Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

📣📣WE WERE FRIGHTENING CLOSE TO THE SYSTEM BREAKING Thomas Peterffy Interactive Brokers describes January 28th, 2021, as a frightening close domino bankruptcy event that would have broken the system. Peterffy said he would like to know why the SEC didn't act on the morning of January 28th. I would... like to know why the SEC has not acted since January 28th to protect shareholders from the out of control market manipulation that is blatantly happening every day❓️ Peterffy said 1: Short positions should be posted every day instead of twice a month. 2: Brokers would need to charge an additional 1% margin for every 1% of short interest. He says that would make margins so high that would stop them from shorting stocks. This is from 2021. We are now in 2026, and nothing has changed to protect companies and their shareholders from predatory short selling. The data is also highly manipulated. They mismark shorts as long and illegal naked short sell every day. The CAT consolidated audit trail was supposed to track all of this. But Citadel has attacked it since it was implemented that the CAT has basically been neutered. When they do use the CAT, the fines are so small that they act as an incentive. PAUL ATKINS WHEN DOES THE NEW DAY AT THE SEC START❓️❓️show more

Stephanie 🇬🇧🇺🇸🦍

40,509 subscribers

16,730 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

📣📣SEC COMPROMISED & INCOMPETENT MORE EVIDENCE🚨 The SEC was well aware that the RegSHO had major loopholes and was not going to be effective. "The SEC didn't want to Trigger a short squeeze" The SEC also grandfathered all of the existing fails to deliver that were destroying small companies with Naked Short Selling. They decided they weren't going to touch that. So basically they gave Criminals a free pass at the expense of small companies and their shareholders. SEC NOT HOLDING ACCOUNTABLE THOSE WHO LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL

📣📣SEC COMPROMISED & INCOMPETENT MORE EVIDENCE🚨 The SEC was well aware that the RegSHO had major loopholes and was not going to be effective. "The SEC didn't want to Trigger a short squeeze" The SEC also grandfathered all of the existing fails to deliver that were destroying small companies with Naked Short Selling. They decided they weren't going to touch that. So basically they gave Criminals a free pass at the expense of small companies and their shareholders. SEC NOT HOLDING ACCOUNTABLE THOSE WHO LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL

Stephanie 🇬🇧🇺🇸🦍

27,860 views • 4 months ago

📣📣SEC HAVE YOU ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT MMTLP ❓️❓️ It has been a week since the press conference outside of the SEC in Washington DC and way over a 1000 days since the MMTLP U3 Halt. Paul Atkins you took an oath and said it would be a "New Day At The SEC" Your lack of action doesn't indicate that to be true. MMTLP Shareholders and many investors from other tickers have sent thousands of letters, Whistleblower reports and FOIA requests. But zero action is being take to protect Retail from blatant fraud. Many Countries like South Korea and China are taking this matter very seriously. While the SEC turns a blind eye and pushes disclosures and transparency years down the road. WE DEMAND ACTION NOW‼️ IGNORING THE PROBLEM DOESN'T SOLVE IT WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY

📣📣SEC HAVE YOU ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT MMTLP ❓️❓️ It has been a week since the press conference outside of the SEC in Washington DC and way over a 1000 days since the MMTLP U3 Halt. Paul Atkins you took an oath and said it would be a "New Day At The SEC" Your lack of action doesn't indicate that to be true. MMTLP Shareholders and many investors from other tickers have sent thousands of letters, Whistleblower reports and FOIA requests. But zero action is being take to protect Retail from blatant fraud. Many Countries like South Korea and China are taking this matter very seriously. While the SEC turns a blind eye and pushes disclosures and transparency years down the road. WE DEMAND ACTION NOW‼️ IGNORING THE PROBLEM DOESN'T SOLVE IT WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY

Stephanie

14,238 views • 6 months ago

📣📣MARKET MAKER EXEMPTION Here is another MUST READ by George Palikaras Market Makers are renting out their Market Participant ID code to get the exemption so they are not real lifeguards. This means all of the corrupt market manipulators are abusing the market maker exemption. With zero accountability or oversight. The Consolidated Audit Trail CAT would expose this. That is why they fought so hard to get the CAT system terminated. Now the CAT system has been put on a diet, declawed and defunded.

📣📣MARKET MAKER EXEMPTION Here is another MUST READ by George Palikaras Market Makers are renting out their Market Participant ID code to get the exemption so they are not real lifeguards. This means all of the corrupt market manipulators are abusing the market maker exemption. With zero accountability or oversight. The Consolidated Audit Trail CAT would expose this. That is why they fought so hard to get the CAT system terminated. Now the CAT system has been put on a diet, declawed and defunded.

Stephanie 🇬🇧🇺🇸🦍

36,666 views • 8 months ago

📣📣PATRICK BYRNE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON AND HOW TO STOP IT IN A WEEK NAKED SHORT SELLING IS ILLEGAL 🚨🚨🚨 Patrick Byrne would have been the ultimate choice as the SEC Chairman not Paul Atkins who has a very questionable past. But to the best of my knowledge was not even considered. Sadly Patrick has openly said he wouldn't want the job. But he would have been great as he knows with first hand experience the level of corruption in the Capital Markets and Regulatory agencies. SEC COULD FIX IT BUT CHOOSE NOT TO‼️

📣📣PATRICK BYRNE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON AND HOW TO STOP IT IN A WEEK NAKED SHORT SELLING IS ILLEGAL 🚨🚨🚨 Patrick Byrne would have been the ultimate choice as the SEC Chairman not Paul Atkins who has a very questionable past. But to the best of my knowledge was not even considered. Sadly Patrick has openly said he wouldn't want the job. But he would have been great as he knows with first hand experience the level of corruption in the Capital Markets and Regulatory agencies. SEC COULD FIX IT BUT CHOOSE NOT TO‼️

Stephanie

13,202 views • 2 months ago

And I said "That's what you want when you have manipulation through short sales. You want short squeezes." The SEC is afraid of short squeezes. Because guess who doesn't want that ? Broker Dealers who have undue influence over financial regulators. Dr. Robert Shapiro told the SEC years ago that closing the enormous loopholes in REG SHO would help stop the market manipulation. But here we are years later and both political parties continue to protect the big players. The broker dealers. We are left with a highly manipulated market that makes brokers dealers a lot of money (share lending anyone?) and screws household investors. We haven't had a president yet, in either party, with the moral will to publicly call for a crack down on market manipulation and force regulators to follow through. Whether that changes with the incoming administration remains to be seen. Every trade has to be settled eventually. You can only kick the can for so long before markets collapse And this can has been kicked for decades. Dr Shapiro: "I was advising the SEC when they were writing REG SHO. I was in a big meeting with them and I said "you know your draft has enormous loopholes and it's not going to work". And I gave them some suggestions. They said "that'll destabilize the markets" and I said "how?" And he said "because it'll cause short squeezes" And I said "That's what you want when you have manipulation through short sales. You want short squeezes." But that is not part of the DNA of almost any large regulatory agency. Whose first law is maintain themselves. That's true of every bureaucracy, true of every corporation. Their second law is when they say don't destabilize the markets what they are saying is "don't make trouble for the major players". ..." STOP Counterfeit shares Patrick Byrne Susanne Trimbath PhD Courtesy: Dave Lauer Urvin

And I said "That's what you want when you have manipulation through short sales. You want short squeezes." The SEC is afraid of short squeezes. Because guess who doesn't want that ? Broker Dealers who have undue influence over financial regulators. Dr. Robert Shapiro told the SEC years ago that closing the enormous loopholes in REG SHO would help stop the market manipulation. But here we are years later and both political parties continue to protect the big players. The broker dealers. We are left with a highly manipulated market that makes brokers dealers a lot of money (share lending anyone?) and screws household investors. We haven't had a president yet, in either party, with the moral will to publicly call for a crack down on market manipulation and force regulators to follow through. Whether that changes with the incoming administration remains to be seen. Every trade has to be settled eventually. You can only kick the can for so long before markets collapse And this can has been kicked for decades. Dr Shapiro: "I was advising the SEC when they were writing REG SHO. I was in a big meeting with them and I said "you know your draft has enormous loopholes and it's not going to work". And I gave them some suggestions. They said "that'll destabilize the markets" and I said "how?" And he said "because it'll cause short squeezes" And I said "That's what you want when you have manipulation through short sales. You want short squeezes." But that is not part of the DNA of almost any large regulatory agency. Whose first law is maintain themselves. That's true of every bureaucracy, true of every corporation. Their second law is when they say don't destabilize the markets what they are saying is "don't make trouble for the major players". ..." STOP Counterfeit shares Patrick Byrne Susanne Trimbath PhD Courtesy: Dave Lauer Urvin

kristen shaughnessy

62,624 views • 1 year ago

Melvin: “The president repeatedly, though, did say that he would end the war in Ukraine on day one, and we are some 250 days into the administration.” Rubio: “That's not up to us to end the war. The Russians have to stop the war…What the president expressed is that it would be a priority of his. And it has been.” Melvin: “Repeatedly on the campaign trail, he said he would end it on day one. We're 246 days into the administration.” Rubio: “Which is an indication that he repeatedly said that he would make it a priority.”

Melvin: “The president repeatedly, though, did say that he would end the war in Ukraine on day one, and we are some 250 days into the administration.” Rubio: “That's not up to us to end the war. The Russians have to stop the war…What the president expressed is that it would be a priority of his. And it has been.” Melvin: “Repeatedly on the campaign trail, he said he would end it on day one. We're 246 days into the administration.” Rubio: “Which is an indication that he repeatedly said that he would make it a priority.”

The Bulwark

190,286 views • 10 months ago

OPTICAL AIDS CAUSE 28 DAY MONTHS? NCS does not recommend that we use optical aids for a moonsighting system in Britain for many reasons. The primary reason is that we are seeking a unified solution, and unity is in the sunnah - local, naked eye sightings. Not everybody believes that optical aids are permissible, but naked eye sightings are wholly uncontroversial. Another issue is that optical aids would lead to more and more examples of the moon being “seen” a day early, and out of phase, on the 28th of a lunar month. This has ALREADY HAPPENED to those who use optical aids in the UK - yet has never happened to naked eye moonsighters for over 100 months. Whilst there are procedures from the sunnah of what to do if you were to see a moon on the 28th, we cannot really justify asking people to end their fast a day early on the 28th because of a moon which is invisible to the eye and only visible through optical aids. Hence our stance. Remember - we ourselves use optical aids - and had them on our livestream. We are experienced in them, and it is from our experience we share with you that we have found that it would leave to problems. In any case why are you in a rush to end Ramadan, using technology, and away from the sunnah?

OPTICAL AIDS CAUSE 28 DAY MONTHS? NCS does not recommend that we use optical aids for a moonsighting system in Britain for many reasons. The primary reason is that we are seeking a unified solution, and unity is in the sunnah - local, naked eye sightings. Not everybody believes that optical aids are permissible, but naked eye sightings are wholly uncontroversial. Another issue is that optical aids would lead to more and more examples of the moon being “seen” a day early, and out of phase, on the 28th of a lunar month. This has ALREADY HAPPENED to those who use optical aids in the UK - yet has never happened to naked eye moonsighters for over 100 months. Whilst there are procedures from the sunnah of what to do if you were to see a moon on the 28th, we cannot really justify asking people to end their fast a day early on the 28th because of a moon which is invisible to the eye and only visible through optical aids. Hence our stance. Remember - we ourselves use optical aids - and had them on our livestream. We are experienced in them, and it is from our experience we share with you that we have found that it would leave to problems. In any case why are you in a rush to end Ramadan, using technology, and away from the sunnah?

New Crescent Society

18,343 views • 4 months ago

🙈🙊🙉 SEC TURNS A BLIND ON MARKET MANIPULATION IN SMALL CAP COMPANIES 🙉🙊🙈 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission turned a blind eye on Market Manipulation in penny stock which gave the manipulators the go ahead to attack small companies. They got bold as the SEC wasn't watching they decided to move up the food chain to bigger companies. Now if you are under a 2 Billion market cap you are at risk of being attacked by Wall Street Parasites. IT'S MORE PROFITABLE TO BANKRUPT COMPANIES This is hurting innovation and the economy. It's out of control. Will they move up to Companies that are under 10 Billion❓️ When does it stop❓️ WHY WOULD ANY COMPANY GO PUBLIC UNDER THESE CONDITIONS ❓️❓️🤔

🙈🙊🙉 SEC TURNS A BLIND ON MARKET MANIPULATION IN SMALL CAP COMPANIES 🙉🙊🙈 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission turned a blind eye on Market Manipulation in penny stock which gave the manipulators the go ahead to attack small companies. They got bold as the SEC wasn't watching they decided to move up the food chain to bigger companies. Now if you are under a 2 Billion market cap you are at risk of being attacked by Wall Street Parasites. IT'S MORE PROFITABLE TO BANKRUPT COMPANIES This is hurting innovation and the economy. It's out of control. Will they move up to Companies that are under 10 Billion❓️ When does it stop❓️ WHY WOULD ANY COMPANY GO PUBLIC UNDER THESE CONDITIONS ❓️❓️🤔

Stephanie

70,383 views • 8 months ago

Whitney Webb on 15-minute cities: "The goal [is] to have people... corralled [so] they're easily surveilled and controlled." "[They would] share... apartments when [they're] not there." "[They would] lose... car ownership, [so they] can't really control where [they] go." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So I haven't written extensively about 15- minute cities, but I would argue that the goal, there is basically to have people more or less corralled into an area where they're easily surveilled and controlled. And that's basically the... interest here is how do a small few rule the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or do anything about it. "Ultimately, this ruling system that they've been attempting to impose on, on people really around the world, because this is a global governance project at the end of the day, is, you know, using Big Tech tools in, in mass surveillance to basically create an entirely new way of life and system of living. "Part of that is to basically reduce the share of what the many, i.e., the 99% or whatever, have. So, you know, a lot of this, you know, became extremely, you know, unpopular. But also like people learned about it during the COVID era because of, you know, these groups like the World Economic Forum, which by the way, bills itself, is the premier promoter of public-private partnerships, that, you know, we need to not own our cars, we need to, rent them. And there should be autonomous fleets of Ubers that drive everyone around a specific radius. We shouldn't own homes. We should, you know, rent apartments and then share those apartments when we're not there and we leave, someone else can occupy the space. "These were all things, that were promoted under the guise, you know, of, of sustainability and other things at the time. But they're actively being, you know, designed and acted upon. "Actually one of the Columbus smart city initiatives that's connected to this Columbus partnership that that Wexner ran. He chaired it basically from 2001, I think, until 2021. So like 20 years, including when this was created. Columbus got a huge Department of Transportation grant from the government and also, you know, funding from private individuals, probably Wexner, but who knows, to to basically create a new system that in Columbus where private car ownership would not exist. "It would be fleets of, you know, smart cars, autonomous cars that drive people around. And so if you lose private car ownership, you can't really control where you go. And so these cars would determine, you know, would. Would have specific routes that you could, you know, pay to use and what have you. "And, interestingly enough, this was actually a goal for the entire United States, described in this by this national Security Commission on AI which was chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google and had a lot of these same Big Tech guys, who's who are have major roles at companies with New Albany data centers. "They basically said that in order for the US they said to beat China in AI it was necessary to end private car ownership in the United States and instead have autonomous, you know, Waymos, basically, drive every, fleets of them, Uber everybody around to where they were supposed to go and have things you know, sort of planned out by AI. Like where people are going, where people are working and all of this. "So the Technocracy Inc. model that you highlighted earlier, you know it was really influenced by things like Taylorism and a lot of these schools of thought that came out of the Industrial revolution that prioritize efficiency above all else. You know, having the trains run on time and all of that stuff being you know the kind of obsession of of these people in that particular era. "And so they want to sort of apply that not just to industry but to micromanaging people's lives as they you know, extract and exploit us for data and how much money our serf-like lives will make for them."

Whitney Webb on 15-minute cities: "The goal [is] to have people... corralled [so] they're easily surveilled and controlled." "[They would] share... apartments when [they're] not there." "[They would] lose... car ownership, [so they] can't really control where [they] go." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So I haven't written extensively about 15- minute cities, but I would argue that the goal, there is basically to have people more or less corralled into an area where they're easily surveilled and controlled. And that's basically the... interest here is how do a small few rule the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or do anything about it. "Ultimately, this ruling system that they've been attempting to impose on, on people really around the world, because this is a global governance project at the end of the day, is, you know, using Big Tech tools in, in mass surveillance to basically create an entirely new way of life and system of living. "Part of that is to basically reduce the share of what the many, i.e., the 99% or whatever, have. So, you know, a lot of this, you know, became extremely, you know, unpopular. But also like people learned about it during the COVID era because of, you know, these groups like the World Economic Forum, which by the way, bills itself, is the premier promoter of public-private partnerships, that, you know, we need to not own our cars, we need to, rent them. And there should be autonomous fleets of Ubers that drive everyone around a specific radius. We shouldn't own homes. We should, you know, rent apartments and then share those apartments when we're not there and we leave, someone else can occupy the space. "These were all things, that were promoted under the guise, you know, of, of sustainability and other things at the time. But they're actively being, you know, designed and acted upon. "Actually one of the Columbus smart city initiatives that's connected to this Columbus partnership that that Wexner ran. He chaired it basically from 2001, I think, until 2021. So like 20 years, including when this was created. Columbus got a huge Department of Transportation grant from the government and also, you know, funding from private individuals, probably Wexner, but who knows, to to basically create a new system that in Columbus where private car ownership would not exist. "It would be fleets of, you know, smart cars, autonomous cars that drive people around. And so if you lose private car ownership, you can't really control where you go. And so these cars would determine, you know, would. Would have specific routes that you could, you know, pay to use and what have you. "And, interestingly enough, this was actually a goal for the entire United States, described in this by this national Security Commission on AI which was chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google and had a lot of these same Big Tech guys, who's who are have major roles at companies with New Albany data centers. "They basically said that in order for the US they said to beat China in AI it was necessary to end private car ownership in the United States and instead have autonomous, you know, Waymos, basically, drive every, fleets of them, Uber everybody around to where they were supposed to go and have things you know, sort of planned out by AI. Like where people are going, where people are working and all of this. "So the Technocracy Inc. model that you highlighted earlier, you know it was really influenced by things like Taylorism and a lot of these schools of thought that came out of the Industrial revolution that prioritize efficiency above all else. You know, having the trains run on time and all of that stuff being you know the kind of obsession of of these people in that particular era. "And so they want to sort of apply that not just to industry but to micromanaging people's lives as they you know, extract and exploit us for data and how much money our serf-like lives will make for them."

Sense Receptor

18,415 views • 4 months ago

Jones: For as long as this country has been around, states have run elections. For the president to try to infringe upon this constitutional duty is laughable. He can see the writing on the wall. He knows they’re going to lose the House. And at this moment, I would predict that we’re going to take back control of the United States Senate as well. So they’re using every mechanism to try to deflect, deter, and confuse—and to hold on to power when they know it’s slipping away from them every single day.

Jones: For as long as this country has been around, states have run elections. For the president to try to infringe upon this constitutional duty is laughable. He can see the writing on the wall. He knows they’re going to lose the House. And at this moment, I would predict that we’re going to take back control of the United States Senate as well. So they’re using every mechanism to try to deflect, deter, and confuse—and to hold on to power when they know it’s slipping away from them every single day.

Acyn

102,283 views • 3 months ago

After the 2024 Election, but before President Trump returned to the White House, he stated that he will not turn the page and concede the 2020 Election. I do not believe the 2020 Election is over. I understand I sound crazy to some people, and trust me, I understand why. But, ever since President Trump first walked down the golden escalator with Melania, he has been signaling to us what is to come, and he has yet to be wrong about any of it. I believe the 2020 Election was the biggest sting operation in history, and that the truth is finally about to be revealed to the world. President Trump also put the entire UNselect J6 committee on notice, especially Liz Cheney and Benny Thompson. They destroyed all of their so called evidence about January 6. Why would they do that? You know why they did that, as there is only one reason why they would do that. They are all guilty. Their evidence was all fabricated. Their job was to cover up the fact that what happened on January 6 was a cover up of the stolen election, and they used FBI agents and paid Antifa members to dress up as MAGA and breach the Capitol building, setting up a fake insurrection in order to force the certification of their fraudulent election. The real insurrection took place on November 3rd, 2020. Lastly, and this should not be ignored, when she said that the Democrats have control of the White House, Trump sort of questioned her, making it stand out. If Trump caught them all, and he never conceded, isn’t it reasonable to think that maybe the military got involved to safeguard the country from “Biden”starting WW3, which is what the Democrats wanted? Don’t ever forget about the Dash. The dash matters. 45 - 47 (45,46,47) Unfortunately, it had to be this way. It was the safest option. Us United was their greatest fear, and they did an amazing job of dividing us at that time via the Mockingbird Media. There would have been a civil war. Trump would have looked like the dictator they all said he was. The people needed to be shown, not told.

After the 2024 Election, but before President Trump returned to the White House, he stated that he will not turn the page and concede the 2020 Election. I do not believe the 2020 Election is over. I understand I sound crazy to some people, and trust me, I understand why. But, ever since President Trump first walked down the golden escalator with Melania, he has been signaling to us what is to come, and he has yet to be wrong about any of it. I believe the 2020 Election was the biggest sting operation in history, and that the truth is finally about to be revealed to the world. President Trump also put the entire UNselect J6 committee on notice, especially Liz Cheney and Benny Thompson. They destroyed all of their so called evidence about January 6. Why would they do that? You know why they did that, as there is only one reason why they would do that. They are all guilty. Their evidence was all fabricated. Their job was to cover up the fact that what happened on January 6 was a cover up of the stolen election, and they used FBI agents and paid Antifa members to dress up as MAGA and breach the Capitol building, setting up a fake insurrection in order to force the certification of their fraudulent election. The real insurrection took place on November 3rd, 2020. Lastly, and this should not be ignored, when she said that the Democrats have control of the White House, Trump sort of questioned her, making it stand out. If Trump caught them all, and he never conceded, isn’t it reasonable to think that maybe the military got involved to safeguard the country from “Biden”starting WW3, which is what the Democrats wanted? Don’t ever forget about the Dash. The dash matters. 45 - 47 (45,46,47) Unfortunately, it had to be this way. It was the safest option. Us United was their greatest fear, and they did an amazing job of dividing us at that time via the Mockingbird Media. There would have been a civil war. Trump would have looked like the dictator they all said he was. The people needed to be shown, not told.

RealAF Patriot

27,832 views • 6 months ago

This teacher says if you ever wonder why people are leaving the teaching profession in droves, this is one of the main reasons. She has students that she has written an incident report on every single day. She has contacted the principal and the support staff and the help that was given to her was to email the parents of the students. Basically, no help or support at all. We have many epidemics in our country but this is one of the biggest that doesn’t get enough attention. We all know our school system is a failure but even more than we know. Students these days have zero consequences. They are passed with straight F’s. They are allowed to be a continuing distraction and disruption in the classrooms and nothing is done about it. We need to start over. 💯 Why do we allow this this as a school? As a district? As a city? As a state? As a country? It didn’t use to be like this? This is why other countries surpass us in education, there is no discipline in our schools. Would you want to be a teacher in this day and age at a public school?

This teacher says if you ever wonder why people are leaving the teaching profession in droves, this is one of the main reasons. She has students that she has written an incident report on every single day. She has contacted the principal and the support staff and the help that was given to her was to email the parents of the students. Basically, no help or support at all. We have many epidemics in our country but this is one of the biggest that doesn’t get enough attention. We all know our school system is a failure but even more than we know. Students these days have zero consequences. They are passed with straight F’s. They are allowed to be a continuing distraction and disruption in the classrooms and nothing is done about it. We need to start over. 💯 Why do we allow this this as a school? As a district? As a city? As a state? As a country? It didn’t use to be like this? This is why other countries surpass us in education, there is no discipline in our schools. Would you want to be a teacher in this day and age at a public school?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

517,220 views • 2 months ago

Every day Wall Street is creating counterfeit shares & naked shorting stocks that don’t exist “Goldman Sachs was charged w/ this clever new way of breaking the short seller rules — They created a program where the computer would say automatically located even if it wasn’t true” NOTHING has changed, every day these Wall Street financial institutions, brokers, hedge funds all break the law and counterfeit shares which floods the market with counterfeits, creating an infinite supply of shares which destroys share prices They make BILLIONS you lose all the value you in your portfolios. Let me repeat myself, THEY ARE DOING THIS EVERY SINGLE DAY AND NO ONE WILL STOP THEM They are robbing every day people every single day. Politicians, bankers and Wall Street need to be in PRISON. The AMC / GameStop APE movement has exposed the crimes in the stock market but NO ONE will do anything about it. We have a uniparty of billionaire advocates sitting in congress. The biggest offender is Ken Griffin of Citadel who is Ron DeSantis, Mitch McConnell & Kevin McCarthy’s MEGADONOR These people should ALL BE IN PRISON. They are racketeering. $AMC $APE $GME #GameStop #NakedShorts

Every day Wall Street is creating counterfeit shares & naked shorting stocks that don’t exist “Goldman Sachs was charged w/ this clever new way of breaking the short seller rules — They created a program where the computer would say automatically located even if it wasn’t true” NOTHING has changed, every day these Wall Street financial institutions, brokers, hedge funds all break the law and counterfeit shares which floods the market with counterfeits, creating an infinite supply of shares which destroys share prices They make BILLIONS you lose all the value you in your portfolios. Let me repeat myself, THEY ARE DOING THIS EVERY SINGLE DAY AND NO ONE WILL STOP THEM They are robbing every day people every single day. Politicians, bankers and Wall Street need to be in PRISON. The AMC / GameStop APE movement has exposed the crimes in the stock market but NO ONE will do anything about it. We have a uniparty of billionaire advocates sitting in congress. The biggest offender is Ken Griffin of Citadel who is Ron DeSantis, Mitch McConnell & Kevin McCarthy’s MEGADONOR These people should ALL BE IN PRISON. They are racketeering. $AMC $APE $GME #GameStop #NakedShorts

Wall Street Apes

197,403 views • 3 years ago

ILLEGAL NAKED SHORTING vs Short Selling ILLEGAL NAKED SHORT SELLING is a prohibited practice in the stock market where investors sell shares without actually borrowing them or ensuring that they can be borrowed, and without the intention of delivering them. This practice violates U.S. securities laws and regulations set by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Breaking it down: 1.SHORT SELLING (Legal Form): In a standard short sale, an investor borrows shares from a broker and sells them on the open market, hoping to buy them back later at a lower price to make a profit. The borrowed shares are delivered to the buyer at the time of sale. 2.NAKED SHORT SELLING: In naked short selling, the investor skips the step of borrowing the shares or even ensuring they can be borrowed. They sell the stock without having possession or borrowing rights, leading to a “FAILURE TO DELIVER” when it’s time to hand over the shares to the buyer. 3.When It Becomes ILLEGAL: NAKED SHORT SELLING BECOMES ILLEGAL when it’s used to manipulate the market, such as artificially driving down a stock’s price by creating an illusion of excess supply. The SEC cracked down on this practice through regulations like Regulation SHO (REG SHO) (implemented in 2005), which requires brokers to locate and secure shares before allowing short sales. Key Issues with Illegal Naked Short Selling: •Market Manipulation: It can distort supply and demand, misleading investors about the stock’s actual value. •Price Suppression: Excessive shorting without real shares can push a stock’s price down unfairly, harming companies and investors. •“Failure to Deliver”: If the seller never delivers the shares, it undermines the integrity of the market. Real-World Example: During the 2008 financial crisis, illegal naked short selling was accused of exacerbating the collapse of some financial institutions. The SEC responded by imposing temporary bans on short selling for certain stocks and tightening regulations. #DJT #GME #AMC HYMC MMTLP TSLA

ILLEGAL NAKED SHORTING vs Short Selling ILLEGAL NAKED SHORT SELLING is a prohibited practice in the stock market where investors sell shares without actually borrowing them or ensuring that they can be borrowed, and without the intention of delivering them. This practice violates U.S. securities laws and regulations set by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Breaking it down: 1.SHORT SELLING (Legal Form): In a standard short sale, an investor borrows shares from a broker and sells them on the open market, hoping to buy them back later at a lower price to make a profit. The borrowed shares are delivered to the buyer at the time of sale. 2.NAKED SHORT SELLING: In naked short selling, the investor skips the step of borrowing the shares or even ensuring they can be borrowed. They sell the stock without having possession or borrowing rights, leading to a “FAILURE TO DELIVER” when it’s time to hand over the shares to the buyer. 3.When It Becomes ILLEGAL: NAKED SHORT SELLING BECOMES ILLEGAL when it’s used to manipulate the market, such as artificially driving down a stock’s price by creating an illusion of excess supply. The SEC cracked down on this practice through regulations like Regulation SHO (REG SHO) (implemented in 2005), which requires brokers to locate and secure shares before allowing short sales. Key Issues with Illegal Naked Short Selling: •Market Manipulation: It can distort supply and demand, misleading investors about the stock’s actual value. •Price Suppression: Excessive shorting without real shares can push a stock’s price down unfairly, harming companies and investors. •“Failure to Deliver”: If the seller never delivers the shares, it undermines the integrity of the market. Real-World Example: During the 2008 financial crisis, illegal naked short selling was accused of exacerbating the collapse of some financial institutions. The SEC responded by imposing temporary bans on short selling for certain stocks and tightening regulations. #DJT #GME #AMC HYMC MMTLP TSLA

BlackManBoating $APE AMC #debtFREE2026 🚀MICHAEL🐐

35,560 views • 1 year ago

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “And then, on — on the war, if the fighting were to resume because you’ve said that Operation Epic Fury is over, the President also said that the U.S. would bomb them off the face of the Earth if they tried to go after U.S. ships. So, if the fighting resumes, are you saying that it would resume under Project Freedom? And I ask as it relates to the War Powers Act.” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah. Look, I’m the Operation Epic Fury is concluded. We achieved the objectives of that operation. I’m not going to — you know, we’re not cheering for an additional situation to occur. We would prefer the path of peace. What the president would prefer is a deal. He would prefer to sit down and work out a memorandum of understanding for future negotiations that touches on all the key topics that have to be addressed, A full opening of the Straits of the world can get back to normal that he and he preferred that that be negotiated through the route that Steve and Jared have been working and that all of us have been supporting. That’s the route he prefers. That is, so far, not the route that Iran has chosen. And so the result has been that the United States has to do something about the fact that we’re the only nation on Earth that can do anything to open up a lane within the Straits of Hormuz, to get product and to rescue these people that are trapped in there. And that’s what we’re undergoing now. What that may lead to in the future is speculative. I’m not going to speculate about what it would take or what it would do. But look, the message to Iran these guys are facing, they — they are facing real catastrophic destruction to their economy, generational destruction to their economy, generational destruction to the wealth of their country imposed on themselves by the — by the actions that they’re taking. They should check themselves before they wreck themselves in the direction that they’re going.”

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “And then, on — on the war, if the fighting were to resume because you’ve said that Operation Epic Fury is over, the President also said that the U.S. would bomb them off the face of the Earth if they tried to go after U.S. ships. So, if the fighting resumes, are you saying that it would resume under Project Freedom? And I ask as it relates to the War Powers Act.” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah. Look, I’m the Operation Epic Fury is concluded. We achieved the objectives of that operation. I’m not going to — you know, we’re not cheering for an additional situation to occur. We would prefer the path of peace. What the president would prefer is a deal. He would prefer to sit down and work out a memorandum of understanding for future negotiations that touches on all the key topics that have to be addressed, A full opening of the Straits of the world can get back to normal that he and he preferred that that be negotiated through the route that Steve and Jared have been working and that all of us have been supporting. That’s the route he prefers. That is, so far, not the route that Iran has chosen. And so the result has been that the United States has to do something about the fact that we’re the only nation on Earth that can do anything to open up a lane within the Straits of Hormuz, to get product and to rescue these people that are trapped in there. And that’s what we’re undergoing now. What that may lead to in the future is speculative. I’m not going to speculate about what it would take or what it would do. But look, the message to Iran these guys are facing, they — they are facing real catastrophic destruction to their economy, generational destruction to their economy, generational destruction to the wealth of their country imposed on themselves by the — by the actions that they’re taking. They should check themselves before they wreck themselves in the direction that they’re going.”

Curtis Houck

10,778 views • 2 months ago

Brooke Rollins: "The president always said he would take care of the farmers. They have been with him since he came down the escalator. So yes, we are looking at the aid right now. We have always said it is to solve, to mitigate anything under these new trade negotiations. Every day that changes."

Brooke Rollins: "The president always said he would take care of the farmers. They have been with him since he came down the escalator. So yes, we are looking at the aid right now. We have always said it is to solve, to mitigate anything under these new trade negotiations. Every day that changes."

Aaron Rupar

146,145 views • 8 months ago

Next up, letter U: “U Don’t Know” #JayZ30 #JayZ Just Blaze: “I remember when I started the first version of ‘U Don't Know’ ... I just knew it had the potential to be something explosive. When Jay first did his rhyme, I’m like, ‘Alright, this is cool.’ But what really set that record off, for me at least, was when I added the [mimics the piano keys] at the very beginning. He does ‘turn my music high’ … it was just the perfect setup to a great record.” The producer added: “...If you notice, there's a start and stop with his [Jay-Z] rhymes, and the reason that is, is because he did the first verse and then he left it there. ...Every day he would come in to refine and work on a new idea. That was like his gym music, so he would listen, add another 8-to-16 bars, and then pull up the next record. ...That was basically the record [‘U Don't Know’] that would get him hype to record every day, which is why it goes on for as long as it does ‘cause he’s thinking of more rhymes...”

Next up, letter U: “U Don’t Know” #JayZ30 #JayZ Just Blaze: “I remember when I started the first version of ‘U Don't Know’ ... I just knew it had the potential to be something explosive. When Jay first did his rhyme, I’m like, ‘Alright, this is cool.’ But what really set that record off, for me at least, was when I added the [mimics the piano keys] at the very beginning. He does ‘turn my music high’ … it was just the perfect setup to a great record.” The producer added: “...If you notice, there's a start and stop with his [Jay-Z] rhymes, and the reason that is, is because he did the first verse and then he left it there. ...Every day he would come in to refine and work on a new idea. That was like his gym music, so he would listen, add another 8-to-16 bars, and then pull up the next record. ...That was basically the record [‘U Don't Know’] that would get him hype to record every day, which is why it goes on for as long as it does ‘cause he’s thinking of more rhymes...”

Luis

36,043 views • 28 days ago

BREAKING: The Speaker of the House of Commons was furious to hear that the Government’s long awaited Defence Review is planned to be snuck out on a Friday when the House isn’t sitting. This can only herald bad news for our nation’s defence. Sir Lindsay Hoyle has long been a powerful advocate for the Armed Forces from the first day he entered Parliament. He said he would be "appalled" to see the plan announced without a statement to the Commons first and makes a direct appeal to No10: "That would be an utter disgrace and an utter kick in the face to members of this House.” It would also be the highest breach of standing orders and an act of cowardice.

BREAKING: The Speaker of the House of Commons was furious to hear that the Government’s long awaited Defence Review is planned to be snuck out on a Friday when the House isn’t sitting. This can only herald bad news for our nation’s defence. Sir Lindsay Hoyle has long been a powerful advocate for the Armed Forces from the first day he entered Parliament. He said he would be "appalled" to see the plan announced without a statement to the Commons first and makes a direct appeal to No10: "That would be an utter disgrace and an utter kick in the face to members of this House.” It would also be the highest breach of standing orders and an act of cowardice.

Michael Fabricant 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦

384,101 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇨🇳 China has been quietly breaking free from the dollar system for over a decade, and even most in finance missed every sign it was happening. Luke Gromen traces it all back, from the Shanghai Gold Exchange in 2014 to the yuan oil contract in 2018 to record trade surpluses that keep growing even as the yuan strengthens. "China and Russia looked at that, and said 'we've got to get out of the dollar system. We have to create an alternative, otherwise any war that started would be over day one.'" The footprints are in the markets. Most just don't know what to look for. Luke Gromen

🇺🇸🇨🇳 China has been quietly breaking free from the dollar system for over a decade, and even most in finance missed every sign it was happening. Luke Gromen traces it all back, from the Shanghai Gold Exchange in 2014 to the yuan oil contract in 2018 to record trade surpluses that keep growing even as the yuan strengthens. "China and Russia looked at that, and said 'we've got to get out of the dollar system. We have to create an alternative, otherwise any war that started would be over day one.'" The footprints are in the markets. Most just don't know what to look for. Luke Gromen

Mario Nawfal

147,496 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

ANI

73,840 views • 3 months ago