Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

We only can see this UFO with Infrared 🧐👽👽 Human eye can perceive mostly 390-700 nanometers of the electromagnetic spectrum. Outside of this falls larger radio waves, microwaves and infrared. Above the visible spectrum we have ultraviolet, x-ray and gamma rays. We only see approximately 5% of the entire...

34,097 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Entities and craft don’t appear and disappear. They enter the human visual frequency range and then leave." Interdimensional, Elizondo, Eric Davis and David Icke "If these craft and beings can operate outside of our perception, they can be involved in our lives and we would have no idea." ~Me (The video has two clips and a meme I made.) Jillian Michaels: "What is inner space? What does interdimensional even mean? Is that like some sort of suggestion that they're coming from another universe? What does that mean?" Lue Elizondo: "Well, you know, not necessarily. So let me give, if I can, to kind of distill this down into something that might be a little bit more easy to consume. The reality...so I mentioned I live here in Wyoming, and you can come out on any particular night and gaze upon the heavens and see just a, you know, a beautiful, beautiful night sky, completely unoccluded. "Now, if you were to take technology like, oh, I don't know, a radio telescope or an infrared telescope, and point at the same part of the sky that you were looking at with your naked eye, you would see a completely different reality. You would see large nebulas and megelenic clouds, and plasma, and things that the human eye just simply can't perceive. "In fact, if you look at the five fundamental ways in which we perceive the Universe, which there's only five, right? And if you can't touch it, taste it, hear it, smell it, etc., we have no idea it's there. But if you had, for example, let's go back to the bumblebee, right? If you had bumblebee-vision and you were to look at a flower, you would see a completely different reality, because they view the Universe in ultraviolet spectrum, beyond our ability to perceive, right? Or if you were a snake and you could see in thermal vision, you see heat, right, and perceive heat. "The human eye...it only picks up - think about this - .0035% of the entire electromagnetic spectrum. In fact, most of the Universe we cannot perceive directly, it lies beyond our ability to directly perceive it." ~~~ The following excerpt is from "The Trap" by David Icke. He's been making this point for decades. Icke: "What we see with our eyes – actually our brain/mind – is only a tiny band of frequency called visible light within the electromagnetic spectrum. The entire spectrum (what we call ‘light’) is estimated to be just 0.005 percent of what exists in the Universe. Some say it’s up to 0.5 percent and whichever it’s infinitesimal. Think about that and even more so this: The only band of frequency that we can ‘see’ is a fractional smear of the 0.005 percent known as visible light. In the name of sanity we are basically blind. "Religions tell us that all we need to know is between the covers of a single book within a barely perceivable fraction of 0.005 percent of the Universe. How crazy is that? As the quote by Socrates at the start of the chapter says: ‘The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.’ The way to know anything is to open your mind to all possibility and not confine perception to the sense of reality programmed into your psyche all your life to keep you perceptually, thus ‘physically’, enslaved. We scan the world and think we can see all there is to see in the perceived ‘space’ we are observing when we are ‘seeing’ only the hilariously narrow frequency band of visible light. "Infinite Reality exists in that same ‘space’; it’s just that we can’t see it. Our five-sense visual decoding system can only decode visible light. Try putting on a computer screen levels of frequency that the computer is not programmed to decode. You can’t and the principle is exactly the same. People are ridiculed and dismissed for claiming they’ve seen non-human entities or spacecraft appearing out of nowhere and then disappearing. Once again the ridicule comes from ignorance. It shows that if you can suppress knowledge of the possible you can manipulate your targets to dismiss with a laugh and a wave of the hand what is actually happening. "Those entities and craft don’t appear and disappear. They enter the human visual frequency range and then leave. To the human observer they only seem to appear and disappear as they come and go from the only band of frequency the observer can see. It’s real simple and that goes for all apparently ‘impossible’ phenomena." Icke, David . The Trap: What it is. How it works. And how we escape its illusions (p. 265). (Function). Kindle Edition. ~~~Back to Lue~~~ Elizondo: To perceive most of the Universe, "we need technology, and yet that is really where most of the Universe lies, beyond our spectrums of visible light. They might lie in X-ray or gamma or radio or microwave, or, you know, all sorts of other areas. And so, we say interdimensional, it might not be something as, you know, exotic as another universe. It doesn't have to be. It can be part of this Universe, but part of this Universe that we simply can't perceive. "And we hear this all the time with things such as dark energy and dark matter. Most of the Universe lies in this invisible realm that, even today, with today's technology, we know it's there but we can't perceive it. And yet, that's where most of the 'stuff,' if you will, of our reality in the Universe actually lies." ~~~ And I think this MIGHT be related... Marik vR: "The Trump administration's first UAP document release also includes witness interviews by FBI agents and an FBI laboratory composite sketch from a truly intriguing, perplexing September 2023 incident. "In this case, which occurred at an Air Force testing range in Florida, three witnesses in two vehicles observed a large, metallic quote, 'cigar-shaped object for five to ten seconds before it disappeared.' Literally vanished instantaneously in front of their eyes. One of the witnesses was a range officer with 15 years of experience, and the others were drone experts. In other words, these were individuals who are well aware of what aircraft and objects are operating at such ranges." (So, did this object switch to its stealth technology and disappear that way, or did it use some other way to avoid the perception of the witnesses and "disappear" into another "dimension," so to speak?) Here's a short and succinct definition of "interdimensional" from Dr. Eric Davis.. "Interdimensional is speculation but it’s widely referring to the potential for different planes of existence that humans haven’t discovered or cannot sense. There is the possibility of life that exists outside of human visual and auditory ranges which an NHI might exist within but this is not in another number of dimensions that differ from our own." ~Dr. Eric W. Davis (If these craft and beings can operate outside of our perception, they can be involved in our lives and we would have no idea. If that's going on, it may be VERY difficult for the masses to accept.)

Joe Murgia

102,647 views • 3 months ago

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 views • 5 months ago

David Kipping on why building AI megastructures might be the strongest evidence that we're alone in the universe: The argument starts with something we can already observe: how much energy AI consumes. "One thing we see already with these AI models is how energy hungry they are." P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) extrapolates from there. If the only purpose of these data centers is to compute as much as possible as fast as possible, then they'll demand vast amounts of energy. And the orbital data centers that billionaires are getting excited about wouldn't be invisible to us. He explains that such structures would leave a detectable signature: "We should probably see that in James Webb. We could probably already put limits on the existence of essentially artificial rings... emitting a lot of infrared because they're warm." Then comes the unsettling turn. If humanity can build these machines, so could anyone else. And that carries a dark implication. "But if we make that breakthrough, I think the biggest point is it seems to imply that we are alone. Because if we can do it, surely someone else could have done it." This connects to what he refers to as Hart's Fact A. The strange observation that everything we look at in the cosmos appears completely natural: "Everything about the universe: we see stars, galaxies, clouds of plasma. Everything is consistent with nature. There's no hint anywhere of anything artificial, no engineering, nothing in the whole universe. As far as we can see, that's true. That is weird." The more powerful the technology we can imagine, the worse that silence looks. Dyson spheres everywhere, colonising wherever they want, faster-than-light spaceships if any of that is achievable, the sky should be full of evidence. It isn't. "It just massively exacerbates the Fermi paradox to the point where you'd probably conclude this is it." His honest conclusion: "It would make me even more pessimistic about the probabilities of intelligent life in the universe."

High Signal AI

10,431 views • 3 months ago