We got DEWs that can shoot ICBMs down in seconds.

I give our Military Industrial Cocaine and Prostitution Complex provided systems a C. Iron Dome gets a C-. Big NOT Secret hiding in Plain Site. All US CONUS land based legacy ICBM Systems are not for attack; that's just the propaganda Gambit. The USAF legacy ICBM system in CONUS is a Defense System only. The US Ground based missile only travel to the Ionosphere to Excite the LOWER HYBRID FREQUENCY of the Ionosphere to produce a Thermonuclear region that last for hours. Several Nukes detonated in Ionosphere provide a intense Ionization zone that has a High Level of static X-Ray domains. These ionized regions of space are impenetrable to all conventional technology. These system ground and destroy Batteries in space vehicles. We have full capabilities to defend against all conventional ICBMS. My uncle Bernie developed the Ionospheric layer Lower Hybrid Frequency Excitation Anti-Missile system, and Captain Kirk narrated a movie about Uncle Bernie's programs. The documentary is on Youtube. In the Documentary, Captain Kirk clearly tells you, an American, Dr. Robert Goodard invented the Fuel Mixing Reactionary Propellant Rocket, not NAZIs. You'll find out this in 50 years. We have Nukes already in China. Dozens & Dozens.

I worked on the modeling and simulation of that system during the early 1980’s.

Our hottest launch of 2024 is here! 🔥 Who will take up the challenge of aerial duels? 🛩️ "Warhammer 40,000: Dakka Squadron" is available now on the Nintendo eShop! More info:

He just said China does, USA doesnt.. 😑

Steven Kwast mentions China. But after listening to @DrStevenGreer’s interview with Jesse Michels about the cabal and the urgency of disclosing suppressed technology, it’s clear something big is being withheld. Greer points out a critical flaw in the system: the people in power who could act often don’t understand the technology—and when they’re briefed, they’re only told fragments or the fear-based side of it. @JustXAshton is helping bridge that gap—breaking down the tech in a way that makes it real, understandable, and impossible to ignore. Steven Kwast echoes this call, and when you factor in the geopolitical shifts and our growing global need for a new energy paradigm, it all starts to align. What really pulled it all together for me was reading The End of the World Is Just the Beginning. The book outlines the collapse of global birth rates and how that decline will directly impact everything—including the workforce, supply chains, and energy production. The old systems simply won’t sustain the future we’re heading toward. It’s becoming clear: we’re approaching a moment of disclosure. The question is no longer if—it’s whether we’re prepared to understand and act on what’s coming.

And much much more.... 🛸🛸🛸

Less 'shoot down' and more turn to dust.

Again, who is "WE", dear Ashton? I am afraid your cheerleading followers seem not to be capable of the necessary critical, differentiating, nuanced, & non-native thinking.

Why can,nt we

I remember as an '80s kid during the cold war, Social Studies teachers would remind us that "there's never been a weapon created that's not ever been used". We used to think nukes were inevitable. 40 years later, @JustXAshton proves via MH370 nukes are least of our worries