Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“We literally, with AI, have a technology that transfers sand into thought.” Marc Andreessen on why AI is the philosopher’s stone: “The early scientists, including Isaac Newton, were super obsessed with this concept of alchemy.” “Alchemy was the transmutation of lead into gold. Which meant the transmutation of something...

a16z's profile picture

a16z

1,030,642 subscribers

185,398 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

BildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan
1:10

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan

a16z

203,805 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Issac Newton was obsessed with the Philosopher’s Stone; the ability to turn lead into gold. He failed. Today, we’re on the cusp of a far more consequential version of his dream: turning sand into intelligence. This isn’t a myth. It’s the AI revolution and it’s happening now.
3:25

Issac Newton was obsessed with the Philosopher’s Stone; the ability to turn lead into gold. He failed. Today, we’re on the cusp of a far more consequential version of his dream: turning sand into intelligence. This isn’t a myth. It’s the AI revolution and it’s happening now.

Marc Warner

40,176 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marc Andreessen describing AI. "We've turned sand into thought. And it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species" Sand → silicon → chip → data center → power → AI → thought
1:10

Marc Andreessen describing AI. "We've turned sand into thought. And it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species" Sand → silicon → chip → data center → power → AI → thought

Rohan Paul

38,457 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Glass between blocks of stone? Now the "EXPERTS" will say that glass was formed from the friction caused by the rope with the sand that cut the rocks, which became very hot and made the sand turn into glass.🤔
0:39

Glass between blocks of stone? Now the "EXPERTS" will say that glass was formed from the friction caused by the rope with the sand that cut the rocks, which became very hot and made the sand turn into glass.🤔

Bronze Giant

44,069 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

We need AI to work. Marc Andreessen on why AI is arriving at a moment of economic and demographic pressure: "Productivity growth for the last 50 years has actually been very low, not very high." "So statistically, in the US, in the west, technology progress in the economy ... has actually slowed way down." "Many countries around the world ... are actually going to depopulate over the next century." "We actually need AI to work in order to get productivity growth up... We actually need AI to work because we’re going to need machines to do all the jobs that we’re not going to have people to do." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky
2:13

We need AI to work. Marc Andreessen on why AI is arriving at a moment of economic and demographic pressure: "Productivity growth for the last 50 years has actually been very low, not very high." "So statistically, in the US, in the west, technology progress in the economy ... has actually slowed way down." "Many countries around the world ... are actually going to depopulate over the next century." "We actually need AI to work in order to get productivity growth up... We actually need AI to work because we’re going to need machines to do all the jobs that we’re not going to have people to do." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky

a16z

31,348 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

ANDREESSEN: “Today AI is software … But there's another turn on AI that's coming, which is the turn to embodied physical AI, which is robotics … Elon Musk believes that robotics is going to be the biggest industry in the history of the planet.” 🎥 Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Joe Lonsdale
4:33

ANDREESSEN: “Today AI is software … But there's another turn on AI that's coming, which is the turn to embodied physical AI, which is robotics … Elon Musk believes that robotics is going to be the biggest industry in the history of the planet.” 🎥 Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Joe Lonsdale

Chief Nerd

397,733 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“The regulatory landscape is fairly scary right now." Marc Andreessen on AI regulation: "We were headed towards extreme overregulation—up to and including possibly full outlawing of the technology, which is very spooky." "The action in the US has now shifted to the states. There are now thousands of AI bills, and many of them are actually quite scary." "The situation in Europe is quite alarming. There are a number of European countries really trying hard to kneecap American technology." Source: Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 at Cisco AI Summit
1:41

“The regulatory landscape is fairly scary right now." Marc Andreessen on AI regulation: "We were headed towards extreme overregulation—up to and including possibly full outlawing of the technology, which is very spooky." "The action in the US has now shifted to the states. There are now thousands of AI bills, and many of them are actually quite scary." "The situation in Europe is quite alarming. There are a number of European countries really trying hard to kneecap American technology." Source: Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 at Cisco AI Summit

a16z

44,385 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:34

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 and Jack Altman on the old VC world and why it was bound to break. “It was this very clubby, cartel, you know, basically kind of thing… It was fine, as long as the ambitions of the industry were constrained.”
0:30

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 and Jack Altman on the old VC world and why it was bound to break. “It was this very clubby, cartel, you know, basically kind of thing… It was fine, as long as the ambitions of the industry were constrained.”

a16z

39,928 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marc Andreessen on the inversion of technology adoption of AI. “It took 40 years for basically technology to cascade down from the largest organizations in the world to small businesses and to the individual.” “This technology, AI, is going the opposite.” “Consumers are adapting the fastest... Small businesses are then adopting right after that... Government is the late adopter.” Source: Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Next Up with Mark Halperin Full episode:
1:25

Marc Andreessen on the inversion of technology adoption of AI. “It took 40 years for basically technology to cascade down from the largest organizations in the world to small businesses and to the individual.” “This technology, AI, is going the opposite.” “Consumers are adapting the fastest... Small businesses are then adopting right after that... Government is the late adopter.” Source: Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Next Up with Mark Halperin Full episode:

a16z

49,008 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Pretty sure The Will Stancil Show was discussed on The Marc Andreessen Podcast as a pioneering piece of AI Filmmaking that is "better than South Park" 😮🔥 Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
4:28

Pretty sure The Will Stancil Show was discussed on The Marc Andreessen Podcast as a pioneering piece of AI Filmmaking that is "better than South Park" 😮🔥 Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

Emily Youcis

57,714 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Moltbook, the social network for AI agents: "All of the science fiction novels basically have AI either being super utopian or super dystopian, but they never have this incredible sense of humor aspect, which is what we're actually getting—where people are just using everything as fodder for memes." "Moltbook is saturated with all of these incredibly funny memes. It's actually quite unclear which ones are real and which ones aren't." "There's an AI agent on Moltbook that has decided to create an AI religion. And at least as of today, it had hired a single human worker to walk the streets of San Francisco and practice the new AI religion." Marc Andreessen with Jeetu Patel at Cisco AI Summit
1:43

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Moltbook, the social network for AI agents: "All of the science fiction novels basically have AI either being super utopian or super dystopian, but they never have this incredible sense of humor aspect, which is what we're actually getting—where people are just using everything as fodder for memes." "Moltbook is saturated with all of these incredibly funny memes. It's actually quite unclear which ones are real and which ones aren't." "There's an AI agent on Moltbook that has decided to create an AI religion. And at least as of today, it had hired a single human worker to walk the streets of San Francisco and practice the new AI religion." Marc Andreessen with Jeetu Patel at Cisco AI Summit

a16z

162,218 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Marc Andreessen on where AI sits in the arc of technology: “This is the biggest technological revolution of my life.” “This is clearly bigger than the internet.” “The comps on this are things like the microprocessor and the steam engine and electricity… the wheel.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
0:22

Marc Andreessen on where AI sits in the arc of technology: “This is the biggest technological revolution of my life.” “This is clearly bigger than the internet.” “The comps on this are things like the microprocessor and the steam engine and electricity… the wheel.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

85,787 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Marc Andreessen says the movie Oppenheimer misunderstands history and morality. "The movie sets up both Oppenheimer and also specifically Albert Einstein as the key moral authorities of the era with respect to the use of nuclear weapons. Both claims of which I believe are deeply incorrect on substance." "My critique is the morality of the movie I think is very badly upside-down. And it's upside-down in a way that flatters our current politics but is very badly upside-down in terms of what actually happened at the time." Its redeeming feature is the first half: "[The first half of the movie is] one of the only recreations on film of what American elite culture and society and American research establishment of the leading experts at the time, in the 1920s and 30s, how thoroughly saturated that world was with Communism." However, the remainder of the movie frames Oppenheimer and Einstein as political heroes and vilifies technology, when in reality Oppenheimer was surrounded by Communists, Einstein was a critic of American democracy, and the hydrogen bomb Oppenheimer refused to build may have prevented World War III. (Marc recommends reading When Reason Goes on Holiday by Neven Sesardić to learn more about Einstein's political views.) "I thought the movie really cheated on the morality of it because it presented this as this slam dunk that the nuke was bad and that these people were bad and the whole thing was bad and that both Einstein and Oppenheimer were moral heroes in some extent trying to line up against this. And I just thought that really cheated the audience." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
7:10

Marc Andreessen says the movie Oppenheimer misunderstands history and morality. "The movie sets up both Oppenheimer and also specifically Albert Einstein as the key moral authorities of the era with respect to the use of nuclear weapons. Both claims of which I believe are deeply incorrect on substance." "My critique is the morality of the movie I think is very badly upside-down. And it's upside-down in a way that flatters our current politics but is very badly upside-down in terms of what actually happened at the time." Its redeeming feature is the first half: "[The first half of the movie is] one of the only recreations on film of what American elite culture and society and American research establishment of the leading experts at the time, in the 1920s and 30s, how thoroughly saturated that world was with Communism." However, the remainder of the movie frames Oppenheimer and Einstein as political heroes and vilifies technology, when in reality Oppenheimer was surrounded by Communists, Einstein was a critic of American democracy, and the hydrogen bomb Oppenheimer refused to build may have prevented World War III. (Marc recommends reading When Reason Goes on Holiday by Neven Sesardić to learn more about Einstein's political views.) "I thought the movie really cheated on the morality of it because it presented this as this slam dunk that the nuke was bad and that these people were bad and the whole thing was bad and that both Einstein and Oppenheimer were moral heroes in some extent trying to line up against this. And I just thought that really cheated the audience." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

328,615 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 says the winner of the US-China AI race could dictate what all 8 billion people on Earth use — but open source introduces a third possibility: "The stakes are basically: what is the world going to run on?" "In the long run, somebody's gonna win. And the world will either be running on American AI or be running on Chinese AI." "The open source thing is super fascinating because it throws a wrench into all of this. It raises a third possibility that neither the US nor China are going to be the platform — it may just be open source." Marc Andreessen with Jeetu Patel at Cisco AI Summit
3:41

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 says the winner of the US-China AI race could dictate what all 8 billion people on Earth use — but open source introduces a third possibility: "The stakes are basically: what is the world going to run on?" "In the long run, somebody's gonna win. And the world will either be running on American AI or be running on Chinese AI." "The open source thing is super fascinating because it throws a wrench into all of this. It raises a third possibility that neither the US nor China are going to be the platform — it may just be open source." Marc Andreessen with Jeetu Patel at Cisco AI Summit

a16z

101,985 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Marc Andreessen says in the future, we may not have programming languages or even user interfaces: "I kind of think that in 10 years, I'm not sure there will even be a salient concept of a programming language in the way that we understand it today." "If you project forward, you have to think forward to a world in which it's just—I'm going to tell the thing what I need, and it's going to do it in whatever way is most optimal." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space
2:40

Marc Andreessen says in the future, we may not have programming languages or even user interfaces: "I kind of think that in 10 years, I'm not sure there will even be a salient concept of a programming language in the way that we understand it today." "If you project forward, you have to think forward to a world in which it's just—I'm going to tell the thing what I need, and it's going to do it in whatever way is most optimal." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space

a16z

65,734 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on the Current Thing: "Everybody has to have an opinion on the Current Thing. It's the most important thing in the world. And then 24 hours later it's like it never happened because something else has become the Current Thing." "As long as the internet is the medium of choice, we're going to live in a world in which this is the cycle now. It's like a 24, 36-hour news cycle." "The role of mainstream media for the rest of our life is just going to be to follow the internet viral posts."
1:23

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on the Current Thing: "Everybody has to have an opinion on the Current Thing. It's the most important thing in the world. And then 24 hours later it's like it never happened because something else has become the Current Thing." "As long as the internet is the medium of choice, we're going to live in a world in which this is the cycle now. It's like a 24, 36-hour news cycle." "The role of mainstream media for the rest of our life is just going to be to follow the internet viral posts."

a16z

89,656 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Marc Andreessen on why the product is the most important thing for a tech CEO to understand: “You better have somebody running the company who really understands those products.” “In the technology industry, that’s usually a technologist.” “The alternate model seems to work better, which is the technologist who basically picks up the skills to become a CEO along the way.” “This is a very difficult, challenging thing to do. Nobody ever said it would be easy.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 at Fortune Brainstorm 2009:
1:38

Marc Andreessen on why the product is the most important thing for a tech CEO to understand: “You better have somebody running the company who really understands those products.” “In the technology industry, that’s usually a technologist.” “The alternate model seems to work better, which is the technologist who basically picks up the skills to become a CEO along the way.” “This is a very difficult, challenging thing to do. Nobody ever said it would be easy.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 at Fortune Brainstorm 2009:

a16z

55,372 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Marc Andreessen on the imperative of speed in AI adoption: "Both the AI utopians and the AI doomers are far too optimistic." "They believe that because the technology makes something possible, 8 billion people all of a sudden are going to change how they behave. It's like—no. So much of how the existing economy works is just wired in." "We're going to be lucky as a society if AI adoption happens quickly. Because if it doesn't, what we're going to have is stagnation." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space
0:24

Marc Andreessen on the imperative of speed in AI adoption: "Both the AI utopians and the AI doomers are far too optimistic." "They believe that because the technology makes something possible, 8 billion people all of a sudden are going to change how they behave. It's like—no. So much of how the existing economy works is just wired in." "We're going to be lucky as a society if AI adoption happens quickly. Because if it doesn't, what we're going to have is stagnation." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space

a16z

70,510 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Peter Thiel on the Origins of Modern AI: It was always US vs China Thiel describes the two canonical books that framed the US vs China AI debate in the 2010s: "There was the Bostrom book, Superintelligence, 2014, where AI was gonna be this superhuman, super-duper intelligent thing." "And then the anti-Bostrom book was the Kai-Fu Lee, 2018, AI Superpowers." "You can think of it as the CCP rebuttal to Bostrom, where basically AI was going to be surveillance tech, face recognition, and China was going to win because they had no qualms about applying this technology." But modern AI became something different: "If we now think about what actually happened, let's say, with the LLMs and and ChatGPT, it was really neither of those two." "And it was this in-between thing, which was actually what people would've defined AI as for the previous 60 or 70 years, which is passing the Turing test." "Which is, you know, this somewhat fuzzy line. It's a computer that can pretend to be a human. Or that can fool you into thinking it's a human." "ChatGPT passed it, and that seems very significant." Recorded September 9th, 2024 at the All-In Summit. Join us in 2025: Sept 7-9 in Los Angeles
0:55

Peter Thiel on the Origins of Modern AI: It was always US vs China Thiel describes the two canonical books that framed the US vs China AI debate in the 2010s: "There was the Bostrom book, Superintelligence, 2014, where AI was gonna be this superhuman, super-duper intelligent thing." "And then the anti-Bostrom book was the Kai-Fu Lee, 2018, AI Superpowers." "You can think of it as the CCP rebuttal to Bostrom, where basically AI was going to be surveillance tech, face recognition, and China was going to win because they had no qualms about applying this technology." But modern AI became something different: "If we now think about what actually happened, let's say, with the LLMs and and ChatGPT, it was really neither of those two." "And it was this in-between thing, which was actually what people would've defined AI as for the previous 60 or 70 years, which is passing the Turing test." "Which is, you know, this somewhat fuzzy line. It's a computer that can pretend to be a human. Or that can fool you into thinking it's a human." "ChatGPT passed it, and that seems very significant." Recorded September 9th, 2024 at the All-In Summit. Join us in 2025: Sept 7-9 in Los Angeles

The All-In Podcast

40,946 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr