Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

We never elected Julie Inman Grant, yet she has been granted extraordinary powers to decide which online platforms are deemed acceptable for children to access. Predictably Bluesky remains untouched. 😏👇🏽

katy 🌸

81,543 subscribers

27,620 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Labor Orchestrated Chaos BREAKING: eKaren has again been caught red handed. Today, it’s been discovered Labor’s new YouTube bans are based on hot air. The report which Julie Inman Grant relied on to manipulate her case for U16’s Social Media Ban - was - A SELF REPORTED SURVEY!

Labor Orchestrated Chaos BREAKING: eKaren has again been caught red handed. Today, it’s been discovered Labor’s new YouTube bans are based on hot air. The report which Julie Inman Grant relied on to manipulate her case for U16’s Social Media Ban - was - A SELF REPORTED SURVEY!

Aus Integrity

53,831 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We are ready to visit the hostages in Gaza, but to do that, we need safe access, which should be granted by all parties to this conflict. Jacob Kurtzer, communication coordinator for ICRC in Israel & OT, shared with CNN 👇🏽

We are ready to visit the hostages in Gaza, but to do that, we need safe access, which should be granted by all parties to this conflict. Jacob Kurtzer, communication coordinator for ICRC in Israel & OT, shared with CNN 👇🏽

ICRC

24,039 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We are serious about keeping Australian children safe - that’s why the Albanese Government has today announced we will enforce a minimum age for access to social media and other relevant digital platforms.

We are serious about keeping Australian children safe - that’s why the Albanese Government has today announced we will enforce a minimum age for access to social media and other relevant digital platforms.

Senator Penny Wong

160,733 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

WATCH: Illegal Somalian foreigner with fake refugee status demand SASSA to be reinstated. SASSA issued a statement claiming they are not paying SASSA grant to foreigners, however, a Somalian confirms that she has been receiving SASSA grant, which it has now been stop for 7 months.

WATCH: Illegal Somalian foreigner with fake refugee status demand SASSA to be reinstated. SASSA issued a statement claiming they are not paying SASSA grant to foreigners, however, a Somalian confirms that she has been receiving SASSA grant, which it has now been stop for 7 months.

PSAFLIVE

257,108 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Julie Inman-Grant has been called to appear before US Congress to give evidence into how Australian laws "threaten" the free speech of Americans. A letter signed by Jim Jordan accuses the eSafety Commissioner of being "a zealot for global takedowns". It requests she give testimony before the committee within the next two weeks, by 2 December.

Julie Inman-Grant has been called to appear before US Congress to give evidence into how Australian laws "threaten" the free speech of Americans. A letter signed by Jim Jordan accuses the eSafety Commissioner of being "a zealot for global takedowns". It requests she give testimony before the committee within the next two weeks, by 2 December.

Francynancy

37,182 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Australia's eSafety Censorship Commissar, Julie Inman-Grant is coming for your cars now, issuing a new warning about smart cars and the risks they pose to victims of domestic and family violence. She's branching out her powers to every corner of our life. The ABC says there are calls to better support frontline services and hold tech companies to account. What's the bet she comes after Tesla because of her obsession with Elon Musk? 😂

Australia's eSafety Censorship Commissar, Julie Inman-Grant is coming for your cars now, issuing a new warning about smart cars and the risks they pose to victims of domestic and family violence. She's branching out her powers to every corner of our life. The ABC says there are calls to better support frontline services and hold tech companies to account. What's the bet she comes after Tesla because of her obsession with Elon Musk? 😂

Francynancy

194,807 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which makes it illegal to sell tobacco to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009, has been granted Royal Assent today, meaning today’s children will never legally be sold cigarettes. For Sue Mountain, she hopes the new law will stop others suffering like her, saying her addiction to smoking - which started at 11 - was 'horrendous'. AJ reports. 🔗

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which makes it illegal to sell tobacco to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009, has been granted Royal Assent today, meaning today’s children will never legally be sold cigarettes. For Sue Mountain, she hopes the new law will stop others suffering like her, saying her addiction to smoking - which started at 11 - was 'horrendous'. AJ reports. 🔗

Sky News

48,812 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I'm seeing a lot of posts on other platforms saying things along the lines of "Australia is doing it right!" in regard to our upcoming Under 16s Social Media Ban. This isn't about protecting children, it's about control. Julie Inman Grant likens being on social media to swimming, and how young people ought to learn how to "swim between the flags." This is all fine and well, except now she wants to ban them from the water entirely? How will they learn to swim if they're just thrown in? Think about the platforms that are allowed to slip through the cracks. Discord, Roblox, Bluesky... All have had allegations of grooming and inappropriate content, yet they're exempt. Why? Control of the narrative. Control of the culture. Control of the impressionable minds of young people. That is all it is.

I'm seeing a lot of posts on other platforms saying things along the lines of "Australia is doing it right!" in regard to our upcoming Under 16s Social Media Ban. This isn't about protecting children, it's about control. Julie Inman Grant likens being on social media to swimming, and how young people ought to learn how to "swim between the flags." This is all fine and well, except now she wants to ban them from the water entirely? How will they learn to swim if they're just thrown in? Think about the platforms that are allowed to slip through the cracks. Discord, Roblox, Bluesky... All have had allegations of grooming and inappropriate content, yet they're exempt. Why? Control of the narrative. Control of the culture. Control of the impressionable minds of young people. That is all it is.

Celine against The Machine

46,319 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 Dear Congressman Jim Jordan. Greetings from Sydney, Australia I write to your in your capacity as the Chair of House Judiciary Committee and thank you for summoning Australia's ESafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant. Australia is days away from having draconian censorship on our internet which will kick off all under 16 year olds from social media ... and force over 16s to prove they are not under 16. Many, many Australians are grateful for your efforts and disappointed with our own political class for inflicting this on us. I will be challenging the constitutionality of Ms Inman Grant's powers in our highest court (see below) Digital Freedom Project

🚨 Dear Congressman Jim Jordan. Greetings from Sydney, Australia I write to your in your capacity as the Chair of House Judiciary Committee and thank you for summoning Australia's ESafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant. Australia is days away from having draconian censorship on our internet which will kick off all under 16 year olds from social media ... and force over 16s to prove they are not under 16. Many, many Australians are grateful for your efforts and disappointed with our own political class for inflicting this on us. I will be challenging the constitutionality of Ms Inman Grant's powers in our highest court (see below) Digital Freedom Project

John Ruddick MLC - Libertarian

35,000 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 Australia’s eSafety Commissioner attacks X for defending free speech in court, insisting the platform’s true goal is profiting from “horrific content” under the banner of free speech Julie Inman Grant, the former Twitter employee and WEF regular now working as Australia’s online safety regulator, shared multiple points of frustration with Elon Musk’s X platform for protecting free speech through legal challenges to censorship requests. When asked whether platforms like X hide behind free speech arguments to protect news-related content, she implied their only purpose must be to monetise it. Grant, who has not yet appeared before the US Congress for trying to diminish the freedom of Americans, went on to argue that sensible censorship can have a role in protecting democracy. The eSafety Commissioner was giving evidence at the Royal Commission on Antisemitism in Australia.

🚨 Australia’s eSafety Commissioner attacks X for defending free speech in court, insisting the platform’s true goal is profiting from “horrific content” under the banner of free speech Julie Inman Grant, the former Twitter employee and WEF regular now working as Australia’s online safety regulator, shared multiple points of frustration with Elon Musk’s X platform for protecting free speech through legal challenges to censorship requests. When asked whether platforms like X hide behind free speech arguments to protect news-related content, she implied their only purpose must be to monetise it. Grant, who has not yet appeared before the US Congress for trying to diminish the freedom of Americans, went on to argue that sensible censorship can have a role in protecting democracy. The eSafety Commissioner was giving evidence at the Royal Commission on Antisemitism in Australia.

Rukshan Fernando

22,864 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don't want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don't take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already working with Ireland, the UK, France, and other governments around the world. “We use the tools that we have, and we can be effective, but we know we're going to be, go much further, um, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe…with the U. K. With Ireland and with Fiji in November 2022, we launched the global online safety regulators network that has now grown to seven independent regulators, including France, South Korea, South Africa and a number of countries are serving as observers.” At the World Economic Forum, Inman Grant said she had launched a global censorship body called “the Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to unify governments around censorship “So that we could have a form to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that. But also make sure that what we're going to have differences in our regulatory schemes, there would be common values that drive us together.” This global censorship body gives governments extraordinary power to invade privacy, explained Inman-Grant. “What this legislation will give us is the ability to compel basic device information and account information. And more and more and more social media companies are starting to collect phone numbers and email addresses so that our investigators can at least find a place to issue a notice or a takedown notice or infringement notice of some sort.” Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet. “You can use VPNs, you can use burner phones,” she said, “different SIM cards every day. So it's going to be a challenge for a long time because, again, the internet's global. If there is no such thing as a kind of global identity system or even a piece of identity everybody can agree with, you know, should we all be sharing our driver's license or our passports?” At that same World Economic Forum meeting, one of the European Union’s top censors, Věra Jourová, calls for censorship to avoid events like January 6, and to fight hate speech. “The same thing, uh, reaction on the 6th of January, 2020. So, in Europe, of course, we have our history. We had to take action against hate speech. Because what it is, anti-Semitism, racism, LGBT, the menu is always the same.” Jourva explains that the EU and Australia intend to pressure social media companies to implement global censorship to simplify things. Who is Jourova? Why she’s the same person that Public caught spreading disinformation about a new Russiagate hoax two weeks ago. Who is Inman Grant?...

CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don't want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don't take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already working with Ireland, the UK, France, and other governments around the world. “We use the tools that we have, and we can be effective, but we know we're going to be, go much further, um, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe…with the U. K. With Ireland and with Fiji in November 2022, we launched the global online safety regulators network that has now grown to seven independent regulators, including France, South Korea, South Africa and a number of countries are serving as observers.” At the World Economic Forum, Inman Grant said she had launched a global censorship body called “the Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to unify governments around censorship “So that we could have a form to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that. But also make sure that what we're going to have differences in our regulatory schemes, there would be common values that drive us together.” This global censorship body gives governments extraordinary power to invade privacy, explained Inman-Grant. “What this legislation will give us is the ability to compel basic device information and account information. And more and more and more social media companies are starting to collect phone numbers and email addresses so that our investigators can at least find a place to issue a notice or a takedown notice or infringement notice of some sort.” Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet. “You can use VPNs, you can use burner phones,” she said, “different SIM cards every day. So it's going to be a challenge for a long time because, again, the internet's global. If there is no such thing as a kind of global identity system or even a piece of identity everybody can agree with, you know, should we all be sharing our driver's license or our passports?” At that same World Economic Forum meeting, one of the European Union’s top censors, Věra Jourová, calls for censorship to avoid events like January 6, and to fight hate speech. “The same thing, uh, reaction on the 6th of January, 2020. So, in Europe, of course, we have our history. We had to take action against hate speech. Because what it is, anti-Semitism, racism, LGBT, the menu is always the same.” Jourva explains that the EU and Australia intend to pressure social media companies to implement global censorship to simplify things. Who is Jourova? Why she’s the same person that Public caught spreading disinformation about a new Russiagate hoax two weeks ago. Who is Inman Grant?...

Michael Shellenberger

648,166 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Julie Inman-Grant, Australia's eSafety Censorship Commissar has not ruled out travelling to the US to testify before a Congressional committee. She says she's been in touch with the committee but thinks she might not be the best person to testify (not sure why she flashed such a sh1t eating grin when she said that. I think she fancies herself as too clever for everyone else). Anyway, every good bureaucrat knows you don't throw a Minister under the bus so it will be interesting to see if she even lasts out her tenure. Public servants are disposable scapegoats in the eyes of government.

Julie Inman-Grant, Australia's eSafety Censorship Commissar has not ruled out travelling to the US to testify before a Congressional committee. She says she's been in touch with the committee but thinks she might not be the best person to testify (not sure why she flashed such a sh1t eating grin when she said that. I think she fancies herself as too clever for everyone else). Anyway, every good bureaucrat knows you don't throw a Minister under the bus so it will be interesting to see if she even lasts out her tenure. Public servants are disposable scapegoats in the eyes of government.

Francynancy

10,364 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Brave mothers like Ellen Roome whose son committed suicide at 13 following what we think was an online prank: She has been fighting for years to protect our children from the harm of the internet. But the corporations and politicians are too self interested.😫

Brave mothers like Ellen Roome whose son committed suicide at 13 following what we think was an online prank: She has been fighting for years to protect our children from the harm of the internet. But the corporations and politicians are too self interested.😫

Katharine Birbalsingh

21,140 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 WOW! Scott Bessent just revealed the IRS has moved to make NGOs LIABLE for violent activity committed by their grant recipients like Antifa George Soros has been put on NOTICE. "The IRS is now giving guidance on the Form 990, which nonprofits they have to file. We are going to DEMAND that nonprofits know their grant recipients." "So if a grant recipient is violent, if they are suppressing people's rights, then YOU are responsible for that." As for the for the investigation into who is funding Antifa terrorism: "We made substantial progress. And I think in the weeks and months ahead, we are going to have a lot to report."

🚨 WOW! Scott Bessent just revealed the IRS has moved to make NGOs LIABLE for violent activity committed by their grant recipients like Antifa George Soros has been put on NOTICE. "The IRS is now giving guidance on the Form 990, which nonprofits they have to file. We are going to DEMAND that nonprofits know their grant recipients." "So if a grant recipient is violent, if they are suppressing people's rights, then YOU are responsible for that." As for the for the investigation into who is funding Antifa terrorism: "We made substantial progress. And I think in the weeks and months ahead, we are going to have a lot to report."

Nick Sortor

907,985 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

‼️ Julie Inman Grant to Step Down After a Decade of Expanding Censorship Via Anthony Khallouf, see first comment Julie Inman Grant has announced her decision to leave her position as Australia's eSafety Commissioner after nearly ten years in charge. She cited personal reasons, including the strain of public attacks and online hostility toward her and her family. During her tenure, she positioned herself as a pioneer in online safety and claimed her work was vital to protecting vulnerable people. In reality, her time in office became one of the most divisive periods in Australian digital policy. Under her leadership, the eSafety Commission grew from a small regulatory office into one of the most powerful speech-policing agencies in the democratic world. Her office gained authority to compel the removal of online material, enforce compliance on global platforms, and determine what Australians can legally view or share. Supporters described her as determined and resilient, while critics accused her of overreach and of turning safety laws into tools of censorship. Inman Grant departs just as the government advances plans for a national social media age restriction, a policy she strongly promoted. She views it as a cornerstone of her legacy, while many Australians see it as another step toward controlling public discourse under the banner of protection. Her decade in office has left a lasting mark on Australia's online environment. What began as a promise to make the internet safer ended as a warning of what happens when power is handed to those who believe their moral authority outweighs the public's right to speak freely.

‼️ Julie Inman Grant to Step Down After a Decade of Expanding Censorship Via Anthony Khallouf, see first comment Julie Inman Grant has announced her decision to leave her position as Australia's eSafety Commissioner after nearly ten years in charge. She cited personal reasons, including the strain of public attacks and online hostility toward her and her family. During her tenure, she positioned herself as a pioneer in online safety and claimed her work was vital to protecting vulnerable people. In reality, her time in office became one of the most divisive periods in Australian digital policy. Under her leadership, the eSafety Commission grew from a small regulatory office into one of the most powerful speech-policing agencies in the democratic world. Her office gained authority to compel the removal of online material, enforce compliance on global platforms, and determine what Australians can legally view or share. Supporters described her as determined and resilient, while critics accused her of overreach and of turning safety laws into tools of censorship. Inman Grant departs just as the government advances plans for a national social media age restriction, a policy she strongly promoted. She views it as a cornerstone of her legacy, while many Australians see it as another step toward controlling public discourse under the banner of protection. Her decade in office has left a lasting mark on Australia's online environment. What began as a promise to make the internet safer ended as a warning of what happens when power is handed to those who believe their moral authority outweighs the public's right to speak freely.

Joel Jammal

61,548 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Another foreigner caught he admits he’s never been to school so has no qualifications for a job so he chooses to try meet children, why are we letting people in with nothing but pain to our children and nothing to offer our country job wise? He actually spits on the ground TB ??

Another foreigner caught he admits he’s never been to school so has no qualifications for a job so he chooses to try meet children, why are we letting people in with nothing but pain to our children and nothing to offer our country job wise? He actually spits on the ground TB ??

Alexandra

20,819 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten