正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

we just added support for bip-360 (p2mr) address, still in draft but soon. possibly the first wallet in the world to ship a quantum-ready address. bc1z is a segwit v2 output defined in bip-360. p2mr stands for pay to merkle root. unlike taproot, it commits only to a script-tree...

ohyishi's profile picture

Yishi

93,656 subscribers

37,634 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is a game changer for New South Wales. We regard the spend on public education in New South Wales not as a cost to the budget, but an investment in the future. And the dividend will live on for a long time.
1:27

This is a game changer for New South Wales. We regard the spend on public education in New South Wales not as a cost to the budget, but an investment in the future. And the dividend will live on for a long time.

Chris Minns

12,841 次观看 • 1 年前

We have police presence in key and strategic locations across the city. The use of temporary structures is not new in policing, it is a common practice worldwide to enhance visibility, response, and public safety.
1:23

We have police presence in key and strategic locations across the city. The use of temporary structures is not new in policing, it is a common practice worldwide to enhance visibility, response, and public safety.

Uganda Police Force

14,673 次观看 • 5 个月前

How email recovery is verified on the network: A new SMTP gateway forwards an email to a canister, which checks the DKIM signature that email servers already attach. To get the public key it uses a root of trust: DNSSEC where supported, or DNS over HTTP via an HTTPS outcall. The gateway is not trusted. The canister does the verification. Set it up at
4:03

How email recovery is verified on the network: A new SMTP gateway forwards an email to a canister, which checks the DKIM signature that email servers already attach. To get the public key it uses a root of trust: DNSSEC where supported, or DNS over HTTP via an HTTPS outcall. The gateway is not trusted. The canister does the verification. Set it up at

DFINITY Foundation

12,867 次观看 • 1 个月前

🔥 Fergus Ewing: ‘I’ve always believed the buck stops at the top, and the top person in every public body in Scotland is still a servant of the public’. STILL, the Chief Constable ‘does not deem it appropriate to meet with me’. Cheers Police Scotland!!
0:15

🔥 Fergus Ewing: ‘I’ve always believed the buck stops at the top, and the top person in every public body in Scotland is still a servant of the public’. STILL, the Chief Constable ‘does not deem it appropriate to meet with me’. Cheers Police Scotland!!

Jules Rose 💜

52,241 次观看 • 1 年前

A Better Model of Health One in which we take responsibility for ourselves Where there is a logical output given an input Where you’re not scared of someone coughing near you or touching a public handrail What makes you sick is not what you think… And even then - being sick is a healing process to support, not something to discourage. Your body is a divine system that is always healing itself All you need to do is give it the right inputs and take control of your environment - the body will do the rest.
1:08

A Better Model of Health One in which we take responsibility for ourselves Where there is a logical output given an input Where you’re not scared of someone coughing near you or touching a public handrail What makes you sick is not what you think… And even then - being sick is a healing process to support, not something to discourage. Your body is a divine system that is always healing itself All you need to do is give it the right inputs and take control of your environment - the body will do the rest.

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

13,136 次观看 • 11 个月前

The first Americans exposed to hantavirus arrived in the U.S. following a cruise ship outbreak and are now being monitored at isolation facilities. People have a lot of questions about how safe the public is from the virus — and whether it could turn into another global pandemic. But health officials say this virus is not like COVID, and experts say the risk to the public remains low. Here’s what to know about the hantavirus outbreak and what it means for the public, in 60 seconds.
1:20

The first Americans exposed to hantavirus arrived in the U.S. following a cruise ship outbreak and are now being monitored at isolation facilities. People have a lot of questions about how safe the public is from the virus — and whether it could turn into another global pandemic. But health officials say this virus is not like COVID, and experts say the risk to the public remains low. Here’s what to know about the hantavirus outbreak and what it means for the public, in 60 seconds.

TIME

43,484 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇦 Zelensky called on the world community to change the regime in Russia, otherwise “Russia will attack the rest of the world.” If the world community does not demand regime change in Russia, it means that even after the war is over, Moscow will continue to try to destabilize neighboring states. It will continue to spend huge amounts of money, resources - perhaps even lives - on this. One of Putin’s key ideas, which has now become mainstream in Russian society, is that Russia has no borders where it does not want to recognize them.
0:44

🇺🇦 Zelensky called on the world community to change the regime in Russia, otherwise “Russia will attack the rest of the world.” If the world community does not demand regime change in Russia, it means that even after the war is over, Moscow will continue to try to destabilize neighboring states. It will continue to spend huge amounts of money, resources - perhaps even lives - on this. One of Putin’s key ideas, which has now become mainstream in Russian society, is that Russia has no borders where it does not want to recognize them.

S p r i n t e r

36,916 次观看 • 1 年前

Another good one for Justice Sila on land titles: If you have bought or deal in land, watch 👇🏽this. It’s not the TITLE DEED that matters, it’s the ROOT OF TITLE that matters. 1.We have become so corrupt that the courts have concluded that we can no longer rely on what is at the lands registry to know who owns the land, we have to go to the root of title. 2.Basically, what is in the land registry is valid, only to the extent there is no dispute on the title. The moment there is a dispute, and there is more than one title, then the registry ceases to have conclusive meaning. We then have to dig into the root of that title. Basically go back in time and see where the title originated from, how it has changed hands overtime to its current claim. Anyone who bought fraudulent land in the process is screwed because they bought fraud not land, even if they did a search at the registry. It does even matter which land was registered first. is supposed to make sense. When fraud is so prevalent, and even originates from the very people supposed to protect us, such as land registry staff, then the law must evolve to protect the public. Root of title is going to protect the public from its corrupt self. Sometimes a mad man is restrained to avoid self harm. 4.And the Good Judge has explained that it does NOT replace the Torrens system, it clarifies Torrens in that when there are two tiles, its Torrens itself that begins to search for the root of title it had all along assumed to be conclusive. Hence there is no conflict between the Stanchart Manchester vs Dina Management cases.
7:51

Another good one for Justice Sila on land titles: If you have bought or deal in land, watch 👇🏽this. It’s not the TITLE DEED that matters, it’s the ROOT OF TITLE that matters. 1.We have become so corrupt that the courts have concluded that we can no longer rely on what is at the lands registry to know who owns the land, we have to go to the root of title. 2.Basically, what is in the land registry is valid, only to the extent there is no dispute on the title. The moment there is a dispute, and there is more than one title, then the registry ceases to have conclusive meaning. We then have to dig into the root of that title. Basically go back in time and see where the title originated from, how it has changed hands overtime to its current claim. Anyone who bought fraudulent land in the process is screwed because they bought fraud not land, even if they did a search at the registry. It does even matter which land was registered first. is supposed to make sense. When fraud is so prevalent, and even originates from the very people supposed to protect us, such as land registry staff, then the law must evolve to protect the public. Root of title is going to protect the public from its corrupt self. Sometimes a mad man is restrained to avoid self harm. 4.And the Good Judge has explained that it does NOT replace the Torrens system, it clarifies Torrens in that when there are two tiles, its Torrens itself that begins to search for the root of title it had all along assumed to be conclusive. Hence there is no conflict between the Stanchart Manchester vs Dina Management cases.

Edwin H. Dande

24,241 次观看 • 6 个月前

There is no difference, for example, between a French politician running for public office in America to advance the interests of France and a Muslim politician running for public office in America, because the Muslim candidate will be serving the causes of the Islamic state. Islam is not only a religion; Islam is a state that has a population, a constitution, and a foreign policy doctrine. This state does not have a territory because its territory is the entire world.
1:33

There is no difference, for example, between a French politician running for public office in America to advance the interests of France and a Muslim politician running for public office in America, because the Muslim candidate will be serving the causes of the Islamic state. Islam is not only a religion; Islam is a state that has a population, a constitution, and a foreign policy doctrine. This state does not have a territory because its territory is the entire world.

Dan Burmawi

29,296 次观看 • 22 天前

🔑With technology as the key, uncover Hainan's past and future. Hainan Science and Technology Museum officially opened to the public on April 29! It is undoubtedly a unique highlight of tourism in Haikou!
1:40

🔑With technology as the key, uncover Hainan's past and future. Hainan Science and Technology Museum officially opened to the public on April 29! It is undoubtedly a unique highlight of tourism in Haikou!

Explore Haikou

65,519 次观看 • 2 个月前

If the DDS cult is obsessed what’s in PBBM’s hair follicle, it’s only fair we find out what’s inside Sara Duterte’s head. It is our right to demand Sara’s long-overdue psychiatric evaluation. Between the epic public meltdowns and the casual "unalive" threats against the nation's top leaders, it’s clear Sara is not just bastos at balahura — we are dealing with a textbook case of clinical instability and a dangerous propensity for violence that belongs in a ward, not a public office.
0:55

If the DDS cult is obsessed what’s in PBBM’s hair follicle, it’s only fair we find out what’s inside Sara Duterte’s head. It is our right to demand Sara’s long-overdue psychiatric evaluation. Between the epic public meltdowns and the casual "unalive" threats against the nation's top leaders, it’s clear Sara is not just bastos at balahura — we are dealing with a textbook case of clinical instability and a dangerous propensity for violence that belongs in a ward, not a public office.

Thea Tan

11,258 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is very concerning - New key making machines scan your keys digitally and create a profile - You can opt to have it save your key so you can access it again in the future - Then you pay for your key with your credit card - This means this system has a virtual copy of your key and your credit card information, meaning they can get your address If a data leak or bad actors were involved it would be incredibly easy for someone to get your address, make a key and do whatever they’re going to do Not all technology is progress, some is dangerous
1:45

This is very concerning - New key making machines scan your keys digitally and create a profile - You can opt to have it save your key so you can access it again in the future - Then you pay for your key with your credit card - This means this system has a virtual copy of your key and your credit card information, meaning they can get your address If a data leak or bad actors were involved it would be incredibly easy for someone to get your address, make a key and do whatever they’re going to do Not all technology is progress, some is dangerous

Wall Street Apes

170,059 次观看 • 1 个月前

The decision by ABC, CNN, and NBC not to carry President Trump’s primetime address on election security raises a fundamental question about the role of major broadcast networks in a democracy. This was a nationally announced speech by a sitting, duly elected president on the integrity of U.S. elections. An issue that affects every voter, regardless of party. This is not about liking or disliking Trump, or agreeing or disagreeing with his claims. The presidency is the highest elected office in the country. When a president addresses the nation in a formal, scheduled primetime speech, there is a strong public‑interest argument that news networks should air it live and in full. Citizens can’t evaluate their leaders, or their claims, if they aren’t allowed to hear those leaders directly. Editorial judgment and criticism remain essential. Networks are entirely within their rights to add clear disclaimers before and after the address, fact‑check in real time or immediately afterward, host panels that challenge, contextualize, or rebut the president’s statements. But substituting that for the speech itself, showing only handpicked clips, summaries, or commentary, shifts from informing the public to curating what the public is permitted to see. At that point, viewers are reacting to the networks’ framing, not to the president’s actual words. Even after being censored in the U.S., having its license revoked and facing sanctions, RT International chose to air the address in full. RT has publicly disagreed with the president’s policies and with parts of this speech, but it treated the event as a matter of public record. Our principle is simple: viewers should be able to watch the complete address in context, hear the arguments unedited, and then weigh both the speech and the subsequent criticism for themselves. Rather than having corporate media gatekeepers decide in advance which presidential messages are fit for broadcast.
1:39

The decision by ABC, CNN, and NBC not to carry President Trump’s primetime address on election security raises a fundamental question about the role of major broadcast networks in a democracy. This was a nationally announced speech by a sitting, duly elected president on the integrity of U.S. elections. An issue that affects every voter, regardless of party. This is not about liking or disliking Trump, or agreeing or disagreeing with his claims. The presidency is the highest elected office in the country. When a president addresses the nation in a formal, scheduled primetime speech, there is a strong public‑interest argument that news networks should air it live and in full. Citizens can’t evaluate their leaders, or their claims, if they aren’t allowed to hear those leaders directly. Editorial judgment and criticism remain essential. Networks are entirely within their rights to add clear disclaimers before and after the address, fact‑check in real time or immediately afterward, host panels that challenge, contextualize, or rebut the president’s statements. But substituting that for the speech itself, showing only handpicked clips, summaries, or commentary, shifts from informing the public to curating what the public is permitted to see. At that point, viewers are reacting to the networks’ framing, not to the president’s actual words. Even after being censored in the U.S., having its license revoked and facing sanctions, RT International chose to air the address in full. RT has publicly disagreed with the president’s policies and with parts of this speech, but it treated the event as a matter of public record. Our principle is simple: viewers should be able to watch the complete address in context, hear the arguments unedited, and then weigh both the speech and the subsequent criticism for themselves. Rather than having corporate media gatekeepers decide in advance which presidential messages are fit for broadcast.

Ben Swann

1,176,926 次观看 • 14 天前

For accuracy: Aidan’s affidavit was not impounded when it was first covered on online. This issue was expressly addressed during the hearing. The judge asked whether the affidavit was impounded, and defense counsel (Attorney Bradl) confirmed that it was not. The judge then stated that it was therefore a “public record.” The only remaining concern raised was whether the plaintiff’s address should have been removed. A temporary impoundment order was issued later in the hearing for the exhibits, at which point Bradl informed the court that some of the materials was already publicly available online. A public record is a public record. In Massachusetts, once a court record (like an affidavit) has already been lawfully made public—including be posted or shared on social media—impoundment of the official court record does not “unpublish” it or retroactively make the public version secret or inaccessible. The judge’s temporary impoundment order applies to the parties of record in the case. It is not surprising that Kate is so wrong on this point. She is doing exactly what the judge ordered must stop, and the judge certainly will not consider her meddling in his decision.
0:30

For accuracy: Aidan’s affidavit was not impounded when it was first covered on online. This issue was expressly addressed during the hearing. The judge asked whether the affidavit was impounded, and defense counsel (Attorney Bradl) confirmed that it was not. The judge then stated that it was therefore a “public record.” The only remaining concern raised was whether the plaintiff’s address should have been removed. A temporary impoundment order was issued later in the hearing for the exhibits, at which point Bradl informed the court that some of the materials was already publicly available online. A public record is a public record. In Massachusetts, once a court record (like an affidavit) has already been lawfully made public—including be posted or shared on social media—impoundment of the official court record does not “unpublish” it or retroactively make the public version secret or inaccessible. The judge’s temporary impoundment order applies to the parties of record in the case. It is not surprising that Kate is so wrong on this point. She is doing exactly what the judge ordered must stop, and the judge certainly will not consider her meddling in his decision.

KY Maverick

13,089 次观看 • 3 个月前

Russia is investing in prolonging conflicts in the Middle East. Wars there make it easier to intensify the war here, in Europe. This was the case after the Hamas attack on Israel. It is also true for the war the Iranian regime is waging to preserve itself. After that war, things must not be worse than before – this is key. And the same applies here in Europe – Russia must not be left in any position that it could see as better than before – not in territory, not in technologies, not in politics. This is essential for peace and Europe. From an address at the meeting of EU Foreign Ministers (2/5)
0:45

Russia is investing in prolonging conflicts in the Middle East. Wars there make it easier to intensify the war here, in Europe. This was the case after the Hamas attack on Israel. It is also true for the war the Iranian regime is waging to preserve itself. After that war, things must not be worse than before – this is key. And the same applies here in Europe – Russia must not be left in any position that it could see as better than before – not in territory, not in technologies, not in politics. This is essential for peace and Europe. From an address at the meeting of EU Foreign Ministers (2/5)

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

82,970 次观看 • 4 个月前

⚡️🇪🇸🇺🇸JUST IN: Spain’s PM Pedro Sanchez: After much reflection, Spain has decided not to participate in the so-called Board of Peace. We thank them for the invitation, but we decline. This board is outside the United Nations framework. It does not include the Palestinian Authority. The future of Gaza and the West Bank must be decided by Palestinians. Spain has tripled its defense spending since I became prime minister. We are investing €34 billion a year in defense. At the same time, we will not renounce public healthcare, public education, social cohesion, or development aid. Security is not only weapons. Security is scholarships for our children. Security is public hospitals for our elderly.
1:51

⚡️🇪🇸🇺🇸JUST IN: Spain’s PM Pedro Sanchez: After much reflection, Spain has decided not to participate in the so-called Board of Peace. We thank them for the invitation, but we decline. This board is outside the United Nations framework. It does not include the Palestinian Authority. The future of Gaza and the West Bank must be decided by Palestinians. Spain has tripled its defense spending since I became prime minister. We are investing €34 billion a year in defense. At the same time, we will not renounce public healthcare, public education, social cohesion, or development aid. Security is not only weapons. Security is scholarships for our children. Security is public hospitals for our elderly.

Suppressed News.

1,656,176 次观看 • 6 个月前

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?
1:23:12

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

31,148 次观看 • 1 年前

NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya makes a strong argument for why, if you are pro vaccine, you should be against vaccine mandates. “The key reason why we’re seeing drop in vaccination uptake by children is because of a drop in public trust in public health.” “The reason why you see high vaccination rates in places without vaccine mandates outside the U.S. is because public trust in public health is just very high.” “That’s the thing we have to address in this country.” “And I believe mandates are counterproductive for that.” “It might work in the short run, but in the long run, ultimately, you build groups that say, ‘I don’t know why you’re forcing me to do this.’” “Instead of reaching out to people and saying, ‘Look this is good for the health of your children.’” Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD
0:56

NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya makes a strong argument for why, if you are pro vaccine, you should be against vaccine mandates. “The key reason why we’re seeing drop in vaccination uptake by children is because of a drop in public trust in public health.” “The reason why you see high vaccination rates in places without vaccine mandates outside the U.S. is because public trust in public health is just very high.” “That’s the thing we have to address in this country.” “And I believe mandates are counterproductive for that.” “It might work in the short run, but in the long run, ultimately, you build groups that say, ‘I don’t know why you’re forcing me to do this.’” “Instead of reaching out to people and saying, ‘Look this is good for the health of your children.’” Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

45,667 次观看 • 4 个月前