We need to have a conversation about Jesus.

Another great video. For additional information - The Philastin were Greek, they are described as invaders from Crete. - the Arab Palestinian identity was created in 1964, most Arabs under the British mandate referred to themselves as south-Syrian, their movement at the time was to connect the future land of Israel to Syria. - the ‘Free Palestine’ movement is itself culturally appropriated from an indigenous Jewish movement of the same name.

Any DNA has proven than the current Palestinians has anything to do with the Philistines? Because I’m not sure if we can call the Philistines ‘indigenous,’ as there is evidence suggesting they came from what we now call Greece.

Correct, let me paste what I clarified in response to a different comment on IG which I think is important context: “from what l understand, I believe the Israelites emerged as a sort of outgrowth of the Canaanites, eventually developing their own distinct cultural/linguistic/religious identity. So then you had both the Canaanites and the Israelites. That's how some Levantine people could have some Canaanite ancestry, but not be descendants of Israelites (who would be todays Jews, or Muslims/Christians that were formally Jews and converted during or around the conquests). The Phillistines were Greeks from the Aegean Islands (so possibly incorrect to have referred to them as indigenous), who eventually disappeared from the archaeological record.”

Durning the British Mandate of Palestine Jews were called “Palestinians” while the Arabs living in the land were called… Arabs… the referring of Jews as Palestinians was the age old antisemitic reasoning as the Romans an attempt to try and disassociate the Jews from the land of Israel

For crying out loud, there is more evidence of the existence of Jesus Christ and his Jewish nationality than anyone else in antiquity. Not just the gospel first hand testimonies of fellow Jews but Roman records and Josephus’ history of the JEWS…. New Testament textual critic Daniel Wallace calls it an embarrassment of riches.

Thanks, but a couple of corrections. 1. Jesus was born "in the days of Herod the king," i.e. in the Kingdom of Judea, before it became a Roman province. 2. Galilee and Samaria were part of Judea, both as a kingdom and as a province. And they are as Jewish as Judea anyway.

Do not be afraid, Miriam, for you have found favor with God. 31 Behold, you will become pregnant and give birth to a son, and you shall call His name Yeshua. [b] He will be great and will be called Ben-Elyon. AdonaiElohim will give Him the throne of David,His father. He shall reign over the house of Jacob for all eternity, and His kingdom will be without end.”

This is ahistorical. Palestine was the name given to the region by both the Romans and Greeks. Jesus was from that region therefore he was Palestinian. On the other hand, Judea and Israel only existed as mythical legends known only to specific literary religious people. Therefore Jesus could have only come from Israel/Judea if he himself was a mythical figure.