Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

We had multiple cases on league twitter debating whether the auto-report system works or not. Agurin's 1 week for spamming pink wards, or the game termination on Mentoss his smurf acc (pink wards aswell). As a few examples. It seems Riot games only sees not ''playing to win'' wasting...

10,260 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My reaction at the Major League Soccer suspension of Lionel Messi (and Jordi Alba) for not participating in the MLS All-Star Game tonight The league's policy for opting to not participate in the All-Star Game is a one game suspension. So, CHANGE THE RULE! This is why it doesn't make sense: MLS copies the All-Star model from the NBA/NFL, but football has a different physical demand and limited subs — no top league in the world does this mid-season friendly. With growing concern over player health and fixture congestion, why prioritize a commercial event over actual league competition? Messi skipping the All-Star Game to manage his fitness shouldn't lead to suspension — it punishes a player trying to perform at his best for the league. Suspending players for missing All-Star sends the message that marketing is more important than the competition itself. This damages MLS’s credibility as a serious league and discourages other stars considering a move — the opposite of what the “Messi effect” started. Inter Miami, under intense global pressure, played 5 games in 15 days, something MLS itself acknowledged. A suspension feels more like punishment than protection. Even US leagues are questioning the All-Star Game's relevance — and no major football league worldwide does anything like it. The irony: in the same game Messi is suspended from, Inter Miami and Adidas planned to launch a new kit with him as the face — and now lose that moment.

Guillem Balague

204,175 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One criticism I always see towards games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Grand Theft Auto VI recently is the topic of small details. "Why does a game need so many details, it doesn't make the experience any better and takes longer to develop" While I do agree with the fact that Rockstar Games development schedules in between each release keep getting longer, the fact is that when you aim for such a high level of realism in a video-game, its not about graphics anymore, its about immersion. I'm sure that if you played RDR2, you know that your horse sweating or its balls shrinking in the cold don't add much to the gameplay itself, but it makes the game feel like its real. This is precisely what sets apart Rockstar Games from other game studios, the level of immersion you get in those games is unbeaten. RDR2, a game designed for the PS4 console has a level of fluidity and immersion that I have yet to see in a video-game from any other game studio, each game mechanic seems to work flawlessly that it feels like a living and breathing open world game. Hell, sometimes you feel bad for shooting an NPC which never happened to me in a video-game before. When you're playing it, hours can go by and you don't even. In other open-world games, sometimes you can notice limitations, for example the same NPCs appearing in one object or the same scripted conversations. RDR2 manages to make that gap of a video-game and reality feel thinner, not get rid of it entirely of course. Making such a massive game filled with tons of details means that it can be can be played for multiple years after its release and not feel outdated. Its not all about details of course, when a game takes so long to develop, the stakes get higher each time and Rockstar Games has to make sure that they deliver on the story that is being told too, hence the reason why their games have always been historically good in terms of writing. Now to address the elephant int he room, the main issue is that as the complexity increases for each new release and optimizing all of these systems to work in tandem, the development time increases and we get longer periods of waiting. Is all of this worth it? In my opinion, yes. Its Rockstar Games after all, they have the budget necessary and the talent to achieve this kind of feat. Not only does it raise the bar for what is possible to do in a video-game, but it also is highly rewarding when you play the game for the first time and its unlike anything you've seen these past couple of years. When I finished playing Red Dead Redemption 2 for the first time, every new game that came out felt outdated for me. Just as technology keeps going forward, the same applies here with open world games too. What are your thoughts on this topic?

NikTek

22,051 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen