正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

We just built a live bridge between Substance Painter and UEFN. 🎨→🎮 Paint in Substance → click Sync → see it in UEFN. In real time. • Auto FBX import + spawn • PBR Material with Material Instances (no recompile on sync) • Smart sync only changed textures get...

13,478 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Two girls, arms overhead all day, plastering a ceiling in perfect sync and it makes them around $12,000 a month between them, mostly from filming it. Anyone who's done overhead work knows it's the worst position in the trade — arms up, neck back, shoulders burning inside ten minutes. Most people tap out. These two do it for hours, side by side, matching each other's pace like they share a brain. That's the thing you can't look away from: not just that it's two women on a ceiling, but that they're in rhythm doing the part everyone else dreads. Here's why the pair matters more than people think. A solo worker is a clip you watch once. Two people moving in sync — no talking, just anticipating each other — is a relationship, and relationships are what turn a viewer into a follower. You're not watching a task get done. You're watching a partnership work, and that pulls people back for the next one. The money runs three ways off one phone. Their calendar stays booked because homeowners watch the finish and hire them at full rate, zero ad spend — the video sells the work. Tool and material brands pay $3 - 5k a post to get their gear in genuinely skilled hands. And views, often 5-10 million a clip, stack payouts on a phone one of them wedges on a bucket. Neither of them edits. They film the shift, hand it to AI, it grabs the tightest synced stretch, cuts it to the beat, captions, schedules. They're onto the next room before it posts. The reframe for anyone doing hard work: the part of your job that's physically brutal — the part you assume nobody wants to see — is exactly what people respect watching. Struggle that looks effortless is magnetic. Doing it in sync with someone else doubles it. Do you work with someone you're so in sync with you barely need words? Drop it below — I'm breaking the best ones down next.

Rich

23,632 次观看 • 1 个月前

If you think this is just another silly demo made with AI, read this post. You might change your mind, because this demo is about MATH. What you see on the screen is not a render from Blender (obviously, it’s not that good). It’s a three.js app built with Toolcraft. Available on the web and rendered in real time(link in the comments). But Blender still has a lot to do with it. Blender has Geometry Nodes - a powerful node-based system for creating and manipulating procedural geometry. In other words, it’s math. And math is a universal language. And who do you think is pretty good at math? >>> AI. Now you can download or buy Blender files from marketplaces, and when they contain Geometry Nodes for procedural animations, objects, surfaces, or effects, you can transfer that logic to the web. Make it real-time, make it interactive. Materials are a separate story, of course. They can still suck unless you use the right tricks: PBR, HDRIs, material blending, displacement, and faked surface relief. So why is Blender important here? Blender is open source, and many tools around it are open source too. An AI trained on their code. That means it can translate the math from one environment to another quite accurately. If you’ve been struggling to reproduce some idea with AI that you had in your head or seen in some references, and it has something to do with Geometry Nodes, and you can find that idea or a close one in the Blender ecosystem - it means you can transfer it to the web. Thank me later.

Alex Barashkov

28,300 次观看 • 2 个月前

I've now built the BEST iFVG Retrace indicator. FREE. One model, mapped end to end — the raid on liquidity, the CISD closure that confirms it, and the entry on the retrace back into the inverted FVG. • Auto setup hunter — scans both directions continuously and arms the next qualifying setup on its own. Nothing to reset, nothing to redraw. • Auto invalidation — a setup kills itself the moment it's wrong: raid broken, zone body-filled, or no retrace inside the window. It clears off the chart instead of sitting there looking valid. • Drawn live as it forms — levels, zones, plan and targets all build in real time. No repainting, nothing added in after the move. • Liquidity mapped for you — PDH/PDL, PWH/PWL, Asia · London · NY AM · NY PM highs and lows, swings and equal highs/lows. Every line stops exactly where price takes it. • Runway grading — A+ open air down to C, so you can see what's standing in front of a trade before you're in it. • Lid lines — the levels stacked between your entry and 3R, drawn. • Entry, stop and target with risk/reward boxes and a written plan on every setup. • Live read-out — direction, RR, nearest draw, grade, session sweep, setups today. • HTF nesting, a V-shape reversal spotter, and alerts on armed / entry / target / stopped, webhook JSON included. No sub. No paywall. FREE. I post more free content in my Discord → Comment below if you want it, and repost so it lands in front of someone still guessing their entries.

Blank333

27,750 次观看 • 2 个月前

We all remember. We all remember when blockchain was pitched as the next big thing. And today, we feel like we’ve been waiting and waiting. Until recently, Blockchain was too expensive, slow under load, and hard to integrate for most businesses. So enterprises ignored it. It didn’t solve their business problems. That’s changed. Why blockchain, why now? Businesses don’t care about the tech, they care about cost and performance. They’d ask a simple question “Does it save or make me more money?” For a long time, blockchain didn’t clearly do this. That’s no longer true. Blockchain is proving real business cases, especially on Avalanche. On Avalanche, transactions cost fractions of a cent. settle in about a second. And instead of forcing everything onto one shared chain, businesses can launch their own Avalanche L1s with their own rules. To understand this let’s identify the problem and then provide the solution in a way that's easy to understand. Where Businesses Lose Money Most large industries lose money due to operational inefficiencies. Data lives in different systems. Teams spend hours reconciling records that should already match. Intermediaries sit in the middle, taking fees to coordinate all of it. Individually, each step looks small. Together, they create real cost: > Labor spent on manual processes > Capital locked up during settlement delays > Fees paid to intermediaries > Risk introduced by time gaps and mismatched data This is where businesses actually lose money. Not in big, obvious ways. In constant, compounding friction. Take Private Credit, for Example Private credit is loans held outside of traditional banks. It’s a multi-trillion dollar market, and much of it still runs on spreadsheets and weekly reconciliation processes. Loan data is tracked across systems. Teams manually process requests. Funds move on traditional rails, often on delayed cycles. It doesn’t have to be this way Entire teams exist just to keep systems in sync. Now move that system onto Avalanche. Loan data updates in real time. Transactions settle in about a second. Every participant sees the same state instantly. Reconciliation isn’t a separate step because the system itself is the source of truth. The impact is straightforward. > Reduced manual work > Shortened settlement cycles > Fewer layers of coordination between parties Avalanche is Infrastructure for Real Businesses Avalanche is designed to match how businesses actually operate. Instead of sharing a single chain, they can launch their own Avalanche L1s with custom rules, built-in compliance, and predictable performance. They control the system. Avalanche’s Moment For the longest time, blockchain naysayers said this could all be done better with spreadsheets or existing systems. They were right. That’s what the technology allowed. Now it’s changed. Avalanche can replace many of those systems with real-time settlement, shared data, and automated execution. For the first time, the economics work. Built for business. 🔺

Avalanche🔺

13,142 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 MIT JUST DISCOVERED HOW INJECTING CO₂ ACTUALLY REWIRES CEMENT CHEMISTRY FROM THE INSIDE. For years, companies have been injecting carbon dioxide into concrete to store emissions and speed up strength gain. But no one fully understood why it worked until now. Using real-time Raman spectroscopy, MIT researchers captured the complete chemical sequence as it happened. They found that CO₂ triggers a three-act process: First, it locks up calcium and creates a temporary silica gel network throughout the paste. Then, as normal hydration resumes, this “ghostly gel” reacts with calcium hydroxide to form calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) but now distributed evenly across the entire matrix instead of clustered around clinker particles. Finally, the gel disappears within eight hours, leaving behind a stronger, more uniform microstructure. In testing, cement paste with just 1% CO₂ by weight showed 13% higher compressive strength at 24 hours compared to conventional mixes. Why this matters: • This is the first direct observation of the fleeting intermediate reactions that drive improved performance • The strength gain comes from better distribution of the binding phase, not from calcium carbonate acting as seeds • The process stores CO₂ while simultaneously improving the material a rare win-win in construction • It gives manufacturers a clearer scientific basis to optimize CO₂ injection rather than relying on trial and error The deeper implication: Concrete is the most used material on Earth and one of the largest sources of CO₂ emissions. Being able to see and therefore control the exact chemical mechanism behind CO₂ injection opens the door to smarter, lower-carbon cement formulations. It also shows how advanced spectroscopy can reveal hidden reaction pathways in materials we thought we already understood. We’re no longer guessing why CO₂ helps cement. We’re watching it happen in real time. How significant do you think real-time molecular imaging will be for decarbonizing construction materials in the next decade? Follow for more frontier materials science and carbon-negative construction research.

TheNewPhysics

62,589 次观看 • 3 个月前

This guy cracked the code on AI virtual influencers using real-time face filters and now D2C brands pay him $2,000 per UGC video. He got tired of watching D2C brands burn $4,000 on a single creator who takes 2 weeks to deliver one angle, so he built a setup that runs hyperrealistic AI girls in real-time from his own webcam, generating viral content without actresses, studios, or makeup artists. His monthly revenue hit $89,000 last month from a network of 7 AI personas across TikTok and Instagram, while the average UGC creator caps at $6K juggling 4 brand deals. Here is the exact breakdown: → The hardware is the moat, but most people butcher the setup in the first frame. You need the face mesh locked at 60fps with zero artifacting → Persona comes first, and if you mess this up nothing saves it. Name, backstory, voice tone, niche before a single clip is shot → Face selection is not random. You A/B test features (eye spacing, jawline, hair contrast with face-framing highlights) because some faces convert better in 9:16 → You are picking who your audience trusts, not who looks cool. That is your targeting baked into bone structure → Real-time physics run before the script, and this is what kills the uncanny valley that destroys watch time in 2 seconds → The filter has to survive the strap of a tank top, the texture of a knit cardigan, the hair flick. → Batching is the move 96 percent skip: one performance, multiple personas, three platforms. → The system pushes 12 pieces of content before lunch, while traditional brands test 2 creators per week and wonder why their CPAs are stuck at $94 The economics are stupid: each video costs him $4 in compute, sells for $1,500 to $3,000, and takes 14 minutes to produce. That is a 37,500 percent margin, while UGC agencies pay creators $400 to $800 per clip and net $200 after revisions. One supplement brand generated 14 variants with 7 personas in 4 hours and found a winner in 36 hours without flying a creator to LA. They were previously paying $1,200 per UGC video and burning $6,000 per week on content that did not scale. Now they spend $210 for 14 variants and their CPA dropped from $89 to $27. The avatars hold real products. Warm window light on the persona, cold neon on the operator. Mouth shapes sync to consonants, not just vowels. Just a webcam, a tracked face, and the discipline to move enough that the filter never has a chance to break.

Shade

136,231 次观看 • 4 个月前

$OnlyMarms Update for the end of Day 2 🦫 The receipts just keep stacking up. Since yesterday... 📺 The token has now been mentioned LIVE on television for the second time, this time on NBC. ( 🎙️ The story has now reached radio, with its first major interview airing on Radio-Canada. ( 🌐 The M.A.D. Lab has created an official OnlyMarms page on its website, documenting the community initiative and bringing everything together in one place. ( 📰 And more media outlets continue picking up the story by the hour - from major newspapers to university publications and international outlets. Take a step back for a second. $OnlyMarms sends a message and sets a statement: Meme coins can do good, and Meme coins can have real-world impact. It is the first time in a while, that we see positive media reports on a meme coin. This isn't a a simple meme that we have invented, it is actually a real world problem that we got to turn into a Crypto narrative to help the M.A.D Lab with fundraising, and awareness. The Pump.fun community, together against a real-world problem. A wildlife research lab founded in 1962 lost critical government funding after more than 60 years of continuous research. The community built around that mission. Now, every TV appearance, every radio interview, every news article, and every official update from the lab brings more attention - not just to the token, but to the research itself and the main issue: get the Lab their funding back. This is what makes OnlyMarms different. The narrative doesn't depend on price action, this is bigger than that. It evolves every time the world learns about the story. For the first time in a while, we have a narrative that I think can send a message and set a statement: Meme coins can do good, and Meme coins can have real-world impact. It is the first time in a while, that we see positive media reports on a meme coin. 🦫 Official M.A.D. Lab OnlyMarms page: 🌍 Community Website: Community Chat for raids and bagworking: Official Linktree: CA: HBrfYZgeLKdSvBBGnGkvAK4563pq8oBGpgNFAaespump Also we set up an official account where more marmot content will be posted: OnlyMarms

Miggl

106,610 次观看 • 1 个月前

This guy cracked the code on AI-powered fashion ecommerce using synthetic face technology and now pulls $50,000 to $150,000 per month from two Shopify stores without paying a single real model. He got tired of watching DTC fashion brands burn $20,000 monthly on photoshoots while their competitors tested 40 product angles in the same timeframe, so he built a system that generates hyperrealistic fashion content using his gaming PC and real-time AI masks instead of studios, contracts, or casting calls. His monthly profit hit $150,000 last month from just 2 stores and organic TikTok traffic, while traditional fashion brands cap out at $30K after paying models $400 to $800 per shoot and studio rentals of $200 to $500 per session. Here is the exact breakdown: → Real-time synthetic face technology becomes the only tool you need, but most people butcher the setup by skipping motion sync calibration in the first 30 seconds → Product selection comes first, and if you mess this up nothing saves it. Stick to women's accessories (bags, sunglasses, jewelry) because that is where organic TikTok engagement lives → Avatar casting is not random. You build one consistent AI face that repeats across all content so your audience recognizes the "model" and trusts the brand continuity → You are picking who your customer projects onto, not who looks expensive. That is your positioning baked into the face → Motion capture runs before generation, and this is what kills the uncanny valley effect that destroys watch time in 4 seconds → You mirror your own gestures through webcam: wave, chin tap, finger point, shoulder dance. The AI mask tracks every micro-movement and applies it to the generated face in real time → Batching is the move 94 percent skip: same outfit base, multiple product swaps, one recording session. No re-shooting, no model schedules, no usage rights negotiations → The system generates 3 to 5 TikToks before lunch, while traditional brands test 2 per week and wonder why their conversion rates are stuck at 0.8 percent The economics are stupid: each video costs him $0 in talent fees, pulls 1.5 million views organically, converts at 0.03 percent into 450 orders at $45 to $60 retail with $30 to $45 margin per sale. That is $15,750 profit per viral video, while fashion brands pay $1,200 per shoot and net $3,000 after ads. The key move nobody talks about: you cannot skip the motion synchronization test. If you generate the AI face without mirroring your own natural gestures first, the avatar moves like a mannequin. The blinks lag. The smile timing breaks. The whole thing screams "synthetic face technology" and your hook rate dies at 1.1 seconds. His system records him doing the exact dance trend first, so the AI mask inherits human timing, natural head tilts, and spontaneous energy that reads as a real creator showing off a product find, not a rendered advertisement. One accessories store generated 10 variants of the same handbag reveal in 18 minutes with different outfits, different backgrounds, different trend audios, and found the winner in 72 hours without spending $6,000 on influencer gifting. They were previously paying $800 per UGC creator and burning $4,800 per week on content that plateaued at 40K views. Now they spend $0 for 10 variants and their cost per acquisition dropped from $62 to $18. UGC agencies now panic because their entire margin was built on talent scarcity, and this removes the human bottleneck. The outfit changes between clips like a wardrobe filter. The lighting matches bedroom setups. The hand gestures sync with beat drops. No casting call. No model release. No location permits. Just a webcamera, a real-time AI mask, and the discipline to batch-test product angles before you commit ad spend to one creative.

Shade

20,471 次观看 • 4 个月前