Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

We spent 2 weeks designing an Ai SaaS video around a complex LLM product. Strong visuals. Clean execution. High sleepless night efforts. It still got rejected... :) Our mistake: we leaned too much into design, not enough into clarity. We took that hit. But here’s the reality most agencies...

14,423 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

We are nine months into this chaos, and it already feels like we’ve lived a thousand lives. Every day is a new disaster, a new headline, a new weight dropped on our backs. Normally, nine months means life is being born — but under this man, it feels like something darker has been delivered into our lives. The kind of thing that doesn’t get better when it arrives. It just keeps multiplying, feeding on our exhaustion. But here’s the truth: overwhelm is the weapon. It’s not random. It’s intentional. He stacks crisis on crisis, hoping that we stop keeping count, hoping we stop caring, hoping that we turn numb. He wants us to believe that our outrage has an expiration date, that our energy has a limit, that our solidarity has a ceiling. But he’s wrong. We’ve lived through enough to know that humans adapt. Pressure doesn’t just break us — it forges us. Think about it: nine months of this, and yes, it’s insane, but we’re still here. Still talking. Still organizing. Still pushing back. That’s proof of life. Proof of resilience. Proof that no matter how many fires he lights, we refuse to be consumed. So we resist the overwhelm. We choose focus. We choose clarity. We protect our joy like it’s a shield, because it is. We protect each other like it’s the last defense, because it is. And every time we refuse to collapse into despair, every time we get back up and act, we prove that his chaos cannot control us. This is not the end. This is the test. And history has shown — every empire built on fear and exhaustion eventually falls. We are not powerless. We are the counterweight. We are the resistance. And we will not be buried under his noise.

Carina C. C

44,264 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

At LinqAI, we’ve been mission-driven since day one—building competitive, revenue-generating SaaS applications. As our product line has expanded and our customer base has grown, one thing has become clear: we have an opportunity to forge a deeper connection between our SaaS innovations and the Web3 ecosystem. As we scale our SaaS offerings, our demand for compute power continues to grow. Traditionally, paying for compute means sending value outside our ecosystem—resources spent elsewhere, never to return. But what if every compute cycle contributed to the LinqAI ecosystem itself? LinqProtocol is our answer. By transforming idle computers (PCs, laptops, servers, and in the future even phones) into a global compute network, we not only secure scalable and efficient infrastructure but also strengthen the utility of $LNQ—ensuring that every workload contributes to our own decentralized future. LinqProtocol allows for arbitrary compute which means that there are virtually no limits to what can be done on LinqProtocol. From AI Training, to Synthetic Data Generation, 3D Rendering and even hosting a Website - It's all possible on LinqProtocol. ✅ On-demand, scalable compute ✅ Transparent, fair-market pricing ✅ Trustless execution with real-time tracking ✅ Governance-based dispute resolution The future of compute isn’t just more efficient. It’s owned by those who use it. It’s decentralized. And it’s coming soon. $LNQ #LinqProtocol

LinqAI

239,673 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

David Senra

27,151 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten