Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

We just discovered faster sorting algorithms! Here is a 60-second explanation of what happened: DeepMind turned the sorting problem into a puzzle, where the goal of an agent is to organize a list of instructions to find a correct and efficient algorithm. Think Tetris, but using lines of code.... They used Deep Reinforcement Learning to train the agent who only wins the game if it finds an efficient algorithm. They called it "AlphaDev," and it didn't disappoint: AlphaDev found shorter and faster solutions for several sorting variants that we use trillions of times daily! This is a big deal. Conceptually, sorting is still an O(N log N) problem; Deepmind didn't change that. But practically speaking, and thanks to AlphaDev, we have code that runs faster. You should read their paper. They compared the current version of these algorithms and the new version they discovered. In some cases, they made significant improvements. Some people aren't happy with the way DeepMind is promoting this work. They argue the results aren't as breathtaking as the headlines claim. We can discuss their marketing, but this is undoubtedly a significant step with a real impact and the potential to generalize to more areas. The new algorithms that AlphaDev found seem trivial, yet no human found them before. That's the true power of Artificial Intelligence.show more

Santiago

452,276 subscribers

407,783 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

Santiago3 years ago

Here is a link to DeepMind's paper:

Santiago3 years ago

Isn't this a new algorithm?

Santiago3 years ago

Thanks for the link! I forgot to include it.

RedEyed3 years ago

It should be noted that it's 70% faster on sequences of length less than 5 elements, and 1.7% speedup on sequences more than 250k elements

Santiago3 years ago

Correct.

Santiago3 years ago

Yup, I read that post. I don't feel comfortable mixing their marketing with their technical accomplishments. I understand those who argue they leaned too much into hype. I do not understand those minimizing the importance of what they did.

𝗝 𝟯 𝟯 𝗣 𝟰 | 𝗷𝟯𝟯𝗽𝟰.𝗲𝘁𝗵3 years ago

This is important in terms of what could be achieved in other problems, but this is definitely overhyped by Deepmind. Nvidia is doing stuff like this with hardware optimisation and they don’t try to publish it in Nature. They just do it and make faster chips faster.

Santiago3 years ago

I think we can argue about their marketing, but it's not fair to subtract importance from their work.

Related Videos

The effective way to get billionaires to toe the line, is to arrest and jail one of them. Russia had a problem billionaires who thought that they controlled Russia and the Kremlin. They had a feast during Yeltsin’s rule. Putin came to power and they believed they could do as they please. In the video below, a group of billionaires close their factories in protest. Putin called them to a meeting and forced them to reopen the factories. One particular billionaire Mikhail Khodorkovsky, at the time Russia’s wealthiest man, arrogantly believed that he could defy Putin and do as he pleased because of his wealth and influence. He was arrested and jailed for 11 years; and his companies expropriated by the State. Russia today has no people of rogue billionaires. We have a problem of rogue billionaires in this country, particularly the Oppenheimers. An investigation can find some criminal wrongdoing on them. It is important to make an example with one family that believes it runs affairs of this country. We won’t have a problem of “markets” in the future.

The effective way to get billionaires to toe the line, is to arrest and jail one of them. Russia had a problem billionaires who thought that they controlled Russia and the Kremlin. They had a feast during Yeltsin’s rule. Putin came to power and they believed they could do as they please. In the video below, a group of billionaires close their factories in protest. Putin called them to a meeting and forced them to reopen the factories. One particular billionaire Mikhail Khodorkovsky, at the time Russia’s wealthiest man, arrogantly believed that he could defy Putin and do as he pleased because of his wealth and influence. He was arrested and jailed for 11 years; and his companies expropriated by the State. Russia today has no people of rogue billionaires. We have a problem of rogue billionaires in this country, particularly the Oppenheimers. An investigation can find some criminal wrongdoing on them. It is important to make an example with one family that believes it runs affairs of this country. We won’t have a problem of “markets” in the future.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

206,063 views • 2 years ago

"One of the things I learned from CBA negations is: They aren't smarter than us...I think we sometimes are victims of having this belief that because these people have made it to the top of their profession that they are as good at what they do as we are at what we do. They aren't....It's a mistake to think that whatever is holding back the union is understanding some complex theories of business or law. That ain't it." – Domonique goes deep on what changes need to be made within the NFLPA.

"One of the things I learned from CBA negations is: They aren't smarter than us...I think we sometimes are victims of having this belief that because these people have made it to the top of their profession that they are as good at what they do as we are at what we do. They aren't....It's a mistake to think that whatever is holding back the union is understanding some complex theories of business or law. That ain't it." – Domonique goes deep on what changes need to be made within the NFLPA.

The Domonique Foxworth Show

159,108 views • 10 months ago

This week we’re getting GPT 5.5 and I couldn’t be more excited to see the first new pre train base in a while Before Spud releases, here’s the last video you need to watch - Greg Brockman perfectly indicated to us 3 important things that perfectly encapsulate the lineage of OpenAI and the mission. 1.This is the culmination of 2 years of research and is a fresh base pre-train that we haven’t gotten for a long time. 2.This is an “exciting release” and it will bring new capabilities (sort of a given but still very grateful nonetheless) & that it is AN EARLY VERSION of what we have coming - meaning they have a lot of RL to do to make this model even better since it’s a fresh pre-train. 3.THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE FLYWHEEL. As he said toward the end, “we have this engine of progress that just moves faster and faster and Spud is just one step along the way.” Depending on the capabilities we see this week from Spud, we may be able to map out if AGI will be sooner rather than later, judging by how much recursive work can exist within this model and the harness. In other words, the flywheel.

This week we’re getting GPT 5.5 and I couldn’t be more excited to see the first new pre train base in a while Before Spud releases, here’s the last video you need to watch - Greg Brockman perfectly indicated to us 3 important things that perfectly encapsulate the lineage of OpenAI and the mission. 1.This is the culmination of 2 years of research and is a fresh base pre-train that we haven’t gotten for a long time. 2.This is an “exciting release” and it will bring new capabilities (sort of a given but still very grateful nonetheless) & that it is AN EARLY VERSION of what we have coming - meaning they have a lot of RL to do to make this model even better since it’s a fresh pre-train. 3.THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE FLYWHEEL. As he said toward the end, “we have this engine of progress that just moves faster and faster and Spud is just one step along the way.” Depending on the capabilities we see this week from Spud, we may be able to map out if AGI will be sooner rather than later, judging by how much recursive work can exist within this model and the harness. In other words, the flywheel.

Chris

103,198 views • 1 month ago

This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

922,151 views • 8 months ago

The most interesting part for me is where Andrej Karpathy describes why LLMs aren't able to learn like humans. As you would expect, he comes up with a wonderfully evocative phrase to describe RL: “sucking supervision bits through a straw.” A single end reward gets broadcast across every token in a successful trajectory, upweighting even wrong or irrelevant turns that lead to the right answer. > “Humans don't use reinforcement learning, as I've said before. I think they do something different. Reinforcement learning is a lot worse than the average person thinks. Reinforcement learning is terrible. It just so happens that everything that we had before is much worse.” So what do humans do instead? > “The book I’m reading is a set of prompts for me to do synthetic data generation. It's by manipulating that information that you actually gain that knowledge. We have no equivalent of that with LLMs; they don't really do that.” > “I'd love to see during pretraining some kind of a stage where the model thinks through the material and tries to reconcile it with what it already knows. There's no equivalent of any of this. This is all research.” Why can’t we just add this training to LLMs today? > “There are very subtle, hard to understand reasons why it's not trivial. If I just give synthetic generation of the model thinking about a book, you look at it and you're like, 'This looks great. Why can't I train on it?' You could try, but the model will actually get much worse if you continue trying.” > “Say we have a chapter of a book and I ask an LLM to think about it. It will give you something that looks very reasonable. But if I ask it 10 times, you'll notice that all of them are the same.” > “You're not getting the richness and the diversity and the entropy from these models as you would get from humans. How do you get synthetic data generation to work despite the collapse and while maintaining the entropy? It is a research problem.” How do humans get around model collapse? > “These analogies are surprisingly good. Humans collapse during the course of their lives. Children haven't overfit yet. They will say stuff that will shock you. Because they're not yet collapsed. But we [adults] are collapsed. We end up revisiting the same thoughts, we end up saying more and more of the same stuff, the learning rates go down, the collapse continues to get worse, and then everything deteriorates.” In fact, there’s an interesting paper arguing that dreaming evolved to assist generalization, and resist overfitting to daily learning - look up The Overfitted Brain by Erik Hoel. I asked Karpathy: Isn’t it interesting that humans learn best at a part of their lives (childhood) whose actual details they completely forget, adults still learn really well but have terrible memory about the particulars of the things they read or watch, and LLMs can memorize arbitrary details about text that no human could but are currently pretty bad at generalization? > “[Fallible human memory] is a feature, not a bug, because it forces you to only learn the generalizable components. LLMs are distracted by all the memory that they have of the pre-trained documents. That's why when I talk about the cognitive core, I actually want to remove the memory. I'd love to have them have less memory so that they have to look things up and they only maintain the algorithms for thought, and the idea of an experiment, and all this cognitive glue for acting.”

The most interesting part for me is where Andrej Karpathy describes why LLMs aren't able to learn like humans. As you would expect, he comes up with a wonderfully evocative phrase to describe RL: “sucking supervision bits through a straw.” A single end reward gets broadcast across every token in a successful trajectory, upweighting even wrong or irrelevant turns that lead to the right answer. > “Humans don't use reinforcement learning, as I've said before. I think they do something different. Reinforcement learning is a lot worse than the average person thinks. Reinforcement learning is terrible. It just so happens that everything that we had before is much worse.” So what do humans do instead? > “The book I’m reading is a set of prompts for me to do synthetic data generation. It's by manipulating that information that you actually gain that knowledge. We have no equivalent of that with LLMs; they don't really do that.” > “I'd love to see during pretraining some kind of a stage where the model thinks through the material and tries to reconcile it with what it already knows. There's no equivalent of any of this. This is all research.” Why can’t we just add this training to LLMs today? > “There are very subtle, hard to understand reasons why it's not trivial. If I just give synthetic generation of the model thinking about a book, you look at it and you're like, 'This looks great. Why can't I train on it?' You could try, but the model will actually get much worse if you continue trying.” > “Say we have a chapter of a book and I ask an LLM to think about it. It will give you something that looks very reasonable. But if I ask it 10 times, you'll notice that all of them are the same.” > “You're not getting the richness and the diversity and the entropy from these models as you would get from humans. How do you get synthetic data generation to work despite the collapse and while maintaining the entropy? It is a research problem.” How do humans get around model collapse? > “These analogies are surprisingly good. Humans collapse during the course of their lives. Children haven't overfit yet. They will say stuff that will shock you. Because they're not yet collapsed. But we [adults] are collapsed. We end up revisiting the same thoughts, we end up saying more and more of the same stuff, the learning rates go down, the collapse continues to get worse, and then everything deteriorates.” In fact, there’s an interesting paper arguing that dreaming evolved to assist generalization, and resist overfitting to daily learning - look up The Overfitted Brain by Erik Hoel. I asked Karpathy: Isn’t it interesting that humans learn best at a part of their lives (childhood) whose actual details they completely forget, adults still learn really well but have terrible memory about the particulars of the things they read or watch, and LLMs can memorize arbitrary details about text that no human could but are currently pretty bad at generalization? > “[Fallible human memory] is a feature, not a bug, because it forces you to only learn the generalizable components. LLMs are distracted by all the memory that they have of the pre-trained documents. That's why when I talk about the cognitive core, I actually want to remove the memory. I'd love to have them have less memory so that they have to look things up and they only maintain the algorithms for thought, and the idea of an experiment, and all this cognitive glue for acting.”

Dwarkesh Patel

1,050,069 views • 8 months ago

Elon Musk: A lot of the negativity is coming from the idea that the economy is a zero-sum game. “What's at the root of a lot of the negativity is an axiomatic flaw. That the pie is static, that it's a zero-sum game, that if someone else succeeds, it's because they took more than their fair share of this fixed pie. But it's not a fixed pie. Obviously the economic pie has grown considerably from what it was in the past. The output of goods and services, the productivity per person is dramatically greater than it has been in the past. When you create a new company and you create new products and services, you're growing the amount of goods and services available to people. So you've not taken anything away from anyone. You've created something new and you've given people new products and services they didn't have before. We didn't use to have an iPhone, we didn't use to have computers. We didn't use to have cars or be able to fly in airplanes. We didn't use to have many of the life saving medicines that we have today. These are all new things. The pie has grown tremendously.” From: Interview with Ben Shapiro, January 24, 2024

Elon Musk: A lot of the negativity is coming from the idea that the economy is a zero-sum game. “What's at the root of a lot of the negativity is an axiomatic flaw. That the pie is static, that it's a zero-sum game, that if someone else succeeds, it's because they took more than their fair share of this fixed pie. But it's not a fixed pie. Obviously the economic pie has grown considerably from what it was in the past. The output of goods and services, the productivity per person is dramatically greater than it has been in the past. When you create a new company and you create new products and services, you're growing the amount of goods and services available to people. So you've not taken anything away from anyone. You've created something new and you've given people new products and services they didn't have before. We didn't use to have an iPhone, we didn't use to have computers. We didn't use to have cars or be able to fly in airplanes. We didn't use to have many of the life saving medicines that we have today. These are all new things. The pie has grown tremendously.” From: Interview with Ben Shapiro, January 24, 2024

ELON CLIPS

38,888 views • 8 months ago

Jews have no problem with Muslims. The only problem is Zionism and Israel. Zionists say that everyone is an enemy of Israel, they blame people, but they forget one thing: They are the real criminals, but since it is in their interest to deny this and declare others guilty, they declare everyone guilty and threaten them. Zionists keep lying to the world and saying we want peace but Muslims want war. This is a big lie, the real ones who want to subjugate everyone who wants war are Zionism and Israel. Zionism is not Judaism. All Zionists do is use Judaism and force people to accept their perverted thoughts.

Jews have no problem with Muslims. The only problem is Zionism and Israel. Zionists say that everyone is an enemy of Israel, they blame people, but they forget one thing: They are the real criminals, but since it is in their interest to deny this and declare others guilty, they declare everyone guilty and threaten them. Zionists keep lying to the world and saying we want peace but Muslims want war. This is a big lie, the real ones who want to subjugate everyone who wants war are Zionism and Israel. Zionism is not Judaism. All Zionists do is use Judaism and force people to accept their perverted thoughts.

Voice of Rabbis

222,742 views • 2 years ago

Jews have no problem with Muslims. The only problem is Zionism and Israel. Zionists say that everyone is an enemy of Israel, they blame people, but they forget one thing: They are the real criminals, but since it is in their interest to deny this and declare others guilty, they declare everyone guilty and threaten them. Zionists keep lying to the world and saying we want peace but Muslims want war. This is a big lie, the real ones who want to subjugate everyone who wants war are Zionism and Israel. Zionism is not Judaism. All Zionists do is use Judaism and force people to accept their perverted thoughts.

Jews have no problem with Muslims. The only problem is Zionism and Israel. Zionists say that everyone is an enemy of Israel, they blame people, but they forget one thing: They are the real criminals, but since it is in their interest to deny this and declare others guilty, they declare everyone guilty and threaten them. Zionists keep lying to the world and saying we want peace but Muslims want war. This is a big lie, the real ones who want to subjugate everyone who wants war are Zionism and Israel. Zionism is not Judaism. All Zionists do is use Judaism and force people to accept their perverted thoughts.

Voice of Rabbis

146,506 views • 2 years ago

☝️🏾Michelle Obama is right! MAGA is NOT full of racist people; it's full of desperate people. And of course, who was the first to attack her? Black liberals. Why? Because racism feeds the black liberal. If Michelle Obama, the queen of black politics, says that it's not racism, how will the black liberal eat? Without racism, how will the black liberal gain the attention of blacks? How will they maintain their sense of purpose? The black liberal is simply an errand dog for white liberals. Without racism, the black liberal is of NO value to the white liberal and immediately becomes disposable. As you can see, they will even attack black women; Barack's wife is not exempt. Anyone can get it! But Michelle is right. These people aren't racist. They truly are desperate. Public schools and universities did not equip them with survival skills. It taught them how to be a slave (we'll talk about the white slaves of America at a later date). The schools didn't teach them how to think. The schools didn't make them more intelligent. In fact, it gave many whites a false sense of intelligence. School taught them that if you have knowledge, then you are intelligent. But that is only half of the puzzle. Knowledge is just mental masturbation...when you don't have the skill of problem-solving. And when you grow up spoon-fed, there aren't many problems to solve. So, what we have is a population of educated fools who think they are intelligent but are not. And many of them are realizing this now, and their ego is shattered. So, what do they do? They look for the low-hanging fruit. Racism. They know that rage bait can get them the attention that their minds can't. Because they have nothing positive to contribute to society, they must resort to the lowest of tactics to survive. That's why they don't anger me. All I see is a sea of pitiful dolts...like someone who is mentally challenged. There's no reason to have high expectations for the intellectually disabled. What we are witnessing from this group of whites is acts of desperation. Hope is almost gone in their minds. The America they learned to love was only a veneer to mask its dark side. If only they studied black history. They would see the evil that the government is capable of. But no, they were happy because the target was not them. They were happy not to be black. But now...white conservatives are the new niggas. How long will they remain suckled at the teat of Lady Liberty?

☝️🏾Michelle Obama is right! MAGA is NOT full of racist people; it's full of desperate people. And of course, who was the first to attack her? Black liberals. Why? Because racism feeds the black liberal. If Michelle Obama, the queen of black politics, says that it's not racism, how will the black liberal eat? Without racism, how will the black liberal gain the attention of blacks? How will they maintain their sense of purpose? The black liberal is simply an errand dog for white liberals. Without racism, the black liberal is of NO value to the white liberal and immediately becomes disposable. As you can see, they will even attack black women; Barack's wife is not exempt. Anyone can get it! But Michelle is right. These people aren't racist. They truly are desperate. Public schools and universities did not equip them with survival skills. It taught them how to be a slave (we'll talk about the white slaves of America at a later date). The schools didn't teach them how to think. The schools didn't make them more intelligent. In fact, it gave many whites a false sense of intelligence. School taught them that if you have knowledge, then you are intelligent. But that is only half of the puzzle. Knowledge is just mental masturbation...when you don't have the skill of problem-solving. And when you grow up spoon-fed, there aren't many problems to solve. So, what we have is a population of educated fools who think they are intelligent but are not. And many of them are realizing this now, and their ego is shattered. So, what do they do? They look for the low-hanging fruit. Racism. They know that rage bait can get them the attention that their minds can't. Because they have nothing positive to contribute to society, they must resort to the lowest of tactics to survive. That's why they don't anger me. All I see is a sea of pitiful dolts...like someone who is mentally challenged. There's no reason to have high expectations for the intellectually disabled. What we are witnessing from this group of whites is acts of desperation. Hope is almost gone in their minds. The America they learned to love was only a veneer to mask its dark side. If only they studied black history. They would see the evil that the government is capable of. But no, they were happy because the target was not them. They were happy not to be black. But now...white conservatives are the new niggas. How long will they remain suckled at the teat of Lady Liberty?

Hotep Jesus

13,644 views • 26 days ago

TEHRAN'S 'LIFELINE': Jack Keane warns that a new deal leaves Iran bruised but intact, convincing the regime that they forced the U.S. to back down. "But my problem with the deal here is that we leave Iran bruised but intact, and they'll walk away from here, citing and convincing themselves that they got the United States to back down." "And as a result of that, we extend a lifeline to the regime, for sure, for them to do what? To recover. And in the deal, the unfrozen assets are about 100 billion. It's likely we're going to take some part of that and give that to them up front and also reduce some of the sanctions." "And certainly we're going to monitor their behavior. But nonetheless, it is a lifeline to the regime that extends them for years to come."

TEHRAN'S 'LIFELINE': Jack Keane warns that a new deal leaves Iran bruised but intact, convincing the regime that they forced the U.S. to back down. "But my problem with the deal here is that we leave Iran bruised but intact, and they'll walk away from here, citing and convincing themselves that they got the United States to back down." "And as a result of that, we extend a lifeline to the regime, for sure, for them to do what? To recover. And in the deal, the unfrozen assets are about 100 billion. It's likely we're going to take some part of that and give that to them up front and also reduce some of the sanctions." "And certainly we're going to monitor their behavior. But nonetheless, it is a lifeline to the regime that extends them for years to come."

FOX & Friends

326,602 views • 25 days ago

Obama: "I think ethically speaking, it is an atrocity that in a country this wealthy we have people just on the streets, and we should insist on policies that recognize their full humanity and provide them the help and resources they need. But we should also recognize that the average person doesn't want to have to navigate around a tent city in the middle of downtown."

Obama: "I think ethically speaking, it is an atrocity that in a country this wealthy we have people just on the streets, and we should insist on policies that recognize their full humanity and provide them the help and resources they need. But we should also recognize that the average person doesn't want to have to navigate around a tent city in the middle of downtown."

Aaron Rupar

122,879 views • 3 months ago

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

50,190 views • 1 year ago

[MEDIA INTERVIEW] ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION PART 2: GLOBAL ISSUE Illegal immigration is not a South African problem it is an African and global problem. The question for us as the African continent is how do we deal with that. We must deal with the root cause of this, where people leave their country’s en masse. It is not only African people, we have European and Asian people coming into our country. We must ask ourselves how did they go through the countries of departure without the correct papers. This is a global crisis, that requires government to formulate a response to this. What we can’t allow is for our country to be described as a xenophobic country. We are a people of Ubuntu. #TheYearOfDecisiveAction

[MEDIA INTERVIEW] ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION PART 2: GLOBAL ISSUE Illegal immigration is not a South African problem it is an African and global problem. The question for us as the African continent is how do we deal with that. We must deal with the root cause of this, where people leave their country’s en masse. It is not only African people, we have European and Asian people coming into our country. We must ask ourselves how did they go through the countries of departure without the correct papers. This is a global crisis, that requires government to formulate a response to this. What we can’t allow is for our country to be described as a xenophobic country. We are a people of Ubuntu. #TheYearOfDecisiveAction

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

57,149 views • 8 days ago

"Do you think that Joe Biden garnered 81 million votes? Do you think the elections were fair? The problem is that the American people don't have all the answers because the media is part of the problem....The media is doing a huge disservice to this country. The people aren't getting the full story but eventually I do think they will. And the media whose numbers are dropping like a rock are,gonna continue to drop and pretty soon nobody will be watching, because the media has turned their back on the people of America and not been honest, ABC News CNN, MSNBC spent more than three years lying to the American people saying that Russia colluded with Donald J Trump to steal an election in 2016. And they knew that was false. They knew they were peddling lies and they did nothing to stop it. It was a complete hoax and it was a lie. And now they're doing the opposite. We have evidence of corruption in our election, and they refuse to cover it. They used to be honest with the people of this country. It is disgusting what the media has done. And I think their days are numbered when it comes to surviving all of this. The business when you're lying to the people and you're in media, that's a bad business model…"

"Do you think that Joe Biden garnered 81 million votes? Do you think the elections were fair? The problem is that the American people don't have all the answers because the media is part of the problem....The media is doing a huge disservice to this country. The people aren't getting the full story but eventually I do think they will. And the media whose numbers are dropping like a rock are,gonna continue to drop and pretty soon nobody will be watching, because the media has turned their back on the people of America and not been honest, ABC News CNN, MSNBC spent more than three years lying to the American people saying that Russia colluded with Donald J Trump to steal an election in 2016. And they knew that was false. They knew they were peddling lies and they did nothing to stop it. It was a complete hoax and it was a lie. And now they're doing the opposite. We have evidence of corruption in our election, and they refuse to cover it. They used to be honest with the people of this country. It is disgusting what the media has done. And I think their days are numbered when it comes to surviving all of this. The business when you're lying to the people and you're in media, that's a bad business model…"

Green Lives Matter

89,423 views • 1 year ago

What is the "Middle Ground Scramble?" Bret Weinstein explains: "So you get a bunch of people in the middle engaged in a game that I call the "middle ground scramble," where they are now going to scold the fringe. Oh, those people, yes, the pandemic didn't turn out to be what we thought, but those people on the fringe, they actually were crazy. And then they scold the mainstream. Yes, we can all agree that out of an abundance of caution, things were done that in retrospect, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They scold both sides and they ascend because the vast number of people who wants to acknowledge that something bad happened without empowering the fringe that they demonized will empower these people in the middle. And the problem, the reason I say this is a tragedy, is that the "middle ground scramblers" do not have a track record that tells you that they actually know anything that would allow them to avoid this the next time. So by promoting them, we effectively guarantee that it will happen again.

What is the "Middle Ground Scramble?" Bret Weinstein explains: "So you get a bunch of people in the middle engaged in a game that I call the "middle ground scramble," where they are now going to scold the fringe. Oh, those people, yes, the pandemic didn't turn out to be what we thought, but those people on the fringe, they actually were crazy. And then they scold the mainstream. Yes, we can all agree that out of an abundance of caution, things were done that in retrospect, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They scold both sides and they ascend because the vast number of people who wants to acknowledge that something bad happened without empowering the fringe that they demonized will empower these people in the middle. And the problem, the reason I say this is a tragedy, is that the "middle ground scramblers" do not have a track record that tells you that they actually know anything that would allow them to avoid this the next time. So by promoting them, we effectively guarantee that it will happen again.

The Darkhorse Podcast

31,649 views • 11 months ago

President Trump on negotiations with Iran: “I mean, the problem with the issue of the Hormuz Straits is this: We've decimated them as a military. No air force, no navy, very few rockets left. We blew up so many. Hard to manufacture them. Same thing with drones. The leadership is gone. The problem with the Straits is this: Let's say we do a great job. We say we got 99%. 1% is unacceptable, because 1% is a missile going into the hull of a ship that cost a billion dollars, right? So 1% is not... If we do a 99% decimation, that's no good. So it's really, you know... I have a feeling it's going to clean up pretty quickly. I could just say this. They want to make -- they want to make -- and I probably hurt our little negotiation. It gives them a little impetus to say, ‘Well, I wish you didn't say that.’ But they said yesterday that we weren't negotiating with them, and now they admit that we were negotiating with them. So they want to make a deal. The reason they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to shit.”

President Trump on negotiations with Iran: “I mean, the problem with the issue of the Hormuz Straits is this: We've decimated them as a military. No air force, no navy, very few rockets left. We blew up so many. Hard to manufacture them. Same thing with drones. The leadership is gone. The problem with the Straits is this: Let's say we do a great job. We say we got 99%. 1% is unacceptable, because 1% is a missile going into the hull of a ship that cost a billion dollars, right? So 1% is not... If we do a 99% decimation, that's no good. So it's really, you know... I have a feeling it's going to clean up pretty quickly. I could just say this. They want to make -- they want to make -- and I probably hurt our little negotiation. It gives them a little impetus to say, ‘Well, I wish you didn't say that.’ But they said yesterday that we weren't negotiating with them, and now they admit that we were negotiating with them. So they want to make a deal. The reason they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to shit.”

OSINTdefender

938,653 views • 2 months ago

“This is insane - what they just discovered - theoretically it could solve a lot of of the water shortages in the world” “under the sea - this is where they found the freshwater Aquifer” “We can drink this and it’s right under the sea”

“This is insane - what they just discovered - theoretically it could solve a lot of of the water shortages in the world” “under the sea - this is where they found the freshwater Aquifer” “We can drink this and it’s right under the sea”

Concerned Citizen

22,217 views • 3 months ago