正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

We should thank Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji for making India a nuclear power.!! Why? Look at #Venezuela today. US never wants any country to become a nuclear power, because it can't dictate terms and at the same time, it never wanted to message with a nuclear power country. During...

Chandra4Bharat's profile picture

Chandra🇮🇳🚩

10,114 subscribers

179,705 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育#Venezuela
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

If Venezuela had nuclear weapons today, the U.S. wouldn’t have the courage to attack it. That’s why Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s decision to make India a nuclear power was historic and essential.
0:27

If Venezuela had nuclear weapons today, the U.S. wouldn’t have the courage to attack it. That’s why Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s decision to make India a nuclear power was historic and essential.

Dr. Rajeshwari Iyer

13,213 次观看 • 6 个月前

Former Ambassador of Pakistan to ⁦United Nations⁩ Dr Maleeha Lodhi said that first time in the history two nuclear countries attacked a non nuclear country, now Iran have the option to become a nuclear power because Iran have 400 kg uranium which is 60% enriched and it is still safe.
1:34

Former Ambassador of Pakistan to ⁦United Nations⁩ Dr Maleeha Lodhi said that first time in the history two nuclear countries attacked a non nuclear country, now Iran have the option to become a nuclear power because Iran have 400 kg uranium which is 60% enriched and it is still safe.

Hamid Mir حامد میر

55,216 次观看 • 1 年前

Chancellor Merz: "If we had Ukraine as member in NATO, which was applied in 2008, and the Americans gave support to that, the French and the German government were against it. You can again speculate, would this war had happened? Ukraine was then a big nuclear power. They were the third biggest nuclear power in the world, and they agreed to get rid of all the nuclear weapons. And then after Russia attacked Ukraine, would this have happened with nuclear weapons on the ground? You can ask the same question again. No, this war is now happening and we have to stop it now, this is our task."
1:06

Chancellor Merz: "If we had Ukraine as member in NATO, which was applied in 2008, and the Americans gave support to that, the French and the German government were against it. You can again speculate, would this war had happened? Ukraine was then a big nuclear power. They were the third biggest nuclear power in the world, and they agreed to get rid of all the nuclear weapons. And then after Russia attacked Ukraine, would this have happened with nuclear weapons on the ground? You can ask the same question again. No, this war is now happening and we have to stop it now, this is our task."

Anton Gerashchenko

251,299 次观看 • 1 年前

In this segment, Scott Ritter talks about nuclear terrorism: "It's not only the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. When Ukrainian forces went into Kursk region in a NATO-guided invasion in 2024, their goal was to capture the Kursk nuclear plant. They are nuclear terrorists. The same mindset that allows Israel to strike a civilian nuclear facility in Bushehr while the US tolerates it. You cannot strike a nuclear power plant. Zero tolerance."
0:58

In this segment, Scott Ritter talks about nuclear terrorism: "It's not only the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. When Ukrainian forces went into Kursk region in a NATO-guided invasion in 2024, their goal was to capture the Kursk nuclear plant. They are nuclear terrorists. The same mindset that allows Israel to strike a civilian nuclear facility in Bushehr while the US tolerates it. You cannot strike a nuclear power plant. Zero tolerance."

Rick Sanchez

30,171 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.
4:26

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

19,076 次观看 • 7 个月前

Why does the US think "China is the Problem?" Well, it's because it's impossible to Bully a Nuclear Power with the worlds biggest Navy and a vast Army Who's also the World's biggest manufacturing Economy, now allied to energy powerhouse Russia That's Uncle Sams real Problem.
2:38

Why does the US think "China is the Problem?" Well, it's because it's impossible to Bully a Nuclear Power with the worlds biggest Navy and a vast Army Who's also the World's biggest manufacturing Economy, now allied to energy powerhouse Russia That's Uncle Sams real Problem.

Chay Bowes

337,174 次观看 • 1 年前

Former PM Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee not only shaped our history but also secured India’s future...🙏🏻 Thanks to Atal ji • India stands tall as a nuclear power • India laid the foundation for missile strength and strategic defence capability Atal ji’s vision did not end with an era. It evolved, with now PM Modi in power. #AtalSmritiVarsh
1:17

Former PM Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee not only shaped our history but also secured India’s future...🙏🏻 Thanks to Atal ji • India stands tall as a nuclear power • India laid the foundation for missile strength and strategic defence capability Atal ji’s vision did not end with an era. It evolved, with now PM Modi in power. #AtalSmritiVarsh

BJP

17,633 次观看 • 6 个月前

Tucker Carlson warns Donald Trump may use nuclear weapons: ‘So if you’ve reached the end of your conventional power, what’s that a euphemism for? Nuclear weapons. Life in Iran won’t be possible. You wipe out a country of 92 million people. What about the 7 countries directly across the Persian Gulf who are US allies? Would a nuclear strike be followed by peace? Probably not. The US is not the only country in the world with nuclear weapons. You could have a global nuclear war.’
1:37

Tucker Carlson warns Donald Trump may use nuclear weapons: ‘So if you’ve reached the end of your conventional power, what’s that a euphemism for? Nuclear weapons. Life in Iran won’t be possible. You wipe out a country of 92 million people. What about the 7 countries directly across the Persian Gulf who are US allies? Would a nuclear strike be followed by peace? Probably not. The US is not the only country in the world with nuclear weapons. You could have a global nuclear war.’

Afshin Rattansi

27,328 次观看 • 3 个月前

NORAH O'DONNELL: So why do we need to test our nuclear weapons? US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, because you have to see how they work, you know. You do have to, and the reason I'm saying testing is because Russia announced that they're gonna be doing a test. If you noticed, North Korea is testing constantly, other countries are testing. We're the only country that doesn't test, and I don't wanna be the only country that doesn't test. NORAH O'DONNELL: Are you saying that after more than 30 years, the United States is going to start detonating nuclear weapons? US PRESIDENT TRUMP: I'm saying that we're going to test nuclear weapons like other countries do, yes. NORAH O'DONNELL: But the only country that is testing nuclear weapons is North Korea. China and Russia are not... US PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, no. Russia is testing nuclear weapons. And China is testing them too. You just don't know about it. NORAH O'DONNELL: That would be certainly newsworthy. My understanding is that what Russia did recently was test essentially the delivery system for nuclear weapons. Essentially - missiles. Which we can do that, but not with nuclear warheads. US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Russia is testing and China is testing, but they don't talk about it, you know. We're an open society, we're different. We talk about it, we have to talk about it. Because otherwise you people gonna report. They don't have reporters that gonna be writing about it, we do.
1:42

NORAH O'DONNELL: So why do we need to test our nuclear weapons? US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, because you have to see how they work, you know. You do have to, and the reason I'm saying testing is because Russia announced that they're gonna be doing a test. If you noticed, North Korea is testing constantly, other countries are testing. We're the only country that doesn't test, and I don't wanna be the only country that doesn't test. NORAH O'DONNELL: Are you saying that after more than 30 years, the United States is going to start detonating nuclear weapons? US PRESIDENT TRUMP: I'm saying that we're going to test nuclear weapons like other countries do, yes. NORAH O'DONNELL: But the only country that is testing nuclear weapons is North Korea. China and Russia are not... US PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, no. Russia is testing nuclear weapons. And China is testing them too. You just don't know about it. NORAH O'DONNELL: That would be certainly newsworthy. My understanding is that what Russia did recently was test essentially the delivery system for nuclear weapons. Essentially - missiles. Which we can do that, but not with nuclear warheads. US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Russia is testing and China is testing, but they don't talk about it, you know. We're an open society, we're different. We talk about it, we have to talk about it. Because otherwise you people gonna report. They don't have reporters that gonna be writing about it, we do.

Status-6 (Military & Conflict News)

19,263 次观看 • 8 个月前

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...
2:34

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

Kerry Burgess

32,789 次观看 • 2 个月前

'Russia is conducting nuclear weapons tests. You just don't know about it' — Trump. - So why do we need to test our nuclear weapons? - Because we need to understand how they work. And the reason I talk about testing is that Russia announced it is going to conduct a test. If you notice, North Korea constantly conducts tests. Other countries test as well. We are the only country that does not conduct tests. And I don't want us to be the only country that doesn't do it. - Are you saying that after more than 30 years, the US will start detonating nuclear weapons for testing again? - I'm saying we will conduct tests. Nuclear weapons tests, like other countries do, yes [we will detonate]. - But the only country conducting nuclear tests is North Korea. China and Russia do not. - No, no, Russia conducts nuclear tests. And China also conducts tests, you just don't know about it. - What Russia did recently was essentially tests of nuclear weapons delivery systems, that is, missiles. - Russia conducts tests, and China conducts tests, they just don't talk about it, you see? They are not open societies. We are different. We discuss openly. We have to discuss it, otherwise you journalists will write about it anyway. They don't have reporters who will write about it. We do. - SK
1:05

'Russia is conducting nuclear weapons tests. You just don't know about it' — Trump. - So why do we need to test our nuclear weapons? - Because we need to understand how they work. And the reason I talk about testing is that Russia announced it is going to conduct a test. If you notice, North Korea constantly conducts tests. Other countries test as well. We are the only country that does not conduct tests. And I don't want us to be the only country that doesn't do it. - Are you saying that after more than 30 years, the US will start detonating nuclear weapons for testing again? - I'm saying we will conduct tests. Nuclear weapons tests, like other countries do, yes [we will detonate]. - But the only country conducting nuclear tests is North Korea. China and Russia do not. - No, no, Russia conducts nuclear tests. And China also conducts tests, you just don't know about it. - What Russia did recently was essentially tests of nuclear weapons delivery systems, that is, missiles. - Russia conducts tests, and China conducts tests, they just don't talk about it, you see? They are not open societies. We are different. We discuss openly. We have to discuss it, otherwise you journalists will write about it anyway. They don't have reporters who will write about it. We do. - SK

Zlatti71

25,888 次观看 • 8 个月前

Steven Bartlett asked: "Why does the US care about Cuba?" Renowned nuclear war expert Annie Jacobsen replied: "Cuba's 90 miles off the coast of Florida... It was where the Soviet Union put nuclear missiles there, almost bringing the United States to the brink of nuclear war during the Kennedy administration." Former CIA covert intelligence officer Andrew Bustamante added: "It's one of the only countries in the Western Hemisphere that does not fall under the United States's sphere of influence." Cuba sits on America's doorstep and has ties to Russia, been accused of supporting terrorism, and operates as an intelligence hub hostile to US interests. With Venezuela and Iran already dealt with, Cuba is the nearest unresolved threat to the US homeland. With no nuclear weapons and no powerful ally willing to protect it, he's already signalled controlling it publicly: "Maybe we'll have a friendly takeover of Cuba." The only name left after that is North Korea, protected by its nuclear weapons.
0:59

Steven Bartlett asked: "Why does the US care about Cuba?" Renowned nuclear war expert Annie Jacobsen replied: "Cuba's 90 miles off the coast of Florida... It was where the Soviet Union put nuclear missiles there, almost bringing the United States to the brink of nuclear war during the Kennedy administration." Former CIA covert intelligence officer Andrew Bustamante added: "It's one of the only countries in the Western Hemisphere that does not fall under the United States's sphere of influence." Cuba sits on America's doorstep and has ties to Russia, been accused of supporting terrorism, and operates as an intelligence hub hostile to US interests. With Venezuela and Iran already dealt with, Cuba is the nearest unresolved threat to the US homeland. With no nuclear weapons and no powerful ally willing to protect it, he's already signalled controlling it publicly: "Maybe we'll have a friendly takeover of Cuba." The only name left after that is North Korea, protected by its nuclear weapons.

Felix Prehn 🐶

34,183 次观看 • 4 个月前

11 May 1998 — Operation Shakti, Pokhran. India under NDA govt lead by Then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee detonated 5 nuclear devices in the Thar Desert & declared itself a nuclear power — defying the world pressure! PM Vajpayee said: "India is now a nuclear state." And Congress? Sonia Gandhi waited 10 days to say — "Real strength lies in restraint, not in the display of Shakti." P. Chidambaram called it against India's "moral commitment." Today, when China & Pakistan both have nuclear arsenals — Thank God BJP led India in 1998. Not Congress. This is why 11 May = #NationalTechnologyDay also remember Congress & its compromising stand on National Security...
0:38

11 May 1998 — Operation Shakti, Pokhran. India under NDA govt lead by Then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee detonated 5 nuclear devices in the Thar Desert & declared itself a nuclear power — defying the world pressure! PM Vajpayee said: "India is now a nuclear state." And Congress? Sonia Gandhi waited 10 days to say — "Real strength lies in restraint, not in the display of Shakti." P. Chidambaram called it against India's "moral commitment." Today, when China & Pakistan both have nuclear arsenals — Thank God BJP led India in 1998. Not Congress. This is why 11 May = #NationalTechnologyDay also remember Congress & its compromising stand on National Security...

Pradeep Bhandari(प्रदीप भंडारी)🇮🇳

22,310 次观看 • 2 个月前

Vladimir Putin has firmly stated that if the U.S allows Ukraine to use long range missiles against Russia… Europe and all NATO countries will be drawn into a Nuclear War.. “You won’t even have to blink your eyes when we carry out Article 5 of the Roman Treaty”… Russia has the most confirmed nuclear weapons, with over 5,500 nuclear warheads.
1:04

Vladimir Putin has firmly stated that if the U.S allows Ukraine to use long range missiles against Russia… Europe and all NATO countries will be drawn into a Nuclear War.. “You won’t even have to blink your eyes when we carry out Article 5 of the Roman Treaty”… Russia has the most confirmed nuclear weapons, with over 5,500 nuclear warheads.

Pelham

1,152,457 次观看 • 1 年前

China provided Pakistan with the design for the nuclear bomb. The Americans knew about it, but they didn't do anything to stop it. Both China and the US wanted to enhance Pakistan's power so that they could use it as a counterbalance to India.
2:09

China provided Pakistan with the design for the nuclear bomb. The Americans knew about it, but they didn't do anything to stop it. Both China and the US wanted to enhance Pakistan's power so that they could use it as a counterbalance to India.

Buddhi

37,359 次观看 • 3 年前

🇪🇺🇷🇺 The globalists are itching for a war with Russia. The purpose? Unknown. There are no winners in a war against a nuclear power. But what's good news is that the US isn't committed. Trump seems like a hindrance to Brussel's plans. Europe can't go to war without the US.
4:40

🇪🇺🇷🇺 The globalists are itching for a war with Russia. The purpose? Unknown. There are no winners in a war against a nuclear power. But what's good news is that the US isn't committed. Trump seems like a hindrance to Brussel's plans. Europe can't go to war without the US.

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

52,838 次观看 • 1 年前

The government has run out of excuses for keeping nuclear power illegal. During this interview with Anthony Albanese the hosts press him on why nuclear power is banned… Albo: “no one is saying that - hey, we want to invest in this [nuclear]. No one.” Host: “There's a rule that says you can't.” Albo: “No, that's because it doesn’t stack up.” Host: “Why do you need a rule if the business case doesn’t stack up, to ban it?” Albo: “Because it doesn’t stack up” Host: “Well, get rid of the moratorium, then” The lack of clear answers goes to show that the government’s only justification for defending the bans on nuclear power is politics. It is wrong to conflate the economics of nuclear with a principled position to just consider nuclear power. At this time, we need all options on the table, including nuclear power. Sign our petition:
1:15

The government has run out of excuses for keeping nuclear power illegal. During this interview with Anthony Albanese the hosts press him on why nuclear power is banned… Albo: “no one is saying that - hey, we want to invest in this [nuclear]. No one.” Host: “There's a rule that says you can't.” Albo: “No, that's because it doesn’t stack up.” Host: “Why do you need a rule if the business case doesn’t stack up, to ban it?” Albo: “Because it doesn’t stack up” Host: “Well, get rid of the moratorium, then” The lack of clear answers goes to show that the government’s only justification for defending the bans on nuclear power is politics. It is wrong to conflate the economics of nuclear with a principled position to just consider nuclear power. At this time, we need all options on the table, including nuclear power. Sign our petition:

Will Shackel

70,341 次观看 • 2 年前