-to-government - we start with a framework agreement. Then companies come in and conduct negotiations. We must plan Ukraine’s future economy not only with agriculture in mind. With all due respect, it is a very important sector. But we have built such a strong defense industry - why shouldn’t it stand on the same level as agriculture?

Anton Gerashchenko

14,619 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

We asked Sigil Wen (Extraordinary) about the O-1 visa. Extraordinary brings the world’s top talent to America’s technology companies. "I'd like to think that the O-1 visa was created for the Manhattan Project. It's that ethos. The premise is that you're in the top 0.1 percentile at what you do." “You can be a tattoo artist, chip designer, or founder of a fast-growing AI company. As long as you can prove you are extraordinary, you can get it."

We asked Sigil Wen (Extraordinary) about the O-1 visa. Extraordinary brings the world’s top talent to America’s technology companies. "I'd like to think that the O-1 visa was created for the Manhattan Project. It's that ethos. The premise is that you're in the top 0.1 percentile at what you do." “You can be a tattoo artist, chip designer, or founder of a fast-growing AI company. As long as you can prove you are extraordinary, you can get it."

TBPN

56,219 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on the future of artificial intelligence: "It is going to be largely optimistic, largely wonderful. There are some use cases that we have to be extremely careful about—as in all great technology. If you look at the progress of technology over the years, electricity, the internet, computers, the automobile, I think we can all, all accept that in each one of those cases, there are situations and cases where we have to be very careful about. So as the creators of this technology, the industry has to be mindful, thoughtful, rigorous about building and advancing this technology properly. This is the first technology in my generation where we invented a new computer technology where it's easier to access than not. For example the computer until now has been programmable for about 30 million people in the world. About 30 million of us know how to program it and apply it to some useful career. Now everybody in the world can program an AI. You just go up to it and just say, 'I'd like to, you know, ask you to do something.' If you're not sure how to use AI, you tell the AI, 'I don't know how to use AI. Tell me how to use AI. How do I, how do I write a program? How do I book a trip? How do I do a research?' And so we've closed the technology divide tremendously, and that's something that's really important to recognize."

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on the future of artificial intelligence: "It is going to be largely optimistic, largely wonderful. There are some use cases that we have to be extremely careful about—as in all great technology. If you look at the progress of technology over the years, electricity, the internet, computers, the automobile, I think we can all, all accept that in each one of those cases, there are situations and cases where we have to be very careful about. So as the creators of this technology, the industry has to be mindful, thoughtful, rigorous about building and advancing this technology properly. This is the first technology in my generation where we invented a new computer technology where it's easier to access than not. For example the computer until now has been programmable for about 30 million people in the world. About 30 million of us know how to program it and apply it to some useful career. Now everybody in the world can program an AI. You just go up to it and just say, 'I'd like to, you know, ask you to do something.' If you're not sure how to use AI, you tell the AI, 'I don't know how to use AI. Tell me how to use AI. How do I, how do I write a program? How do I book a trip? How do I do a research?' And so we've closed the technology divide tremendously, and that's something that's really important to recognize."

Ryan Saavedra

20,105 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar— Silicon Valley can’t be replicated. American culture is unique 🇺🇸 “We did import the culture to Silicon Valley. We imported it from Iowa. It’s deeply rooted in midwestern values, a willingness to play a positive-sum game.” “Bob Noyce coined the term ‘open door policy.’” “I think that explains why it’s so hard for other countries to copy. People like their culture. They’re committed to their culture.” “One of the great American strengths in the present moment is software… America is so good at software, that we almost underestimate how good we are at it.” “There are zero Indian or Chinese enterprise software companies that are competitive on the global stage. That tells you that software is not just about IQ… it tells you there’s something very cultural about it.”

Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar— Silicon Valley can’t be replicated. American culture is unique 🇺🇸 “We did import the culture to Silicon Valley. We imported it from Iowa. It’s deeply rooted in midwestern values, a willingness to play a positive-sum game.” “Bob Noyce coined the term ‘open door policy.’” “I think that explains why it’s so hard for other countries to copy. People like their culture. They’re committed to their culture.” “One of the great American strengths in the present moment is software… America is so good at software, that we almost underestimate how good we are at it.” “There are zero Indian or Chinese enterprise software companies that are competitive on the global stage. That tells you that software is not just about IQ… it tells you there’s something very cultural about it.”

Jawwwn

53,247 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce