Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Weird dating program ends up with these hairy holes sluts getting fingered n eaten out #sluts #pussy #hairy #bush #fingered #creamy #lickedout #porn #pov

31,222 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

First, Rep. Burlison opened up about his recent trip to Mexico to investigate the Buga Sphere—a metallic UFO that was just recovered by civilians. “There’s this object that’s been flying around in Colombia, it’s like a beach ball-size metallic sphere … it’s called the Buga sphere.” “Then another one that’s like an identical sphere was also filmed about two months later in a region about 30 miles away.” “When it first came to the ground, it weighed about 2kg.” “By the time that I was able to look at it, it weighed a little over 10kg. So what they claim is that it started gaining mass over time.” “This sphere has got all these weird markings on it.” “When I was down there, there were three scientists that did work for NASA … that went on the same trip with me at the same time because they wanted to get samples of this sphere.” “The people that found this thing and have it, they don’t want it cut up. They think that’ll compromise its capabilities.” “So they cut off about one gram, I think, of the metal on the surface. And they’re going to test that to see if it was made on planet Earth or if it’s from another planet.” “The sphere has these little holes that go around what you would think is the equator.” “They cut this type of what they call the fiber optic. When you look in a magnifying glass, the inside of these holes … is filled with these intricate other holes.” “They were able to cut into that and pull that material out and they’re going to test it because they think that they can get carbon dating on that.” Eric Burlison Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

Holden Culotta

94,115 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨New "Tridactyl" Species Discovered In Peru: Never Before Seen Footage, Forensic and DNA Data Revealed 🚨 Hundreds of appendages, body parts and full intact bodies were found in a tunnel system in Peru. "Tridactly", 3-Fingered, 3-Toed Ancient Humanoid Species With Long, Conical Skulls and Rare Metal Implants Were Found In Peru Carbon Dating to 1K+ Years Ago. The Peruvian Government is being sued for 300 million dollars over a possible cover-up. Facts Around the case: (All medical imaging files of these bodies are linked on for any researcher to investigate. The files show cartilage, bones, tendons, veins etc.) 1) One of the beings, Montserrat, is pregnant. Her fetus ALSO has 3 fingers and 3 toes implying real inheritance between mother and offspring 2) The bodies contain what seem to be "biomedical" implants made of Osmium and Cadmium, very rare earth metals. The implants are fused to the tissue of these beings in a process called Osseointegration indicating that they were alive when implanted. This is especially fascinating because these metals were only officially discovered by HUMANS in the 19th Century (and these beings carbon date to 1K+ years old...) 3) Bioinformatics researchers claim the bodies contain a GLI3 genetic mutation that dictate anomalous amounts of fingers and toes in other organisms too: this also shows that phenotype follows genotype here and implies the fingers weren't artificially mutated. 4) Top forensic experts in three different countries (The United States, Mexico and Peru) all looked for evidence of finger and toe mutilation and found none. They all think these beings were likely once alive and warrant further research. They claim leading surgeons and synthetic biologists would never be able to recreate such complex biological organisms. One of these Forensic experts, John McDowell, was the President of the American Forensic Association for a year. 5) Art - pottery, cave paintings, woven fabric - with Tridactyl, 3 finger and toed beings, are depicted ALL OVER the region in Nazca, Peru 6) The specific region of Nazca where the beings were found is a tunnel system, and, according to a local historian, its original name translates to: “Laboratory for Insemination and Hybridization” 7) Other researchers claim this is a sophisticated hoax involving finger and toe mutilations of ancient beings for profit. Or they claim the bodies are sophisticated ritual reconstructions of other animal parts. There are also real issues with the provenance of the original tunnel these beings were sourced from. 8) But the reason most people in the Western world think these are fake are because of a conflation: one between small wooden tourist artifacts apprehended by the Peruvian Ministry of Culture at the Lima Airport. And these very real bodies with genetic, forensic and imaging data associated with them. 9) To get even more answers, we are working with Colossal Biosciences Colossal Biosciences® (of Dire Wolf de-extinction fame!) to use their proprietary ancient DNA testing techniques to test these beings. All they need is Peru’s permission to ship samples of these beings from Peru to their labs in the United States. They want to go about this in an open, honest, scientific way to help figure this out for humanity. RT and Comment #Wewantanswers and tag peru if you want this to happen! Jaime Maussan Michael Mazzola Yes Theory Jois Mantilla Gonzalo Chavez Pavel Ibarra Meda David Velasco F. Joe Rogan INCREDIBLE HISTORY Full documentary live on YouTube and Spotify now:

Jesse Michels

206,492 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Just UNCOVERED Erika Kirk's SECRET Early Years— And It’s WILDER Than Anyone Expected... Was Erika BORN A MALE?! 🤯 Tonight on “The Bride of Charlie,” Candace dropped the most mind-blowing connection yet. Erika didn’t just move to Arizona after the “divorce.” She attended an ultra-elite, ultra-weird charter school called Tesseract — literally housed inside a Jewish school named “Gaan Yaladim Looking Glass School.” Yes. Looking Glass. The same name as the top-secret CIA Project Looking Glass — the alleged time-travel program that used stolen Sumerian technology to peer into the future. Tesseract itself? Named after the time-travel device in A Wrinkle in Time. Founded by the Walton family, Bush family, and Monsanto execs. Ran by Jewish administrators. Shut down for fraud shortly after Erika left. And the kicker? Candace found Erika’s actual yearbook photos from 1st, 2nd, and 3rd grade at this school, and in one of them, Erika is dressed as a boy. Full boy’s outfit. Short hair. Posing like one of the guys. Candace’s reaction says it all: “They were freaking out when I talked about Project Looking Glass… meanwhile Erika was literally going to the Looking Glass School.” Is this why Erika’s backstory has so many holes? Why the family tree doesn’t add up? Why she’s been caught lying about basic facts? Or… is something even darker going on? The “grieving widow” narrative just got obliterated again. This series is exposing everything they tried to bury. Watch the full clip right now. Your jaw will hit the floor. Drop 🔥 if you’re officially speechless RT this everywhere — the Looking Glass connection is insane Tag Candace Owens — we’re riding with you all the way They tried to cancel her for even mentioning time travel. Turns out Erika was living it.

Project Constitution

4,957,880 次观看 • 5 个月前

hypergamy is going to hit women like a 50-megaton thermonuclear bomb, and the reason is because these women are hypergamous themselves female hypergamy hit society first due to the natural supply/demand gap between the sexes, and it's certainly caused somewhat of a death spiral of intersexual relations, but the outcome will not be this hypercompetition between men for women, but rather men checking out of the game entirely as the juice stops being worth the squeeze porn is only getting more immersive and sex bots are on the way, and social media exposes men to 10/10 women nonstop; why then would men break their backs for a crumb of attention for mediocre women? even men with genuine value to bring struggle in the current dating market, the fatigue is beginning to set in for women there are two options: a) make the squeeze easier, or b) make the juice more worthwhile a) would require that they lower their standards and expectations, make themselves more accessible, accept a man with less to offer when they know someone better is out there they don't have that in them, so they resort to b) b) means making the juice tastier, it mean tightening up the juice's nasolabial folds and waist-to-hip ratio. it means injecting the juice with hyaluronic acid fillers and, when that isn't enough to get ahead, it means making real changes to the juice's recipe like getting structural surgery there is a very small supply of beautiful people on this planet, but in the age of the internet that small supply is accessible to everyone at all times instead of being a random beautiful stranger you may rarely come across on the street. everyone’s perceptions of what is accessible to them is being distorted, and even if only 1% of people are truly beautiful themselves that is enough for 99% of the subpar masses to feel like they can share. past a certain point of abundance a person cannot comprehend the difference between 10 million people and 1 billion, it’s just a lot. if 1 billion compete for 10 million it still feels like an infinite prize pool. this has corrupted women tremendously, but it is absolutely going to and already beginning to do the same with men as men get more and more immersed in and addicted to cheap hits of sexual dopamine such as porn, social media, online dating (which is a corrupting force for both genders) they will be less and less willing to settle for a girl who is any less than perfect because quite frankly, she probably just won’t be worth it to them anyway there is already a long cultural precedent for women going to extreme measures to looksmaxx for male attention, if men start to become fed up with them and hypergamy increases on both ends the blackpill will explode with women. already women know when they are left on delivered by chad that if they were prettier this wouldn’t be happening, they are beginning to make this observation en masse and it is driving the rise in radfem and “femcel” (i.e. girl who can’t bag chad) ideology. women are realizing that body positivity and self-love was a scam, and that looks are law i’m betting all in on the upcoming female blackpill trend, putting my stock in it. i’d keep an eye out for it because it has already begun and it’s only going to get bigger
0:22

Sensitive content

hypergamy is going to hit women like a 50-megaton thermonuclear bomb, and the reason is because these women are hypergamous themselves female hypergamy hit society first due to the natural supply/demand gap between the sexes, and it's certainly caused somewhat of a death spiral of intersexual relations, but the outcome will not be this hypercompetition between men for women, but rather men checking out of the game entirely as the juice stops being worth the squeeze porn is only getting more immersive and sex bots are on the way, and social media exposes men to 10/10 women nonstop; why then would men break their backs for a crumb of attention for mediocre women? even men with genuine value to bring struggle in the current dating market, the fatigue is beginning to set in for women there are two options: a) make the squeeze easier, or b) make the juice more worthwhile a) would require that they lower their standards and expectations, make themselves more accessible, accept a man with less to offer when they know someone better is out there they don't have that in them, so they resort to b) b) means making the juice tastier, it mean tightening up the juice's nasolabial folds and waist-to-hip ratio. it means injecting the juice with hyaluronic acid fillers and, when that isn't enough to get ahead, it means making real changes to the juice's recipe like getting structural surgery there is a very small supply of beautiful people on this planet, but in the age of the internet that small supply is accessible to everyone at all times instead of being a random beautiful stranger you may rarely come across on the street. everyone’s perceptions of what is accessible to them is being distorted, and even if only 1% of people are truly beautiful themselves that is enough for 99% of the subpar masses to feel like they can share. past a certain point of abundance a person cannot comprehend the difference between 10 million people and 1 billion, it’s just a lot. if 1 billion compete for 10 million it still feels like an infinite prize pool. this has corrupted women tremendously, but it is absolutely going to and already beginning to do the same with men as men get more and more immersed in and addicted to cheap hits of sexual dopamine such as porn, social media, online dating (which is a corrupting force for both genders) they will be less and less willing to settle for a girl who is any less than perfect because quite frankly, she probably just won’t be worth it to them anyway there is already a long cultural precedent for women going to extreme measures to looksmaxx for male attention, if men start to become fed up with them and hypergamy increases on both ends the blackpill will explode with women. already women know when they are left on delivered by chad that if they were prettier this wouldn’t be happening, they are beginning to make this observation en masse and it is driving the rise in radfem and “femcel” (i.e. girl who can’t bag chad) ideology. women are realizing that body positivity and self-love was a scam, and that looks are law i’m betting all in on the upcoming female blackpill trend, putting my stock in it. i’d keep an eye out for it because it has already begun and it’s only going to get bigger

