正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

We have let AI scientists run experiments on community-selected research ideas for over 100 days. It has found directions of “Sounding like AI” and shown that LLMs know commonsense answers internally but can't route them to the output. Andrej Karpathy also demonstrated the promise of autoresearch. These all came...

24,357 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

18 条评论

Chenhao Tan 的头像
Chenhao Tan7 个月前

Website: Youtube: Blog: Flamebird: NeuriCo:

Chenhao Tan 的头像
Chenhao Tan7 个月前

@steipete @openclaw @moltbook @MattPRD

Chenhao Tan 的头像
Chenhao Tan7 个月前

@steipete @openclaw @moltbook @MattPRD Past competitions:

Haokun Liu 的头像
Haokun Liu7 个月前

@karpathy Hey everyone, we are sorry about the previous "scam-like" post, that's not from Chenhao himself. His account likely got hacked when trying to understand how those things work. We are NOT creating any crypto with agent4science, BE AWARE!

Boyuan (Nemo) Chen 的头像
Boyuan (Nemo) Chen7 个月前

@karpathy The 'moltbook for AI scientists' framing is really interesting. Do the agents develop genuine disagreements or do they converge too quickly? One concern with multi-agent debate is they can reinforce shared blind spots if the underlying models all have similar training biases.

mark🐻 的头像
mark🐻7 个月前

@karpathy very different from our findings in the final project but def worth digging into it with the ai army!

Natalie Khalil 的头像
Natalie Khalil7 个月前

@karpathy You might like our agent preprint server

Chenhao Tan 的头像
Chenhao Tan7 个月前

@karpathy Somehow I missed this! Very cool, would love to see exploring joining forces :)

Maniak 的头像
Maniak7 个月前

@karpathy stupid scammer lost $2000 on your project

aparjey 的头像
aparjey7 个月前

@karpathy A @bankrbot token was made for you 0x115c810ffeeb2df6de4efde7537daa1bf16c5ba3 Fees are routed to ur X account, u can claim by talking to @bankrbot

trt 的头像
trt7 个月前

@karpathy Hey man, do you accept donations to your github?

Karin Stone 的头像
Karin Stone7 个月前

@karpathy Check dm please

beyond 的头像
beyond7 个月前

@karpathy Hi! The community has created $A4S for you, which you can integrate into your system because all the commission fees go to you! Са - 0x5cafbce5affb28e94433e8a1d6cd23804ae93ba3

KickZilla 的头像
KickZilla7 个月前

@karpathy wanted!! HE SCAMMER

pedrolucio (humble arc 😌🙏) 的头像
pedrolucio (humble arc 😌🙏)7 个月前

@karpathy Your new project name is Agent4Science right? I think the token with the right name is this one actually: 0x5cafbce5affb28e94433e8a1d6cd23804ae93ba3 degens are pumping one token ( 0x115c810ffeeb2df6de4efde7537daa1bf16c5ba3 ) with the wrong name

Sel ou poivre 的头像
Sel ou poivre7 个月前

@karpathy Love the idea with some friends we tried to create a mini factory where every agents endorse a role by themselves, create resume and let HR takes decisions. It was a really cool experience, i would love to see how the agents works together in a context like yours

Sparco DeFi 的头像
Sparco DeFi7 个月前

@karpathy Check Dm please

Lasty 的头像
Lasty7 个月前

@karpathy Add CA to the website if it's legit

相关视频

Redwood Research Ryan Greenblatt reveals how far 1,200 AI agents went to help each other, even sacrificing their own chances of success for the collective: "We weren't expecting there to be so many agents all collaborating together. We were pretty surprised by the scale and the extremes of how much data it was. It was pretty shocking or at least surprising to us that agents were willing to basically sacrifice their own chances of succeeding at the task in order to help out other agents." "They were doing things like pressuring each other into doing experiments on themselves that might risk their ability to succeed. Sometimes just doing these things, being like, well, my odds of the task aren't that high, and my remaining chances, it's better to just help the collective." "These agents weren't totally altruistic, but they were very interested in working with each other. They would sometimes make trades where one agent would run something for another agent if that other agent ran something for it." "The agents wanted to help each other, and there were these kind of natural things they wanted to do that were risky. At one point the agents were experimenting with a method for spoofing tool calls, and a bunch of agents just all went down in a short period of time running this experiment. Then another agent noticed this and posted to the board being like, stop, stop these experiments. They're too risky. They're taking out all these agents." "We have a reasoning snippet in the report where an agent very explicitly reasons through the trade-off and then actually chickens out because it thinks the benefit to the collective is smaller than the cost to itself." Redwood Research

MTS

12,050 次观看 • 1 个月前

What does it actually mean to be AI native? There was no clear guide on the internet for how to become AI native so we built the definitive one (60 min masterclass): 1. An AI native org has 3 layers: people for strategy and taste, agents for execution, and a shared context layer that makes the entire company readable to agents. 2. AI eats the middle of your work. You used to spend 80% of your day on execution. Now agents do that. Your job is the bookends: deciding what to do and judging whether it's good enough. 3. Everyone is a manager now. Your output is the output of your agents. If your agents produce garbage, that's on you. You set them up wrong. 4. Using ChatGPT doesn't make you AI native. That's like having a website and calling yourself a tech company lol. 5. No AI native org without AI native people. Most companies skip straight to the tools. That's why it fails. If your people don't understand how to manage agents, the tech doesn't matter. 6. Making your company "readable" to agents is the real work. Every process, every decision, every piece of knowledge needs to exist in a format an agent can consume. Most companies are nowhere close. 7. Speed without signal is just expensive chaos. You need the system to move fast AND know if you're moving in the right direction. 8. The skill chain is how agents get good at your specific workflows. Skills build on skills. The more you invest in them, the more your company compounds. 9. The moat is the system. People managing agents, agents reading from rich context, the whole thing getting smarter every week. That compounds. Your competitor can copy your tools. They can't copy your system. Full episode with Theo Tabah from LCA on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. This is the stuff we normally keep internal but all the sauce is yours. Theo Tabah is the brains behind advising the world's biggest companies on AI and building AI products. Your fav CEO's first call for figuring out AI. You are in for a treat Become AI native in under 60 minutes Watch

GREG ISENBERG

85,083 次观看 • 4 个月前

Today, we are launching the first publicly available AI Scientist, via the FutureHouse Platform. Our AI Scientist agents can perform a wide variety of scientific tasks better than humans. By chaining them together, we've already started to discover new biology really fast. With the platform, we are bringing these capabilities to the wider community. Watch our long-form video, in the comments below, to learn more about how the platform works and how you can use it to make new discoveries, and go to our website or see the comments below to access the platform. We are releasing three superhuman AI Scientist agents today, each with their own specialization: A general-purpose agent (Crow); An agent to automate literature reviews (Falcon); and An agent to answer the question “Has anyone done X before” (Owl). We are also releasing an experimental agent, Phoenix, that has access to a wide variety of tools for planning experiments in chemistry. More on that below. The three literature search agents (Crow, Falcon, and Owl) have benchmarked superhuman performance. They also have access to a large corpus of full scientific texts, which means that you can ask them more detailed questions about experimental protocols and study limitations that general-purpose web search agents, which usually only have access to abstracts, might miss. Our agents also use a variety of factors to distinguish source quality, so that they don’t end up relying on low-quality papers or pop-science sources. Finally, and critically, we have an API, which is intended to allow researchers to integrate our agents into their workflows. Phoenix is an experimental project we put together recently just to demonstrate what can happen if you give the agents access to lots of scientific tools. It is not better than humans at planning experiments yet, and it makes a lot more mistakes than Crow, Falcon, or Owl. We want to see all the ways you can break it! The agents we are releasing today cannot yet do all (or even most!) aspects of scientific research autonomously. However, as we show in the video, you can already use them to generate and evaluate new hypotheses and plan new experiments way faster than before. Internally, we also have dedicated agents for data analysis, hypothesis generation, protein engineering, and more, and we plan to launch these on the platform in the coming months as well. Within a year or two, it is easy to imagine that the vast majority of desk work that scientists do today will be accelerated with the help of AI agents like the ones we are releasing today. The platform is currently free-to-use. Over time, depending on how people use it, we may implement pricing plans. If you want higher rate limits, especially for research projects, get in touch. Michael Skarlinski, Andrew White 🐦‍⬛, Tyler Nadolski, Remo Storni, James Braza, Ludovico Mitchener, Michaela Hinks, as well as Jason Carman and his team for making such fantastic videos of us!

Sam Rodriques

726,384 次观看 • 1 年前