Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

We live inside three dimensions and assume that’s all there is. When Einstein wrote down gravity, he used four. When Kaluza tried to add electromagnetism, he needed five. By the time string theory walked in trying to unify everything, the count was eleven. Every time physics got closer to... show more

Kekius Maximus

127,225 subscribers

51,293 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”

Jan Jekielek

31,984 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

There is no more time left to sugar coat anything. Most people, even unbelievers can FEEL something is wrong and we need to USE that to talk about what is going on. We need to be talking about the reality of hell. About the reality of eternity separated from God. About Satan, demons and the demonic realm. About the spiritual warfare we are in because we are now in a period of time they can see EVIDENCE of it when they look outside. Get right with Jesus. He died for you, took your place on the cross so that through the blood that He shed, you can spend eternity in the presence of God Almighty.

There is no more time left to sugar coat anything. Most people, even unbelievers can FEEL something is wrong and we need to USE that to talk about what is going on. We need to be talking about the reality of hell. About the reality of eternity separated from God. About Satan, demons and the demonic realm. About the spiritual warfare we are in because we are now in a period of time they can see EVIDENCE of it when they look outside. Get right with Jesus. He died for you, took your place on the cross so that through the blood that He shed, you can spend eternity in the presence of God Almighty.

Ashley Hays

32,790 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Friends, we come to the First Sunday of Advent, which is the commencement of the new liturgical year. “Adventus” in Latin means arrival or coming, and one way to look at Advent is to see three comings of Christ. There is the coming of Christ in history in Bethlehem, the coming of Christ now as he approaches our hearts, and the coming of Christ someday in the future. All three of these dimensions belong to our Advent preparation.

Friends, we come to the First Sunday of Advent, which is the commencement of the new liturgical year. “Adventus” in Latin means arrival or coming, and one way to look at Advent is to see three comings of Christ. There is the coming of Christ in history in Bethlehem, the coming of Christ now as he approaches our hearts, and the coming of Christ someday in the future. All three of these dimensions belong to our Advent preparation.

Bishop Robert Barron

35,536 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A tesseract is the four-dimensional analog of a cube. While we live in a three-dimensional world, a tesseract exists in four dimensions, and its full structure is difficult to visualize

A tesseract is the four-dimensional analog of a cube. While we live in a three-dimensional world, a tesseract exists in four dimensions, and its full structure is difficult to visualize

Science girl

104,127 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Are we getting closer to understanding the universe or realising how little we actually know? Today’s guest Dr Michio Kaku has spent more than 70 years studying the universe, and he believes we may be closer than ever to discovering a “theory of everything”. Dr Michio is a theoretical physicist, futurist and one of the scientists behind String Theory. His work attempts to answer one of the biggest questions humans have ever asked: what is the universe actually made of?? Michio has this rare ability to zoom out and make you realise how small we are, whilst also making you feel hopeful about what humanity could become. What I learned about Michio is that he doesn’t pretend to have certainty about everything. He’s comfortable sitting in the unknown whilst still pushing relentlessly towards understanding it. The truth is, most of us are so consumed by day-to-day life that we rarely stop and ask bigger questions about where we came from or where we’re going. We spoke about: - How the universe actually works? - Is immortality possible? - Are parallel universes real?! - What happens if humanity becomes advanced enough to leave Earth… - The real reason scientists are taking UFOs/UAPs more seriously. I was going through his videos as research before we sat down, and so many of the top comments are people saying that he’s the reason they worked harder in their physics classes - they say he’s the person that made them more curious. I think that’s such a wonderful thing, because as he said at the start our conversation, physics is the basis of everything and the more we understand, the better the lives we could live. The reason conversations like this fascinate people is because all of us are trying to understand where we came from and what all of this means. I expected to learn about physics. I didn’t expect to leave questioning humanity, time and consciousness itself. Whether you agree with every theory or not, listening to someone think this deeply about the future of humanity is incredibly valuable

Are we getting closer to understanding the universe or realising how little we actually know? Today’s guest Dr Michio Kaku has spent more than 70 years studying the universe, and he believes we may be closer than ever to discovering a “theory of everything”. Dr Michio is a theoretical physicist, futurist and one of the scientists behind String Theory. His work attempts to answer one of the biggest questions humans have ever asked: what is the universe actually made of?? Michio has this rare ability to zoom out and make you realise how small we are, whilst also making you feel hopeful about what humanity could become. What I learned about Michio is that he doesn’t pretend to have certainty about everything. He’s comfortable sitting in the unknown whilst still pushing relentlessly towards understanding it. The truth is, most of us are so consumed by day-to-day life that we rarely stop and ask bigger questions about where we came from or where we’re going. We spoke about: - How the universe actually works? - Is immortality possible? - Are parallel universes real?! - What happens if humanity becomes advanced enough to leave Earth… - The real reason scientists are taking UFOs/UAPs more seriously. I was going through his videos as research before we sat down, and so many of the top comments are people saying that he’s the reason they worked harder in their physics classes - they say he’s the person that made them more curious. I think that’s such a wonderful thing, because as he said at the start our conversation, physics is the basis of everything and the more we understand, the better the lives we could live. The reason conversations like this fascinate people is because all of us are trying to understand where we came from and what all of this means. I expected to learn about physics. I didn’t expect to leave questioning humanity, time and consciousness itself. Whether you agree with every theory or not, listening to someone think this deeply about the future of humanity is incredibly valuable

Steven Bartlett

26,281 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jimmy Carr echoing Peter Thiel with a line that lands hard: “Minus the screens from any room, we’re still living in the 1970s. Nothing’s happened in physics since 1972. String theory has not got us anywhere.” But the real shift? “Take the compute power of AI and point it at physics… everything else in science is stamp collecting. Physics is the real thing. That gave us every bit of technology we have. What happens when you point AI at that?” He sees two roads ahead: a world of plenty with 50× productivity and human flourishing… or something that goes “another way.” If AI finally cracks physics in the next decade — what single breakthrough do you hope comes first: limitless energy, gravity control, new materials… or something we haven’t even named yet?

Jimmy Carr echoing Peter Thiel with a line that lands hard: “Minus the screens from any room, we’re still living in the 1970s. Nothing’s happened in physics since 1972. String theory has not got us anywhere.” But the real shift? “Take the compute power of AI and point it at physics… everything else in science is stamp collecting. Physics is the real thing. That gave us every bit of technology we have. What happens when you point AI at that?” He sees two roads ahead: a world of plenty with 50× productivity and human flourishing… or something that goes “another way.” If AI finally cracks physics in the next decade — what single breakthrough do you hope comes first: limitless energy, gravity control, new materials… or something we haven’t even named yet?

Camus

2,477,426 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The 4th DIMENSION Only occupying regions of 3-dimensional space WE are not able to perceive 4 DIMENSIONS, but we do its said, INTERSECT the 4th dimension, which is TIME at a single point... the PRESENT. YET, we hear of 'time travel', a POSSIBILITY now, or once... in a TIME past?

The 4th DIMENSION Only occupying regions of 3-dimensional space WE are not able to perceive 4 DIMENSIONS, but we do its said, INTERSECT the 4th dimension, which is TIME at a single point... the PRESENT. YET, we hear of 'time travel', a POSSIBILITY now, or once... in a TIME past?

WhatdoIknow

22,532 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔥🚨JUST IN: This woman named Elizabeth April who claims to be a remote viewers says she spoke to the source of the universe and was told what the meaning of life is which she claims involves in traveling through dimensions in different lifetimes and initially being one with God who chose to create life to experience it. April: “Here’s what Source said … ” “It said … imagine having all access to materials, money, to knowledge, resources, what would you do?” “I said I’d be pretty bored.” “Source was like, yeah, exactly.” “It went from itself—which is everything all at once, all light, all dark … center of the universe, God, whatever you wanna call it—and … decided to separate myself a billion, trillion times over and go into lower life forms to experience limitation.” “This universe is divided into, this is what it told me, 12 different dimensions.” “Dimensions are densities.” “And within a dimension there are certain limitations.” “You can freaking hop around all the dimensions.” “I started doing past life regression, I’m like, holy shit, you were an 8th dimensional being in your last life.” “Source said you go through every dimension, not in a linear fashion … and you experience everything that there is to learn through all of those limitations.” “And then you get back to the 12th dimension.” “And at the point where you’ve learned everything there is to learn through all … 12 dimension densities, you have a choice to make.” “The choice is, are you going to go back to Source and reunite with the initial source of this universe?” “Or are you gonna break away and create your own universe?” “The choice is yours.” “The purpose of existence is experiencing through limitation.” Credits: Holden Culotta Elizabeth April Acid For Squares

🔥🚨JUST IN: This woman named Elizabeth April who claims to be a remote viewers says she spoke to the source of the universe and was told what the meaning of life is which she claims involves in traveling through dimensions in different lifetimes and initially being one with God who chose to create life to experience it. April: “Here’s what Source said … ” “It said … imagine having all access to materials, money, to knowledge, resources, what would you do?” “I said I’d be pretty bored.” “Source was like, yeah, exactly.” “It went from itself—which is everything all at once, all light, all dark … center of the universe, God, whatever you wanna call it—and … decided to separate myself a billion, trillion times over and go into lower life forms to experience limitation.” “This universe is divided into, this is what it told me, 12 different dimensions.” “Dimensions are densities.” “And within a dimension there are certain limitations.” “You can freaking hop around all the dimensions.” “I started doing past life regression, I’m like, holy shit, you were an 8th dimensional being in your last life.” “Source said you go through every dimension, not in a linear fashion … and you experience everything that there is to learn through all of those limitations.” “And then you get back to the 12th dimension.” “And at the point where you’ve learned everything there is to learn through all … 12 dimension densities, you have a choice to make.” “The choice is, are you going to go back to Source and reunite with the initial source of this universe?” “Or are you gonna break away and create your own universe?” “The choice is yours.” “The purpose of existence is experiencing through limitation.” Credits: Holden Culotta Elizabeth April Acid For Squares

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

333,222 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

32,810 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The aliens kindly showed us that reality is not limited to the three-dimensional world we currently inhabit. A rift appeared between the three-dimensional world we inhabit and the multidimensional world. It is foolish to think that the three-dimensional world is all that exists.

The aliens kindly showed us that reality is not limited to the three-dimensional world we currently inhabit. A rift appeared between the three-dimensional world we inhabit and the multidimensional world. It is foolish to think that the three-dimensional world is all that exists.

永倉盛照 nagakura moriteru

532,804 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Seeing here that JASPER clearly love spending time together 5555555 #KatanyutonightxJASPER #JASPER 👤: At what point did u get close enough to pull eo around like that? I mean, when did u start becoming closer? Was there any specific moment? 🐻: I think the point was that we've known eo for a long time. 🌼: We've known eo for a long time. I think it was at that first Musicon we went to. 🐻: In Japan? 🌼: In Japan. When the four of us stayed in the same room. 🐻: And that was when we did that live and just kept talking nonstop, right? 👤: So that was the exact moment? 🌼: Yes. It was the moment we got to try living together for three days straight. 🐻: Yeah, that's right. 🌼: Uh... I don't want that to happen again.

Seeing here that JASPER clearly love spending time together 5555555 #KatanyutonightxJASPER #JASPER 👤: At what point did u get close enough to pull eo around like that? I mean, when did u start becoming closer? Was there any specific moment? 🐻: I think the point was that we've known eo for a long time. 🌼: We've known eo for a long time. I think it was at that first Musicon we went to. 🐻: In Japan? 🌼: In Japan. When the four of us stayed in the same room. 🐻: And that was when we did that live and just kept talking nonstop, right? 👤: So that was the exact moment? 🌼: Yes. It was the moment we got to try living together for three days straight. 🐻: Yeah, that's right. 🌼: Uh... I don't want that to happen again.

Narawins 🇧🇷

19,974 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

The Geneva Bible confirms Jesus’s second coming had already come to pass, and that we are in the time of Satan. Honestly, where are we really when it comes to the timeline? What year is it in reality?

The Geneva Bible confirms Jesus’s second coming had already come to pass, and that we are in the time of Satan. Honestly, where are we really when it comes to the timeline? What year is it in reality?

🜌🜈🜓

69,850 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jeff Bezos: I think most of the world recognize that we should go to the Moon first. We'll go to Mars and we'll do all the other things. But the Moon is the first best step and there are many reasons for that. But it's kind of a gift. It's so near Earth. We can get there in three and a half days. We can return in three and a half days. You can go anytime you want. You don't have to wait for the planetary alignment to be just right. And you can only go to Mars every two years or so. And so there are a lot of advantages to the Moon. The Moon’s gravity well is much lower than Earth’s, so when you get materials from the Moon, you can lift them off the Moon using about 28 times less energy per kilogram than is needed to lift something off Earth.

Jeff Bezos: I think most of the world recognize that we should go to the Moon first. We'll go to Mars and we'll do all the other things. But the Moon is the first best step and there are many reasons for that. But it's kind of a gift. It's so near Earth. We can get there in three and a half days. We can return in three and a half days. You can go anytime you want. You don't have to wait for the planetary alignment to be just right. And you can only go to Mars every two years or so. And so there are a lot of advantages to the Moon. The Moon’s gravity well is much lower than Earth’s, so when you get materials from the Moon, you can lift them off the Moon using about 28 times less energy per kilogram than is needed to lift something off Earth.

Clash Report

22,850 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

I was letting Passport play in the water when it was 1”-2” deep, then I would fill the tub for myself The last time we did that, he decided to jump back in when I was in there, but there was no room to play This was the first time he got to have a full tub all to himself. #Caturday

I was letting Passport play in the water when it was 1”-2” deep, then I would fill the tub for myself The last time we did that, he decided to jump back in when I was in there, but there was no room to play This was the first time he got to have a full tub all to himself. #Caturday

Rain's Cats

72,726 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🧠 "Last season, I understood that maybe I don't have the players to play well in that system, but it was the beginning of a process. We are trying to build an identity..." "...but then, when you talk about changing the system all the time, I cannot change, because the players will understand I'm changing because of you - and I think that is the END for the manager." "...when all the players return, we are not going to play all the time with three defenders." Ruben Amorim on changing formations and being adaptable in recent weeks 🔄 #MUFC

🧠 "Last season, I understood that maybe I don't have the players to play well in that system, but it was the beginning of a process. We are trying to build an identity..." "...but then, when you talk about changing the system all the time, I cannot change, because the players will understand I'm changing because of you - and I think that is the END for the manager." "...when all the players return, we are not going to play all the time with three defenders." Ruben Amorim on changing formations and being adaptable in recent weeks 🔄 #MUFC

Stretford Paddock

67,858 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,207 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Nicholas Galitzine talks about getting into physical shape to play He-Man in ‘MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE’. “By the time we finally got to set... it’s more when you see other people looking at you and the expressions on their face that really solidifies that you’ve done a good job.”

Nicholas Galitzine talks about getting into physical shape to play He-Man in ‘MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE’. “By the time we finally got to set... it’s more when you see other people looking at you and the expressions on their face that really solidifies that you’ve done a good job.”

DiscussingFilm

275,248 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

RAY DALIO: WITH AI, WE WILL UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING AT A MICRO LEVEL "Nowadays, when we or policymakers like the Federal Reserve think about something like inflation, there might be five different measures of it. We use the term 'inflation' because our minds are limited in the number of things we can think about. But in this new reality we're in, you can go down to a molecular level and see all the different transactions—what was bought, what was sold, and exactly why. Now, we can really have a deeper level of understanding." Source: Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson Network

RAY DALIO: WITH AI, WE WILL UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING AT A MICRO LEVEL "Nowadays, when we or policymakers like the Federal Reserve think about something like inflation, there might be five different measures of it. We use the term 'inflation' because our minds are limited in the number of things we can think about. But in this new reality we're in, you can go down to a molecular level and see all the different transactions—what was bought, what was sold, and exactly why. Now, we can really have a deeper level of understanding." Source: Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson Network

Mario Nawfal

200,679 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Demis Hassabis just told a room full of academics that they’re running out of time. Not the engineers. Not the technologists. The economists. The philosophers. The people who are supposed to understand what a civilization actually is. Hassabis: “It’s very urgent that we really think about the second-order consequences.” He wasn’t talking about the technology. He was talking about everything that comes after it. Hassabis: “I’m always a little bit astounded when I talk to economists about what’s happening and it’s sort of, they’re pretty skeptical. ‘Where’s it, where’s it coming in the GDP?’” The architects of the global economy are asking where the biggest economic shift in human history is showing up in a spreadsheet. That’s not skepticism. That’s institutional paralysis dressed up as rigor. Hassabis: “It’s ten times the Industrial Revolution.” The Industrial Revolution didn’t just move capital. It burned the feudal system to the ground and birthed the modern world. Hassabis is telling us to multiply that violence by ten. Hassabis: “We’re going to be in a world for the first time, if we get the technology right, where we’re a non-zero-sum world for the first time in humanity’s existence. How can that not need a new type of economic system?” Every economic model you have ever lived under shares the exact same foundational assumption. Scarcity. Capitalism. Communism. Mercantilism. Feudalism. Four names for the mathematics of starvation. Hassabis: “I don’t think it’s any of the ones we’ve tried, because they were all done under the guise of a zero-sum, a limited, a scarce world.” He’s not saying capitalism failed. He’s saying the premise underneath it is about to dissolve. And nobody has written the replacement. But scarcity didn’t just shape our economies. It shaped our identities. You found meaning in your labor. You found virtue in your utility. You worked so you didn’t die. Every concept of purpose humans have ever constructed was forged in a world where things run out. Where choices cost something. Where suffering had a function. Remove scarcity and you don’t just disrupt markets. You collapse the entire philosophical framework through which human beings have understood what it means to live. Hassabis: “There’s the even harder question of how do we want to evolve our society and what is virtuous, what is meaning, what is purpose.” The technology is solvable. The economics is redesignable. But philosophy itself was built inside scarcity. Ethics is the study of hard choices. Meaning is what we extract from struggle. Purpose is what we build against resistance. Take that away and the entire architecture of human meaning loses its load-bearing wall. Hassabis: “I think that’s going to need lots of great philosophers.” He’s asking for thinkers who don’t exist yet. The engineers are about to automate your survival. And in doing so, they will automate your purpose. We spent all of human history fighting for the right to stop struggling. We have no idea what happens to the human mind when we actually win.

Demis Hassabis just told a room full of academics that they’re running out of time. Not the engineers. Not the technologists. The economists. The philosophers. The people who are supposed to understand what a civilization actually is. Hassabis: “It’s very urgent that we really think about the second-order consequences.” He wasn’t talking about the technology. He was talking about everything that comes after it. Hassabis: “I’m always a little bit astounded when I talk to economists about what’s happening and it’s sort of, they’re pretty skeptical. ‘Where’s it, where’s it coming in the GDP?’” The architects of the global economy are asking where the biggest economic shift in human history is showing up in a spreadsheet. That’s not skepticism. That’s institutional paralysis dressed up as rigor. Hassabis: “It’s ten times the Industrial Revolution.” The Industrial Revolution didn’t just move capital. It burned the feudal system to the ground and birthed the modern world. Hassabis is telling us to multiply that violence by ten. Hassabis: “We’re going to be in a world for the first time, if we get the technology right, where we’re a non-zero-sum world for the first time in humanity’s existence. How can that not need a new type of economic system?” Every economic model you have ever lived under shares the exact same foundational assumption. Scarcity. Capitalism. Communism. Mercantilism. Feudalism. Four names for the mathematics of starvation. Hassabis: “I don’t think it’s any of the ones we’ve tried, because they were all done under the guise of a zero-sum, a limited, a scarce world.” He’s not saying capitalism failed. He’s saying the premise underneath it is about to dissolve. And nobody has written the replacement. But scarcity didn’t just shape our economies. It shaped our identities. You found meaning in your labor. You found virtue in your utility. You worked so you didn’t die. Every concept of purpose humans have ever constructed was forged in a world where things run out. Where choices cost something. Where suffering had a function. Remove scarcity and you don’t just disrupt markets. You collapse the entire philosophical framework through which human beings have understood what it means to live. Hassabis: “There’s the even harder question of how do we want to evolve our society and what is virtuous, what is meaning, what is purpose.” The technology is solvable. The economics is redesignable. But philosophy itself was built inside scarcity. Ethics is the study of hard choices. Meaning is what we extract from struggle. Purpose is what we build against resistance. Take that away and the entire architecture of human meaning loses its load-bearing wall. Hassabis: “I think that’s going to need lots of great philosophers.” He’s asking for thinkers who don’t exist yet. The engineers are about to automate your survival. And in doing so, they will automate your purpose. We spent all of human history fighting for the right to stop struggling. We have no idea what happens to the human mind when we actually win.

Dustin

10,554 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen