Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We gave Grok 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol the exact same prompt and compared the outputs side by side. The task: generate a fully interactive HTML5 glass bridge simulation with realistic physics, structural failure, cinematic visuals, polished UI, and smooth animations. The difference is actually visible.

EntelligenceAI's profile picture

Entelligence AI

2,316 subscribers

71,177 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiEğitimSanat
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓
0:13

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓

Kiki

21,329 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Grok 4.5 performed GPT Sol level for free! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: -robot deathmatch, Tombstone vs Minotaur -a hydraulic press flattening stuff on a conveyor -a semi truck jumping a canyon Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol: 12.9K tokens, $0.51 (~7 min) Grok 4.5: 10.8K tokens, $0 (~5 min) Muse Spark 1.1: 26.8K tokens, $0.12 (~7.5 min) GLM 5.2: 10.9K tokens, $0.02 (~12 min) Grok 4.5 handled all three scenes genuinely well and got surprisingly close to GPT-5.6 this round. On top of that, it ran on the free tier. GPT-5.6 Sol, the frontier model, put out solid but not standout work. GLM 5.2 rendered all three scenes for pennies, but it came out the roughest of the four. Meta's new Muse Spark burned the most tokens yet still stayed cheap, delivering an average result.
0:18

Grok 4.5 performed GPT Sol level for free! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: -robot deathmatch, Tombstone vs Minotaur -a hydraulic press flattening stuff on a conveyor -a semi truck jumping a canyon Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol: 12.9K tokens, $0.51 (~7 min) Grok 4.5: 10.8K tokens, $0 (~5 min) Muse Spark 1.1: 26.8K tokens, $0.12 (~7.5 min) GLM 5.2: 10.9K tokens, $0.02 (~12 min) Grok 4.5 handled all three scenes genuinely well and got surprisingly close to GPT-5.6 this round. On top of that, it ran on the free tier. GPT-5.6 Sol, the frontier model, put out solid but not standout work. GLM 5.2 rendered all three scenes for pennies, but it came out the roughest of the four. Meta's new Muse Spark burned the most tokens yet still stayed cheap, delivering an average result.

atomic.chat

70,490 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle the same brief. Outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:15

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle the same brief. Outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

28,435 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Can you tell the difference? I tested the exact same prompt, same scene, and identical luxury perfume commercial in Seedance 2.0 4k on EaseMate AI_Official , comparing 4K and 1080p output. From the Mediterranean lighting and glass reflections to skin texture and cinematic depth of field, the difference is clear when viewed side by side. Which version would you choose for your next commercial—4K or 1080p? 👇 Prompt in the comments.
0:15

Can you tell the difference? I tested the exact same prompt, same scene, and identical luxury perfume commercial in Seedance 2.0 4k on EaseMate AI_Official , comparing 4K and 1080p output. From the Mediterranean lighting and glass reflections to skin texture and cinematic depth of field, the difference is clear when viewed side by side. Which version would you choose for your next commercial—4K or 1080p? 👇 Prompt in the comments.

Jessica Collins

468,098 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I gave the same prompt to Kimi K3 Max and GPT 5.6 SOL Ultra to create a 3D castle GPT 5.6 SOL Ultra is clearly better here, but I am also really impressed with the Kimi K3 as well Anthropic gotta reset the limits again lol
0:15

I gave the same prompt to Kimi K3 Max and GPT 5.6 SOL Ultra to create a 3D castle GPT 5.6 SOL Ultra is clearly better here, but I am also really impressed with the Kimi K3 as well Anthropic gotta reset the limits again lol

fardeen

35,594 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

AI can generate beautiful game worlds now. But a world is not a game. I tested Kimi K3 in Verdent against GPT-5.6 using the exact same prompt. One created a scene. K3 added real enemies, working combat, and something I could actually play. Watch the difference 🧵
0:17

AI can generate beautiful game worlds now. But a world is not a game. I tested Kimi K3 in Verdent against GPT-5.6 using the exact same prompt. One created a scene. K3 added real enemies, working combat, and something I could actually play. Watch the difference 🧵

Darshal Jaitwar

80,428 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

GPT image 2.0 combined with Seedance 2.0 is changing how animated videos are created. With a single prompt like the one below , AI can generate an entire storyboard and turn it into a cinematic 2D animation, complete with expressive characters, smooth motion, realistic physics, comedy, and perfectly timed action.
0:15

GPT image 2.0 combined with Seedance 2.0 is changing how animated videos are created. With a single prompt like the one below , AI can generate an entire storyboard and turn it into a cinematic 2D animation, complete with expressive characters, smooth motion, realistic physics, comedy, and perfectly timed action.

FATHELA ESQ

47,447 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Seedance 2.5 is officially available on CapCut. To test it, I used the same cinematic prompt in Seedance 2.5 and Seedance 2.0 and compared the results side by side. With support for up to 30-second generation, 50 reference materials, infinite scene extension, and frame-precise editing, Seedance 2.5 gives creators much more control over complex cinematic videos. Same prompt. Same settings. Watch both generations and see how they compare in prompt accuracy, motion quality, and cinematic consistency.
0:15

Seedance 2.5 is officially available on CapCut. To test it, I used the same cinematic prompt in Seedance 2.5 and Seedance 2.0 and compared the results side by side. With support for up to 30-second generation, 50 reference materials, infinite scene extension, and frame-precise editing, Seedance 2.5 gives creators much more control over complex cinematic videos. Same prompt. Same settings. Watch both generations and see how they compare in prompt accuracy, motion quality, and cinematic consistency.

Zara

24,291 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

I didn’t expect Grok’s video model to improve this much. Today, when I was generating a video with Seedance 2.0, I found the results weren’t very good. So I tried using the exact same source material and prompt in Grok instead. To my surprise, Grok actually produced better results than Seedance 2.0. I’ve put the prompt and source material in the comments, so if you’re interested, you can give it a try too. The left side shows the video generated by Grok, and the right side shows the video generated by Seedance 2.0.
0:10

I didn’t expect Grok’s video model to improve this much. Today, when I was generating a video with Seedance 2.0, I found the results weren’t very good. So I tried using the exact same source material and prompt in Grok instead. To my surprise, Grok actually produced better results than Seedance 2.0. I’ve put the prompt and source material in the comments, so if you’re interested, you can give it a try too. The left side shows the video generated by Grok, and the right side shows the video generated by Seedance 2.0.

underwood

34,518 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

1. Realistic Physics Game (Hexagon Test) Prompt: Create a HTML, CSS, and javascript where a ball is inside a rotating hexagon. The ball is affected by Earth’s gravity and friction from the hexagon walls. The bouncing must appear realistic. → Tests physics simulation, code planning, and visual realism.
0:13

1. Realistic Physics Game (Hexagon Test) Prompt: Create a HTML, CSS, and javascript where a ball is inside a rotating hexagon. The ball is affected by Earth’s gravity and friction from the hexagon walls. The bouncing must appear realistic. → Tests physics simulation, code planning, and visual realism.

Alex Prompter

888,311 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Most benchmarks just give you a number on a chart. We made one where you judge the actual work side-by-side. Here's Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on a mix of design, writing, and creative work. Try Hyperbench and choose your winner:
0:17

Most benchmarks just give you a number on a chart. We made one where you judge the actual work side-by-side. Here's Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on a mix of design, writing, and creative work. Try Hyperbench and choose your winner:

Hyperagent

124,112 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a realistic cloth simulation using HTML5 Canvas and JavaScript. The cloth should be a grid of points connected by constraints using Verlet integration. Implement gravity and mouse interaction: the user should be able to click and drag particles to tear the cloth. The physics must remain stable without exploding.
0:13

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a realistic cloth simulation using HTML5 Canvas and JavaScript. The cloth should be a grid of points connected by constraints using Verlet integration. Implement gravity and mouse interaction: the user should be able to click and drag particles to tear the cloth. The physics must remain stable without exploding.

God of Prompt

96,685 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The gap between “here’s the design” and “here’s the working app” is getting very small. Grok 4.6 took #1 on the VISTA leaderboard, beating Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. It has to look at a real Figma design, figure out the structure, recreate the visuals, and build the functioning app from it. And it finished the benchmark at roughly $2.38 per task. That’s the kind of shortcut builders actually care about. Grok SpaceXAI / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné
0:15

The gap between “here’s the design” and “here’s the working app” is getting very small. Grok 4.6 took #1 on the VISTA leaderboard, beating Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. It has to look at a real Figma design, figure out the structure, recreate the visuals, and build the functioning app from it. And it finished the benchmark at roughly $2.38 per task. That’s the kind of shortcut builders actually care about. Grok SpaceXAI / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

58,791 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

We put grok 4.5 and opus 4.8 head to head on the same browser task, on Hyperbrowser Sandboxes. We then asked it to open a page in a real sandboxed browser and pull the title. Grok build on Grok 4.5, Claude code on Opus 4.8, identical setup. Grok 4.5 came out ahead ↓
0:16

We put grok 4.5 and opus 4.8 head to head on the same browser task, on Hyperbrowser Sandboxes. We then asked it to open a page in a real sandboxed browser and pull the title. Grok build on Grok 4.5, Claude code on Opus 4.8, identical setup. Grok 4.5 came out ahead ↓

Hyperbrowser

400,136 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

this is f**king dangerous someone ran GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 side by side. same prompt. same task. one shot each. both nailed it first try. Sol just finished faster. nobody expected that. Fable 5 was supposed to dominate long reasoning without competition. you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit save and bookmark it no matter what
0:15

this is f**king dangerous someone ran GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 side by side. same prompt. same task. one shot each. both nailed it first try. Sol just finished faster. nobody expected that. Fable 5 was supposed to dominate long reasoning without competition. you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit save and bookmark it no matter what

Khairallah AL-Awady

686,584 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Player stats UI animation with GPT Image 2 and MiniMax H3. This model is amazing for UI animations. Give GPT Image 2 your character image and ask it to create a stats UI. Then use that UI as a reference for MiniMax H3. You can check the prompt in the replies.
0:15

Player stats UI animation with GPT Image 2 and MiniMax H3. This model is amazing for UI animations. Give GPT Image 2 your character image and ask it to create a stats UI. Then use that UI as a reference for MiniMax H3. You can check the prompt in the replies.

Kōda

40,507 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

GPT Image 2.0 + Seedance 2.0 is a powerful combo for game scene creation. Generate the character UI, loading screen, HUD, and cinematic gameplay look with GPT Image 2.0, then use Seedance 2.0 to turn it into a smooth one-shot game demo video.
0:15

GPT Image 2.0 + Seedance 2.0 is a powerful combo for game scene creation. Generate the character UI, loading screen, HUD, and cinematic gameplay look with GPT Image 2.0, then use Seedance 2.0 to turn it into a smooth one-shot game demo video.

BudgetPixel AI

730,287 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

1. Generate UI with gpt-image-2 2. Generate a normal map from the image 3. Dynamic lighting for UI components - raised elements actually cast shadows and get lit naturally.
0:13

1. Generate UI with gpt-image-2 2. Generate a normal map from the image 3. Dynamic lighting for UI components - raised elements actually cast shadows and get lit naturally.

Jacob Miller

57,203 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Sol is seriously impressive. I used it to create the prompt for this Peking Opera video. It did a great job capturing the cultural elements and visual language. Prompt below ⤵️
0:15

GPT-5.6 Sol is seriously impressive. I used it to create the prompt for this Peking Opera video. It did a great job capturing the cultural elements and visual language. Prompt below ⤵️

Kiki

31,048 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4
0:13

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4

GMI Cloud

24,606 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce