Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“We may soon be able to split the United States and take it back.” — British Foreign Minister to Queen Victoria, January 1861 Harley Schlanger traces the unbroken thread: “The American Revolution showed there was a way to build an economy other than imperialism. This was picked up in...

apocalypseos's profile picture

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

85,445 subscribers

23,301 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducationScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇬🇧 Perfidious Albion: They Created Zionism & Wahhabism. Their 1904 Rule Explains Ukraine. This is the Hidden Empire. To understand the war in Ukraine, you must first understand the 500-year project of the British Empire. It is not a story of kings and colonies, but of finance, ideology, and a single, ruthless geopolitical rule. Harley Schlanger, president of LaRoucheOrg, connects the dots in a way you’ve never heard before. According to his research, the empire’s modern form began not with a battle, but with a bank. “1688 was the so-called ‘Glorious Revolution’ where the Dutch moved in and pretty much taught the British a lot of what the Dutch learned from the Venetians, namely how to set up a central bank, a private bank. The Bank of England was modeled on the Bank of the Netherlands.” This was the birth of the Empire as a financial machine. The drive for resources and land was forever fused with the power of private central banking. But this system faced a fatal challenge. “In the midst of this 500-year period, there was an extremely important break, namely the American Revolution. And we should never forget that the American colonies fought the first successful anti-imperial revolution.” This was the original sin in London’s eyes. Schlanger states plainly: “The British never accepted it and have continued in one way or another to try to figure out how to undermine the United States and the American Republican tradition.” The war for independence never ended. How do you maintain an empire in the modern age? Through psychological warfare. The British, Schlanger reveals, built the tools for this at Oxford. “The British have an enormous storehouse of history that they rely on at Oxford… the Ashmolean Museum. This is where Zionism was created. This is where Wahhabiism, the perversion of Islam, was created. This is where they use studies of ideology, national ideologies and a kind of identity politics for nations.” This research was formalized into a strategic doctrine. We misuse the word today, but Schlanger corrects the record: “Geopolitics was a specific doctrine developed by the British at the end of the 19th century and put into a form in 1904 by a man named Halford Mackinder… It was a strategy of how the British could use their power of the deep sea navy to control international trade, currency, terms of trade and so on.” And here is the single rule at its heart—the rule that explains our world right now: “At the heart of it was the idea that the British could never allow an alliance between central European countries and Eurasian countries. And that is what we’re seeing today fought out over Ukraine over the whole question of China and so on.” The war in Ukraine is not a random conflict. It is the latest, most violent application of a 120-year-old British imperial rule. It is a war to prevent the rise of an independent, powerful Eurasia—the greatest existential threat to the financial-ideological empire born in the Bank of England. This is the hidden history of the world order.
2:58

🇬🇧 Perfidious Albion: They Created Zionism & Wahhabism. Their 1904 Rule Explains Ukraine. This is the Hidden Empire. To understand the war in Ukraine, you must first understand the 500-year project of the British Empire. It is not a story of kings and colonies, but of finance, ideology, and a single, ruthless geopolitical rule. Harley Schlanger, president of LaRoucheOrg, connects the dots in a way you’ve never heard before. According to his research, the empire’s modern form began not with a battle, but with a bank. “1688 was the so-called ‘Glorious Revolution’ where the Dutch moved in and pretty much taught the British a lot of what the Dutch learned from the Venetians, namely how to set up a central bank, a private bank. The Bank of England was modeled on the Bank of the Netherlands.” This was the birth of the Empire as a financial machine. The drive for resources and land was forever fused with the power of private central banking. But this system faced a fatal challenge. “In the midst of this 500-year period, there was an extremely important break, namely the American Revolution. And we should never forget that the American colonies fought the first successful anti-imperial revolution.” This was the original sin in London’s eyes. Schlanger states plainly: “The British never accepted it and have continued in one way or another to try to figure out how to undermine the United States and the American Republican tradition.” The war for independence never ended. How do you maintain an empire in the modern age? Through psychological warfare. The British, Schlanger reveals, built the tools for this at Oxford. “The British have an enormous storehouse of history that they rely on at Oxford… the Ashmolean Museum. This is where Zionism was created. This is where Wahhabiism, the perversion of Islam, was created. This is where they use studies of ideology, national ideologies and a kind of identity politics for nations.” This research was formalized into a strategic doctrine. We misuse the word today, but Schlanger corrects the record: “Geopolitics was a specific doctrine developed by the British at the end of the 19th century and put into a form in 1904 by a man named Halford Mackinder… It was a strategy of how the British could use their power of the deep sea navy to control international trade, currency, terms of trade and so on.” And here is the single rule at its heart—the rule that explains our world right now: “At the heart of it was the idea that the British could never allow an alliance between central European countries and Eurasian countries. And that is what we’re seeing today fought out over Ukraine over the whole question of China and so on.” The war in Ukraine is not a random conflict. It is the latest, most violent application of a 120-year-old British imperial rule. It is a war to prevent the rise of an independent, powerful Eurasia—the greatest existential threat to the financial-ideological empire born in the Bank of England. This is the hidden history of the world order.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

185,656 views • 7 months ago

Some say that the war with Iran is a war of choice. In fact, it was the Islamic Republic that chose war back in 1979 - and they've been at it ever since. We need to use every tool at our disposal to neutralize this threat to keep the American people - and the world - safe.
1:02

Some say that the war with Iran is a war of choice. In fact, it was the Islamic Republic that chose war back in 1979 - and they've been at it ever since. We need to use every tool at our disposal to neutralize this threat to keep the American people - and the world - safe.

Mike Pompeo

68,531 views • 5 days ago

"Putin's squad" think it was Putin who stopped the war between Israel and Iran. "The Iranian foreign minister came to Putin, and in a very short time, the war ended. What does this indicate? We always say this, Vladimir Vladimirovich - you are simply a world power. As long as you are here, there will be peace throughout the world," they said. This is what people in Russia are told and what many believe.
1:17

"Putin's squad" think it was Putin who stopped the war between Israel and Iran. "The Iranian foreign minister came to Putin, and in a very short time, the war ended. What does this indicate? We always say this, Vladimir Vladimirovich - you are simply a world power. As long as you are here, there will be peace throughout the world," they said. This is what people in Russia are told and what many believe.

Anton Gerashchenko

59,499 views • 1 year ago

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: We entered the negotiations to prove to the whole world that their intention was to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran; their intention was hostile. And they could not claim that we requested negotiations and the Islamic Republic did not accept. We also negotiated so that it would be clear that the truth was with us, so that ultimate proof would be established for the whole world. Our own people would also understand that it wasn't the Islamic Republic that caused the war by refraining from negotiations. Because there was a question: if we hadn't negotiated and a war had broken out, everyone might have thought to themselves that if we had negotiated, the war wouldn't have happened.
1:02

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: We entered the negotiations to prove to the whole world that their intention was to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran; their intention was hostile. And they could not claim that we requested negotiations and the Islamic Republic did not accept. We also negotiated so that it would be clear that the truth was with us, so that ultimate proof would be established for the whole world. Our own people would also understand that it wasn't the Islamic Republic that caused the war by refraining from negotiations. Because there was a question: if we hadn't negotiated and a war had broken out, everyone might have thought to themselves that if we had negotiated, the war wouldn't have happened.

Clash Report

28,540 views • 4 months ago

I have to admit, I thought I was in the know until this woman OPENED UP A WHOLE LAYER OF WHAT THE HELL IS REALLY GOING ON🫨! I didn’t know the British Empire was still RUNNING EVERYTHING🤬! We’ve been fighting this War since 1776😡! No wonder they want DJT☠️😤
3:13

I have to admit, I thought I was in the know until this woman OPENED UP A WHOLE LAYER OF WHAT THE HELL IS REALLY GOING ON🫨! I didn’t know the British Empire was still RUNNING EVERYTHING🤬! We’ve been fighting this War since 1776😡! No wonder they want DJT☠️😤

Bobby D🎙

314,725 views • 3 months ago

Here Is The Famous World War 2 “We Shall Fight On The Beaches” Speech by WINSTON CHURCHILL “We shall fight on the beaches" was a speech delivered by the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom on 4 June 1940. It was the second of three iconic speeches Churchill gave during this period shortly following his appointment as UK Prime Minister (replacing Neville Chamberlain): chronologically, it falls between his ‘Blood, toil, tears and sweat’ speech (13 May 1940) and his ‘This was their finest hour’ speech (18 June 1940). The context was what became known as the Battle of France. In early June 1940, British forces had completed the evacuation of Dunkirk, the rescue of more than 338,000 British and French soldiers from the French port of Dunkirk between 26 May and 4 June.
2:15

Here Is The Famous World War 2 “We Shall Fight On The Beaches” Speech by WINSTON CHURCHILL “We shall fight on the beaches" was a speech delivered by the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom on 4 June 1940. It was the second of three iconic speeches Churchill gave during this period shortly following his appointment as UK Prime Minister (replacing Neville Chamberlain): chronologically, it falls between his ‘Blood, toil, tears and sweat’ speech (13 May 1940) and his ‘This was their finest hour’ speech (18 June 1940). The context was what became known as the Battle of France. In early June 1940, British forces had completed the evacuation of Dunkirk, the rescue of more than 338,000 British and French soldiers from the French port of Dunkirk between 26 May and 4 June.

J Stewart

37,382 views • 2 years ago

Did you know: back in the 1930s, it was actually the Jews who declared war on Germany, not the other way around? “Judea Declares War On Germany” (1933). Right there for everyone with eyes to see The entire WW2 narrative we were given in school was a lie
0:56

Did you know: back in the 1930s, it was actually the Jews who declared war on Germany, not the other way around? “Judea Declares War On Germany” (1933). Right there for everyone with eyes to see The entire WW2 narrative we were given in school was a lie

₿en Wehrman

349,861 views • 4 months ago

🇬🇧🇺🇸 Britain went into World War I as the world's financial center. It came out owing money to Wall Street. Prof. Richard Werner argues that while Germany largely financed the war internally, Britain borrowed heavily from J.P. Morgan, which became both a lender and a key procurement agent for the war effort. The war drained the British Empire and accelerated the transfer of global power to the United States. Professor Richard A. Werner
11:42

🇬🇧🇺🇸 Britain went into World War I as the world's financial center. It came out owing money to Wall Street. Prof. Richard Werner argues that while Germany largely financed the war internally, Britain borrowed heavily from J.P. Morgan, which became both a lender and a key procurement agent for the war effort. The war drained the British Empire and accelerated the transfer of global power to the United States. Professor Richard A. Werner

Mario Nawfal

36,188 views • 1 month ago

Read this carefully. In the Oval Office on Thursday, the President of the United States was asked how much longer the war with Iran would last. This is what he said. "During the war we have the highest stock market. During, you know, a war. It's not a big war for us, but it's a war." It is not a big war for us. For the families of the American sailors deployed to the Strait of Hormuz, including those injured, and those who lost their lives, it is a big war. For American truckers, retirees, and families paying $4 and 17 cents a gallon at the pump, it is a big war.
0:37

Read this carefully. In the Oval Office on Thursday, the President of the United States was asked how much longer the war with Iran would last. This is what he said. "During the war we have the highest stock market. During, you know, a war. It's not a big war for us, but it's a war." It is not a big war for us. For the families of the American sailors deployed to the Strait of Hormuz, including those injured, and those who lost their lives, it is a big war. For American truckers, retirees, and families paying $4 and 17 cents a gallon at the pump, it is a big war.

Brian Allen

94,992 views • 3 months ago

This mother got a call to school because the HISTORY teacher kicked out her son for having a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack because it represented slavery 🤨.. The mom had to inform the teacher that was not true.. it is a symbol of fighting oppression, fighting for freedom, and was the battle cry for the Revolutionary war . Can you imagine a History teacher not knowing this ? I knew there was a systemic problem with some modern day teachers but I had no idea it was this bad. Funny thing is the little boy has a look of confidence on his face as he sits down next to his mother because he knows what it means and he knows his mom will stick it up the teachers behind .. 😁
1:09

This mother got a call to school because the HISTORY teacher kicked out her son for having a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack because it represented slavery 🤨.. The mom had to inform the teacher that was not true.. it is a symbol of fighting oppression, fighting for freedom, and was the battle cry for the Revolutionary war . Can you imagine a History teacher not knowing this ? I knew there was a systemic problem with some modern day teachers but I had no idea it was this bad. Funny thing is the little boy has a look of confidence on his face as he sits down next to his mother because he knows what it means and he knows his mom will stick it up the teachers behind .. 😁

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

93,171 views • 20 days ago

Jake Sullivan on Iran: The United States is at war with Iran in the middle of an active shooting war that, in my view, was a war of choice. It did not stem from an imminent threat to the United States. We have yet to hear a clear and distinctive answer to the question: Why? What is this all about and what are we trying to achieve?
1:25

Jake Sullivan on Iran: The United States is at war with Iran in the middle of an active shooting war that, in my view, was a war of choice. It did not stem from an imminent threat to the United States. We have yet to hear a clear and distinctive answer to the question: Why? What is this all about and what are we trying to achieve?

Clash Report

17,487 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING: US Senator Jeff Merkley, moments ago: "If this was a legal action of war, then it would be a war crime. If it was not, it was a murder. In either case, again, the right way to find out if there are drugs onboard a boat, is you stop the boat, you board it, you investigate it and in the process you learn about the strategies involved which gives you information to dismantle a broad operation."
0:48

BREAKING: US Senator Jeff Merkley, moments ago: "If this was a legal action of war, then it would be a war crime. If it was not, it was a murder. In either case, again, the right way to find out if there are drugs onboard a boat, is you stop the boat, you board it, you investigate it and in the process you learn about the strategies involved which gives you information to dismantle a broad operation."

Ed Krassenstein

314,707 views • 7 months ago

🇨🇴🇺🇸 Colombian President Gustavo Petro on the US's war against drugs in Latin and South America: The violent war against drugs was a failure and I replaced it with an effective anti-trafficking policy. The anti-drug policy is not meant to stop cocaine that is coming to the United States. The anti-drug policy is to dominate the peoples of the south as a whole. You shouldn't look at the drugs. You should look at who has the power and who dominates.
1:30

🇨🇴🇺🇸 Colombian President Gustavo Petro on the US's war against drugs in Latin and South America: The violent war against drugs was a failure and I replaced it with an effective anti-trafficking policy. The anti-drug policy is not meant to stop cocaine that is coming to the United States. The anti-drug policy is to dominate the peoples of the south as a whole. You shouldn't look at the drugs. You should look at who has the power and who dominates.

DD Geopolitics

18,512 views • 10 months ago

How The U.S. Bankrupted The British Empire - The Secret Bill for WWII. We are taught that Britain "won" World War II. Financially, they lost everything. While the history books focus on the victory in 1945, they rarely mention the secret economic collapse that followed. On December 31, 2006-more than 60 years after the war ended-the British government quietly made a final wire transfer of $83 million to the United States. This was the last installment of the Anglo-American Loan, a desperate $4.33 billion lifeline negotiated by John Maynard Keynes to save a bankrupt nation from starvation. The "Special Relationship" wasn't free. The abrupt end of Lend-Lease, the forced convertibility of the Sterling, and the "dollar gap" destroyed the British Empire's financial dominance and ushered in decades of austerity. To understand why India was bled dry of its resources and finances and left bankrupt, you have to watch this documentary in full and then I will post part two.
22:48

How The U.S. Bankrupted The British Empire - The Secret Bill for WWII. We are taught that Britain "won" World War II. Financially, they lost everything. While the history books focus on the victory in 1945, they rarely mention the secret economic collapse that followed. On December 31, 2006-more than 60 years after the war ended-the British government quietly made a final wire transfer of $83 million to the United States. This was the last installment of the Anglo-American Loan, a desperate $4.33 billion lifeline negotiated by John Maynard Keynes to save a bankrupt nation from starvation. The "Special Relationship" wasn't free. The abrupt end of Lend-Lease, the forced convertibility of the Sterling, and the "dollar gap" destroyed the British Empire's financial dominance and ushered in decades of austerity. To understand why India was bled dry of its resources and finances and left bankrupt, you have to watch this documentary in full and then I will post part two.

JIX5A

167,803 views • 7 months ago

Bill O’Reilly defends dropping nukes on Japan and killing “a million” civilians during WWII. He says “crazy people” call it a war crime, but insists it was the “only way” to “defeat these fascist countries.” “The only reason Japan surrendered to the United States in 1945 was because we dropped the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” “We… killed, what, a million civilians?” “That was the only way to defeat these fascist countries that launched the war.” “So a few nuts will accuse Truman and Winston Churchill of war crimes. But these are crazy people. You had to end it.” “All I can give you are the facts.”
1:29

Bill O’Reilly defends dropping nukes on Japan and killing “a million” civilians during WWII. He says “crazy people” call it a war crime, but insists it was the “only way” to “defeat these fascist countries.” “The only reason Japan surrendered to the United States in 1945 was because we dropped the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” “We… killed, what, a million civilians?” “That was the only way to defeat these fascist countries that launched the war.” “So a few nuts will accuse Truman and Winston Churchill of war crimes. But these are crazy people. You had to end it.” “All I can give you are the facts.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

72,218 views • 3 months ago

I break down a pivotal moment in the lead-up to the American Revolution—when General Gage was given sweeping authority by the British to use force against the colonies. This wasn’t just policy—it was a turning point that pushed America closer to war. I also take on how our founding is often misunderstood or oversimplified, and why knowing the full history matters—especially when it comes to identity, education, and what it means to be an American. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:
1:00

I break down a pivotal moment in the lead-up to the American Revolution—when General Gage was given sweeping authority by the British to use force against the colonies. This wasn’t just policy—it was a turning point that pushed America closer to war. I also take on how our founding is often misunderstood or oversimplified, and why knowing the full history matters—especially when it comes to identity, education, and what it means to be an American. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

23,612 views • 3 months ago

Nikki Haley defended not citing slavery as the cause of the Civil War during a campaign event in New Hampshire, saying that this was "a given" for people who grew up in the South: "To me, it was about freedom. It's bigger than slavery."
0:51

Nikki Haley defended not citing slavery as the cause of the Civil War during a campaign event in New Hampshire, saying that this was "a given" for people who grew up in the South: "To me, it was about freedom. It's bigger than slavery."

CBS News

3,998,610 views • 2 years ago

'Iran proved it through action: until the last minute, before the start of hostilities, until the moment of the first strike on the country, Tehran remained open to the continuation of mediations.’ -Kremlin🇷🇺 Spokseperson Dmitri Peskov Oman’s Foreign Minister put it on the record before the war started; that there had been a breakthrough in negotiations and Iran was willing to give unprecedented concessions. This was always a war of choice unleashed by Donald Trump, which has led to unprecedented destruction in the region. It was also a choice to allow the Israelis to dictate the choice between war and peace. One phone call from an American President to Israel with the threat of cutting off support could have stopped this disaster from taking place.
0:39

'Iran proved it through action: until the last minute, before the start of hostilities, until the moment of the first strike on the country, Tehran remained open to the continuation of mediations.’ -Kremlin🇷🇺 Spokseperson Dmitri Peskov Oman’s Foreign Minister put it on the record before the war started; that there had been a breakthrough in negotiations and Iran was willing to give unprecedented concessions. This was always a war of choice unleashed by Donald Trump, which has led to unprecedented destruction in the region. It was also a choice to allow the Israelis to dictate the choice between war and peace. One phone call from an American President to Israel with the threat of cutting off support could have stopped this disaster from taking place.

Afshin Rattansi

23,339 views • 4 months ago

What was the symbol of Palestine before the water Melon? Palestine prior to the Nakba was a major producer of Oranges. This made up most of the economy output of the region and was part of the reason the British wanted to take it over during World War 1. Post Nakba most of the areas in which oranges were grown were seized by Israel leading to the industry to no longer be controlled by Palestinians. Over time the association between Oranges and Palestine has faded.
8:37

What was the symbol of Palestine before the water Melon? Palestine prior to the Nakba was a major producer of Oranges. This made up most of the economy output of the region and was part of the reason the British wanted to take it over during World War 1. Post Nakba most of the areas in which oranges were grown were seized by Israel leading to the industry to no longer be controlled by Palestinians. Over time the association between Oranges and Palestine has faded.

YourFavoriteGuy

21,511 views • 1 year ago