Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

We asked the Pentagon to clarify why Biden's recent changes to DOD directive 5240.01 removed mention of the First Amendment and added language about potential "lethal force" against Americans. They responded by insisted that there's NOTHING TO SEE HERE: "It does not reflect any change to DOD's policy regarding...

419,038 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Rob
Rob1 год назад

What it means is that federal civilian law enforcement can request DOD intelligence and weapon assets such as integrated surveillance reconnaissance drones with weapons and use them against Americans. While the DOD cant push the button, they provide the asset and technology while just having federal law enforcement push the button. It’s similar to the CIA contracting activities it itself can’t do. An example would be a US reaper drone used by federal law enforcement conducting an air strike on your house. Or a dod awacs conducting electronic surveillance but piloted by federal law enforcement. These assets were never intended for civilian use, especially on Americans. Congress and the American public would never allow the FBI to run armed reapers so they can now just borrow them from the DOD. Gross violation of the PCA.

Фото профиля TheDad
TheDad1 год назад

Honestly, @elonmusk and “X” gave the public a tool to fight back. No one would have known about this. No one would see all the glitches. No one hear about the CO SOS leaking dominion passwords. The impact “x” has had in my state alone (PA) is incredible. We have a chance

Фото профиля Allister Clisham
Allister Clisham1 год назад

@pow77196 A coincidence. Sure. Is anyone still falling for this doublespeak?

Фото профиля BillieCotter
BillieCotter1 год назад

Mr. Beck, @glennbeck …if people like Jamie Raskin are not re-elected in the house, doesn’t that mean his threats for Jan 6 are basically moot? Just saying, it seems like a no brainer to get his opponent elected in Maryland. @Cheryl4moco needs to win!

Фото профиля Pamerz
Pamerz1 год назад

Please stay on this Glenn! Everyone so preoccupied with the election so corrupt admin taking advantage of the distraction.

Фото профиля Josh Barnett-AZ
Josh Barnett-AZ1 год назад

they are lying like usual

Фото профиля The Tyrannists’ Plan
The Tyrannists’ Plan1 год назад

Democrat party has two significant operations ongoing right now. One is the dehumanization campaign against MAGA and the other is the justification campaign against MAGA. These campaigns started seriously strong roughly three to four weeks ago and that is not by coincidence

Фото профиля John Ferguson
John Ferguson1 год назад

Feels concerning that the DOD literally made more than half the nation targets

Фото профиля David Petolicchio
David Petolicchio1 год назад

@JCZ516 The federal government would love to use violence in order to retain power (and to expand it)

Похожие видео

🚨 Ron Paul Warns that the US Military has now been Authorized to Kill Americans on US Soil, Just before the 2024 Election I covered this the other day.. it’s a very big deal. 🔴 Here was my breakdown The DoD quietly revised Directive 5240.01, Turning the Directive into a Stealthy Expansion of Military Intelligence Powers in Life-or-Death Domestic Scenarios • Just weeks before the most consequential election in history… the U.S. military has quietly been granted the authority to assist in domestic law enforcement activities—including the use of lethal force against U.S. citizens in certain circumstances. • The reissuance of DoD Directive 5240.01 repealed previous versions, including the 1982 DoD 5240.1-R. • The update is routine, but the specific changes are very noteworthy being that we’re so close to the election. • The changes specifically mention the authorization of LETHAL FORCE in domestic operations, working in tandem with local authorities.. This is hitting all kinds of Q drops.. #34 in particular. In the 2016 version, the directive primarily focused on intelligence collection and ensuring civil liberties protections... The Sept 2024 version just updated expands the military's role, particularly in assisting civil law enforcement, and authorizes lethal force under specific conditions, raising questions about its use during potential civil unrest surrounding the election. —— Section 3.3.a.(2)(c) now explicitly permits lethal force in cases of imminent threats or national security emergencies, provided the action complies with legal oversight. Clip Source

MJTruthUltra

871,722 просмотров • 1 год назад

Thank you to all who joined us in Brewer yesterday to fight to stop this senseless war. Full remarks and video below. ********* First, I want to say thank you to Food and Medicine for having me. The work of Food and Medicine, the Eastern Maine Labor Council, quite frankly, has really kept organizing alive and as part of the state for a long time. And if you have the time and the energy to get involved, I highly recommend that you do. I also just want to give a hearty thank you to everyone who's joined us here today. It means a lot and it also shows that this is, whether it's mothers, whether it's veterans, whether it's people just running for political office and part of our main community, nobody wants this war. Absolutely no one thinks that this is a good idea. And the reason why they don't want it is because they know what it's actually about. This is a war that's being pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu. He's been trying to make this war happen for almost 30 years. This is a war that's being pushed by the Saudis, who have also wanted this war to happen. Two nations that are happy to watch American blood be expended on their behalf. This war is also being pushed because Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. And other people in the White House, and other people connected with the Epstein class. They are terrified that we have noticed what they are doing. They are terrified that we're going to start wondering why the hell we let them stay in power. And to do that, they're going to do the oldest trick in the book. They're going to try to just start a war to distract all of us. They are willing to sacrifice the lives of young American men and women and the lives of Iranian civilians simply to protect their political interests. I cannot think of a more reprehensible act. I cannot think of a more unpatriotic act, of a more un-American act, than to send our sons and daughters off to die, to kill, to bring immense violence to innocent civilians abroad simply because you're afraid you might lose the midterms. It is disgusting. As reprehensible as it is, it's also important to remember that this situation we find ourselves in is only possible because we have had a Congress that for decades has abdicated its responsibility, its constitutional responsibility, in making war. We need to rescind the 2001 Authorization of Use of Military Force. Its vague language and lack of clarity has been abused by multiple administrations of both parties to carry out wars in the name of the military-industrial complex and those in power, to carry out military operations that did absolutely nothing to keep Americans safe, but made some people very, very wealthy and protected the political interests of those in power. It needs to go. But not only does it need to go, we need a war powers resolution that actually claws power back from the executive branch. The resolutions that are on the table, I highly recommend you call your elected officials and put pressure on them to vote for them. They are necessary, but they are not sufficient. We need a truly reformed War Powers Act, where we really pull the power back. No more 48 hours of combat operations where you have to notify Congress. No more 60 days of combat operations before you have to prove to Congress that you should have gone to war in the first place. No. We need to know why military force is used right off the bat. And it needs to be approved by Congress right off the bat. The Constitution is clear about who is supposed to have the power of waging war in this country. It is the body that is most representative of the American people because it is the American people who have to bear the brunt of combat. It is the American people who are asked to make the sacrifice. It is American families who have to bury their dead sons and daughters. It is American friends who have to watch their best friends come home from a war and struggle for years with physical and mental trauma.

Graham Platner for Senate

75,721 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🫤 A Dose of Reality from Karl Nell 🫤 "My view is that this cycle [of disclosure], essentially, has ended, and we should take stock of what worked and what didn't work, to think about maybe a new way forward." ~Nell ~Excellent Discussion~ "By not passing [the UAPDA], Congress has written themselves out of any type of way forward." ~Nell ~ Karl Nell: "I guess the postulate I've got is that this recent cycle of disclosure - that we might say started in 2017 with the Navy videos and Lue Elizondo coming out as a whistleblower, making various assertions - that cycle of disclosure is effectively ended with the failure to pass the UAP Disclosure Act. and with sort of the third in the series of hearings on the topic that I think, increasingly, have moved the media less and less." (Brutal reality.) Nell: "And so, in some sense, it seems like the people that have been at the forefront of this recent cycle have said what they've had to say [and[ it's starting to become stale in the sense of being repetitive. The conversation isn't necessarily advancing to new topics. But really, more importantly, the mechanism in order to which to address these whistleblower issues has not gained traction. "And ,you know, particularly, to kind of maybe amplify upon that, I think the essence of that Schumer/Rounds amendment was to create a management structure that you could argue, perhaps, mirrored the original process that was maybe put in place by Truman and Eisenhower to manage this topic, but to do it in a manner that was assured to have proper congressional oversight and proper transparency and accountability to elected officials. Which had ceased to pertain at some point in the past. "And so, essentially, by not passing this, Congress has written themselves out of any type of way forward, and without a control group to manage the policy aspect, then the government's really not gonna be in a position to deal with ramification of any released material. And so, increasing whistleblowers, increasing attention, is gonna force the government into a reactive mode and really a hunker-down mode. "So, my view is that this cycle essentially has ended, and we should take stock of what worked and what didn't work to think about maybe a new way forward. So that's sort of my view on the current state of play."

Joe Murgia

67,997 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад