Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

We keep inheriting knowledge we’re not ready to survive! I spent a few days putting this presentation together, that explores the recurring pattern found across ancient civilizations. Where knowledge is given, humanity advances, and then destabilizes when wisdom fails to keep up!. It looks at how this same structure... show more

Jason Wilde

45,781 subscribers

14,562 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Steve was asked about this at the post-game presser: “I think where we are as a franchise is we’re still a good team, still competitive. We’re trying to give ourselves a swing at the plate every year. We did that last year. The point of where we are with the age of our best players is we can still be good but we’re obviously not in the same class as we were 5-6 years ago. We’re not in the same class as the team we played tonight and several other teams in the league. There’s no point in denying that. We have to embrace it, be realistic, and give ourselves a shot. We can give ourselves a shot like we did a year ago by connecting and staying healthy and getting on a run. We’re still good enough to do that. If you do that and you have a shot, you get to the playoffs, you never know what’s going to happen. I think that’s where we are right now so we’ve got to keep fighting.”

Steve was asked about this at the post-game presser: “I think where we are as a franchise is we’re still a good team, still competitive. We’re trying to give ourselves a swing at the plate every year. We did that last year. The point of where we are with the age of our best players is we can still be good but we’re obviously not in the same class as we were 5-6 years ago. We’re not in the same class as the team we played tonight and several other teams in the league. There’s no point in denying that. We have to embrace it, be realistic, and give ourselves a shot. We can give ourselves a shot like we did a year ago by connecting and staying healthy and getting on a run. We’re still good enough to do that. If you do that and you have a shot, you get to the playoffs, you never know what’s going to happen. I think that’s where we are right now so we’ve got to keep fighting.”

aly ✶

97,051 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“I came from the Lakers where the structure is not the same, and then I go to Brooklyn where it’s all structure and it taught me how to be a professional.” 👀 - D’Angelo Russell (🎥 Wy Network by Dwyane Wade )

“I came from the Lakers where the structure is not the same, and then I go to Brooklyn where it’s all structure and it taught me how to be a professional.” 👀 - D’Angelo Russell (🎥 Wy Network by Dwyane Wade )

NBACentral

1,237,673 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Prof. Brian Cox: "Carl Sagan said all civilisations destroy themselves at the stage we are at" He warns that civilizations like ours may never reach the stars because we destroy ourselves first. When you industrialize as a civilization you hit problems which are probably common to all civilizations. We're approaching that filter and it could be we don't pass through it. This is one of the leading explanations for the Fermi Paradox: the eerie silence of the universe despite its vastness. Advanced societies rise, gain nuclear power and technology, but collapse through war, climate collapse, or self destruction before becoming multi-planetary. Humanity stands at this critical point. Our knowledge may be outpacing our wisdom.

Prof. Brian Cox: "Carl Sagan said all civilisations destroy themselves at the stage we are at" He warns that civilizations like ours may never reach the stars because we destroy ourselves first. When you industrialize as a civilization you hit problems which are probably common to all civilizations. We're approaching that filter and it could be we don't pass through it. This is one of the leading explanations for the Fermi Paradox: the eerie silence of the universe despite its vastness. Advanced societies rise, gain nuclear power and technology, but collapse through war, climate collapse, or self destruction before becoming multi-planetary. Humanity stands at this critical point. Our knowledge may be outpacing our wisdom.

Interstellar

13,401 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is classified as a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad."

"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is classified as a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

41,246 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The knowledge given to us by our ancient traditions is not limited to books; it is a living science, breathing. Shiva stands at the very centre of this tradition. He has no single form, yet He is the source of all forms. When nothing existed, Shiva was there, and when nothing remains, He will still be. This concept is the greatest strength of our culture.

The knowledge given to us by our ancient traditions is not limited to books; it is a living science, breathing. Shiva stands at the very centre of this tradition. He has no single form, yet He is the source of all forms. When nothing existed, Shiva was there, and when nothing remains, He will still be. This concept is the greatest strength of our culture.

Rajnath Singh

23,167 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis: 🗣️ “Sanskrit is ancient but not widely spoken today. Tamil is perhaps the OLDEST living language with immense knowledge. If we keep opposing languages for politics, some may gain votes, but knowledge will suffer."👏🏼

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis: 🗣️ “Sanskrit is ancient but not widely spoken today. Tamil is perhaps the OLDEST living language with immense knowledge. If we keep opposing languages for politics, some may gain votes, but knowledge will suffer."👏🏼

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

190,744 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"There are many similarities between our civilizations. We have the Nile River, and China has the Yangtze River," said Mostafa Mahmoud Ismail Kafafy at the 2026 Ancient Capitals Dialogue (Hangzhou–Cairo). This dialogue is not only about history. It is about friendship, mutual understanding, and building a shared future through culture, knowledge, and human connection. #LiangzhuMeetsPyramid #Hangzhou #Cairo #ChinaEgypt #CulturalExchange #Civilizations

"There are many similarities between our civilizations. We have the Nile River, and China has the Yangtze River," said Mostafa Mahmoud Ismail Kafafy at the 2026 Ancient Capitals Dialogue (Hangzhou–Cairo). This dialogue is not only about history. It is about friendship, mutual understanding, and building a shared future through culture, knowledge, and human connection. #LiangzhuMeetsPyramid #Hangzhou #Cairo #ChinaEgypt #CulturalExchange #Civilizations

Hangzhoufeel

150,870 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Fraudsters may attempt to access your personal data, but the right knowledge can keep you a step ahead. VFS Global is committed to providing applicants a smooth and secure application process. Keep this in mind to ensure you Do Not Fall For Fraud when applying for a visa

Fraudsters may attempt to access your personal data, but the right knowledge can keep you a step ahead. VFS Global is committed to providing applicants a smooth and secure application process. Keep this in mind to ensure you Do Not Fall For Fraud when applying for a visa

VFS Global

12,144,927 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: Actor Varun Sharma, who is participating in the 'One Nation One Election' awareness drive, says, "I think it's a great initiative...I have been reading about this for the past 2-3 months.I think we should acquire more and more knowledge about it, we should read up on it...The more we talk about it, the more it will be taken forward. Get as much knowledge as you can, read up on it. Talk to your friends, talk to your relatives, talk to your family. Knowledge is the key for everything. So, my request is, get as much knowledge as possible...I think this (One Nation One Election) will save a lot of time...I am sure that when this is consolidated, it will save a lot of everyone's time..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Actor Varun Sharma, who is participating in the 'One Nation One Election' awareness drive, says, "I think it's a great initiative...I have been reading about this for the past 2-3 months.I think we should acquire more and more knowledge about it, we should read up on it...The more we talk about it, the more it will be taken forward. Get as much knowledge as you can, read up on it. Talk to your friends, talk to your relatives, talk to your family. Knowledge is the key for everything. So, my request is, get as much knowledge as possible...I think this (One Nation One Election) will save a lot of time...I am sure that when this is consolidated, it will save a lot of everyone's time..."

ANI

90,418 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

As we walk into a new week, let this be the moment we stop second guessing ourselves. May this be the beginning of trusting our guts, of listening to our instincts. As a new week begins, believe in yourself and all that you have done to get yourself to this place. Keep going, keep moving forward, keep at it! #sundayeveningreminder

As we walk into a new week, let this be the moment we stop second guessing ourselves. May this be the beginning of trusting our guts, of listening to our instincts. As a new week begins, believe in yourself and all that you have done to get yourself to this place. Keep going, keep moving forward, keep at it! #sundayeveningreminder

Maria Shriver

11,425 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Karl Popper on How We Gain Knowledge: ––Karl Popper: "People think, usually, that we acquire knowledge by opening our eyes and our ears and let the sensations stream into us, and they believe then that we record this like a camera. In my opinion, if we wish to get knowledge, we have to have a problem. It has to be knowledge of something. We have to find out something. We don't have to wait for information to stream into us, but we have to be inquisitive if we want to get knowledge. If we were passive, we would gain a confused mass of sensations or something like that, which we would hardly be able to understand and to convert into what one may call knowledge. Quite apart from that, perception is not really, in my opinion, the main source of our knowledge. The role of perception is to inform us about a momentary situation in our environment. But we couldn't really interpret our perceptions without knowing much more about our environment, namely, we know whether we are in a house or whether we are in a glacier. So we have two kinds of knowledge: this wider knowledge of a frame in which we orientate ourselves, and the momentary perception which gives us information about the situation at that particular moment. And it is only this situation in which we can use our perception. So we have theoretical knowledge and, if you like, the momentary practical challenge to our theoretical knowledge. And here comes perception in."

Karl Popper on How We Gain Knowledge: ––Karl Popper: "People think, usually, that we acquire knowledge by opening our eyes and our ears and let the sensations stream into us, and they believe then that we record this like a camera. In my opinion, if we wish to get knowledge, we have to have a problem. It has to be knowledge of something. We have to find out something. We don't have to wait for information to stream into us, but we have to be inquisitive if we want to get knowledge. If we were passive, we would gain a confused mass of sensations or something like that, which we would hardly be able to understand and to convert into what one may call knowledge. Quite apart from that, perception is not really, in my opinion, the main source of our knowledge. The role of perception is to inform us about a momentary situation in our environment. But we couldn't really interpret our perceptions without knowing much more about our environment, namely, we know whether we are in a house or whether we are in a glacier. So we have two kinds of knowledge: this wider knowledge of a frame in which we orientate ourselves, and the momentary perception which gives us information about the situation at that particular moment. And it is only this situation in which we can use our perception. So we have theoretical knowledge and, if you like, the momentary practical challenge to our theoretical knowledge. And here comes perception in."

Karl Popper Quotes

114,824 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Software > Systems > Societies As 2025 comes to a close, we’re all moving from isolated software tools to agentic systems coordinating those tools to emerging “societies” of autonomous agents that can research, generate, QA, and ship with minimal (to zero) human intervention. Dan Batten and I spent the past few months putting together a 25-minute presentation that covers: → Why the Software Era is ending → How Systems replace disconnected tools with coordinated, generative workflows → Teams can evolve structure today for the coming Societies phase This isn’t AI research. It’s a practical framework for teams building real work today and tomorrow. It's a look at what we’re actively running at Little Plains , and rolling out next at Infinite Garden Watch the Loom. Hope you enjoy! 1/2

Software > Systems > Societies As 2025 comes to a close, we’re all moving from isolated software tools to agentic systems coordinating those tools to emerging “societies” of autonomous agents that can research, generate, QA, and ship with minimal (to zero) human intervention. Dan Batten and I spent the past few months putting together a 25-minute presentation that covers: → Why the Software Era is ending → How Systems replace disconnected tools with coordinated, generative workflows → Teams can evolve structure today for the coming Societies phase This isn’t AI research. It’s a practical framework for teams building real work today and tomorrow. It's a look at what we’re actively running at Little Plains , and rolling out next at Infinite Garden Watch the Loom. Hope you enjoy! 1/2

Emmett

13,505 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This is so funny!!! see how skinny I was! 😩😂 I actually started today not feeling so motivated, but watching this reminded me of where it all began and how far I’ve come. Ojo KetaLa (The 13th Day) my first film as a producer, around 2003/2004. To anyone out there chasing a dream please don’t give up. Keep pushing. Stay intentional. Stay consistent. Every stage of your life will require a new version of you. Be ready to evolve. Be ready to reinvent yourself. If this young girl could keep going… then so can you. I’m grateful for the journey. And I’m still becoming. #funkeakindele #throwbackthursday

This is so funny!!! see how skinny I was! 😩😂 I actually started today not feeling so motivated, but watching this reminded me of where it all began and how far I’ve come. Ojo KetaLa (The 13th Day) my first film as a producer, around 2003/2004. To anyone out there chasing a dream please don’t give up. Keep pushing. Stay intentional. Stay consistent. Every stage of your life will require a new version of you. Be ready to evolve. Be ready to reinvent yourself. If this young girl could keep going… then so can you. I’m grateful for the journey. And I’m still becoming. #funkeakindele #throwbackthursday

Funke Akindele

99,366 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Secretary Linda McMahon: "We spent $3T since the Department of Education was established, only to see scores continuing to decline. And that's just a trend we have to stop, and I think the money is not being spent where it needs to be spent, and that is in the states."

.Secretary Linda McMahon: "We spent $3T since the Department of Education was established, only to see scores continuing to decline. And that's just a trend we have to stop, and I think the money is not being spent where it needs to be spent, and that is in the states."

Trump War Room

31,680 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten