'We don't actually have to worry about this catastrophic doomsday tale that has bee peddled fort he last 60 yeas - it's not true.' Climate Scientist Anika Sweetland explains why her mindset has changed from climate advocate to climate sceptic.

She isnt a climate scientist. She deleted her linkedIn to hide that she isn't one

She is not a climate scientist. If she were, she would know not to repeat nonsense about a “saturation point”. If you were a news station, you would not provide her with a platform to peddle such utter bollocks.

Thank you @GBNEWS @LeeAndersonMP_ & @anika_climate for pointing out facts. Thank god for @reformparty_uk

“When did the penny drop” “Well my day job wasn’t offering me much income and I realised I could earn more money being a climate change denier on the worlds garbage media pretending to drink a beer in front of gullible fools”

What is not true is that she claims to be a "climate scientist" in her X profile. Her BS does not give her that qualification. ClimateBrawl

I'm surprised the Australian government is allowing this to be aired. Western Europe and Canada are doing their best to block X in their countries so stories like this aren't seen by the general public.

She is not a climate scientist. Apparently, just a BS and 0 publications. Then...👇

Just as many have thought. Climate is a scam. There is no climate emergency. More evidence from the experts.

The last ice age lasted 2,6 million years and ended only 11,700 years ago....we are still coming out of that last ice age. Great to see more and more "experts" seeing this climate change hysteria for the total bullocks that it is!

The reason why climate scientists are so dogmatic about global warming is they have a religious like belief that anything mankind does to the planet is evil and corrupt and must be stopped. As a result they miss that there are many good things about global warming. For example desert shrink and Arctic and tundra are turned into livable space for both humans and animals far quicker than the sea levels will rise.

In other words,

@Anika_Climate aka Anika Sweetland is NOT a "climate scientist" as she claims: See thread for evidence:

Disgraceful fake a climate scientist and lies from GB news and Reform. Just what we would expect from you.

Piers Corbyn: "The policies for controlling climate are not actually about controlling climate, they are about controlling you. Making you pay money and pay taxes controlling you to do all sorts of things which is part of a big globalist agenda."

GBNews comes across as amateurish when it peddles nonsense like this. True ‘Alarmism’ is a problem but the "saturation point" claim - that CO2 in the atmosphere is already saturated and adding more won't cause significant further warming - is a longstanding myth that's been debunked by mainstream climate science. It's based on a misunderstanding of how the greenhouse effect works across different atmospheric layers and absorption bands. The effect of CO2 on warming is logarithmic, meaning each additional doubling of CO2 concentration adds a roughly fixed amount of warming (around 3°C per doubling, including feedbacks, per IPCC estimates), but it's not "saturated" at current levels (~420 ppm).

Have you noticed how many 'Climate Scientist's' are waking up to the truth. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN A SCAM

Except, of course, for the rather minor point that she's not a Climate Scientist. Holds no scientific qualification. But why let facts get in the way of ideology, and propaganda, hey @LeeAndersonMP_ ?

Anika Sweetland has a degree in Climate Science, that does not make her a climate scientist. It takes far more to be an expert than getting a degree, ask any graduate!

Sadly not a good take. She isn't a climate scientist, and the Princeton research has been debunked many times. I am a climate sceptic, but to convince others you must use credible arguments and people. Do the research!

She's not a scientist of any kind, much less a climate scientist.

She's not a climate scientist! Her LinkedIn described her as a beauty pageant planner

She's lying for oil money

I don't think anyone should have a monopoly over the truth or over insight into a topic, and don't care much for "credentialism." But it seems misleading to represent Anika Sweetland as a "climate scientist." Check out her bio.

She is not a climate scientist and never was. She is just a Reform grifter.

If Anika Sweetland is a climate scientist then I am a Hollywood movie star. She has no physics qualifications, has done no weather research, published no climate papers nor worked professionally in meteorology.

Trees should be used instead of Ed Miliband's net zero approach

lol "when did the penny drop" "well, government suspiciously didn't seem to be preparing well enough for the coming catastrophe - so it must not be real" oh dear, government is in tow to fossil fuel companies and billionaires - that is why they are not preparing.

Science denial ordered by GB news’ backers. Anderson will do anything for a tenner. Anything.

I have seen a lot of evidence to suggest that Man Made Climate change is a hoax but little actual evidence to back up it's real. Just a lot of people with letters behind their names claiming it is. I'm no scientist so can't say either way but am certainly leaning towards hoax.

She strawmans the climate change argument and then argues against that. Climate change is happening - if not apocalyptic - and needs to be tackled with policies like replacing fossil fuels with clean nuclear power.

40+ years of failed predictions should be enough for anyone.

Great interview it needs shared all over