Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We should never manipulate markets that are very competitive and have been functioning so well for so long. The truth is about credit cards, every time there's a new entrant, it's so competitive. They offer 0% financing for six months. Now as a result of this jawboning, it'd be...

kevinolearytv's profile picture

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

1,233,037 subscribers

38,788 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

19 Yorum

Mike ter Maat profil fotoğrafı
Mike ter Maat8 ay önce

This is exactly right. Credit cards are competitive because they’re competitive, not because Washington micromanages them. Once government starts jawboning prices, availability drops and costs creep back in anyway. Markets adjust. Mandates distort. That lesson never changes.

Daniell Burleson profil fotoğrafı
Daniell Burleson8 ay önce

Functioning well for who??? Certainly not the consumers. Credit card debt is a viscous cycle once your in its hard to get out for the common person.

Tanner profil fotoğrafı
Tanner8 ay önce

Please, go on.

Rural and Right profil fotoğrafı
Rural and Right8 ay önce

Words of wisdom! Keep up the awsome posts Mr. Wonderful!

just me.....original MAGA profil fotoğrafı
just me.....original MAGA8 ay önce

Ok Kevin…let’s talk about the silver and gold market manipulation and of course revisit nickel on the lbma…all manipulation has been to the benefit of the too big to fail crowd…

Sam and Sam profil fotoğrafı
Sam and Sam8 ay önce

This is a great big nothing burger. Its impossible to implement in such a short time.

ThunderMeat profil fotoğrafı
ThunderMeat8 ay önce

It’s not really a free market when the Fed sets the rates.

Brian profil fotoğrafı
Brian8 ay önce

Are you saying the massively high regulatory barriers to entry, structured by bank lobbyists, does not incentivize price fixing? And therefore anyone who could theoretically reach the bar to compete would not instead be crushed like a cockroach?

Andres Mambuca Jr., REALTOR® profil fotoğrafı
Andres Mambuca Jr., REALTOR®8 ay önce

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.” Matthew 6:34 (NKJV) This is one of the most freeing verses in Scripture — and one I come back to constantly in real estate (and in life). The market will do what the market does: rates will fluctuate, inventory will shift, buyers will hesitate, sellers will overprice, appraisals will frustrate. Tomorrow’s headlines, tomorrow’s Fed meeting, tomorrow’s potential crash or boom — none of it is in my control today. What is in my control today? - The calls I make - The follow-ups I send - The value I deliver to the client on the phone right now - The integrity I bring to every conversation - The gratitude I choose to carry instead of worry Worry about tomorrow steals today’s peace and today’s action. The trouble of today is enough. Handle it with focus, faith, and hard work — and tomorrow will take care of itself. **I'm Andres Mambuca Jr. (@RealtorMambuca)** 20+ years selling ownership in Broward, Miami-Dade and West Palm Beach for happy owners · Top Producer since 2001 📲 (954) 247-4475 💻 Genesis Realty Svcs YouTube: @realtormambuca FOLLOW @RealtorMambuca RIGHT NOW — daily South Florida market updates, off-market deals, mindset fuel, and real encouragement like this that thousands use to stay grounded and win big. Hit follow + turn on notifications — your peace and your productivity start here! VISIT RIGHT NOW — browse hundreds of listings, get your free home value report, and take today’s step toward the home or investment you need. Don’t worry about tomorrow — start winning today! Tag someone who needs this verse today 👇 Sufficient for the day is its own trouble. Handle today. Trust tomorrow. 🌴🙏 #Matthew634 #NoWorry #SouthFLRealEstate

⚡️Crypto₿aggTrav⚡️🎯💰 profil fotoğrafı
⚡️Crypto₿aggTrav⚡️🎯💰8 ay önce

Whoa

Richard.Stillhard profil fotoğrafı
Richard.Stillhard8 ay önce

I'm going to just keep paying my full credit card balance off each month, and continue not knowing or caring what the rate is.

Patrick profil fotoğrafı
Patrick8 ay önce

Should only be 5%. If you make 5% on your investments it's very good.

uknowme profil fotoğrafı
uknowme8 ay önce

...kinda sad you make no mention of the predatory lending that pervades the market? Much like pharma and food have manipulated the public with zero accountability - now the president takes aim on other culprits. If anything, it is overdue.

Jeremiah Chronister profil fotoğrafı
Jeremiah Chronister8 ay önce

Wrong question. Not whether credit card markets are competitive—they are. The issue is regulatory uncertainty creating investment freeze. When rules might change tomorrow, capital sits idle today.

Irv Rolon (Tiki) profil fotoğrafı
Irv Rolon (Tiki)8 ay önce

Kevin Oleary..... STFU!

Andrew Pisano profil fotoğrafı
Andrew Pisano8 ay önce

So why not allow credit cards to charge 80% interest or 100%? Why are they capped?

Shaun Alexander Gaff profil fotoğrafı
Shaun Alexander Gaff8 ay önce

I agree. Nobody is forced to get a new phone every 2 years, or a 6 year car loan. Everyone laughs if I say stop paying $6 for a coffee but it all adds up. Control your spending then interest rates won’t matter

Kenneth Dennis profil fotoğrafı
Kenneth Dennis8 ay önce

You cannot legislate away risk. You just push it underground or make it more expensive somewhere else.

Greg Stevens profil fotoğrafı
Greg Stevens8 ay önce

Yeah like Fed intentionally crashing housing, letting most Americans lose all networth, then TARP, Bailouts etc to prevent 1% from losing networth! End the privately owned for profit Federal Reserve Bank! @POTUS

Benzer Videolar

Chamath and Larry Summers Debate the Market Reaction to Trump's Tariffs Lawrence H. Summers: "If this is such a terrific thing, why do markets think it's so terrible for the American economy?" "Maybe the market's just completely wrong ... but the job of markets is to look forward." "It's to look passed the immediate." "It's to see what the long run consequences are going to be." "And markets are making a pretty devastatingly negative judgment on this step." Chamath Palihapitiya: " Larry, that's not true." " So let's just establish a couple facts about 'the markets.'" "Number one, there are two markets and they behave totally differently, and sometimes inversely to each other." "There's the stock market and there's the bond market." 1) Stocks: mean reversion "With respect to the stock market, what they are debating, and you're right Larry, is what is the effective long-term rate of return a dollar needs to generate in order to pay me back that dollar?" "That is what the fundamental stock market does." "And what we've seen for many years with trade imbalances, trade deficits, and close-to-zero interest rates, of which more of that happened under Democrats than Republicans, we have allowed the stock market to inflate past historical averages." " What we've actually seen happen in the last week is what most people would call mean reversion." "The stock market is still way above where it was last year, two years ago, three years ago." "What has happened is that the forward multiples have compressed. So that's number one. That's a fact." 2) Bonds: it's possible a major trade blew up "And then with respect to bonds, what we are seeing now is there are two very complicated issues." "In the last two days, we saw one part of the bond market totally get out of whack." "And what we know is that the yields changed materially in a very acute way, which is atypical of how the bond market typically digests a philosophical change in approach to policy." " What we heard in the last 24 hours is a lot of this move may have been attributed to an enormous levered bet on US treasuries by a Japanese hedge fund." " It will take three, and four, and five, and six weeks for us to really know." 3) Private credit: something to watch closely " Separately, what we do know, though, where the structural complexity of the market — and this is where, Larry, I agree with you — is acute and important to observe is in the credit markets for private companies." "And that is where you have to pay a lot of attention."
2:18

Chamath and Larry Summers Debate the Market Reaction to Trump's Tariffs Lawrence H. Summers: "If this is such a terrific thing, why do markets think it's so terrible for the American economy?" "Maybe the market's just completely wrong ... but the job of markets is to look forward." "It's to look passed the immediate." "It's to see what the long run consequences are going to be." "And markets are making a pretty devastatingly negative judgment on this step." Chamath Palihapitiya: " Larry, that's not true." " So let's just establish a couple facts about 'the markets.'" "Number one, there are two markets and they behave totally differently, and sometimes inversely to each other." "There's the stock market and there's the bond market." 1) Stocks: mean reversion "With respect to the stock market, what they are debating, and you're right Larry, is what is the effective long-term rate of return a dollar needs to generate in order to pay me back that dollar?" "That is what the fundamental stock market does." "And what we've seen for many years with trade imbalances, trade deficits, and close-to-zero interest rates, of which more of that happened under Democrats than Republicans, we have allowed the stock market to inflate past historical averages." " What we've actually seen happen in the last week is what most people would call mean reversion." "The stock market is still way above where it was last year, two years ago, three years ago." "What has happened is that the forward multiples have compressed. So that's number one. That's a fact." 2) Bonds: it's possible a major trade blew up "And then with respect to bonds, what we are seeing now is there are two very complicated issues." "In the last two days, we saw one part of the bond market totally get out of whack." "And what we know is that the yields changed materially in a very acute way, which is atypical of how the bond market typically digests a philosophical change in approach to policy." " What we heard in the last 24 hours is a lot of this move may have been attributed to an enormous levered bet on US treasuries by a Japanese hedge fund." " It will take three, and four, and five, and six weeks for us to really know." 3) Private credit: something to watch closely " Separately, what we do know, though, where the structural complexity of the market — and this is where, Larry, I agree with you — is acute and important to observe is in the credit markets for private companies." "And that is where you have to pay a lot of attention."

The All-In Podcast

98,290 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Q: Esteban, new year, new rules, new car. You've had the first run out this morning at the Shakedown. What are the first impressions? How did the program go for you? Esteban Ocon: Yeah, feeling good. I think, frist of all, an unbelievable effort from the team really to put the car down, you know, at 9:20 this morning. But the was ready at 9:00 you know. We were waiting on a bit of a better track condition and a few things that we wanted to be perfect before we went out. But yeah, from Fiorano testing with Ollie to here there's been moving like people have climbed mountains really to make this car work and it's been really good. So, we are dealing with the plan, learning as it goes. Of course, it's a busy program that we have for the day. So you know, its gonna be difficult to complete it. But for the first real day of driving, I think so far it's going really well and we'll keep pushing to make sure that all the details are covered. But we have more days than normal which is a good thing. Q: Very early days, of course, but just how different are these cars to drive? Have you had a chance to play around a little bit with some of the new modes? Ocon: Yeah, it's very difficult, very complicated. I got lucky be able to do a lot of simulator days before we started the year, so we are pretty well set on that. Everything is clear, but yes, it's very complicated you know, for all of us. But I hope that this will be the same for everyone, because if it is we're in the same boat, so we'll see. Q: But I get the sense you're really relishing that challange and what about the priorities from here, the rest of the weel here at the shakedown? Ocon: Yeah, the aim is really to learn, to get mileage under the car, you know, see the weak points, what we have to improve really. First feel of things, so we are sure that we take the right development path and we are sure that we put the resources where it matters the most. Where it's the most bothering us, so you know, we'll try and put all that together for that end of the test. It's a long week, which is very good and then we have the chance to go back to Bahrain with hopefully, further step made, so that's the aim. #HaasF1 #F1Testing #F1
2:17

Q: Esteban, new year, new rules, new car. You've had the first run out this morning at the Shakedown. What are the first impressions? How did the program go for you? Esteban Ocon: Yeah, feeling good. I think, frist of all, an unbelievable effort from the team really to put the car down, you know, at 9:20 this morning. But the was ready at 9:00 you know. We were waiting on a bit of a better track condition and a few things that we wanted to be perfect before we went out. But yeah, from Fiorano testing with Ollie to here there's been moving like people have climbed mountains really to make this car work and it's been really good. So, we are dealing with the plan, learning as it goes. Of course, it's a busy program that we have for the day. So you know, its gonna be difficult to complete it. But for the first real day of driving, I think so far it's going really well and we'll keep pushing to make sure that all the details are covered. But we have more days than normal which is a good thing. Q: Very early days, of course, but just how different are these cars to drive? Have you had a chance to play around a little bit with some of the new modes? Ocon: Yeah, it's very difficult, very complicated. I got lucky be able to do a lot of simulator days before we started the year, so we are pretty well set on that. Everything is clear, but yes, it's very complicated you know, for all of us. But I hope that this will be the same for everyone, because if it is we're in the same boat, so we'll see. Q: But I get the sense you're really relishing that challange and what about the priorities from here, the rest of the weel here at the shakedown? Ocon: Yeah, the aim is really to learn, to get mileage under the car, you know, see the weak points, what we have to improve really. First feel of things, so we are sure that we take the right development path and we are sure that we put the resources where it matters the most. Where it's the most bothering us, so you know, we'll try and put all that together for that end of the test. It's a long week, which is very good and then we have the chance to go back to Bahrain with hopefully, further step made, so that's the aim. #HaasF1 #F1Testing #F1

Lucho Yoma

12,593 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.
2:50

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

50,207 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."
2:15

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Founder Mode

39,005 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Anne Hathaway admits she took on five massive blockbuster movies in a single year just to prove a point about male laziness "I mean they [men] are at a disadvantage. It's just a literal truth." Host: "Anne Hathaway having 5 movies premiering this year and then announcing that she is pregnant is the level of productivity that men can't achieve." The career: "I've been doing this for a very, very, very long time. And I hope to do it for, you know, a long time to come." Anne: "you just never know, there's, there's peaks, there's valleys, there's everything in between. And so it's just crazy to have a time like this where you pull these cards." "the thing that's so exciting is they're films that audiences want to see. Which is just one of my favorite things in the world is going to the movies." "And then yeah to have this personal thing going on at the same time, it's amazing."
1:05

Anne Hathaway admits she took on five massive blockbuster movies in a single year just to prove a point about male laziness "I mean they [men] are at a disadvantage. It's just a literal truth." Host: "Anne Hathaway having 5 movies premiering this year and then announcing that she is pregnant is the level of productivity that men can't achieve." The career: "I've been doing this for a very, very, very long time. And I hope to do it for, you know, a long time to come." Anne: "you just never know, there's, there's peaks, there's valleys, there's everything in between. And so it's just crazy to have a time like this where you pull these cards." "the thing that's so exciting is they're films that audiences want to see. Which is just one of my favorite things in the world is going to the movies." "And then yeah to have this personal thing going on at the same time, it's amazing."

Rixlerr

2,739,957 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

David Friedberg: Higher Interest Rates Are About to Make America’s $40 Trillion Debt Problem Much Worse “The federal government has a problem because over the next 12 months they have to refinance $10 trillion of debt. That debt is coming due. Those bonds are now due. They have to pay the principal back to the bond holders, and they have to go back to the treasury market and sell more treasuries to borrow more money to refinance. So the borrowing cost now is going to climb up, and when that borrowing cost climbs up, the federal government's burn goes up and the fiscal deficit goes up. So my theory and my argument on this is: There is no action that Bessent can take that's actually going to have a meaningful effect on the long end of the curve. We have a fundamental fiscal spending problem with the federal government right now. It is very expensive now to borrow money if you're the US federal government. And the reason is persistent inflation, I would argue because of excess government spending on social programs and other things. And the big problem at this point is the federal government is spending so much that if they were to cut spending aggressively, the argument and the concern is it would hit unemployment and it would cause a recession because the federal government is such an intricate part of the economy now. That's the argument. But it's causing inflation, and it's causing deficit spending. So this year the deficit will be roughly $2 trillion. And as a result, the market is saying, ‘We're worried about the US fiscal solvency over the long run, or there's a higher risk. As a result, we're going to charge you a higher interest, 5.2% on the 30 year.’ What does this mean for the federal government? Well, today, the federal government's average cost of debt is 3.4%. That's what we're paying on interest on average on the $40 trillion of debt that the federal government has outstanding. For every 1% change in the interest rate, the US government has to pay 1.25% of GDP in excess interest each year. 1.25% of GDP in interest each year for that 1% change in the interest rate.”
1:58

David Friedberg: Higher Interest Rates Are About to Make America’s $40 Trillion Debt Problem Much Worse “The federal government has a problem because over the next 12 months they have to refinance $10 trillion of debt. That debt is coming due. Those bonds are now due. They have to pay the principal back to the bond holders, and they have to go back to the treasury market and sell more treasuries to borrow more money to refinance. So the borrowing cost now is going to climb up, and when that borrowing cost climbs up, the federal government's burn goes up and the fiscal deficit goes up. So my theory and my argument on this is: There is no action that Bessent can take that's actually going to have a meaningful effect on the long end of the curve. We have a fundamental fiscal spending problem with the federal government right now. It is very expensive now to borrow money if you're the US federal government. And the reason is persistent inflation, I would argue because of excess government spending on social programs and other things. And the big problem at this point is the federal government is spending so much that if they were to cut spending aggressively, the argument and the concern is it would hit unemployment and it would cause a recession because the federal government is such an intricate part of the economy now. That's the argument. But it's causing inflation, and it's causing deficit spending. So this year the deficit will be roughly $2 trillion. And as a result, the market is saying, ‘We're worried about the US fiscal solvency over the long run, or there's a higher risk. As a result, we're going to charge you a higher interest, 5.2% on the 30 year.’ What does this mean for the federal government? Well, today, the federal government's average cost of debt is 3.4%. That's what we're paying on interest on average on the $40 trillion of debt that the federal government has outstanding. For every 1% change in the interest rate, the US government has to pay 1.25% of GDP in excess interest each year. 1.25% of GDP in interest each year for that 1% change in the interest rate.”

The All-In Podcast

334,996 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Retired pharma R&D executive says "the whole idea of vaccination and public health was always [about] eugenics"🩸💉 "it was always the mechanism the government... [used] to keep the population under control" "it's... especially [about] access to each and every body with injections, with needles. That's what they're always after" sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" Andrew Kaufman MD ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Latypova: "As I've been saying for a long time, this whole idea of vaccination, public health, was always eugenics idea. It was always the mechanism that the government, early on, the monarchy or some other type of government figured out that this is a great method to keep the population under control. "And they were pretty explicit about this in many, many documents, more contemporary documents as population control policies, population control strategies." Kaufman: "Well we even have vaccines that are used as birth control, right? They've been studied in, in, in clinical trials that are published." Latypova: "Oh yeah, I'm just— I'm going to publish about that. I found one paper that's, of course, in French, it's not in English, so I auto translated it, and it's very explicit. We are developing contraceptive vaccines for the developing countries for the purposes of population control. It's very explicit—" Kaufman: "I have a study published in English, very similar. It was done in Africa. I can get you a copy of that if you like...." Latypova: "So, the governments together with these 'scientists,' you know, I can't call them scientists, they are profiteers, off of this idea, like Koch, like Pasteur, Mechnikov, there was a bunch of Russian ones. So they started the whole idea of hunting viruses became very lucrative because if you could isolate and find something or virus or bacteria or some bacilli, like the Koch, then you could become rich and famous because you could be awarded big commissions from the government, given lots of power, and labs and staff." "And, of course, you can then patent your inventions and sell them in terms of rabies shots or tuberculin or things like that. There were attempts at vaccines for diphtheria, vaccines for plague, cholera, none of them worked, they all failed." Kaufman: "And they were, they were experimenting with different technologies at that time as well, right? Because I believe the diphtheria immunization was made from horse serum. Right? Rather than, you know, something in a culture or, or from a, from an animal lesion. So, sort of closer to what might be called today monoclonal antibody technology." Latypova: "Yes... it's very similar the monoclonal that they use horses for, commonly. That was how it originated. "Also, they experimented with injecting all sorts of things. So, for example, foot and mouth disease also at the same time was being claimed to be viral. And they would invariably, they will claim either it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin, depending on the situation. "But it's always because they can't find anything in the solution that they make. So if they can't find any cells, then they will claim it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin just because it's invisible. It's very convenient." Kaufman: "So this would incentivize the scientist or the businessman because there's a big commercial opportunity there to become rich and famous. But from the government's perspective, who may be financing these operations, it's a tool of eugenics and health control, essentially." Latypova: "Yeah, it's... especially access to each and every body with injection, with a needle. That's what they're always after. And it continues today."
3:49

Retired pharma R&D executive says "the whole idea of vaccination and public health was always [about] eugenics"🩸💉 "it was always the mechanism the government... [used] to keep the population under control" "it's... especially [about] access to each and every body with injections, with needles. That's what they're always after" sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" Andrew Kaufman MD ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Latypova: "As I've been saying for a long time, this whole idea of vaccination, public health, was always eugenics idea. It was always the mechanism that the government, early on, the monarchy or some other type of government figured out that this is a great method to keep the population under control. "And they were pretty explicit about this in many, many documents, more contemporary documents as population control policies, population control strategies." Kaufman: "Well we even have vaccines that are used as birth control, right? They've been studied in, in, in clinical trials that are published." Latypova: "Oh yeah, I'm just— I'm going to publish about that. I found one paper that's, of course, in French, it's not in English, so I auto translated it, and it's very explicit. We are developing contraceptive vaccines for the developing countries for the purposes of population control. It's very explicit—" Kaufman: "I have a study published in English, very similar. It was done in Africa. I can get you a copy of that if you like...." Latypova: "So, the governments together with these 'scientists,' you know, I can't call them scientists, they are profiteers, off of this idea, like Koch, like Pasteur, Mechnikov, there was a bunch of Russian ones. So they started the whole idea of hunting viruses became very lucrative because if you could isolate and find something or virus or bacteria or some bacilli, like the Koch, then you could become rich and famous because you could be awarded big commissions from the government, given lots of power, and labs and staff." "And, of course, you can then patent your inventions and sell them in terms of rabies shots or tuberculin or things like that. There were attempts at vaccines for diphtheria, vaccines for plague, cholera, none of them worked, they all failed." Kaufman: "And they were, they were experimenting with different technologies at that time as well, right? Because I believe the diphtheria immunization was made from horse serum. Right? Rather than, you know, something in a culture or, or from a, from an animal lesion. So, sort of closer to what might be called today monoclonal antibody technology." Latypova: "Yes... it's very similar the monoclonal that they use horses for, commonly. That was how it originated. "Also, they experimented with injecting all sorts of things. So, for example, foot and mouth disease also at the same time was being claimed to be viral. And they would invariably, they will claim either it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin, depending on the situation. "But it's always because they can't find anything in the solution that they make. So if they can't find any cells, then they will claim it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin just because it's invisible. It's very convenient." Kaufman: "So this would incentivize the scientist or the businessman because there's a big commercial opportunity there to become rich and famous. But from the government's perspective, who may be financing these operations, it's a tool of eugenics and health control, essentially." Latypova: "Yeah, it's... especially access to each and every body with injection, with a needle. That's what they're always after. And it continues today."

Sense Receptor

12,325 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It's not about red or blue anymore. It's about policy and how poorly managed they've been for so long. They want change, and if they have to get a Republican to do it for them, they'll do it. It's so poorly run, the massive exodus of business and capital and people, and overtaxing them. The place is a dumpster fire, and they want it put out. I don't care what their politics are. Get me anybody that knows what they're doing, that has some executional skills.
1:01

It's not about red or blue anymore. It's about policy and how poorly managed they've been for so long. They want change, and if they have to get a Republican to do it for them, they'll do it. It's so poorly run, the massive exodus of business and capital and people, and overtaxing them. The place is a dumpster fire, and they want it put out. I don't care what their politics are. Get me anybody that knows what they're doing, that has some executional skills.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

15,158 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi | UIDAI Chairperson and World Bank Executive Director Neelkanth Mishra says, “The stress in the global markets is already visible. Fuel prices have risen; fuel demand growth globally has already come off… In finance, the bond yields have gone up so substantially that it is already pinching, so mortgage rates, new mortgage issuance are now building up… All of these issues are real; they are not in the future… This linkage between global rates and Indian rates is something that I don't think is appropriate. The fiscal laxity that we are seeing in developed markets is not something that we have seen here. So despite all the stresses this year, the government is sticking to its fiscal deficit targets… Now that credit growth has revived, the economy is doing well; it is finally starting to go above our trend…”
2:21

#WATCH | Delhi | UIDAI Chairperson and World Bank Executive Director Neelkanth Mishra says, “The stress in the global markets is already visible. Fuel prices have risen; fuel demand growth globally has already come off… In finance, the bond yields have gone up so substantially that it is already pinching, so mortgage rates, new mortgage issuance are now building up… All of these issues are real; they are not in the future… This linkage between global rates and Indian rates is something that I don't think is appropriate. The fiscal laxity that we are seeing in developed markets is not something that we have seen here. So despite all the stresses this year, the government is sticking to its fiscal deficit targets… Now that credit growth has revived, the economy is doing well; it is finally starting to go above our trend…”

ANI

21,196 görüntüleme • 14 saat önce

NOW: President Trump takes credit for when the Biden administration became "totally pro-crypto," saying they made the policy change after trailing Trump in the polls. "They were very violently against it. They were putting people in jail that what they were doing to the crypto was horrible. It's amazing. It's survived that onslaught. It was a weaponization of government." "So now I'm killing Biden. I'm winning by so much. And all of a sudden he becomes totally pro-crypto. They dropped all investigations of everybody. They allowed people to come out of jail." "I'm very much for crypto because it's- I don't- it's not a question of a personal thing because I let my kids do whatever the hell they do. I don't talk to them ever- talk to them about it. I'm allowed to, I think I'm allowed to, but I don't bother because this is a much higher- this office is a much higher calling."
2:01

NOW: President Trump takes credit for when the Biden administration became "totally pro-crypto," saying they made the policy change after trailing Trump in the polls. "They were very violently against it. They were putting people in jail that what they were doing to the crypto was horrible. It's amazing. It's survived that onslaught. It was a weaponization of government." "So now I'm killing Biden. I'm winning by so much. And all of a sudden he becomes totally pro-crypto. They dropped all investigations of everybody. They allowed people to come out of jail." "I'm very much for crypto because it's- I don't- it's not a question of a personal thing because I let my kids do whatever the hell they do. I don't talk to them ever- talk to them about it. I'm allowed to, I think I'm allowed to, but I don't bother because this is a much higher- this office is a much higher calling."

Fox News

464,736 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Zack Polanski, "Why do we hear this phrase all the time, unconscious bias?" Professor Keon West, "It's incredibly comfortable" "In the UK it's so hard to have a conversation about racism or sexism" "You won't hear people say: I did that and that was a racist thing to do" "You can go on TV and say you hate seeing a bunch of black and brown faces - like Reform UK's Sarah Pochin - and say you cannot be racist, it must be a misunderstanding" "Similarly men will say all sorts of things but not say that was sexist" "I think that is considered so impolite and so hurtful, to own up to that bias, that we sneak in a word in front of that, 'unconscious', and suddenly we don't have to feel quite so bad" "And everybody has it" "That focus that makes us calmer about the bias, that's really for the benefit of the people feeling bias" "It's not at all for the benefit of the people on the receiving end of the bias"
1:08

Zack Polanski, "Why do we hear this phrase all the time, unconscious bias?" Professor Keon West, "It's incredibly comfortable" "In the UK it's so hard to have a conversation about racism or sexism" "You won't hear people say: I did that and that was a racist thing to do" "You can go on TV and say you hate seeing a bunch of black and brown faces - like Reform UK's Sarah Pochin - and say you cannot be racist, it must be a misunderstanding" "Similarly men will say all sorts of things but not say that was sexist" "I think that is considered so impolite and so hurtful, to own up to that bias, that we sneak in a word in front of that, 'unconscious', and suddenly we don't have to feel quite so bad" "And everybody has it" "That focus that makes us calmer about the bias, that's really for the benefit of the people feeling bias" "It's not at all for the benefit of the people on the receiving end of the bias"

Farrukh

70,597 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Jim Bianco says the Fed should raise rates, and the market has been signaling it for two years "I'm going to take the other side of this conversation, that the Fed will raise rates, the Fed should raise rates. And the market has been signaling that for a long time." "September 18th 2024, almost two years ago, is when they first started cutting rates. The 10-year yield at that point was 3.60. Today it's 4.99, 4.98. It's up 130 basis points." "This is the first time in at least 60 years that we did a rate cut cycle and long term rates went up. This is the only time this has happened." "The reason this has happened is the market has been screaming that the Fed has had the wrong policy for two years. I think it's now a correction of that incorrect policy that we're going to start to see happen, starting on Wednesday."
1:10

Jim Bianco says the Fed should raise rates, and the market has been signaling it for two years "I'm going to take the other side of this conversation, that the Fed will raise rates, the Fed should raise rates. And the market has been signaling that for a long time." "September 18th 2024, almost two years ago, is when they first started cutting rates. The 10-year yield at that point was 3.60. Today it's 4.99, 4.98. It's up 130 basis points." "This is the first time in at least 60 years that we did a rate cut cycle and long term rates went up. This is the only time this has happened." "The reason this has happened is the market has been screaming that the Fed has had the wrong policy for two years. I think it's now a correction of that incorrect policy that we're going to start to see happen, starting on Wednesday."

The Wolf Of All Streets

33,065 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Chamath's CDS Bet: Outlining Major Corporate Debt Default Risks "With all of the tariffs, the one thing that we haven't sufficiently talked about is there is a tremendous amount of corporate debt that supports these businesses today." "And you would say, 'Well, if long-term rates go down, there's no real risk.'" "But the tariff picture actually impacts revenues." "And the problem with that is that there's a lot of companies that have debt covenants tied to revenue and EBITDA." "And so this is what I spoke about at the beginning of January, which is, the one risk that is uncontrollable, is what happens to corporate debt and could we see a wave of defaults and a wave of action?" On our 2025 predictions show in January, Chamath Palihapitiya picked credit default swaps as his best-performing asset this year, calling it a long-shot with major upside: " I would be long CDS. I'm buying insurance using credit default swaps. I think that there is a small chance of some volatility next year. I hope it doesn't happen. I hope that this trade loses money. But if it hits, it will be the best-performing asset of 2025." Fast-forward to April: " It has hit. For every billion dollars of risk you would've put on, would have cost you ~$1M, and that million dollars would've made you ~$7M in about three months." "Why is this important? The CDS actually represents the structural risk in the United States corporate economy." "So when you see these spreads blowing out, this is actually a very important warning sign." "This is what was the canary in the coal mine for the Great Financial Crisis." "The tariff picture and the recession picture will get played out in this chart." "And I think it's something that folks can and should probably pay tremendous attention to."
1:32

Chamath's CDS Bet: Outlining Major Corporate Debt Default Risks "With all of the tariffs, the one thing that we haven't sufficiently talked about is there is a tremendous amount of corporate debt that supports these businesses today." "And you would say, 'Well, if long-term rates go down, there's no real risk.'" "But the tariff picture actually impacts revenues." "And the problem with that is that there's a lot of companies that have debt covenants tied to revenue and EBITDA." "And so this is what I spoke about at the beginning of January, which is, the one risk that is uncontrollable, is what happens to corporate debt and could we see a wave of defaults and a wave of action?" On our 2025 predictions show in January, Chamath Palihapitiya picked credit default swaps as his best-performing asset this year, calling it a long-shot with major upside: " I would be long CDS. I'm buying insurance using credit default swaps. I think that there is a small chance of some volatility next year. I hope it doesn't happen. I hope that this trade loses money. But if it hits, it will be the best-performing asset of 2025." Fast-forward to April: " It has hit. For every billion dollars of risk you would've put on, would have cost you ~$1M, and that million dollars would've made you ~$7M in about three months." "Why is this important? The CDS actually represents the structural risk in the United States corporate economy." "So when you see these spreads blowing out, this is actually a very important warning sign." "This is what was the canary in the coal mine for the Great Financial Crisis." "The tariff picture and the recession picture will get played out in this chart." "And I think it's something that folks can and should probably pay tremendous attention to."

The All-In Podcast

1,102,765 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?
7:05

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?

Kyle Becker

104,422 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

“Democrats don't stand for anything and they haven't for a very long time..They do exactly what the corporate right does, which is to go back and forth about cultural issues hoping that nobody notices that 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. Hoping that nobody notices that while life expectancies are great for the top 1%, you live 7 years less long...if you're in the bottom 50% of this country. “And so as long as they're doing TikTok dances, or holding up paddles, or we're talking about 'wokeness,' or the mere 10 trans athletes that are in the NCAA, you can convince people to go to the polls and pull a lever for one side or the other, and 10/20/30 years from now they’ll wake up and say: What happen to my mortgage? What happened to my life? What happened to my ability raise a family and have kids? “And that's exactly the conversation they want us to be having, instead of focusing on why it is that our government, run by corporatists and billionaires, regardless of if it's a Democratic government or a Republican government, consistently serves one segment of the population, and it's the very very rich.”
1:29

“Democrats don't stand for anything and they haven't for a very long time..They do exactly what the corporate right does, which is to go back and forth about cultural issues hoping that nobody notices that 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. Hoping that nobody notices that while life expectancies are great for the top 1%, you live 7 years less long...if you're in the bottom 50% of this country. “And so as long as they're doing TikTok dances, or holding up paddles, or we're talking about 'wokeness,' or the mere 10 trans athletes that are in the NCAA, you can convince people to go to the polls and pull a lever for one side or the other, and 10/20/30 years from now they’ll wake up and say: What happen to my mortgage? What happened to my life? What happened to my ability raise a family and have kids? “And that's exactly the conversation they want us to be having, instead of focusing on why it is that our government, run by corporatists and billionaires, regardless of if it's a Democratic government or a Republican government, consistently serves one segment of the population, and it's the very very rich.”

Briahna Joy Gray

364,117 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I can't believe this was allowed to air on UK television. 😲 Neil Oliver succinctly exposes the "Ponzi scheme" that is the modern banking system: "Inflation is caused, always and only, by the printing of money... It's a transparent attempt to disguise a Ponzi scheme... which is the conjuring into existence of money from nothing, which only banks are allowed to do." "Every time they magic up more money... all they do is devalue any money you had in your pocket, or in savings. This is deliberate." "Since the creation of the so-called Federal Reserve... the actual value of the dollar has fallen by at least 90%... Inflation is the invisible tax." "Our government, everyone's government... uses banks to put people into debt, and then continuously devalues the currency by creating more money, always out of nowhere, and so making it harder and harder... for anyone ever to be free of that debt." "If all debt was repaid, all money would vanish." Credit: Neil Oliver
3:18

I can't believe this was allowed to air on UK television. 😲 Neil Oliver succinctly exposes the "Ponzi scheme" that is the modern banking system: "Inflation is caused, always and only, by the printing of money... It's a transparent attempt to disguise a Ponzi scheme... which is the conjuring into existence of money from nothing, which only banks are allowed to do." "Every time they magic up more money... all they do is devalue any money you had in your pocket, or in savings. This is deliberate." "Since the creation of the so-called Federal Reserve... the actual value of the dollar has fallen by at least 90%... Inflation is the invisible tax." "Our government, everyone's government... uses banks to put people into debt, and then continuously devalues the currency by creating more money, always out of nowhere, and so making it harder and harder... for anyone ever to be free of that debt." "If all debt was repaid, all money would vanish." Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

476,183 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce