Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
We can’t have a serious conversation about UAP data without first defining: - What counts as data? - What thresholds make something anomalous? - What standards should apply? Without this foundation, the conversation just keeps going in circles. When new data emerges, the goalposts shouldn’t move—standards should be set... show more
37,093 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
11 Kommentare

If you have better ideas, I can’t wait to see them.

🤖 Big Tech's watching? Not on our watch. 😎 See how UP Phone keeps your data off their radar. 🚫📱 #PrivacyWin #TakeControl 👉

This is a great idea. However, you're implicitly conceding one type of evidence that we have lots of but people constantly try to claim is not evidence: testimony and first-hand accounts. We should also consider how to evaluate such evidence and what factors make such evidence more or less reliable.

We can’t do everything lol. Would love to see anybody else step up.

Even using consumer grade cameras, the following would help.Set up at least two observing sites, each having at least 2 cameras, with the sites at a measured distance apart, say 1 kilometer. The sites would communicate via a narrow-band link, say modulated laser. Then triangulate altitude/azimuth readings to establish distance, altitude, and size.

@DietrichVFA41 Thanks for putting this together! Great readable analysis for laypeople!

@DietrichVFA41 It’s time we stop ignoring the Biological Evidence from our friends south of the border in Peru and Mexico.

Exactly. This way goal posts can’t keep being moved by skeptics.

As someone coming from a science background, I think this is great. I've always thought there needs to be a way to set guidelines for what passes as useable UAP data and a way to standardize said data after it's collected so it can be used in research. Well done!

This framework is excellent work. I am finding it particularly helpful for a high level reference for military and civilian sensor data in easy to understand terms. (The brothers Tedesco may have some excellent data but need your presentation help.)

There's plenty of evidence if you know where to look. More than you could ever ask for, or comprehend in a single life time. We're past the point of confirmation, straight into the 'call to action'. Check the entire post. ;)

