"We knew that we had a chance to get a conversation started that could change something, that could maybe stop this from ever happening again." Paula Devlin, a juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial, tells Fox News Digital she hopes the case can spark a larger conversation and prevent... another family from enduring something similar. "I think that's one of the reasons why we feel, or I feel, so strongly about this, is that I hope that no other woman or husband has to go through this." Devlin's comments come as the lone holdout juror who believed Clancy was guilty faces heavy criticism and scrutiny of his past for his perspective on the murder trial.show more

The conversation worth having is how three children—Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; Callan, 8 months—were strangled one by one with exercise bands and some jurors still treated the case as a vehicle to “change something” for other women. A jury’s job is to apply the law to this evidence, not to legislate from the box or send a message. The kids don’t get a second chance.

Nothing in this world—no words, no conditions, no excuses—can mitigate what she did. She killed three children. The three who trusted her more than anyone else on earth. The ultimate betrayal. She is guilty.

Larger conversation? For what exactly? YOU WANTED A TRIPLE MURDERER TO GO FREE.

Hmmm.... making policy statements in a jury diliberation seems a dangerous thing.

Bringing activism to a court case is wild... Not sure how you weed this out, but this is incredibly wrong as it puts an ideal before law & order. Meaning, justice could be ignored for what a juror finds to be a greater cause

Seems like they are just trying to milk the exposure now. Trying to stay relevant

Guilty These women are sickening 🤮 She is guilty. She mudered her kids. She should have removed herself from the home.

The converaation: we need to be more liberal about removing children from moody mothers.

wtf, “…so that no other woman or husband…” WHAT ABOUT THE INNICENT CHILDREN???

Is she implying the female jurors discussed the case amongst themselves before the judge presented it to all the jurors for deliberation?

Why are we allowing these crazy jurors to make any kind of statement if the case may still be tried again.

I say the minute a women says she has post pordom the kids should be removed immediately and they must institutionalize the women . Thats how you save the kids fuck the woman.

“No other woman or husband has to go through this”? How about no more innocent children have to go through that? What kind of person disregards the actual victims? Especially when they are….I just can’t even say it.

So,she came in with an agenda. Which means she should not have been on the jury.

Hopefully this conversation brings more awareness and helps prevent another family from going through something like this.

Why were the other 11 jurors so brainwashed to believe that letting Lindsay off was compassion?

The focus should be on the victims, the facts, and preventing another tragedy. Whatever people’s views on the verdict, the children and their families deserve justice and compassion.

She simply didn't understand the assignment. F

my gosh ...we know how you feel...you made that abundantly clear...how much money are you being paid for your interviews...no one will ever want to be a juror after this mess

Sentencing Lindsay Clancy to death would be an excellent deterrent against mothers trying to perform post-term abortions.

They had their own agenda. Lone juror is a bigger hero than we thought

Does she realize that she is NOT an advocate now...

Bringing activism into a court case is quite unusual. not sure how to distinguish between legitimate activism and this particular case, but it’s fundamentally wrong because it prioritizes ideals over law and order.

Not your job, lady. It was to get justice for the 3 kids.

Good for the lone juror. He’s the only one who did the right thing.

Liberal white women are going to be the death of this country.

Moron. Weak minded.

Whatever one thinks of the verdict, the jurors’ comments show how deeply this case affected everyone involved. The focus should remain on the evidence, the legal process, and preventing another tragedy.

She needs to stop talking. There is absolutely no excuse that makes it ok to kill your children. None and never.

The hope that something positive can come from such a devastating case is understandable. But preventing tragedies like this requires honest, compassionate conversations about mental health, warning signs, support systems, and

Blah, blah, it should never be on to murder 3 children.

Those lunatics are openly admitting they reached a verdict before the trial began. Now, they're doxing the lone juror for not buckling under their pressure. Why are they not being held accountable?

Fucking moron STOP giving this woman a platform she is as delusional as LC