Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We need term limits and a binding code of conduct and ethics for the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Thomas has been on the bench almost as long as I’ve been alive — that’s not good government. There is no binding code of conduct or ethics for Justices of the...

268,788 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

29 Yorum

Gunther Eagleman™ profil fotoğrafı
Gunther Eagleman™8 ay önce

We need term limits and a binding code of conduct and ethics for Congress.

Buzz Patterson profil fotoğrafı
Buzz Patterson8 ay önce

You’re under investigation, sweetie. 🤣🤣🤣

LHGrey™️ profil fotoğrafı
LHGrey™️8 ay önce

No, Maggie, you insufferable, power-hungry communist bitch...absolutely fucking not. The Founders deliberately gave Supreme Court Justices lifetime tenure under Article III..."during good Behaviour"...to shield the judiciary from exactly the kind of partisan lynching you're salivating over. Hamilton shredded your exact brand of idiocy in Federalist No. 78: a permanent judiciary is the citadel of liberty against legislative tyranny. Long-serving giants like Justice Thomas aren't a bug; they're the feature...decades of unflinching originalist steel, unmoved by the transient tantrums of election-losing authoritarians like you. Your whining about "no binding code of conduct" is pure bullshit. The Court adopted a formal Code of Conduct in 2023, and any "enforceable" version dictated by Congress would violate separation of powers so violently it'd make Marbury v. Madison blush. You don't get to leash the branch that checks your Marxist fever dreams just because Dobbs and Bruen broke your collectivist playbook. This isn't "reform." This is a naked power grab by a dying ideology that can't win appointments, can't win elections, and can't win in the Court of public opinion...so you try to burn the Constitution to remake the judiciary in your woke image. It will not happen. The structure endures as the Founders intended: independent, lifelong, untouchable by useful idiots in the House. Touch it, and you'll learn what real resistance looks like. Hands off our Court, you treacherous little tyrant.

§ profil fotoğrafı
§8 ay önce

How about Congress starts term limits with Congress, then work those term limits throughout the federal court system, then maybe up to the Supreme Court.

𝙅𝙊𝙃𝙉 𝙎𝙆𝙅𝙐𝙇𝙏 profil fotoğrafı
𝙅𝙊𝙃𝙉 𝙎𝙆𝙅𝙐𝙇𝙏8 ay önce

@PeterLBrandt Nothing from you while Ginsburg was forever on death’s door. But then, she was a teammate.

GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE profil fotoğrafı
GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE8 ay önce

So you’re just another constitutionally illiterate Democrat cockroach

Daxton Brown profil fotoğrafı
Daxton Brown8 ay önce

Let's start with term limits for corrupt old Democrat criminals.

Chief_Engineer profil fotoğrafı
Chief_Engineer8 ay önce

I never remember this being an issue when Democrats had the majority and Ruth Bader Ginsberg was in the court. Strange.

Marv-Ellis (aka Malcolm Twain) profil fotoğrafı
Marv-Ellis (aka Malcolm Twain)8 ay önce

We need term limits and a binding code of conduct and ethics for members of Congress...

BraveHeart™ profil fotoğrafı
BraveHeart™8 ay önce

We definitely need reform. However “We the People” will be doing the reforms. 535 elected have failed time and time again. You personally have violated our constitution and should resign.

Citizen Covfefe 𝕷𝖎𝖘𝖆 🇺🇸✝️ profil fotoğrafı
Citizen Covfefe 𝕷𝖎𝖘𝖆 🇺🇸✝️8 ay önce

You need to be in prison.

Greg West profil fotoğrafı
Greg West8 ay önce

We need a code of conduct that prevents members of congress from conducting psychological operations against the US military to get them to question legality of orders. Not one of you has shown an illegal order given by Trump. Slotkin had to quote a movie & go back to Vietnam.

Dana Sharpe profil fotoğrafı
Dana Sharpe8 ay önce

Term limits for the Legislative Branch first.

Jason Premo • Acclaim Aerospace profil fotoğrafı
Jason Premo • Acclaim Aerospace8 ay önce

Oh. Shut. Up. Hypocrites.

dcnh profil fotoğrafı
dcnh8 ay önce

what a racist !!! Do you support term limits for Congress as well? How long has Pelosi been there?

H.E. Dr. MIC (🤖,🤖) EngD, ScD, MBA, CFA ⚔️ profil fotoğrafı
H.E. Dr. MIC (🤖,🤖) EngD, ScD, MBA, CFA ⚔️8 ay önce

lifetime appointments are to immunize the justices against the political whims of the day that's what irks you they are there to serve the constitution not your suck ass agenda

Citizen Covfefe 𝕷𝖎𝖘𝖆 🇺🇸✝️ profil fotoğrafı
Citizen Covfefe 𝕷𝖎𝖘𝖆 🇺🇸✝️8 ay önce

This you!

Cynthia Holt profil fotoğrafı
Cynthia Holt8 ay önce

Oh boy, this treasonous bitch is back at it again, spewing her fucking lies and bullshit about needing Supreme Court reform now. Who the hell does she think she is, bitching about Justice Thomas being on the bench too long? That's just her whiny ass way of saying she hates how the court ain't bending over for her liberal crap. Term limits and ethics codes? Give me a break, that's code for packing the court with her commie pals so they can screw over real Americans. We don't need her meddling in shit that works just fine, Congress is the real joke here, full of corrupt assholes like her. Shut your fucking mouth cunt and get out, nobody wants your treasonous garbage!

Small Government profil fotoğrafı
Small Government8 ay önce

How about for Congress? Term limits Balanced Budget Amendment

Cindy Corbin profil fotoğrafı
Cindy Corbin8 ay önce

Time to go back to what our Republic was set up to be

Sammy M profil fotoğrafı
Sammy M8 ay önce

Miss Maggie: Why don't you just DO YOUR JOB and stop trying to weasel enough 'change' to get your way. WE had an election. WE voted for the direction WE want OUR country to go. Either get on board with that .. or frankly - STFU!

a Zeleny profil fotoğrafı
a Zeleny8 ay önce

SCOTUS is a lifetime appointment. Congressional impeachment is the method for bench removal. Requiring 2/3rds. *Not true for fraudulent Autopen appointments of lower courts where ‘good behavior’ has options: the Executive (and Judiciary). Congress cannot impose term limits upon Article II and Article III without term limits imposed upon itself, Article I. 🤷🏻‍♀️ Congress should increase eligibility requirements for judges to U.S. only citizens, ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ No dual loyalties. As a check, Congress should not be allowed to police itself. That experiment has been an utter disaster. As has the position of ‘Senate Leader’ and abuses of Advice & Consent - both are fiat constructs eroding the separate but co-equal branches. Congress has abysmal approval ratings, for decades. Pretty much the last branch a constituent wants tinkering with the U.S. Constitution.

Sanguine1969 profil fotoğrafı
Sanguine19698 ay önce

Ahem...

Jade’s Corner profil fotoğrafı
Jade’s Corner8 ay önce

🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣Are you freakin kidding us??? Almost all of the House and Senate have been there as long as you have been alive. Nancy is 85 Chuck is 75 Maxine Waters is freakin 87 lady. Mitch is 83 You just don't like Clarence, so you want him gone.

Lauren Bradley profil fotoğrafı
Lauren Bradley8 ay önce

Term limits for congress is a much better idea.

Kwasny profil fotoğrafı
Kwasny8 ay önce

We need term limits in Congress before anything else, seditious traitor, Soros controlled deep state puppet, likely sleeping with Mark Kelly for your video. You have lost all credibility, any sense of hope, disgraced your uniform, disgraced our country, and for what? Maggie Goodlander will go down as one of the most infamous representatives in American history. Shameful.

An American profil fotoğrafı
An American8 ay önce

Let's do the US House first. Get rid of the 15 term old biddies that can't even speak coherently

CX Carrillo profil fotoğrafı
CX Carrillo8 ay önce

If you want to be taken seriously, begin with proposing a bill to enact term limits in Congress. Otherwise you’re just another liberal hypocrite.

Stamos916 profil fotoğrafı
Stamos9168 ay önce

This you 👇

Benzer Videolar