Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We keep inheriting knowledge we’re not ready to survive! I spent a few days putting this presentation together, that explores the recurring pattern found across ancient civilizations. Where knowledge is given, humanity advances, and then destabilizes when wisdom fails to keep up!. It looks at how this same structure... show more

Jason Wilde

46,096 subscribers

21,537 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,949 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Steve was asked about this at the post-game presser: “I think where we are as a franchise is we’re still a good team, still competitive. We’re trying to give ourselves a swing at the plate every year. We did that last year. The point of where we are with the age of our best players is we can still be good but we’re obviously not in the same class as we were 5-6 years ago. We’re not in the same class as the team we played tonight and several other teams in the league. There’s no point in denying that. We have to embrace it, be realistic, and give ourselves a shot. We can give ourselves a shot like we did a year ago by connecting and staying healthy and getting on a run. We’re still good enough to do that. If you do that and you have a shot, you get to the playoffs, you never know what’s going to happen. I think that’s where we are right now so we’ve got to keep fighting.”

Steve was asked about this at the post-game presser: “I think where we are as a franchise is we’re still a good team, still competitive. We’re trying to give ourselves a swing at the plate every year. We did that last year. The point of where we are with the age of our best players is we can still be good but we’re obviously not in the same class as we were 5-6 years ago. We’re not in the same class as the team we played tonight and several other teams in the league. There’s no point in denying that. We have to embrace it, be realistic, and give ourselves a shot. We can give ourselves a shot like we did a year ago by connecting and staying healthy and getting on a run. We’re still good enough to do that. If you do that and you have a shot, you get to the playoffs, you never know what’s going to happen. I think that’s where we are right now so we’ve got to keep fighting.”

aly ✶

97,051 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

I keep coming back to the same uncomfortable conclusion. When a whole society is organised around labour as the organising principle of life, and machines suddenly remove both the work and the need for it, most people will not feel free. They will feel cut loose. Energy cannot be created. It can only change form. Every energy stock we rely on was already in the ground. We did not invent coal or oil. We found them and worked out how to dig them up and burn them at industrial scale. That single fact undercuts the entire fantasy of endless growth on a finite planet. Yet we keep building systems that pretend the physical limits do not exist. The political acceleration, the technological rush, the economic pressure all keep intensifying while human bodies quietly struggle to keep pace. I laid this out in a recent conversation, so for a more comprehensive understanding refer to the video presentation given in the comments. #SteveKeen #EnergyEconomics #PostKeynesian #FinitePlanet #AI

I keep coming back to the same uncomfortable conclusion. When a whole society is organised around labour as the organising principle of life, and machines suddenly remove both the work and the need for it, most people will not feel free. They will feel cut loose. Energy cannot be created. It can only change form. Every energy stock we rely on was already in the ground. We did not invent coal or oil. We found them and worked out how to dig them up and burn them at industrial scale. That single fact undercuts the entire fantasy of endless growth on a finite planet. Yet we keep building systems that pretend the physical limits do not exist. The political acceleration, the technological rush, the economic pressure all keep intensifying while human bodies quietly struggle to keep pace. I laid this out in a recent conversation, so for a more comprehensive understanding refer to the video presentation given in the comments. #SteveKeen #EnergyEconomics #PostKeynesian #FinitePlanet #AI

Prof. Steve Keen

16,482 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

Prof. Brian Cox: "Carl Sagan said all civilisations destroy themselves at the stage we are at" He warns that civilizations like ours may never reach the stars because we destroy ourselves first. When you industrialize as a civilization you hit problems which are probably common to all civilizations. We're approaching that filter and it could be we don't pass through it. This is one of the leading explanations for the Fermi Paradox: the eerie silence of the universe despite its vastness. Advanced societies rise, gain nuclear power and technology, but collapse through war, climate collapse, or self destruction before becoming multi-planetary. Humanity stands at this critical point. Our knowledge may be outpacing our wisdom.

Prof. Brian Cox: "Carl Sagan said all civilisations destroy themselves at the stage we are at" He warns that civilizations like ours may never reach the stars because we destroy ourselves first. When you industrialize as a civilization you hit problems which are probably common to all civilizations. We're approaching that filter and it could be we don't pass through it. This is one of the leading explanations for the Fermi Paradox: the eerie silence of the universe despite its vastness. Advanced societies rise, gain nuclear power and technology, but collapse through war, climate collapse, or self destruction before becoming multi-planetary. Humanity stands at this critical point. Our knowledge may be outpacing our wisdom.

Interstellar

13,641 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The knowledge given to us by our ancient traditions is not limited to books; it is a living science, breathing. Shiva stands at the very centre of this tradition. He has no single form, yet He is the source of all forms. When nothing existed, Shiva was there, and when nothing remains, He will still be. This concept is the greatest strength of our culture.

The knowledge given to us by our ancient traditions is not limited to books; it is a living science, breathing. Shiva stands at the very centre of this tradition. He has no single form, yet He is the source of all forms. When nothing existed, Shiva was there, and when nothing remains, He will still be. This concept is the greatest strength of our culture.

Rajnath Singh

23,223 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Actor Varun Sharma, who is participating in the 'One Nation One Election' awareness drive, says, "I think it's a great initiative...I have been reading about this for the past 2-3 months.I think we should acquire more and more knowledge about it, we should read up on it...The more we talk about it, the more it will be taken forward. Get as much knowledge as you can, read up on it. Talk to your friends, talk to your relatives, talk to your family. Knowledge is the key for everything. So, my request is, get as much knowledge as possible...I think this (One Nation One Election) will save a lot of time...I am sure that when this is consolidated, it will save a lot of everyone's time..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Actor Varun Sharma, who is participating in the 'One Nation One Election' awareness drive, says, "I think it's a great initiative...I have been reading about this for the past 2-3 months.I think we should acquire more and more knowledge about it, we should read up on it...The more we talk about it, the more it will be taken forward. Get as much knowledge as you can, read up on it. Talk to your friends, talk to your relatives, talk to your family. Knowledge is the key for everything. So, my request is, get as much knowledge as possible...I think this (One Nation One Election) will save a lot of time...I am sure that when this is consolidated, it will save a lot of everyone's time..."

ANI

90,428 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Karl Popper on How We Gain Knowledge: ––Karl Popper: "People think, usually, that we acquire knowledge by opening our eyes and our ears and let the sensations stream into us, and they believe then that we record this like a camera. In my opinion, if we wish to get knowledge, we have to have a problem. It has to be knowledge of something. We have to find out something. We don't have to wait for information to stream into us, but we have to be inquisitive if we want to get knowledge. If we were passive, we would gain a confused mass of sensations or something like that, which we would hardly be able to understand and to convert into what one may call knowledge. Quite apart from that, perception is not really, in my opinion, the main source of our knowledge. The role of perception is to inform us about a momentary situation in our environment. But we couldn't really interpret our perceptions without knowing much more about our environment, namely, we know whether we are in a house or whether we are in a glacier. So we have two kinds of knowledge: this wider knowledge of a frame in which we orientate ourselves, and the momentary perception which gives us information about the situation at that particular moment. And it is only this situation in which we can use our perception. So we have theoretical knowledge and, if you like, the momentary practical challenge to our theoretical knowledge. And here comes perception in."

Karl Popper on How We Gain Knowledge: ––Karl Popper: "People think, usually, that we acquire knowledge by opening our eyes and our ears and let the sensations stream into us, and they believe then that we record this like a camera. In my opinion, if we wish to get knowledge, we have to have a problem. It has to be knowledge of something. We have to find out something. We don't have to wait for information to stream into us, but we have to be inquisitive if we want to get knowledge. If we were passive, we would gain a confused mass of sensations or something like that, which we would hardly be able to understand and to convert into what one may call knowledge. Quite apart from that, perception is not really, in my opinion, the main source of our knowledge. The role of perception is to inform us about a momentary situation in our environment. But we couldn't really interpret our perceptions without knowing much more about our environment, namely, we know whether we are in a house or whether we are in a glacier. So we have two kinds of knowledge: this wider knowledge of a frame in which we orientate ourselves, and the momentary perception which gives us information about the situation at that particular moment. And it is only this situation in which we can use our perception. So we have theoretical knowledge and, if you like, the momentary practical challenge to our theoretical knowledge. And here comes perception in."

Karl Popper Quotes

115,200 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

As we walk into a new week, let this be the moment we stop second guessing ourselves. May this be the beginning of trusting our guts, of listening to our instincts. As a new week begins, believe in yourself and all that you have done to get yourself to this place. Keep going, keep moving forward, keep at it! #sundayeveningreminder

As we walk into a new week, let this be the moment we stop second guessing ourselves. May this be the beginning of trusting our guts, of listening to our instincts. As a new week begins, believe in yourself and all that you have done to get yourself to this place. Keep going, keep moving forward, keep at it! #sundayeveningreminder

Maria Shriver

11,425 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Software > Systems > Societies As 2025 comes to a close, we’re all moving from isolated software tools to agentic systems coordinating those tools to emerging “societies” of autonomous agents that can research, generate, QA, and ship with minimal (to zero) human intervention. Dan Batten and I spent the past few months putting together a 25-minute presentation that covers: → Why the Software Era is ending → How Systems replace disconnected tools with coordinated, generative workflows → Teams can evolve structure today for the coming Societies phase This isn’t AI research. It’s a practical framework for teams building real work today and tomorrow. It's a look at what we’re actively running at Little Plains , and rolling out next at Infinite Garden Watch the Loom. Hope you enjoy! 1/2

Software > Systems > Societies As 2025 comes to a close, we’re all moving from isolated software tools to agentic systems coordinating those tools to emerging “societies” of autonomous agents that can research, generate, QA, and ship with minimal (to zero) human intervention. Dan Batten and I spent the past few months putting together a 25-minute presentation that covers: → Why the Software Era is ending → How Systems replace disconnected tools with coordinated, generative workflows → Teams can evolve structure today for the coming Societies phase This isn’t AI research. It’s a practical framework for teams building real work today and tomorrow. It's a look at what we’re actively running at Little Plains , and rolling out next at Infinite Garden Watch the Loom. Hope you enjoy! 1/2

Emmett

13,505 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This is so funny!!! see how skinny I was! 😩😂 I actually started today not feeling so motivated, but watching this reminded me of where it all began and how far I’ve come. Ojo KetaLa (The 13th Day) my first film as a producer, around 2003/2004. To anyone out there chasing a dream please don’t give up. Keep pushing. Stay intentional. Stay consistent. Every stage of your life will require a new version of you. Be ready to evolve. Be ready to reinvent yourself. If this young girl could keep going… then so can you. I’m grateful for the journey. And I’m still becoming. #funkeakindele #throwbackthursday

This is so funny!!! see how skinny I was! 😩😂 I actually started today not feeling so motivated, but watching this reminded me of where it all began and how far I’ve come. Ojo KetaLa (The 13th Day) my first film as a producer, around 2003/2004. To anyone out there chasing a dream please don’t give up. Keep pushing. Stay intentional. Stay consistent. Every stage of your life will require a new version of you. Be ready to evolve. Be ready to reinvent yourself. If this young girl could keep going… then so can you. I’m grateful for the journey. And I’m still becoming. #funkeakindele #throwbackthursday

Funke Akindele

99,527 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Straight up it was gonna be dangerous to keep the show at RBC on Tuesday. Moved it to Puzzles. Still same area and tix are honored. It’s fun when shows are a little dangerous, but heatstroke is not a part of that.

Straight up it was gonna be dangerous to keep the show at RBC on Tuesday. Moved it to Puzzles. Still same area and tix are honored. It’s fun when shows are a little dangerous, but heatstroke is not a part of that.

NO CURE XXX

173,164 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🐖🐇: i love the members 8️⃣: ㅎㅎㅎ 🐖🐇: we really try to not let things pile up. when a trouble comes up, we try to resolve it immediately. even when we argue, i do it with the mindset "i'll definitely resolve this today" and also, without the members, i know too well that things wouldn't work out. looking at how we've been together until now, i think that they're the people i want to be with and keep seeing forever. they're really like a family!

🐖🐇: i love the members 8️⃣: ㅎㅎㅎ 🐖🐇: we really try to not let things pile up. when a trouble comes up, we try to resolve it immediately. even when we argue, i do it with the mindset "i'll definitely resolve this today" and also, without the members, i know too well that things wouldn't work out. looking at how we've been together until now, i think that they're the people i want to be with and keep seeing forever. they're really like a family!

비니

60,426 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Jesus said His return would be like the days of Noah. Not just marked by darkness, but by people continuing on as normal, unaware of what was coming. There may be increasing spiritual confusion and deception, but the greater issue is this: people are not ready. God is patient. He is not trying to keep people out, He is calling them in. There is still time to turn, to come back, and to walk in fellowship with Him. Sin doesn’t just affect behavior, it affects relationship. It separates, and if we’re not careful, it leaves us unprepared for His appearing. This isn’t a message of fear. It’s a call to be ready while there is still time. Watch the full episode here:

Jesus said His return would be like the days of Noah. Not just marked by darkness, but by people continuing on as normal, unaware of what was coming. There may be increasing spiritual confusion and deception, but the greater issue is this: people are not ready. God is patient. He is not trying to keep people out, He is calling them in. There is still time to turn, to come back, and to walk in fellowship with Him. Sin doesn’t just affect behavior, it affects relationship. It separates, and if we’re not careful, it leaves us unprepared for His appearing. This isn’t a message of fear. It’s a call to be ready while there is still time. Watch the full episode here:

John Bevere

31,843 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

A new cinematic AI piece. "Panopticon - Survivorship" This is my sixth piece in my Midjourney + Magnific.ai + Runway series. I've been on a bit of a creative streak for the past week and loving this new process. I almost gave up on this one, but then finally found a narrative through line. It looks at those who survive a disaster, but it is a contemplation of those who did not survive. We not only zoom in on those who are trying to get to safety, but we zoom in looking for those who may not have survived. We also zoom into elements that may help identify people. It also looks at who is hardest hit by a disaster and it is often people of color and I hope the piece elicits a question of why this is the case and an examination of the dark history it may uncover.

A new cinematic AI piece. "Panopticon - Survivorship" This is my sixth piece in my Midjourney + Magnific.ai + Runway series. I've been on a bit of a creative streak for the past week and loving this new process. I almost gave up on this one, but then finally found a narrative through line. It looks at those who survive a disaster, but it is a contemplation of those who did not survive. We not only zoom in on those who are trying to get to safety, but we zoom in looking for those who may not have survived. We also zoom into elements that may help identify people. It also looks at who is hardest hit by a disaster and it is often people of color and I hope the piece elicits a question of why this is the case and an examination of the dark history it may uncover.

Chikai

33,485 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A few years ago Jessi asked me if I would be interested in being her next co-host for the Bardown Beauties Podcast. People have always asked me how that came to be and this is how. I knew of Jessi when I started working with the Wild, and interacted with her initially when I was a guest on the podcast and then she and Alexis were guests on the show I hosted for the Wild at the time. But, the first summer I spent working for DaBeauty League was where I went from knowing Jessi as a professional and got to know Jessi on an incredibly personal level. This was the stuff we did that summer. We talked about life, we had fun, and she signed herself up to get some of her hair shaved off. This is one of the videos I’ve watched over and over these last few days because this is where it really all started and I’m forever grateful for it.

A few years ago Jessi asked me if I would be interested in being her next co-host for the Bardown Beauties Podcast. People have always asked me how that came to be and this is how. I knew of Jessi when I started working with the Wild, and interacted with her initially when I was a guest on the podcast and then she and Alexis were guests on the show I hosted for the Wild at the time. But, the first summer I spent working for DaBeauty League was where I went from knowing Jessi as a professional and got to know Jessi on an incredibly personal level. This was the stuff we did that summer. We talked about life, we had fun, and she signed herself up to get some of her hair shaved off. This is one of the videos I’ve watched over and over these last few days because this is where it really all started and I’m forever grateful for it.

Kirsten Krull

76,067 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce