Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

We trained a graph-native AI, then let it reason for days, forming a dynamic relational world model on its own - no pre-programming. Emergent hubs, small-world properties, modularity, & scale-free structures arose naturally. The model then exploited compositional reasoning & uncovered uncoded properties from deep synthesis: Materials with memory,...

359,512 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

12 Comments

benferrum - e/jounce's profile picture
benferrum - e/jounce1 year ago

Hello sir, is there a paper/code available?

Markus J. Buehler's profile picture
Markus J. Buehler1 year ago

Yes - here it is:

InterSystems Developers's profile picture
InterSystems Developers1 year ago

📺 Watch this #video to learn how #OpenSource vs. proprietary #AI models compare one to another. We explore how proprietary models dominate leaderboards like Chatbot Arena, but open-source models are quickly catching up. Plus, we discuss how businesses can start with proprietary models and transition to open-source alternatives over time 👇 Fit AI into your development strategy!

Leonidas Pitsoulis's profile picture
Leonidas Pitsoulis1 year ago

very interesting work, exciting to see graph reasoning as a paradigm

Markus J. Buehler's profile picture
Markus J. Buehler1 year ago

Thanks @LPitsoulis !

Ryan Freel's profile picture
Ryan Freel1 year ago

For the normies imagine you build a machine to organize your sock drawer, but instead of just sorting socks, it spends a few days thinking and suddenly figures out physics, biology, and self-repairing materials all on its own. You didn’t program it to do that. It just happened.

Ali Ihsan Nergiz's profile picture
Ali Ihsan Nergiz1 year ago

Interesting project as always Markus, really loved the graphics around it. It kind of reminds evolutional process

Markus J. Buehler's profile picture
Markus J. Buehler1 year ago

Thank you @aihsannergiz !

Brian Hershey's profile picture
Brian Hershey1 year ago

This is next level proof of concept Markus, you kinda shifted my gears with this one 🙏

Markus J. Buehler's profile picture
Markus J. Buehler1 year ago

Thanks 😀 we were blown away by this result also!

👾Moritz Rietschel's profile picture
👾Moritz Rietschel1 year ago

what did you use grok for? the graphics?

Markus J. Buehler's profile picture
Markus J. Buehler1 year ago

Yes, the 3D graphics - to visualize how the graphs formed over the thinking period evolve.

Related Videos

DisCo: Disentangled Control for Referring Human Dance Generation in Real World paper page: Generative AI has made significant strides in computer vision, particularly in image/video synthesis conditioned on text descriptions. Despite the advancements, it remains challenging especially in the generation of human-centric content such as dance synthesis. Existing dance synthesis methods struggle with the gap between synthesized content and real-world dance scenarios. In this paper, we define a new problem setting: Referring Human Dance Generation, which focuses on real-world dance scenarios with three important properties: (i) Faithfulness: the synthesis should retain the appearance of both human subject foreground and background from the reference image, and precisely follow the target pose; (ii) Generalizability: the model should generalize to unseen human subjects, backgrounds, and poses; (iii) Compositionality: it should allow for composition of seen/unseen subjects, backgrounds, and poses from different sources. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel approach, DISCO, which includes a novel model architecture with disentangled control to improve the faithfulness and compositionality of dance synthesis, and an effective human attribute pre-training for better generalizability to unseen humans. Extensive qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate that DISCO can generate high-quality human dance images and videos with diverse appearances and flexible motions.

AK

161,478 views • 3 years ago

Tencent presents GameGen-O Open-world Video Game Generation We introduce GameGen-O, the first diffusion transformer model tailored for the generation of open-world video games. This model facilitates high-quality, open-domain generation by simulating a wide array of game engine features, such as innovative characters, dynamic environments, complex actions, and diverse events. Additionally, it provides interactive controllability, thus allowing for the gameplay simulation. The development of GameGen-O involves a comprehensive data collection and processing effort from scratch. We collect and build the first Open-World Video Game Dataset (OGameData), amassed extensive data from over a hundred of next-generation open-world games, employing a proprietary data pipeline for efficient sorting, scoring, filtering, and decoupled captioning. This robust and extensive OGameData forms the foundation of our model's training process. GameGen-O undergoes a two-stage training process, consisting of foundation model pretraining and instruction tuning. In the first phase, the model is pre-trained on the OGameData via the text-to-video and video continuation, endowing GameGen-O with the capability for open-domain video game generation. In the second phase, the pre-trained model is frozen, and we fine-tuned using a trainable InstructNet, which enables the production of subsequent frames based on multimodal structural instructions. This whole training process imparts the model with the ability to generate and interactively control content. In summary, GameGen-O represents a notable initial step forward in the realm of open-world video game generation via generative models. It underscores the potential of generative models to serve as an alternative to rendering techniques, which can efficiently combine creative generation with interactive capabilities.

AK

367,108 views • 1 year ago

researchers gave a tiny local model human-style memory and its context limit basically stopped existing a team from MBZUAI, Princeton and Weizmann took a 1B model and rebuilt how it reads. instead of attending to everything at once, the model reads in 1,024 token chunks and passes the important stuff forward through an associative memory, the same way you carry the plot of a book between chapters without rereading them. the design mirrors human memory on purpose. full attention inside a chunk works as short-term memory. the module that carries information between chunks works as long-term memory. they even trained it like a person, starting with short easy texts and raising the difficulty gradually, because memory thrown into the deep end learns nothing. the numbers back it up. the normal model burns 40GB of GPU memory on a long document and collapses hard past its limit, dropping from 0.86 to 0.32 accuracy. the memory version holds 0.71 at double that length while using a flat 12GB no matter how long the input gets. it also needs about 30% fewer FLOPs. the part i keep thinking about is that nobody scaled anything here. they didn't build a bigger model, didn't stretch the window, didn't add compute. they looked at how a brain handles a long day and copied the architecture. a model small enough to run on a consumer gpu now survives documents its own architecture used to choke on. we keep treating intelligence as a compute problem. sometimes it's a memory problem.

Alex Veremeyenko

16,147 views • 8 days ago