Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"We didn't have this problem a year ago." Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley says the backlash over his company's cameras is a recent phenomenon that will pass. I've spent years investigating how Flock expanded across Arizona through public records, council meetings and interviews. The timeline I've compiled may explain... show more

Jen's Two Cents. 🎙

1,720 subscribers

192,011 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

Wall Street Apes

105,323 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Tucker Carlson says Flock Cameras will being “The slave state” This is the building of the surveillance state He calls out the founded of Flock, “Here is the founder of Flock Safety describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project:” Founder “Terroristic organizations like Deflock, primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else.” Tucker Carlson says he’s on side of Deflock, he believes “They're an invasion of your privacy. They're dehumanizing” They’re funded by taxpayer money, so he’s a smug billionaire calling us all terrorists for being worried about surveillance while at the same time only being rich because our tax money The good news is, cities are responding to public outrage over this unlawful surveillance Dozens of cities and towns across the United States have pulled out of or even declined to renew contracts with Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras due to public pushback, privacy concerns and data-sharing issues. I’ll go over a few at the end of the video You have to keep being loud and not accept unlawful surveillance 82+ communities across 28 states have terminated contracts or deactivated cameras since early 2025

Tucker Carlson says Flock Cameras will being “The slave state” This is the building of the surveillance state He calls out the founded of Flock, “Here is the founder of Flock Safety describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project:” Founder “Terroristic organizations like Deflock, primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else.” Tucker Carlson says he’s on side of Deflock, he believes “They're an invasion of your privacy. They're dehumanizing” They’re funded by taxpayer money, so he’s a smug billionaire calling us all terrorists for being worried about surveillance while at the same time only being rich because our tax money The good news is, cities are responding to public outrage over this unlawful surveillance Dozens of cities and towns across the United States have pulled out of or even declined to renew contracts with Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras due to public pushback, privacy concerns and data-sharing issues. I’ll go over a few at the end of the video You have to keep being loud and not accept unlawful surveillance 82+ communities across 28 states have terminated contracts or deactivated cameras since early 2025

Wall Street Apes

68,487 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is horrifying and every American needs to hear this California resident exposes what’s really going on with Flock Cameras in America “I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They're AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company's servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception, built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the City Council to start auditing the queries made against Flock's database, to disclose any data sharing agreements, and to take a vote to cancel the Flock safety contract” I looked more into this and he is 100% right Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure If you ask me this is laying the infrastructure for a mass surveillance network in America. We are being lied to. Cancel all contracts nationwide

This is horrifying and every American needs to hear this California resident exposes what’s really going on with Flock Cameras in America “I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They're AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company's servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception, built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the City Council to start auditing the queries made against Flock's database, to disclose any data sharing agreements, and to take a vote to cancel the Flock safety contract” I looked more into this and he is 100% right Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure If you ask me this is laying the infrastructure for a mass surveillance network in America. We are being lied to. Cancel all contracts nationwide

Wall Street Apes

968,163 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Flock Safety: Is America Building a “Pre-Crime” Surveillance State? | Free the Money Ep. 39 Are we moving toward a “pre-crime” surveillance state where authorities can track your movements, build a profile of your behavior, and potentially decide you’re suspicious before you’ve even committed a crime? Jason Bassler, co-founder of the Free Thought Project, joins me to expose Flock and the rapidly expanding surveillance infrastructure being built across America. We break down how Flock’s automated license plate readers (ALPRs) can track far more than just a license plate, creating a “digital fingerprint” of your vehicle and logging your daily movements. Jason also discusses documented cases of police abusing ALPRs, innocent people being wrongfully stopped or held at gunpoint, and Flock data being accessed beyond local police. He says ICE, the ATF, FBI, and DHS have accessed Flock data that cities never approved. Key points we cover: -Flock Safety’s nationwide network of ALPR cameras and its expanding drone technology -Why ALPRs account for less than 1% of crime clearance in many departments—meaning roughly 99% of the surveillance collected is on innocent people -Motorola Signal Trace technology that can detect wireless signals from phones, Bluetooth devices, AirPods, and wearables -The growing push for age verification and digital ID across the internet -Why taxpayers could be spending roughly $360 million per year on Flock cameras -The Fourth Amendment questions surrounding mass location tracking -Why financial privacy and private digital money matter in an increasingly surveilled world -How communities are fighting back through FOIA requests, city councils, and projects like DeFlock Remember to subscribe and hit the bell “🔔” icon to get notifications. Want financial privacy? Check out my favorite privacy coin Zano You can buy Zano seamlessly on MEXC using a VPN, or browse the full list of exchanges where Zano is available here: You can also find educational content, tutorials, and interviews on the official Zano YouTube Channel: 0:00 Jason Bassler’s Background: The Free Thought Project & Deplatforming 5:29 Flock Safety: Surveillance Infrastructure Disguised as Public Safety 7:04 How Flock ALPR Cameras Track Your Vehicle’s “Digital Fingerprint” 8:28 Flock’s New Alpha Drone: The Next Level of Mass Surveillance 10:22 Is Flock Unconstitutional? The Fourth Amendment Legal Gray Area 13:23 Private Businesses Are Using Flock Cameras Too 15:51 Flock vs. Your Phone: The Critical Difference 16:55 Zano 21:09 Police Abusing Flock: Stalking Exes & Innocent People Held at Gunpoint 22:40 Who Has Access to this Flock Data? Police, Federal Agencies & More 25:33 The Massive Data Breach & Foreign Adversary Risk 28:34 Flock’s Shocking Crime Stats: 99% of Surveillance Is on Innocent People 34:00 Beyond License Plates: Motorola Signal Trace Tracks Your Electronics 37:21 Age Verification & Digital ID: The Push to Identify Everyone Online 40:21 DeFlock: Mapping America’s Flock Surveillance Network 45:07 Taxpayers Are Spending $360 Million a Year to Be Surveilled 46:19 Why Private Money Is Essential for a Free Society 52:05 How to Fight Back: FOIA Requests, City Councils & Taking Action

Bri Teresi

110,458 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

$🚨NEW: Our adversaries secretly funded the anti-fracking & anti-nuclear movements. Now Joe Lonsdale asks: Who's funding the outrage about Flock? And of all the surveillance cameras, why is the outrage only directed at the ones arresting criminals and illegal aliens? Joe Lonsdale: I've been working on this for 25 years... I've been trying to make the government competent in the areas that I touch and trying to "watch the watchers." You can go back and see me talk about "watching the watchers" for a very long time now. Now, what what bothers me about about this... there are the legitimate things you can argue about, and then there's the psyops from the left... We're in Texas here today. I'm a proud Texan now for six years. I want to give you one other example of a psyop.... You guys may remember we heard a lot about how bad fracking was. This is a big, big deal. It's now a known fact -- it's not conspiracy -- it's a known fact that our adversaries saw how good fracking was, and how bad it would be for them. And Russia especially spent an insane amount of money trying to stop us from doing fracking... Thank goodness Texans were bold and said, these psyops are bullshit, I'm not gonna listen to them. So my question is, so we have lots of types of cameras that watch us. We have license plate reader cameras, we have parking cameras, and we have Flocks. And I'm not involved in Flock at all. I think they've done a shitty job on some of the messaging here, but isn't it a little suspicious to you as well that no one's attacking the other cameras? No one's attacking the cameras that are giving us speeding tickets, that are watching other parts of our society. But everyone, after DSA spends insane amounts of money, message tests, the far left figures out how to get the right to agree with them, and then they go after the things that are arresting criminals. And those are the only ones that everyone on the populist right is protesting... Isn't that a little bit silly? Shouldn't it be that we're protesting all of them or none of them? Are we kind of falling for the left here? Is there something where we shouldn't be going along with the psyop?$

🚨NEW: Our adversaries secretly funded the anti-fracking & anti-nuclear movements. Now Joe Lonsdale asks: Who's funding the outrage about Flock? And of all the surveillance cameras, why is the outrage only directed at the ones arresting criminals and illegal aliens? Joe Lonsdale: I've been working on this for 25 years... I've been trying to make the government competent in the areas that I touch and trying to "watch the watchers." You can go back and see me talk about "watching the watchers" for a very long time now. Now, what what bothers me about about this... there are the legitimate things you can argue about, and then there's the psyops from the left... We're in Texas here today. I'm a proud Texan now for six years. I want to give you one other example of a psyop.... You guys may remember we heard a lot about how bad fracking was. This is a big, big deal. It's now a known fact -- it's not conspiracy -- it's a known fact that our adversaries saw how good fracking was, and how bad it would be for them. And Russia especially spent an insane amount of money trying to stop us from doing fracking... Thank goodness Texans were bold and said, these psyops are bullshit, I'm not gonna listen to them. So my question is, so we have lots of types of cameras that watch us. We have license plate reader cameras, we have parking cameras, and we have Flocks. And I'm not involved in Flock at all. I think they've done a shitty job on some of the messaging here, but isn't it a little suspicious to you as well that no one's attacking the other cameras? No one's attacking the cameras that are giving us speeding tickets, that are watching other parts of our society. But everyone, after DSA spends insane amounts of money, message tests, the far left figures out how to get the right to agree with them, and then they go after the things that are arresting criminals. And those are the only ones that everyone on the populist right is protesting... Isn't that a little bit silly? Shouldn't it be that we're protesting all of them or none of them? Are we kind of falling for the left here? Is there something where we shouldn't be going along with the psyop?

American Optimist

80,609 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

🚨 AMERICANS ARE DECLARING WAR ON FLOCK CAMERAS — AND PEOPLE ARE TEARING THEM DOWN Something is happening all over America. People aren't just complaining about surveillance cameras anymore. They're taking action. Reports are emerging of Flock cameras being cut down, damaged, disabled, and targeted in multiple cities. Why? Because what started as a tool to track stolen vehicles has turned into something many people believe is far bigger. The breaking point came when public records reportedly revealed that federal agencies had conducted thousands of searches through local camera networks. For many people, that confirmed their worst fears. But now the story is getting even darker. People are learning the next generation of surveillance won't stop at license plates. New systems are already being discussed that could potentially pull Bluetooth identifiers from phones, smart watches, earbuds, and other devices traveling inside vehicles. In other words, your car may not be the thing they're interested in tracking. You are. Meanwhile, cities across the country are beginning to reconsider their contracts as public backlash continues to grow. And as more cameras go up, more cameras seem to be coming down. How much surveillance are people supposed to tolerate before they start fighting back?

🚨 AMERICANS ARE DECLARING WAR ON FLOCK CAMERAS — AND PEOPLE ARE TEARING THEM DOWN Something is happening all over America. People aren't just complaining about surveillance cameras anymore. They're taking action. Reports are emerging of Flock cameras being cut down, damaged, disabled, and targeted in multiple cities. Why? Because what started as a tool to track stolen vehicles has turned into something many people believe is far bigger. The breaking point came when public records reportedly revealed that federal agencies had conducted thousands of searches through local camera networks. For many people, that confirmed their worst fears. But now the story is getting even darker. People are learning the next generation of surveillance won't stop at license plates. New systems are already being discussed that could potentially pull Bluetooth identifiers from phones, smart watches, earbuds, and other devices traveling inside vehicles. In other words, your car may not be the thing they're interested in tracking. You are. Meanwhile, cities across the country are beginning to reconsider their contracts as public backlash continues to grow. And as more cameras go up, more cameras seem to be coming down. How much surveillance are people supposed to tolerate before they start fighting back?

HustleBitch

100,922 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Zack Polanski, "Because this election is hope versus hate. In the Reform Party, you have a party that Stoke Division, that stoke toxicity, and they're on a bit of a losing streak" "And then in the Green Party, you've got what we've got in this room" "And right across Greater Manchester, ordinary people coming together because we believe that better is possible" "We know when we organise in our communities, when we work together to end the toxic combination of high bills and low wages and the awful rhetoric that's coming out of reform and offer people a better, future, that is how we can and we will win so much hope in this room" "Right now, right across the Green Party, we also have to recognise the challenges that Greater Manchester are facing right now" "All across Greater Manchester, you're seeing skyscraper, after skyscraper go up. Yet between 2020 and 2024, families living in temporary accommodation rose by 71%" "Meanwhile, rents across Greater Manchester are far too high. Far too many people are struggling just to keep a roof above their head and keep food on the table. High street after high street across Greater Manchester, despite so many people's pride in the place that they're from, they're feeling or they're not feeling, they're seeing that they're hollowed out, that they're not looked after." "And it doesn't have to be this way. And this creates the perfect conditions for men like Nigel Farage to come along and stoke resentment and stoke division. But as I've often heard Hans Spencer MP say, this is Manchester and we do things differently here" "We need a green mayor who will build affordable social and council housing that. That will lobby and demand from national government rent controls that will look after our high streets and turn them back into the thriving, inclusive, accessible communities that we know that they sometimes can be and they must always be" "And so we need someone pretty impressive to do this job. And I think it might have been a pretty open secret that this election was about to happen. So, for the last five, six weeks, I've been thinking about what are the qualities that you need in a candidate who is not going to just run an amazing campaign, but is going to control the budget?" "Who is going to be the mayor? Great Manchester. And can do this job? You need someone with a plan, someone who is organised, someone who cares about others, someone who is compassionate and will lift up and empower all communities, make sure that the listen are there to protect both people and planet, protect our communities and protect the environment" "And if all of that wasn't enough, I thought you need a little bit of luck. So how about the luck of the Irish?"

Zack Polanski, "Because this election is hope versus hate. In the Reform Party, you have a party that Stoke Division, that stoke toxicity, and they're on a bit of a losing streak" "And then in the Green Party, you've got what we've got in this room" "And right across Greater Manchester, ordinary people coming together because we believe that better is possible" "We know when we organise in our communities, when we work together to end the toxic combination of high bills and low wages and the awful rhetoric that's coming out of reform and offer people a better, future, that is how we can and we will win so much hope in this room" "Right now, right across the Green Party, we also have to recognise the challenges that Greater Manchester are facing right now" "All across Greater Manchester, you're seeing skyscraper, after skyscraper go up. Yet between 2020 and 2024, families living in temporary accommodation rose by 71%" "Meanwhile, rents across Greater Manchester are far too high. Far too many people are struggling just to keep a roof above their head and keep food on the table. High street after high street across Greater Manchester, despite so many people's pride in the place that they're from, they're feeling or they're not feeling, they're seeing that they're hollowed out, that they're not looked after." "And it doesn't have to be this way. And this creates the perfect conditions for men like Nigel Farage to come along and stoke resentment and stoke division. But as I've often heard Hans Spencer MP say, this is Manchester and we do things differently here" "We need a green mayor who will build affordable social and council housing that. That will lobby and demand from national government rent controls that will look after our high streets and turn them back into the thriving, inclusive, accessible communities that we know that they sometimes can be and they must always be" "And so we need someone pretty impressive to do this job. And I think it might have been a pretty open secret that this election was about to happen. So, for the last five, six weeks, I've been thinking about what are the qualities that you need in a candidate who is not going to just run an amazing campaign, but is going to control the budget?" "Who is going to be the mayor? Great Manchester. And can do this job? You need someone with a plan, someone who is organised, someone who cares about others, someone who is compassionate and will lift up and empower all communities, make sure that the listen are there to protect both people and planet, protect our communities and protect the environment" "And if all of that wasn't enough, I thought you need a little bit of luck. So how about the luck of the Irish?"

Farrukh

22,142 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Houston is NOT Flocking Around, No means NO! 🚨 Two MORE Flock surveillance cameras were chopped down yesterday... that’s 4 destroyed in 3 days. Officials are PANICKING while the public floods tip lines with savage replies: “The cameras are succumbing to heat exhaustion.” 😂 What are Flock cameras? They’re not “just license plate readers.” They’re a massive private surveillance network that: - Records every vehicle passing by. - Stores your movements for 30+ days. (or longer) - Combines it with your personal data via their “Nova” platform. - Hands it all to police... and who knows who else... without a warrant. Houston just spent $869,000 on this. Did YOU vote for it? No. Did anyone? No. This is the Surveillance State rolling out in real time: - 4th Amendment? Ignored. - Privacy? Gone. - Your daily movements turned into a searchable database for government and God knows who. If these cameras are so great for “public safety,” why are cities hiding the contracts? When did we consent to being tracked like criminals everywhere we drive? How many more “upgrades” (audio, device tracking, facial recognition) are coming without our knowledge? Who really owns and profits from your location data? The Blade Runners are awake. Houston is showing the rest of America what resistance looks like. Tag your mayor. Tag your city council. Share this everywhere. The surveillance grid only wins if we stay silent. Your taxes are paying for your own enslavement. Defund the spy cams. Reclaim your freedom. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?!

🚨 BREAKING: Houston is NOT Flocking Around, No means NO! 🚨 Two MORE Flock surveillance cameras were chopped down yesterday... that’s 4 destroyed in 3 days. Officials are PANICKING while the public floods tip lines with savage replies: “The cameras are succumbing to heat exhaustion.” 😂 What are Flock cameras? They’re not “just license plate readers.” They’re a massive private surveillance network that: - Records every vehicle passing by. - Stores your movements for 30+ days. (or longer) - Combines it with your personal data via their “Nova” platform. - Hands it all to police... and who knows who else... without a warrant. Houston just spent $869,000 on this. Did YOU vote for it? No. Did anyone? No. This is the Surveillance State rolling out in real time: - 4th Amendment? Ignored. - Privacy? Gone. - Your daily movements turned into a searchable database for government and God knows who. If these cameras are so great for “public safety,” why are cities hiding the contracts? When did we consent to being tracked like criminals everywhere we drive? How many more “upgrades” (audio, device tracking, facial recognition) are coming without our knowledge? Who really owns and profits from your location data? The Blade Runners are awake. Houston is showing the rest of America what resistance looks like. Tag your mayor. Tag your city council. Share this everywhere. The surveillance grid only wins if we stay silent. Your taxes are paying for your own enslavement. Defund the spy cams. Reclaim your freedom. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?!

Noah B. Price

21,944 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 EXPOSED: What the Flock is going on?! This is The Most Unhinged Surveillance Warning video You Will see All Year 🚨 A man fully painted as the Joker sits in his car and delivers a WILD rant about the exact laser YOU Must Never point at Flock Safety cameras. Flock runs a massive private network of license plate readers that photograph every vehicle, log the plate, time, location, and vehicle details. All that data feeds into searchable databases for police and subscribers nationwide. It tracks movements of millions of Americans every day with minimal oversight and has already sparked privacy lawsuits and city shutdowns in multiple places. The Joker guy dramatically warns against a powerful green laser in the 490 to 570 nanometer range above one thousand milliwatts. In technical reality such lasers can overwhelm and damage camera sensors by saturating them with intense light. Anything claiming megawatts is absurd theater because that power level belongs in industrial or military systems not pocket devices. Pointing lasers at surveillance gear can lead to felony charges for tampering or vandalism. Shockingly this appears to be the same person whose own robbery was solved using Flock camera footage... The irony is off the charts. Now answer these questions honestly... Do these cameras protect public safety or do they create warrantless mass tracking of every driver in America? Would you ever test a laser on one of these systems if it recorded your movements without permission? How powerful does a laser actually need to be to reliably blind these cameras and what are the permanent eye damage risks to the user? Have Flock cameras appeared near your home or commute and does knowing they watch you change how you drive? Is this Joker video hilarious performance art or a sign of growing public revolt against constant surveillance? What happens to society if thousands of people start countering these cameras with cheap tech anyone can buy online? Should private companies like Flock be allowed to build national vehicle tracking networks at all? Why do some cities keep installing them despite the privacy backlash and data breach risks? Is interfering with surveillance ever justified self defense or is it always criminal? The video exposes more than it intends. Watch it. Reply with your real take. The discussion starts here. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too. And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?! Don't forget to check out the comments below for a FREE Book.

🚨 EXPOSED: What the Flock is going on?! This is The Most Unhinged Surveillance Warning video You Will see All Year 🚨 A man fully painted as the Joker sits in his car and delivers a WILD rant about the exact laser YOU Must Never point at Flock Safety cameras. Flock runs a massive private network of license plate readers that photograph every vehicle, log the plate, time, location, and vehicle details. All that data feeds into searchable databases for police and subscribers nationwide. It tracks movements of millions of Americans every day with minimal oversight and has already sparked privacy lawsuits and city shutdowns in multiple places. The Joker guy dramatically warns against a powerful green laser in the 490 to 570 nanometer range above one thousand milliwatts. In technical reality such lasers can overwhelm and damage camera sensors by saturating them with intense light. Anything claiming megawatts is absurd theater because that power level belongs in industrial or military systems not pocket devices. Pointing lasers at surveillance gear can lead to felony charges for tampering or vandalism. Shockingly this appears to be the same person whose own robbery was solved using Flock camera footage... The irony is off the charts. Now answer these questions honestly... Do these cameras protect public safety or do they create warrantless mass tracking of every driver in America? Would you ever test a laser on one of these systems if it recorded your movements without permission? How powerful does a laser actually need to be to reliably blind these cameras and what are the permanent eye damage risks to the user? Have Flock cameras appeared near your home or commute and does knowing they watch you change how you drive? Is this Joker video hilarious performance art or a sign of growing public revolt against constant surveillance? What happens to society if thousands of people start countering these cameras with cheap tech anyone can buy online? Should private companies like Flock be allowed to build national vehicle tracking networks at all? Why do some cities keep installing them despite the privacy backlash and data breach risks? Is interfering with surveillance ever justified self defense or is it always criminal? The video exposes more than it intends. Watch it. Reply with your real take. The discussion starts here. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too. And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?! Don't forget to check out the comments below for a FREE Book.

Noah B. Price

30,342 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Catherine Austin Fitts on people waking up to dangers of Flock cameras and data centers: "There is a revolution across America of people who are... furious to discover that they are paying their county to put up cameras that track their every movement" "[And] the people putting in data centers have a couple of problems. One is people are beginning to understand that they're going to be used for control. They're not going to be used to increase productivity, they're going to be used to increase control" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Derrick Broze (Derrick Broze) posted to The Conscious Resistance YouTube channel on May 6, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So let me tell you some of the good news. You know, for many, many years, I've been trying to pass legislation to protect cash and stop programmable money for all these reasons. But one of the things that's happened because it's an abstract idea and people have struggle with that, but now the local hardware you need to implement that system is going into place. With both the data centers, the telecom that everyone's fighting, but then the Flock cameras. "And what has happened is there is a revolution across America of people who are so furious to discover that they are paying their county to put up cameras that track their every movement with the Flock cameras... And there is huge pushback. It's unbelievable. "And it's interesting. So the people putting in data centers have a couple of problems. One is people are beginning to understand that they're going to be used for control. They're not going to be used to increase productivity, they're going to be used to increase control. "But the other thing they're realizing is if you look at the projections of what energy they need and what water they need and what their environmental impact is, what the noise does to people who live around it, they're beginning to realize, 'Oh, wait a minute. These people don't care about climate change.' "There was an article last, I was just telling a guy who I met who'd just gone to a data center conference. There was an article last year that Texas, for the projected data centers, needed 50 new nuclear plants. And he told me it takes 30 years to build a nuclear plant in Texas, so—"

Catherine Austin Fitts on people waking up to dangers of Flock cameras and data centers: "There is a revolution across America of people who are... furious to discover that they are paying their county to put up cameras that track their every movement" "[And] the people putting in data centers have a couple of problems. One is people are beginning to understand that they're going to be used for control. They're not going to be used to increase productivity, they're going to be used to increase control" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Derrick Broze (Derrick Broze) posted to The Conscious Resistance YouTube channel on May 6, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So let me tell you some of the good news. You know, for many, many years, I've been trying to pass legislation to protect cash and stop programmable money for all these reasons. But one of the things that's happened because it's an abstract idea and people have struggle with that, but now the local hardware you need to implement that system is going into place. With both the data centers, the telecom that everyone's fighting, but then the Flock cameras. "And what has happened is there is a revolution across America of people who are so furious to discover that they are paying their county to put up cameras that track their every movement with the Flock cameras... And there is huge pushback. It's unbelievable. "And it's interesting. So the people putting in data centers have a couple of problems. One is people are beginning to understand that they're going to be used for control. They're not going to be used to increase productivity, they're going to be used to increase control. "But the other thing they're realizing is if you look at the projections of what energy they need and what water they need and what their environmental impact is, what the noise does to people who live around it, they're beginning to realize, 'Oh, wait a minute. These people don't care about climate change.' "There was an article last, I was just telling a guy who I met who'd just gone to a data center conference. There was an article last year that Texas, for the projected data centers, needed 50 new nuclear plants. And he told me it takes 30 years to build a nuclear plant in Texas, so—"

Sense Receptor

19,404 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 Mamdani Transition Team Member: “Defund” Is Losing the Narrative War Zohran Mamdani transition team member and CUNY professor Lumumba Bandele just said the quiet part out loud on a recent podcast: the movement that pushed “defund the police” has spent the last five years losing, and he thinks the problem is not the policy, it’s the messaging. “What we are losing ground on is the narrative war. Think about this, just 5 years ago we had the entire country, if not saying, considering this concept, this idea of defunding police. That was only 5 years ago, y’all. Now you’re hard pressed to get anybody to say that out loud.” Notably, he glides past the 2020 riots and the public-safety backlash that followed, and instead treats “defund” as a messaging problem to be re-sold, even though some cities did adopt versions of it through budget cuts and shifting responsibilities. “Culture eats strategy for breakfast… if you’re not able to shift the culture of a people, it’s not gonna mean much.” Translation: they know “defund” became politically radioactive, and the response is not backing off. It’s rebuilding the culture and narrative infrastructure so the public buys it again

🚨 Mamdani Transition Team Member: “Defund” Is Losing the Narrative War Zohran Mamdani transition team member and CUNY professor Lumumba Bandele just said the quiet part out loud on a recent podcast: the movement that pushed “defund the police” has spent the last five years losing, and he thinks the problem is not the policy, it’s the messaging. “What we are losing ground on is the narrative war. Think about this, just 5 years ago we had the entire country, if not saying, considering this concept, this idea of defunding police. That was only 5 years ago, y’all. Now you’re hard pressed to get anybody to say that out loud.” Notably, he glides past the 2020 riots and the public-safety backlash that followed, and instead treats “defund” as a messaging problem to be re-sold, even though some cities did adopt versions of it through budget cuts and shifting responsibilities. “Culture eats strategy for breakfast… if you’re not able to shift the culture of a people, it’s not gonna mean much.” Translation: they know “defund” became politically radioactive, and the response is not backing off. It’s rebuilding the culture and narrative infrastructure so the public buys it again

Stu Smith

48,248 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Robert Kennedy Jr.’s running mate, Nicole Shanahan, goes scorched-earth on the Democratic Party upon Chris Cuomo asking her why she is trusting former President Trump. Cuomo began by asking, “Why are you, who’s known for being a savvy person, so quick to trust that Donald Trump will deliver on what he says?” Shanahan replied, “Bobby has been running for over a year. We have crossed this nation, we have talked to Americans, we have met people from all ends of the political spectrum… our job is to bring that voice to whomever is going to be sincere in their reception.” She continued, “Farmers are on their knees… Who can I take that message to today? You tell me, Chris. Who’s gonna listen to me? Cause I have taken this message for years to the Democratic Party, and I cannot get through to anybody. It’s not like this has happened over night. I don’t wake up one morning and say, ‘What a great idea it would be to leave the Democratic Party.’ No. I tried everything, everything, in my capability to get through to someone who would listen… and right now, Trump has some really good people around him, and he’s more than willing to listen.”

Robert Kennedy Jr.’s running mate, Nicole Shanahan, goes scorched-earth on the Democratic Party upon Chris Cuomo asking her why she is trusting former President Trump. Cuomo began by asking, “Why are you, who’s known for being a savvy person, so quick to trust that Donald Trump will deliver on what he says?” Shanahan replied, “Bobby has been running for over a year. We have crossed this nation, we have talked to Americans, we have met people from all ends of the political spectrum… our job is to bring that voice to whomever is going to be sincere in their reception.” She continued, “Farmers are on their knees… Who can I take that message to today? You tell me, Chris. Who’s gonna listen to me? Cause I have taken this message for years to the Democratic Party, and I cannot get through to anybody. It’s not like this has happened over night. I don’t wake up one morning and say, ‘What a great idea it would be to leave the Democratic Party.’ No. I tried everything, everything, in my capability to get through to someone who would listen… and right now, Trump has some really good people around him, and he’s more than willing to listen.”

Christian Movick

2,558,334 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨🚨THERE IS NO QUESTION A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IS BEING RUN IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA BY THE CRIMINAL KATIE HOBBS. Investigation and prosecution by the FBI and the DOJ it’s long overdue. A: Katie Hobbs is now being investigated for bribery, fraud conspiracy and racketeering. The Chairman of the Joint Legislative Committee has informed Maricopa County's investigator that the Auditor General will assist in the investigation. This comes after The Arizona Republic detailed how state contractor Sunshine Residential Homes bribed Gov. Katie Hobbs and AZ Democrats with $400,000 and in returns got millions more in state money. "In my capacity as chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, I want you to know that the Auditor General’s Office stands ready to partner with you in getting the facts about this troubling matter. Make no mistake, we will allocate the resources the Auditor General needs to help restore what appears to be a major breach of trust in our government." B: Additionally Arizona State lawmakers are now investigating Katie Hobbs after $339 MILLION "disappeared." As Hobbs's budget director also mysteriously resigns, State Senator Alex Kolodin: "Imagine my shock when the Legislature was informed the State has several insolvent agencies and requires a $339 million bailout to close out the current Fiscal Year. Since your liaisons dedicated to briefing members of the Legislature failed to provide detail on how we got here, I am putting my request in writing: Arizonans deserve to know the details. Why did you mislead the legislature about the spending you intended to approve? In just two weeks' time, I've learned that the problem has worsened and that your office's request is now $350 million.”

🚨🚨THERE IS NO QUESTION A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IS BEING RUN IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA BY THE CRIMINAL KATIE HOBBS. Investigation and prosecution by the FBI and the DOJ it’s long overdue. A: Katie Hobbs is now being investigated for bribery, fraud conspiracy and racketeering. The Chairman of the Joint Legislative Committee has informed Maricopa County's investigator that the Auditor General will assist in the investigation. This comes after The Arizona Republic detailed how state contractor Sunshine Residential Homes bribed Gov. Katie Hobbs and AZ Democrats with $400,000 and in returns got millions more in state money. "In my capacity as chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, I want you to know that the Auditor General’s Office stands ready to partner with you in getting the facts about this troubling matter. Make no mistake, we will allocate the resources the Auditor General needs to help restore what appears to be a major breach of trust in our government." B: Additionally Arizona State lawmakers are now investigating Katie Hobbs after $339 MILLION "disappeared." As Hobbs's budget director also mysteriously resigns, State Senator Alex Kolodin: "Imagine my shock when the Legislature was informed the State has several insolvent agencies and requires a $339 million bailout to close out the current Fiscal Year. Since your liaisons dedicated to briefing members of the Legislature failed to provide detail on how we got here, I am putting my request in writing: Arizonans deserve to know the details. Why did you mislead the legislature about the spending you intended to approve? In just two weeks' time, I've learned that the problem has worsened and that your office's request is now $350 million.”

Deep Leaks

38,525 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

14,268 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

🚨🚨THERE IS NO QUESTION A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IS BEING RUN IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA BY THE CRIMINAL KATIE HOBBS. Investigation and prosecution by the FBI and the DOJ it’s long overdue. A: Katie Hobbs is now being investigated for bribery, fraud conspiracy and racketeering. The Chairman of the Joint Legislative Committee has informed Maricopa County's investigator that the Auditor General will assist in the investigation. This comes after The Arizona Republic detailed how state contractor Sunshine Residential Homes bribed Gov. Katie Hobbs and AZ Democrats with $400,000 and in returns got millions more in state money. "In my capacity as chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, I want you to know that the Auditor General’s Office stands ready to partner with you in getting the facts about this troubling matter. Make no mistake, we will allocate the resources the Auditor General needs to help restore what appears to be a major breach of trust in our government." B: Additionally Arizona State lawmakers are now investigating Katie Hobbs after $339 MILLION "disappeared." As Hobbs's budget director also mysteriously resigns, State Senator Alex Kolodin: "Imagine my shock when the Legislature was informed the State has several insolvent agencies and requires a $339 million bailout to close out the current Fiscal Year. Since your liaisons dedicated to briefing members of the Legislature failed to provide detail on how we got here, I am putting my request in writing: Arizonans deserve to know the details. Why did you mislead the legislature about the spending you intended to approve? In just two weeks' time, I've learned that the problem has worsened and that your office's request is now $350 million.”

🚨🚨THERE IS NO QUESTION A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IS BEING RUN IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA BY THE CRIMINAL KATIE HOBBS. Investigation and prosecution by the FBI and the DOJ it’s long overdue. A: Katie Hobbs is now being investigated for bribery, fraud conspiracy and racketeering. The Chairman of the Joint Legislative Committee has informed Maricopa County's investigator that the Auditor General will assist in the investigation. This comes after The Arizona Republic detailed how state contractor Sunshine Residential Homes bribed Gov. Katie Hobbs and AZ Democrats with $400,000 and in returns got millions more in state money. "In my capacity as chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, I want you to know that the Auditor General’s Office stands ready to partner with you in getting the facts about this troubling matter. Make no mistake, we will allocate the resources the Auditor General needs to help restore what appears to be a major breach of trust in our government." B: Additionally Arizona State lawmakers are now investigating Katie Hobbs after $339 MILLION "disappeared." As Hobbs's budget director also mysteriously resigns, State Senator Alex Kolodin: "Imagine my shock when the Legislature was informed the State has several insolvent agencies and requires a $339 million bailout to close out the current Fiscal Year. Since your liaisons dedicated to briefing members of the Legislature failed to provide detail on how we got here, I am putting my request in writing: Arizonans deserve to know the details. Why did you mislead the legislature about the spending you intended to approve? In just two weeks' time, I've learned that the problem has worsened and that your office's request is now $350 million.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

2,936,387 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Zack Polanski humiliates Ed Balls and Susanna Reid by calling them out for not talking about actual local election issues, days before the local elections, Zack Polanski, "Someone pretending to be a journalist the leader of a political party having a very strong association with a Labour government that are currently in power" "Is very different to asking me about a story, when I wasn't a politician from 13 years ago that I apologised for repeatedly" "I'm not sure what value your audience are getting from this conversation" Ed Balls, "You didn't finish that sentence. I said asking you about questions about you ten years ago pretending to increase the size of women's breasts" Zack Polanski, "Of which I said I apologised, many times and I stand by my apology" "I'm not sure how many times you want me to say on this program that I apologise for that" "Most of the audience would think, he's apologised for that why are you still talking about it" Susanna Reid, "You said you apologised for it a day later but then a week later said you still believed that" "You can accuse us as much as you like about not asking the questions you want to answer that is your prerogative" "I think it is reasonable to ask you about something back that that is demonstrably untrue. And to ask you when you did actually change your mind" Zack Polanski, "Let me answer that question even though I've already answered it several times over the last few weeks" "I didn't ever believe that. It was a Sun journalists idea. I shouldn't have ever gone along with it. That was a mistake. It was 13 years ago before I became a politician. I stand by that apology" "I also apologised years and years ago, before I became deputy leader of a political party and an elected member of the London Assembly, and then the leader of the Green party" "I've apologised for this over and over again" "What I'm more concerned about right now is that Donald Trump killed 158 girls in Iran and we are calling a special relationship with Donald Trump" "This feels very much like this has been a setup where the Green party haven't been given the opportunity to talk about our actual plans at these local elections" "Of course you're able to ask me questions, of course you're able to scrutinise me, but why not scrutinise me on what's on this election that people are voting for, rather than these silly side stories that don't make a meaningful difference" Susanna Reid, "Don't you think it's unreasonable for you ask you about your integrity about your beliefs, about what you say and whether that is the case or not" "You can be as angry as you like at the media" Zack Polanski, "I'm not angry" Susanna Reid, "You used the phase, that is why people hate the media. That is not the words of someone who is not angry" Zack Polanski, "I'm not angry, this is what I expect some times when I come on your program" "But also speaking to the public, over and over again, they think political discourse in this country has been eroded and debased" "Because far too often we're talking about Westminster bubble stories, or things that are a distraction or gossip" "Apart from the fact that people can't heat their homes, they can't put food on the table, they can't afford the bus to work" "We live in the fifth wealthiest country in the world" "Where the 50 wealthiest families have more wealth than 34 million people" "These are the things we should be talking about"

Zack Polanski humiliates Ed Balls and Susanna Reid by calling them out for not talking about actual local election issues, days before the local elections, Zack Polanski, "Someone pretending to be a journalist the leader of a political party having a very strong association with a Labour government that are currently in power" "Is very different to asking me about a story, when I wasn't a politician from 13 years ago that I apologised for repeatedly" "I'm not sure what value your audience are getting from this conversation" Ed Balls, "You didn't finish that sentence. I said asking you about questions about you ten years ago pretending to increase the size of women's breasts" Zack Polanski, "Of which I said I apologised, many times and I stand by my apology" "I'm not sure how many times you want me to say on this program that I apologise for that" "Most of the audience would think, he's apologised for that why are you still talking about it" Susanna Reid, "You said you apologised for it a day later but then a week later said you still believed that" "You can accuse us as much as you like about not asking the questions you want to answer that is your prerogative" "I think it is reasonable to ask you about something back that that is demonstrably untrue. And to ask you when you did actually change your mind" Zack Polanski, "Let me answer that question even though I've already answered it several times over the last few weeks" "I didn't ever believe that. It was a Sun journalists idea. I shouldn't have ever gone along with it. That was a mistake. It was 13 years ago before I became a politician. I stand by that apology" "I also apologised years and years ago, before I became deputy leader of a political party and an elected member of the London Assembly, and then the leader of the Green party" "I've apologised for this over and over again" "What I'm more concerned about right now is that Donald Trump killed 158 girls in Iran and we are calling a special relationship with Donald Trump" "This feels very much like this has been a setup where the Green party haven't been given the opportunity to talk about our actual plans at these local elections" "Of course you're able to ask me questions, of course you're able to scrutinise me, but why not scrutinise me on what's on this election that people are voting for, rather than these silly side stories that don't make a meaningful difference" Susanna Reid, "Don't you think it's unreasonable for you ask you about your integrity about your beliefs, about what you say and whether that is the case or not" "You can be as angry as you like at the media" Zack Polanski, "I'm not angry" Susanna Reid, "You used the phase, that is why people hate the media. That is not the words of someone who is not angry" Zack Polanski, "I'm not angry, this is what I expect some times when I come on your program" "But also speaking to the public, over and over again, they think political discourse in this country has been eroded and debased" "Because far too often we're talking about Westminster bubble stories, or things that are a distraction or gossip" "Apart from the fact that people can't heat their homes, they can't put food on the table, they can't afford the bus to work" "We live in the fifth wealthiest country in the world" "Where the 50 wealthiest families have more wealth than 34 million people" "These are the things we should be talking about"

Farrukh

34,235 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten