Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We know the games Senator Marcoleta and Mike Defensor has been playing in destabilising the government under President Marcos. The government must now throw all its weight and power, and back the necessary agencies in its deeper dive into the connections between Marcoleta and Defensor. The NBI must not...

26,942 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

WATCH: As early as April, retired Marine Orly Guteza said he was being pressured to deny delivering cash to former House Speaker Martin Romualdez residence and instead implicate Sen. Rodante Marcoleta and former Rep. Mike Defensor in his affidavit. In a video posted by Defensor on April 29, Guteza is heard telling his wife that he was being made to read a new affidavit stating that he did not deliver cash to Romualdez and accusing the two lawmakers instead. Fast-forward to the present, Guteza has recanted his earlier account and his affidavit now contains essentially the same allegations, claiming that Marcoleta and Defensor—both now detained—pressured him to make the accusations. The Office of the Ombudsman has since downplayed Guteza’s reversal, describing recantations in high-profile cases as a “classic pressure tactic.” It said the investigation does not hinge on Guteza or the other Marines who recanted, noting that 28 other witnesses are prepared to provide direct and material information in the case involving Romualdez. Ombudsman Boying Remulla earlier said the Romualdez camp was pulling the strings behind the recantations, describing the moves as a desperate effort as the flood-control probe closes in on the former Speaker. Atty. Levito Baligod, counsel for the former Marines, said his clients were offered up to ₱10 million each to recant and were also subjected to threats to their security. Baligod said he has screenshots of messages and recorded conversations that he plans to submit to Ombudsman investigators. George Villalon Jr., one of the witnesses who stood by his testimony, separately claimed that offers to reverse their accounts reached ₱20 million to ₱25 million.

Peanut Gallery Media Network

14,988 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Novice Senator Marcoleta to be subpoenaed for his participation in the fraudulent presentation of a witness with falsified and spurious affidavit. The Orly Guteza Affair: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus Let’s point-by-point lay out the facts and appraise the areas of collusion and responsibility: 1.Fraudulent affidavit 👉 Orly Guteza’s affidavit was publicly repudiated by Attorney Espera, whose name was attached to the document. 👉 Espera categorically declared it unauthorised, fraudulent, and spurious, stressing that she never met Guteza nor prepared the affidavit attributed to her office. 👉 This places Guteza’s testimony on highly questionable legal ground and hints at a deliberate attempt to fabricate evidence. 2.Improper Senate procedure 👉 Senator Marcoleta introduced Guteza as a “surprise witness” in the Blue Ribbon Committee hearings. 👉 By bypassing established vetting and notification procedures, Marcoleta undermined the credibility of the proceedings. 👉 His action casts doubt on his intent and suggests possible orchestration rather than genuine fact-finding. 3.The witness’ background 👉 Guteza has a history as a “close-in” security aide, shifting loyalties but consistently attached to Duterte allies: ✅ 2016 – Security detail to Nicanor Faeldon at Bureau of Customs. ✅ 2018 – Assigned to Martin Andanar at PCOO. ✅ 2020 – Detail to Gerald Bantag at BuCor. ✅ 2022 – Security for VP Sara Duterte at the OVP. ✅ 2024 – Later linked to Congressman Zaldy Co, also an ally of the Duterte bloc prior to 2022 before relationship went sour. 👉 This revolving door of Duterte-aligned principals paints him as an insider operative embedded in networks loyal to Rodrigo and Sara Duterte. 4.Sara Duterte’s posture 👉 Sara Duterte openly declared that she would “destroy her political enemies regardless of truthfulness.” 👉 Guteza’s sudden surfacing with a dubious affidavit and connections to her inner circle lends weight to suspicions that her combative stance may be translating into tactical fabrications and weaponised testimonies. 5.Preparation of the witness 👉 Reports indicate that Mike Defensor, a staunch Sara Duterte supporter, played a role in preparing and bringing Guteza to the Senate. 👉 Defensor’s involvement situates this episode within a larger Duterte-loyalist operation to insert compromised testimony into official proceedings. 6.Espera’s denial and legal ripples 👉 Lawyer Espie Espera has taken firm steps to protect her integrity, denying involvement with Guteza and moving to contest the fraudulent affidavit in court. 👉 Her repudiation doesn’t just nullify the affidavit—it places Marcoleta and Guteza in direct exposure to charges of perjury, falsification, or obstruction of legislative process. 7.Judicial scrutiny 👉 Manila Executive Judge Carolina Sison has jurisdiction over the matter, given that Espera’s law office falls within her authority. 👉 Judge Sison is preparing to issue subpoenas to key figures, including Guteza and Senator Marcoleta, to establish how a fraudulent affidavit was created and introduced into official proceedings. 8.Possible complicity of the OVP 👉 Guteza’s tenure as close-in security to VP Sara Duterte and his sudden role as Marcoleta’s witness cannot be dismissed as coincidence. 👉 The chain of loyalties—from Faeldon, Andanar, Bantag, Sara Duterte—maps a clear Duterte-aligned ecosystem. 👉 If it is proven that Guteza was deployed with OVP knowledge or backing, Sara herself may be implicated in orchestrating a deliberate campaign to malign political adversaries under the cover of Senate investigations. The fraudulent affidavit of Orly Guteza, the procedural breach by Senator Marcoleta, and the denial by Attorney Espera form a triad of scandal that now rests in the hands of Manila’s judiciary.

The King

60,446 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Probe Senator Dante Marcoleta You have to admit it! How Senator Panfilo Lacson called him out was satisfying! That is the Marcoleta brand — confusing people with his extreme emotions and nonsense rhetoric. Divert the conversation elsewhere, to save someone or something. It is definitely not okay when he made a deal with the Discayas without the approval of the whole committee when he was the chair. Later on, the affidavit of the Discaya was proven wrong a couple of times. Why are we even talking about the possibility of being a state witness? Well, it is not the first time that Senator Dante Marcoleta tried to defend sketchy personalities and/ or entities — truth be told, there’s a clear pattern. I am not surprised how he would go above, over and beyond for the Discayas because that’s how I’ve known him in the 19th Congress. I think that it is of national interest to probe the Date Marcoleta —- why is he protecting the Discayas? What was his stake with NGCP? And others. A clear pattern: Why focus on ____? This is one of the usual arguments of Marcoleta to shield the sketchy entities and people. He used this argument when the NGCP was on the hot seat for not complying with the tax requirements and the Chinese ownership in our state grip. —- this was also his argument to shield Sara Duterte from legitimate questions regarding the confidential funds of the OVP and Duterte-led DepEd. Flip-flopping opinion about COA To protect Sara Duterte, he defended the process of the Commission on Audit — but during the Senate Blue Ribbon Chair he lambasted the COA for not doing a pre-emptive audit. COA defended itself saying that their mandate is limited only to post-fact. Divert the conversation This is his ultimate tactic — stop or divert the conversation when the things are not looking good for whomever he is protecting. This was very evident when he chaired the Blue Ribbon Committee and was raised by other Senators. He interrupted the conversation when it’s heading towards the Duterte administration. Several times if I may add. This is the very reason why he’s stealing the show — to confuse the public and get the headlines. Not accepting a different answer It is one thing when the Resource Person is lying, that is one contemptible violation — but Dante Marcoleta formula is to pressure the person into what he wants to hear. I am pretty sure that this is very obvious once you want him in action

Just

155,886 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce