Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

We were played from the start. The side effects we see were the primary intended effects. Preventing severe illness and death was the sales pitch to a well terrified audience 💉🚨- BREAKING: THE NARRATIVE HAS OFFICIALLY COLLAPSED. A massive 2026 study just documented the longest persistence of mRNA vaccine...

30,807 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A stunning testimony before the Massachusetts Legislature demands our full attention. Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, a PhD molecular biologist and toxicologist, delivered a methodical and devastating critique of the COVID-19 mRNA injections, asserting that the public was built upon a foundation of falsehoods. According to Dr. Lindsay, the very platform was "sold with a bunch of lies." She systematically listed the key promises made to the public that, in her professional assessment, have proven untrue: ▪️ The Nature of the Product: We were assured it was not a gene therapy. ▪️ Localized Effect: We were told the injection would remain localized in the arm. ▪ mRNA Stability: We were told the modified mRNA would break down rapidly. ▪️ Cellular Mechanism: We were told the spike protein could not enter the cell nucleus. ▪️ Genomic Impact: We were told reverse transcription and integration into human DNA was impossible. ▪️ Vaccine Purity: We were told there was no risk of DNA contamination altering our genetics. ▪️ Protein Specificity: We were told the shots would only produce the intended spike protein. ▪️ Treatment Alternatives: We were told no other safe and effective treatments existed. ▪️ Efficacy: We were told the shots were effective at preventing severe disease and death. ▪️ Transmission: We were told the products could not be shed to others. Her conclusion is stark: "All of these were lies." This testimony from a credentialed expert challenges the core narrative of the global pandemic response. It raises profound questions about institutional trust, scientific transparency, and informed consent. This is not a fringe theory; it is a formal allegation from a scientist with the background to make it. The conversation can no longer be avoided.

Camus

158,301 views • 11 months ago

A bombshell scientific publication confirms a critical danger in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and the implications are as severe as they are alarming. The core issue is plasmid DNA contamination. New research confirms this contaminating DNA is not just present in the vial; it is capable of entering human cells. This fact alone is concerning, but the true danger lies in what this DNA contains. Scientists have identified the presence of an SV40 viral promoter/enhancer sequence within Pfizer's plasmid DNA. For decades, SV40 has been known to be a potent tool for driving gene expression and is associated with potential genomic integration risks. Here is why this is a catastrophic failure in regulatory disclosure and vaccine design: 1. Nuclear Entry & Genomic Integration: The SV40 promoter is functionally active in human cells. Its presence means the contaminating plasmid DNA has a non-zero chance of entering the nucleus of a human cell. Once inside the nucleus, it runs a tangible risk of integrating into the human genome. 2. Uncontrolled, Long-Term Gene Expression: If integration occurs, it could effectively turn the vaccine into an unintended and uncontrolled gene therapy. This could force the body to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein indefinitely—for months, years, or permanently, with unknown health consequences. 3. A Deliberate Omission? Most damningly, Pfizer never disclosed the presence of this known biohazard, the SV40 sequence, to regulatory bodies during the approval process. There was no functional reason for its inclusion, as Moderna's production process utilized a standard bacterial plasmid without such dangerous components. The authors of this pivotal study are now calling for the immediate suspension of these mRNA vaccines until a full understanding of their long-term genomic risks is achieved. They further state that Pfizer and BioNTech must be held accountable for exposing the global population to a risk this significant without informed consent. This is no longer speculation. This is published, peer-reviewed science confirming a pathway for potential permanent alteration of the human genome. The demand for transparency and accountability has never been more urgent.

Camus

205,951 views • 11 months ago

It’s embarrassing to watch the TGA tie itself up in knots and contradict itself over the safety of the vaccine. The mRNA vaccine is designed to attack your own cells because the antigen sits on the cell membrane. The T-cell which responds to the vaccine antigen can’t separate your cell from the spike protein. It kills both and the TGA has already admitted as much in the past conceding myocarditis is an autoimmune response. The spike proteins are not rapidly degraded as numerous studies have shown they last in the body for up to 60 days. But more importantly the mRNA is designed to last much longer and produce more proteins. This means the body produces a much larger concentration of the toxic spike protein than what the virus would have delivered. And I quote from one study: “Later studies documented similar effects for 5-methylcytidine and 2-thiouridine and observed that modified mRNAs produced 10- to 100-fold more protein compared with unmodified mRNAs. Recently, N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), the modification used in the current mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, was found to possess superior characteristics to Ψ; m1Ψ elicited less immunogenicity and increased protein production by more than an order of magnitude relative to Ψ.” And another on the Poly-A tail increases the duration. “Whether for the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNtech® laboratories or that of Moderna®, the two mRNA sequences end in a Poly(A) tail. The purpose of this addition is to increase the stability of the mRNA in biological medium and also to allow the recruitment of the ribosome, in order to initiate an efficient translation. After translation, the mRNA can be reused several times, but when this happens, it also loses part of the Adenines of its Poly(A) tail, as enzymatic degradation begins there, which only ensures a transient protection against this degradation. When this tail is too degraded, the mRNA is no longer functional and is destroyed. The poly(A) tail stabilizes mRNA and boosts protein translation, and the length of the poly(A) tail is proportional to translation efficiency. It is a critical factor in determining the longevity of mRNA molecules.” Long story short - the TGA continues to lie. Quotes from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

62,548 views • 1 year ago

Renowned Toxicologist Issues Grave Warning Over Pfizer Vaccine DNA Integration A chilling laboratory finding has been revealed by toxicologist Dr. Lindsay Janci, and it demands immediate independent investigation. Dr. Janci highlighted an alarming in vitro study on ovarian carcinoma cells. When these cells were exposed to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in a lab setting, researchers observed something previously thought impossible: the integration of foreign vaccine-related genetic material directly into the human genome. Specifically, the study reported the integration of chromosomes 9 and 12 into the DNA of these cells. This genomic damage was not a temporary anomaly; it was stably passed on through at least two subsequent generations of cell divisions. The most catastrophic implication? Dr. Janci warns that this mechanism could theoretically occur in germline cells (ova and sperm). If true, this means the genetic alterations could be passed to the NEXT generation of children, potentially causing inherited cancers and widespread mutagenesis. The central, unforgivable failure, as Dr. Janci states, is that no studies were ever conducted to rule this out before global rollout. The assumption that mRNA vaccines were "temporary" and could not alter DNA has been challenged, yet the public was used as an uninformed test group. This isn't just about side effects; it's about the permanent alteration of the human genome. Where is the regulatory scrutiny? Where is the mainstream media? This cannot be ignored. The health of future generations may hang in the balance.

Camus

36,156 views • 11 months ago