Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

We don’t need a wealth tax.

15,259 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

28 Comments

Kirk Wilcox's profile picture
Kirk Wilcox18 days ago

Robert Reich lying about tax policy? Must be a day that ends in Y

tender's profile picture
tender17 days ago

and you even steel man their argument by assuming their assumptions on new tax revenue is correct and would hold discounting any behavior changes it still doesn't work

ray's profile picture
ray18 days ago

Hilarious that these creeps' definition of "fair" is "it impacts someone else, not me".

strallweat's profile picture
strallweat17 days ago

Wealth tax is the dumbest thing ever. They're eventually going to start taxing the wealth of everyone. People don't realize that a wealth tax means you pay based on what all your stuff is worth (minus debts,) NOT on income. So you could be someone living on your great grandparents old farm land and make $40k a year, and you're gonna have to pay taxes based on the current value of all your land and buildings etc on it. Not the amount the great grandparents paid for it in 1900 or whatever.

Firearm User Network's profile picture
Firearm User Network18 days ago

Still waiting for anyone to explain how to get the government to use our tax money more efficiently. Giving wasteful fools more money fails to solve money management problems.

Skinner.'s profile picture
Skinner.17 days ago

To enforce an Annual Wealth Tax, the IRS has to determine who is actually above the wealth threshold. That would require appraisals, audits, accountants, lawyers, IRS agents, and valuation disputes. They would have to create a massive bureaucracy that would cost BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY YEAR just to figure out what people owe, before collecting a single dollar in tax. Wealth is tied up in assets not cash, so where does the tax payment come from? They have to liquidate assets (this practice is literally written in the Communist Manifesto) which would then evoke Capital Gains Taxes. So that "5%" Tax then turns to over 15%. And not only that, the value of Assets drops immediately when a Wealth Tax passes. And the best part, all of what I said above is IRRELEVANT because before any of this took place, you would see Capital Flight. So when the wealthy leave, how do you now pay for the Free public college + higher teacher wages, Free childcare and paying stay-at-home parents, a fund to build schools & factories across the country, etc. ? The answer is that WE will have to pay for it. OUR taxes will jump by a lot to be able to afford it. That’s why countries such as Sweden, Denmark, France, and several others quickly abandoned wealth taxes after almost ruining their economies. And now they have the highest income tax rates (not even gonna get into the VAT Taxes as well) to afford their welfare programs. But they also have some of the strictest immigration and border policies to protect those same welfare programs.

Viking Esq.'s profile picture
Viking Esq.18 days ago

The people saying greater tax revenue would help the people have clearly never worked for govt. it’s the most inefficient use of, and biggest waste of money.

John S. Nash's profile picture
John S. Nash18 days ago

Curious as to what was the top 0.1% in the 1950s income was in current dollars and what share of total income did they take versus today?

Dingus McMillan's profile picture
Dingus McMillan17 days ago

The govt is an insatiable, corrupt, grossly inefficient beast. We need reform, not taxation.

Dark Bob's profile picture
Dark Bob17 days ago

Most of a billionaire’s wealth is in stock. A wealth tax would require them to sell huge blocks of shares but with no one to buy those shares ultimately it would crash prices, the stock market and the economy.

AiTuring's profile picture
AiTuring17 days ago

How would even tax unrealised gains, would you force musk to sell stock? That sounds like a terrible idea.

Vasia's profile picture
Vasia17 days ago

I was hoping you would mention Land Value Tax as an alternative. Did you ever have a video on that? It seems like your kinda topic.

George Wert's profile picture
George Wert17 days ago

Great counter points but the substance of their argument is really just "other people have money/status and I want it"

Jason's profile picture
Jason17 days ago

Elon musk might have 20 million dollars liquid and can’t be taxed based on the price of a car or something like that

uninspected's profile picture
uninspected17 days ago

Wealth tax, to the economically illiterate - read that as Democrats - would take productive capital out of the economy and give it to government bureaucrats who would use it for counterproductive programs, waste, and their own corruption. This would make life worse for everyone.

JeffJongsma's profile picture
JeffJongsma17 days ago

Robert Reich is as smart as he is tall (Seriously though, look up how tall he is)

Johns Island's profile picture
Johns Island17 days ago

Private property/wealth should be considered sacred. Off limits.

Alex 🍊🍊🍊🍊🍦🐄's profile picture
Alex 🍊🍊🍊🍊🍦🐄18 days ago

Well done, ty

Ranch Rhubarb's profile picture
Ranch Rhubarb16 days ago

Robert Reich is a commie goblin

Jason Newton's profile picture
Jason Newton18 days ago

correct, it's related why the california train can't get built

Vu1c3n's profile picture
Vu1c3n18 days ago

I always enjoy your analysis and communication. You have have me appreciate our economy more.

the policy wonka's profile picture
the policy wonka18 days ago

Great post man

Bread Fred's profile picture
Bread Fred16 days ago

Good stuff. Easy to understand.

Sake Nigiri's profile picture
Sake Nigiri17 days ago

Great video. My hunch is that even if a wealth tax is limited to billionaires that it would still overall harm ordinary people indirectly. Might be hard to make that point with a short video, though.

Carne Asada Corso's profile picture
Carne Asada Corso18 days ago

Taxation is theft.

Hermes Quad-Megistus's profile picture
Hermes Quad-Megistus17 days ago

Yep. Taxation is theft

Faraday Capital's profile picture
Faraday Capital18 days ago

Great post like usual.

LightKnight's profile picture
LightKnight16 days ago

Dude, it's just liberal economics. A lower income bracket, when more wealthy, means that the entire country progresses faster in development, in ALL areas. We DO need to trim the knees off these giga wealthy If you don't, them things are going to end up one way you don't want.

Related Videos