正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

“We leave here. And we leave here with a very simple proposal. A method of understanding, that is our final and best offer. We see if the Iranians accept it.” My understanding of the final words of JD Vance is that he has not declared the negotiations a failure....

97,043 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tomorrow JD Vance could become the most senior American official to meet Iranian leadership since 1977... The last time a top U.S. official sat across from an Iranian leader, Jimmy Carter was visiting the Shah on New Year's Eve. Vance wasn't born yet. 47 years of hostage crises, proxy wars, and "Death to America" chants stand between then and Saturday morning in Islamabad. Obama tried to arrange a handshake at the UN. Iran's hardliners killed it. Trump tried in France in 2019. Same result. Kerry met Iran's FM for the nuclear deal but that was lower-level. A sitting Vice President meeting Iran's top officials in person would be genuinely unprecedented in the history of the Islamic Republic. The stakes for Vance personally are enormous. He opposed this war from the start. He told Trump to his face it was "a bad idea" in the final Situation Room meeting. He was the one Iran specifically requested as a negotiating partner. Now he walks into a room in Islamabad carrying the weight of 2,000+ dead Iranian civilians, 13 dead Americans, and a fractured conservative base watching his every move. If he lands a deal that gives the U.S. a credible exit, he carries that achievement all the way to 2028. If talks collapse and the war restarts, the man who said "don't do this" becomes the face of failing to fix it. To his credit, being right about the war before it started is the best possible foundation for negotiating its end. Source: WSJ JD Vance

Mario Nawfal

195,614 次观看 • 3 个月前

I think a big mistake is believing that if something is here, we should be able to see it. Right? The lights in the sky and the pilots or the gods or whatever they are? I think we assume out of arrogance and ego. An insect can crawl across your hand and never understand that you are a whole entire being. It only experiences pressure, heat, vibration, and movement. A fingertip appears. A shadow passes. The insect never sees the body attached to it. The insect does not have access to the full image. Ever. I think our situation may be exactly the same. Whatever people call the phenomenon, nonhuman intelligence, gods, or something else entirely, may be present in full while we only register a portion of it. We notice effects, not the actual being. Changes in perception. Anomalies. We expect a face when all we are capable of sensing is the fingertip. Let me explain. Reports are always partial and strange. Lights, shapes, impressions, symbols, missing time, pressure, fear, calm. None of it ever shows us a full being, or the real craft; because our senses are not built to assemble it. Just like the ant cannot assemble a human from a few sensations. Now that doesn't mean what we are seeing is fake. It means the insect’s world is smaller than the thing interacting with it. I get sick of people saying there is no there there, I think they are making the same mistake the insect would make. Our reality is likely a thin slice of what actually exists. We move through a world full of forces and intelligences that exceed our resolution. We are not seeing nothing. We are seeing effects. And effects are often the only honest proof a limited observer ever gets.

Jason Wilde

12,125 次观看 • 5 个月前

Americans are not ready to watch sons and daughters hunted by FPV drones. Some may not like this post, and that’s OK. Some may see this as being a “panican,” and that is also OK. My tolerance for American blood being spilled is very, very low. But this needs to be said: If you have paid any attention to the war in Ukraine, you will know how drone warfare has escalated. You will have an understanding of the sophistication of the Ukrainians and Russians in their pursuit of hunting and killing each other with human-guided robots strapped with explosives. We know Russia and Iran share military ties; hell, the most common form of long-range standoff munition used to target Ukrainian infrastructure is an Iranian-designed Shahed drone. Now, are the Iranians as sophisticated as the Russians? No. But will a ground action result in grainy videos of Americans being hit by FPV drones? Almost certainly. Could the deployment of ground forces to the Gulf be a feint? Sure, it could be, but this point extends beyond Iran. The U.S. needs to be ready to counter the drone menace. I won’t pretend to know the inner machinations of the Joint Chiefs, the White House, or President Trump, but with the destruction of an E-3 Sentry on the runway, it has become absolutely clear the U.S. armed forces have not scaled their ability to handle drones. I don’t know what the answer here is, but I haven’t seen this point brought up at the frequency it deserves. It needs to be said. We are not ready for footage of American soldiers and Marines cowering in their last moments, set to some upbeat pop song or some cleric screaming praises to Allah.

Fanatic 🇺🇸

1,081,705 次观看 • 4 个月前