𝖒𝖔𝖌𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖌

42,726 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andrew Kolvet’s Deep Intelligence Family Ties Raise Major Red Flags Around Charlie Kirk Assassination – Even Mikey McCoy Saw It Travis just dropped a deep dive on Andrew Kolvet’s tangled family tree that raises some serious red flags around the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. Kolvet’s father Brent was a prominent Nevada district attorney. His stepmother Denise was previously married to Joseph Richard Sizoo Jr., whose grandfather Joseph Mapes Sizoo was a high-ranking FBI official in the Domestic Intelligence Division — the same division running surveillance and COINTELPRO operations against figures like Martin Luther King Jr. Andrew’s brother Curtis is a Lieutenant Colonel in the Nevada National Guard. His first cousin Robert Kolvet works in military intelligence for NETCOM at Fort Huachuca in Arizona — the same fort where an eyewitness spotted Erika Kirk only days before Charlie was killed. Andrew tried to provide an alibi for Erika and referred to Fort Huachuca as “some fort in Tucson” while playing dumb. Curtis was also deployed to Romania, just 30 minutes from where Erika’s charity Romanian Angels operated. Mikey McCoy told Candace Owens to look into Kolvet in regards to assassination involvement. That direct tip from someone inside the circle adds even more weight to the family connections. A guy with deep FBI, military intelligence, and prosecutorial family ties ends up as TPUSA’s spokesperson right next to Charlie. Then Charlie is assassinated and Andrew is out here providing alibis and pushing narratives. The connections are too tight to ignore. The post lays out how these power nodes touch nearly every level of government and intelligence. If there is an ongoing cover-up, Andrew Kolvet is not some innocent bystander — he is integral. The official story has more holes than Swiss cheese and the people closest to it have the strangest family histories. This kind of exposure cuts through the spin. When a key figure in TPUSA has this level of intelligence and law enforcement lineage, it makes you question who was really in control and who benefited from Charlie’s death. The same organization that turned a memorial into a merch and data harvest operation now has insiders with these backgrounds steering the ship. The questions are piling up and the answers keep getting thinner. People are tired of the coincidences and the convenient alibis. The family connections and the direct tip from Mikey McCoy make the whole thing smell even worse than it already did. Make sure to subscribe and support my content.

Sword Truth

13,798 次观看 • 3 个月前

There is no hope for a lot of Gen Z guys. If a girl rejecting you with something like “Aren’t you too old?” is now ‘shaming’, Gen Z is COOKED ♨️ Let me tell you something: women have been telling guys they are “too old”, “too short”, “too poor”, etc., since TIME IMMEMORIAL. The reason women give you for rejecting you has nothing to do with the actual reason they’re rejecting you. It is also not solely or principally due to “not finding you physically attractive”, like this guy seems to think. Here is a brief list of reasons women may give you for rejecting you: • You’re too young • You’re too old • You’re too short • You’re too tall • They don’t know you • They don’t date your race guys • They prefer to date guys from their country • They’re not looking to date right now • They don’t feel like you’re their type These reasons are completely irrelevant and women constantly violate their own rules. She rejects you for being too short, then you catch her hooking up with a guy shorter than you. She rejects you for being too young, then you see her playing cougar to a guy 3 years younger than you. She rejects you for being too old, then you find out she’s dating a dude 8 years older than you. You can either take this stuff to heart and let it BREAK you, and go cry on the Internet about “being shamed”, and get into a circle-jerk with a bunch of other dudes in the Internet safe space who jerk you off and talk about how “it’s so hard out here with these girls, all shaming you”, or you can suck it up, get a little testosterone flowing through your nads, and do better. Let me tell you something else: All those ‘rejection’ reasons are actually TESTS. If you handle them appropriately, you can still get the girl. When a girl says, “Aren’t you too old?” and you say, “No, I’m exactly the right age. How old are YOU?” you take control of the frame. If you CONTINUE to keep control of the frame, she becomes attracted. That’s how attraction works: It is not due to some facile calculation in her brain of “he is insufficiently looksmaxxed therefore RULED OUT!” Instead, the calculation in her brain is saying, “Hmm, he doesn’t look like the kinds of guys I’m accustomed to. Let’s see what he’s got!” So, she tests you. You either own the test and get the girl, or you fold up, talk about being “shamed”, and go cry on the Internet. So here is some advice: 1️⃣ Stop being a pussy who talks about ‘being shamed’ (i.e., estrogenmaxxing) 2️⃣ Learn a little FRAME CONTROL and learn how to LEAD (i.e., testosteronemaxxing) 3️⃣ Start getting those girls who push back on you rather than slinking off in utter defeat The first time you take some girl trying to test you and turn her into date or lay, you will have unlocked a whole new world for yourself… one in which, rather than crumple anytime anyone gives you any resistance, you learn how to take what you want from life. Godspeed!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

18,055 次观看 • 5 个月前

💥 LAP Alert 💥 "I did this sort of spy thing where I changed hotel rooms and I changed taxis. I was making sure I wasn’t followed." ~Knapp Is Lacatski Lying to Us About the Craft and Breaching the Hull? ~ "If not for that [2017 NYT] story about AATIP and the problems that [Lacatski] saw with it, he would never have mentioned [AAWSAP]...I don't think, ever." ~Knapp (So, in other words...thank you from the UFO community, to the NYT, for getting it wrong? 🙂) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Should we listen to Dr. James Lacatski on UFOs, on the fact, or the idea, that our government has at least one, he's admitted, and we breached the hull? Should we listen to him, George?" George Knapp: "I know a lot of people have noticed that he's talked about his role in counterintelligence as part of the AAWSAP program. And because they equate counterintelligence with lies, false info., cover stories, misdirection. Aha! He's putting out a bunch of false info. a decade after he retired from government service." (I saw one person suggest that, and I thought it was a questionable take...) Grant Lavac: "Given that Dr. James Lacatski was the 'counterintelligence coordinator' for AAWSAP, how much confidence can we invest in the veracity of his public statements that 'at least one recovered craft of unknown origin, a flying machine with no wings, no engine, no fuel, and no fuel tanks' is in the possession of the US government and that they had 'breached the hull' of the UFO? In the context of the counterintelligence value of UAP/UFO, his comments in this most recent interview on WEAPONIZED (edited for brevity) only raise more questions for me." ~~~ Knapp: "A, it's not [Lacatski]. He's not out there beating the bushes. He's talked to us, but that's pretty much it. He's telling the full story as much as he can in a series of books. And I was co-author on two of those, not on this one. And, you know, I remember the first time I met him, it was in 2018." ~ (In April of 2019, Knapp shared that story, minus Lacatski's name, at UFO MegaCon. Knapp in 2019: "I thought today I would share with you, sort of the informational foundation that I’ve acquired. So, one year ago, I made this trip to Washington, D.C. at the invitation of Senator Harry Reid. It was St. Patrick’s Day, 2018 and I already knew a little bit about AATIP and AAWSAP and what they’ve been studying and where the money came from and how the program was created. I did this sort of spy thing where I changed hotel rooms and I changed taxis. I was making sure I wasn’t followed. And if there was ever actually, anybody following me, they must have thought I looked ridiculous because it was way over the top. "But I ended up having to meet with Senator Reid and some other people who were directly involved in these programs and they gave me a download. And I thought I knew a lot about these programs when I went there and realized that I only knew a little tiny bit. The purpose of this was to learn about these programs. We all know about AATIP, but in reality, there was something before that. "I sat down for a couple of hours with Senator Reid and other people whose names, they don’t want to be known. They brought me up to speed on how AATIP was created. How its predecessor was under way for a number of years. It coexisted for a long time. People in this room. People who investigate this topic may have suspected for a long time that there was some kind of a program that still existed. We’ve all heard that Project Bluebook was the end. 1969 it ended and the government was done with UFOs. They closed up shop. And the reason they closed it down is because there was no evidence that it involved national security. "And we all knew that was baloney because of the stories that we’ve seen that are really well documented. For example, UFOs over nuclear missile bases. UFO encounters with the military installations and atomic facilities. Things of that sort the have been well documented over the years. There are cases that involved national security. So at the end of Blue Book, of course, this memo said, alright, any cases involving national security will continue to be investigated in the regular way. Well, what the heck was the regular way? We didn’t know. Well now we do know. At least a little bit of it." (Project Blue Book was shut down in December of 1969, but a few months earlier, in October, we had the Bolender memo, which noted that "reports of UFOs which could affect national security should continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedure designed for this purpose." What standard Air Force procedure? The regular way? Where did those cases go? We still don't know what Bolender was referring to in that memo.) ~ Knapp in 2019: "And one of the regular ways was this program called AATIP. So I went on this trip. [and] I learned this stuff about AATIP. I had known a lot about it before but I got this briefing about this alphabet soup of different programs, how they began and what they studied. December 2017, the New York Times breaks this story about AATIP. Now, I had known about it for a long time because I lived in Las Vegas. I knew Bob Bigelow. I knew Harry Reid. We’d talk about UFO stuff and what was going on. "So when I was told the New York Times was gonna break the story, I’m kind ticked off about it. Because hey, I’ve been sitting on this for a long time. Why don’t I get to break the story? And they had to, one after another, gently remind me, 'You know. You’re not the New York Times.' Which I had to admit! It was true. And if I had done the story, the Times had said that they weren’t going to do it if somebody else breaks it. So, if I had done it, it’d be another story from a UFO reporter. "The New York Times did it and they changed everything. Because they did it, wider organizations did it. Some of them took shots at the New York Times because The Times got the story and they didn’t. But that story was accurate, to a degree. But the story that it told was not the full story. AATIP, that we know about…the AATIP that studies nuts and bolts saucers…case of UFOs that have encounters with military units such as the USS Nimitz, that is studied by a group of people, Lue Elizondo was the head of it. "It’s not so much a program as it was a loose network of intelligence officials in different agencies, including the Air Force and the Navy, CIA, DIA, DARPA…there might be a couple of other agencies. But a case would come in from any one of their units [and] it would be shared with this group of people, analysis would be done, evidence would be looked at and then stashed in a draw and nobody ever sees it. It’s not passed up the chain of command. "In 2007, that changed. One of the guys (Lacatski. ~Joe 2025) I met with in this meeting in Washington is the one who changed it. He had been in the same position that Lue Elizondo had been in. And his name is just not out there. He grew frustrated with what was happening with the phenomenon and he suspected that UFOs flying around the sky, buzzing our military units every once in a while, is not the full story. Even if you could solve that part of the mystery it wouldn’t solve the bigger part of the picture. "So he grew interested in Skinwalker Ranch and he had read the (Knapp/Kelleher – 'Hunt For The Skinwalker') book. And after he read it, he called up Bob Bigelow and said…actually, he wrote him a letter and said, 'Hey, can I go to the ranch…go look around? I’m with the DIA.' Bigelow says, 'Come on out to Las Vegas and I’ll take you there.' And that’s what happened. He flew to Las Vegas. They flew on Bigelow’s jet. They went to the ranch. "This guy’s not there fifteen minutes and he has an experience. And I’m not gonna go into detail. I’m hoping that he’s going to maybe come forward at some point and describe his experience. But it was just for him. Of all the people in this room, in the encounter, he was the only one who could see it. He’s the only one who had an angle on this thing that appeared. And he’s pretending that he’s not seeing it but it’s right out of the corner of his eye. And he doesn’t say anything until he leaves the ranch. And he gets off and he asks Bigelow if he had seen it. And he had not. The other people who had been in the room had not seen it. "He flies back to Las Vegas, goes back to Washington, D.C. and looks up Harry Reid and tells him about it. Now Reid had some experience in these matters that I’ll get into in a little bit. But as a result of that conversation, Reid, who had an interest in UFOs and had maintained that interest over many years – and I can attest to that personally – called in a couple of his friends in the Senate – Daniel Inouye and Ted Stevens. They had a conversation in a secure room and they decided to provide some funding for a much broader study. Something that looked at…beyond flying saucers, that looked at other paranormal aspects…supernatural aspects that we would not normally associate with aliens or ETs. Assuming that that’s what this is, which I’m not sure anyone knows for sure. And that is how AAWSAP was born. The Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program." ~~~ Knapp Yesterday: "The only reason [Lacatski] came forward, he was ticked off about how AATIP had been described in major media reports, and no mention had been given to the actual, real program. That one that had a $22 million budget, lasted 27 months, and which put together the biggest UFO data warehouse in history, that had written all these papers that still have not been released." (In the most-recent interview (Part 1) with Weaponized, Lacatski let it fly with his issues related to the 2017 NYT article: "The initial reporting...by the New York Times story in 2017 was totally inaccurate. Contrary to what some people claim, the authors knew my name and position at AAWSAP, yet never attempted to contact me. Likewise, the The Washington Post. POLITICO (laughs) contacted me within hours after the articles were published in the free publications, asking for my opinion. They knew my name, they had my phone number. Why didn't they contact me [beforehand]?" ~Dr. James Lacatski on Weaponized ~ Knapp: "So, Jim was a counterintelligence guy for AAWSAP, but in this role. He wasn't putting out cover stories or lies, he didn't put out anything. The world didn't hear that AAWSAP existed until years later, at least by that name. There was one statement made to the press about that program. It was by Robert Bigelow, whose company, BAASS, got the contract. A week after he signed it, he came on with me on Coast to Coast AM and said, 'We got this program dealing with UFOs, we have an unnamed partner, and we're excited to get going.' That was it. "Jim Lacatski wasn't putting out PR releases about AAWSAP. There was nothing. That was the last thing anybody said until the New York Times did the AATIP story, and then Jim Lacatski felt the real story was being covered up. If not for that story about AATIP and the problems that he saw with it, he would never have mentioned this. I don't think ever." (Well, then, thank you to the NYT journalists and editors for pissing off Lacatski!) Knapp: "You'll recall, AAWSAP, at the time that things went downhill, that the funding was moved away, they were trying to make it into a SAP, a Special Access Program. And if it had happened, we probably would never have heard of it. If it had happened, Lue Elizondo would have been the counterintelligence guy for AAWSAP, that he had already talked to Lacatski. "But Lacatski is not proclaiming the greatness of the program. He's not out there beating the bushes on podcasts and newscasts, other than with us, and he never put out in counterintelligence. His role, counterintelligence, meant something different for AAWSAP. The thing that DIA had told him was, 'Look, you know, it's not a rogue program. I know it gets weird into some of the phenomena that was at Skinwalker Ranch and other places. We don't care. Here's what we care about: Don't let the secret out. We don't want to see this on the front page of the Washington Post. We want it kept secret.' (John Greenewald was one person questioning whether AAWSAP was actually a prosaic program and Lacatski just decided to go rogue with a foray into UFOs and the paranormal.) Greenewald Tweet: "Did the U.S. government really sanction this, and if so, is this really how it was run? Or was this a rogue operation by a select few on the inside playing with Uncle Sam's coffers?" (Greenewald was quote tweeting a Greenstreet hit-piece video on AAWSAP. In his interview on Weaponized aired over the past few weeks, Lacatski said that former Deputy Director of AARO, Tim Phillips, also used the "rogue" word when describing AAWSAP. Did DIA really not know what AAWSAP was about? Did Lacatski go rogue and turn a program that was supposed to look at prosaic, advanced technology into one that studied UFOs and the paranormal? Here's an exchange from the 2023 interview Knapp and Corbell did with Lacatski and Colm Kelleher.) Kelleher: "The critical part of AAWSAP that we tried to convey in 'Skinwalkers at the Pentagon,' was that there were two fundamental, parallel tracks that AAWSAP ran on. The first one was the examination of UFO performance. And, you know, the UFO performance part was getting all of the data from eyewitnesses, plus deploying sensors into the field, in order to gather data on the performance of UFOs. That was track number one. And track number two was: What effects do UFOs have on humans? That was a parallel track that, from the get go, AAWSAP decided, unambiguously, to run both tracks in parallel. We documented psychological effects, and then we also documented paranormal effects." Lacatski: "Anything can be said on the internet it seems, factual or not. Well, one thing that is not factual is, DIA knew what it was getting into in regard to both aspects that Colm just described to you. And let me end my statement right here. We had no choice but to pursue both aspects." (That was a poor way of him saying: The claim that DIA was unaware of AAWSAP looking into all aspects of UFOs, including the paranormal, is NOT true.) Lacatski: "I want to emphasize something I said on my first and only interview. It was a closed program. It operated very similar to a SAP. The director, the director of analysis, and my office chief...and, of course, division chief, knew about this program. No one else did. Now, I was also protected by the stovepipe nature of that. I did not have to address political-type questions. I was insulated, but they were, too. There was no one else. People in the surrounding cubicles didn't know. Nothing was purposely being hid. It was a closed, stovepipe system, and it needed to be. It needed to be operated that way." ~~~ Knapp: "And so, Jim Lacatski took it on himself, put it in his own hands. He and Colm Kelleher interviewed all these people who applied for the jobs, the 50 full-time positions that they staffed, in a matter of months. They did background checks, they required security clearances for all those people, and they were worried about leaks. They didn't want information to get out. "They also were concerned about espionage by foreign players, by foreign companies, things of that sort. And some of that really did happen. As Jim has shared with us, there were a couple of phones that were transmitters that were found inside Bigelow Aerospace, inside the Bigelow, uh, facilities, and it was very alarming because they weren't sure who was doing it. I think they think it was a foreign government. I'm not going to say which one, uh, they suspected the most." (Lacatski said that the phones in question were made in China.) Knapp: "But, and then they also found weird frequencies emanating from Skinwalker Ranch. That's not strange, and there's a lot of unusual stuff that happens there, but it was some sort of a an espionage program that they believed was was not only looking at the ranch, but also at BAASS. "That was his primary concern. He was worried that the story gets out, because secrecy was of paramount interest to the heads of DIA and he's worried about the information getting out to the public. Because once it happened, then the knives come out in the Pentagon and within the intelligence community, which is kind of what happened. A memo was sent from Harry Reid's office, let other people know that AAWSAP existed, and that's when things started getting problematic." Corbell: "The bugging thing. So, it's not just like Bigelow Aerospace was tapped with something, he said, specifically, AAWSAP, right? So they were looking at that new UFO program. And I don't know how public this is, but he did say it was - not just him, other people have all said - it was multiple nations, multiple, different devices from those phones. And he also said that they worked with FBI, they had FBI liaisons looking at the ranch property, and also at Bigelow Aerospace. "Because, remember, they were supposed to receive a transfer of materials. That's why they reverse, reverse engineered (laughs), you know, they built everything to be able to hold SCIF-capable and material-capable property at that classification level. So, look, I think if we pull it back, the whole idea is, James Lacatski made a statement at some point that he was, you know, head of, or part of, or running the counterintelligence for AAWSAP. But his point was to keep AAWSAP itself secret from foreign nations. So then he has to keep it secret from the U.S. He did it. He did a great job. They actually kept it secret. That doesn't mean he's going out and creating false information to the public like he's been accused of. "So, should we listen to Jim Lacatski? That was like, you know, the main question. Oh, one second. He also identified that there is currently a counter-programming, counterintelligence operation going on to the American public, but not against the American public, by AARO." (In other words, spread misinformation to the American public so they can advance their goal of misinforming and confusing our adversaries who are always listening. National security! IMO, that's only acceptable if we're talking specifics related to propulsion, technology and weapons that can be used to give us a leg up on said adversaries. But everything else should come out and be made public. We shouldn't be told a bunch of lies about information we paid for and that could, potentially, give us some clarity about our species and other lifeforms on this planet.) Corbell: That was so clear in our interview with him that he said that, you know, 'Look, they're acting this way. They are telling you lies about AAWSAP and what happened.' And that's why he said, 'My books, I'm a government employee. This was paid by taxpayers. I'm trying to give you information.' And that's what his books are. "So it's clear from these rounds of interviews that we just had with Dr. Lacatski that he supports a controlled UFO disclosure. He made that very clear. So should we listen to what he has to say? I mean, he was a big dog, right, George?" Knapp: "He was the head of the largest U.S. government-funded UFO investigation in history, that we know of. He worked with Colm Kelleher, who was the boots-on-the-ground guy in Las Vegas. He worked with Jay Stratton. Stratton's role in the development of AAWSAP has not been really fully explored, but he's got a book coming out at some point, once it gets through the DOPSR process. But then we'll get additional information to buttress what Lacatski has said."

Joe Murgia

56,558 次观看 • 8 个月前

Moms Across America Lab Tested The Top 20 Popular Restaurants In America, Including In-N-Out & Locations Who Provide The Food For American School Lunches & Found 100% Of The Food Was Toxic. We Are Being Poisoned Along With Our Kids 🚨☣️ “It is eaten by 85 millions Americans a day, and we do have a health crisis in America, so we wanted to investigate them for that reason, if there's a possible connection, but also because they supply the majority of school lunches. We learned this when we did school lunch testing last year from a school lunch director, and so we wanted to go to the source of where the schools are getting their food. And we're talking about restaurants that we all know and love. Can you talk a little bit about what you found? Sure, yes, we tested the top 20 most popular restaurants plus one more, which was In-N-Out restaurant because they claim to be more healthy, and we found some very disturbing results. For instance, we tested for glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the world, and in school lunches we found them in 95.3% positive for glyphosate, 100% in the fast food samples. Pesticides we found between 74 and 76% positive in both school lunches and fast food. Heavy metals were found in 100% of the samples and some levels up to 6000 times higher than what the EPA allows in drinking water and these can cause lifelong neurological damages. So that was extremely concerning and the highest levels were in the heavy metals were in in and out french fries actually and also the lead was found in a sonic cheeseburger. We also found veterinary drugs and approved by the FDA for human use. They're very toxic in horses and dogs and can cause their hind legs to go to be paralyzed. And we also found a aviary contraceptive in a Chick-fil-A sandwich. And we do not know what that's doing to humans. So we're very concerned about that. Found harmful antibiotics. And of course, the calories were higher than what they should be. The minerals are lower than what they should be. And vitamin B, for instance, was very concerning. One would have to, a woman would have to eat 333 Chick-fil-A sandwiches in order to meet her daily recommended intake of vitamin B. A man would have to eat 380 Chick-fil-A sandwiches. So of course we are very concerned about the low levels of minerals that Americans are consuming by consistently consuming school lunches and fast food and the high levels of toxicity which are contributing to disease in America. So what do you recommend us parents do? Well, we recommend that we budget differently and save up for organic, grow your own food, buy organic as much as possible. Regenerative organic agriculture actually helps protect the soil and draw down carbon and can give us higher density, higher nutrient density food. So that's what we recommend as much as possible to support your local organic farmers. Now, is there a plan to take these results somewhere to nationally? What do you plan to do with these test results? Well, thank you for asking. Yes, we just did. We went we did a US congressional briefing Senator cookies Cory Booker's office helped organize that and we presented this information to many congressional aides and we did talk to the USDA We hope to speak to the FDA next we did test over 40 samples. That is a scientifically significant number So this information cannot be ignored and we hope that policy change will be happening very soon Okay. All right. Thank you so much then for bringing this to our attention. I really appreciate it. Thank you, Janelle. Thank you to your team.”

Wall Street Apes

250,222 次观看 • 2 年前

This pieced together video is very scary. From my point of view I will explain why. You may have already seen it.But first, listen to how many things get debunked or exposed here. Her little cocaine use which is actually a habitual addiction. Her claim that Johnny isolated her, when she actually had the whole Shady Bunch living in the penthouses with her. Johnny's wine drinking when it was her 3 glasses a day. Her anger, her rage.But Johnny was the monster? She said Johnny was the jealous one. In his case his doubts came true. But look at all she projected onto Johnny that she actually did herself. But here is what I want to highlight. When professionals like a doctor or therapist record or annotate. The language they use tends to minimize actions and they will write in a conservative way. Mostly shorthand and they summarize. I can have a hacking cough with blood and nurse will write, "patient reports cough." You can imagine the fits of rage that she had on those appointments. I bet she had wild, immature adult tantrums, expressing how jealous she was. Like for example: "look at the whores that Johnny is around every day! Those sluts climb all over him!" But how will the therapist write it? "patient expressed concern over the availability of women and his ability to interact with them often." When she's a jealous fucking maniac! We know Amber is narcissistic and craves attention. We know it irks her when on a Red Carpet, Johnny gets all the shine and not her. He is not around to cater to her. But what is written? "client reports difficulty with issues surrounding husbands fame". How calm do you think Amber "expressed" that? And What do you think Johnny hears from her when he gets home? Do you think the words that she yells and screams at him are as calm and professional as what nurses or doctors write? What they write masks the tip of that Abusive Iceberg. Do you think maybe these words of rage, jealousy and anger are accompanied by fists, hitting, and thrown objects? That is the scary part. I can see Amber acting out in that doctor's office. Uncontrolled. In that nurses office. Her childish tantrums, insecurities and rage flying out. But they calmly write down "has issues with..." No shit, she has issues! JD comes home after a long shoot, or is about to travel to another one, and what does he have to put up with from her every time? He's a stronger man than me. How many of you reading this have had a jealous partner who made you feel like shit just because they had their own insecurities, and they wanted to dump them onto you to make themselves feel better? Did Amber detail exactly how she "expresses anger and concern" when saying this to Johnny? Did she admit to punches and flying bottles? She was a ticking, fucking time bomb, that exploded multiple times. This video is scary to me, because what the nurse is reading, is probably 10% of the actual severity of what Johnny had to deal with. I hear and read those words, and I can see the abuse behind them. I apologize if this sounds like an exaggeration. But that is what I get when I hear those words. I have never been a victim of abuse, and I give the shortest leash possible to either a controlling or insecure woman. I walk away from the wrong girls, very easily. I am glad that finally, Johnny did the same. Thank you God for saving him or for Johnny getting himself out. The best thing that Johnny could have done is go through with that Virginia Trial. He was eventually freed and gave himself back to us. In freeing himself, he gave himself back to us. And I Love him for it.

Wyno Forever

12,515 次观看 • 2 年前

Getting clobbered by the economy? Identify as an illegal alien and the feds will treat you like royalty Millions of dollars of taxpayer funds are being used to rent hotels to house asylum claimants. In Mark Carney-led Canada, by every economic metric, life is in decline. The cost of living, unemployment, homelessness, and food bank usage have all soared this past decade. Indeed, the war on poverty has never seemed so grim as we all breathlessly await the “elbows up” strategy to kick in. So, riddle us this: how is it that given the overwhelming debt and deficit in Ottawa, somehow there are apparently millions of taxpayer dollars available to put up illegal aliens in nice motels and hotels? The latest example: the Comfort Inn on Kingston Road in Pickering, Ont., is now owned by Durham Region. It was recently “repurposed” to provide temporary housing for asylum claimants. Translation: members of the taxpaying public are persona non grata at the so-called “Durham Reception Centre” but non-citizens are warmly welcomed. Yet, the question arises: in these tough times, is this a prudent use of taxpayer dollars? We went to the former Comfort Inn to interview City of Pickering Councillor Lisa Robinson. She is the lone voice on council who is highly critical of this program and laments that there was zero public input into this initiative as the meetings about the property were held in secret. But while on site, we learned about an astounding piece of information that has received no publicity whatsoever. Namely, “guests” at the reception centre are only allowed to stay there for a maximum of 90 days. So, what happens when that three-month term expires? Do these people seek accommodation at city shelters? Do they join the rank and file of the local tent city? But no. It appears they get upgraded, not downgraded! Case in point: we approached an African man in the parking lot in a late-model SUV. He told us he used to stay at the former Comfort Inn, but he now lives in a house. He also told us that he remains unemployed. So, who is paying the rent for that house? You guessed it: the ever-beleaguered taxpayer. Note: the average rent for a house in Pickering is $2,650. Then, things got weird. Staff and security at the former motel called the police. Why? Good question. Two police SUVs soon arrived. The officers were very cordial. We explained our purpose for being there and they passed on to us that a representative from Durham Region was en route to answer our queries. In the meantime, we were welcome to stay on the property. And then things got weirder: after about an hour passed, one of the police officers informed us that the person we were waiting to interview from Durham Region had changed his mind. Apparently, he would not be leaving his office at Durham Region – a headquarters that features a $1 million revolving door, by the way. Bottom line: it would appear those bureaucrats gainfully employed at Durham Region are not only good at wasting taxpayer money but they also excel at wasting everyone’s time. That’s unfortunate. There are so many questions about this “reception centre”. But there remains a dearth of tangible answers – which is egregious given that the taxpayer is funding this program. Prior to our visit, we did reach out previously via email to Durham Region. Here were our queries: 1⃣ If this is a federal government initiative, why is Durham Region involved? 2⃣ What are the capital costs and operating costs pertaining to this facility? 3⃣ Homelessness and food bank usage have rapidly increased this past decade. How do we win the war on poverty if we keep importing the world’s impoverished? 4⃣ Is this facility exclusively for illegal aliens or can domestic homeless people access it? If not, why not? 5⃣ From which countries to the illegal aliens originate from? Alas, none of our questions were directly answered. Instead, we were provided with the following statement: “The Government of Canada provided funding, to the Region of Durham, to purchase a former hotel in Pickering. It will become the Durham Reception Centre. Located at 533 Kingston Road, in Pickering, the centre will provide temporary accommodation and supports for asylum claimants through the Durham Humanitarian Response Program (DHRP). Ukrainian nationals began staying here in 2022. By 2023, all asylum claimants were welcome at this site. And as of March 31, 2026, the program had assisted 1,957 people, with 1,244 putting down roots in this region. The location was purchased with funding from the federal Interim Housing Assistance Program (IHAP), which will also help to support some future operating costs. Securing a dedicated interim housing facility was a core requirement of the IHAP funding. It also aligns with several priorities outlined in the Durham Region 2025–2035 Strategic Plan. Although owned by the Region, the Community Development Council Durham (CDCD) will operate the site. The team will provide temporary accommodations and settlement services for up to 250 asylum claimants who will stay for no more than 90 days. An asylum claimant is someone who arrives here then asks for help to stay safe. There is no federal income support while their claim is being decided. Municipalities and community organizations step in to help. Asylum claimants are different from government‑assisted refugees. The Durham Reception Centre strengthens this work by providing a dedicated, federally funded facility where individuals and families can safely and efficiently transition into long‑term, independent housing and begin building their lives in Durham Region." Alas, no dollar figures were provided. And the wording seemed to imply that Ukrainian asylum seekers were being accommodated here, although on the day we visited, all the illegal aliens we encountered hailed from Africa and the Middle East. And we can only imagine the full price of this program if these people all get a house to live in after their motel stay expires. Again: must be nice. David Menzies

Rebel News

11,248 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚩Luxon’s elite richlist progressive B416 astroturf is nothing more than a huge big brother facisim program. Malindi McLean (who ironically runs a business on social media) admits to Bridges on Monday that they are going to use Biometric Digital ID - and then says “this is not a parenting issue it’s a Govt issue” For those who maintained this was never going to be about Digital ID, over the next few days I have some news for ya. We always knew that this was going to come down to Digital ID. No where in the world have these restrictions worked (only China & North Korea as they ban VPN’s) France for example has had to redesign their S.M restriction laws twice and now have announced they will roll out Biometric Digital ID - across the EU to make restrictions work. Users will be constantly scanned by the biometric app, that will then pair to a token that will be sent to the ‘verification provider’ and a token that is linked to your identity will allow you to browse that page . Mclean who sounds like she’s doing an impression of Lynn of Tawa admits the Govt will have to have access to this data, hey but don’t worry “no one is taking your data!” She says. This means evey website you browse at, every comment you write, every post you like will be recorded. People are stupid to think otherwise. I’m serious the amount of background and financial interest members of B416 is staggering. Anna Curzons for example ws hand picked by Ardern to lead a Digital framework body - all related to digital ID and tracking. All the banks also have a huge interest in this bill - I wonder why. Super woke KiwiBank CEO Steve Jerkovic is super excited by B416, he even said so on LinkedIn under Curzons latest post. It will make it so much easier to weed out those to debank for wrong politcal think eh Steve? Oh the police are manually tracking legal social media comments they don’t like - with this digital ID it’s going to free them up hugely. There’s a ton more to come on this, it’s mind blowing. They also have done a deal with Samsung for ‘safesurf’ phones - the group are banking (that’s a good word) on the govt banning access for any child to devices unless ya buy their phone. If they made parents buy every kid a replacement phone you are taking the vicinity of half a billion dollars. Holy Jean Brooker another nitwit from the B416 gang is currently touring schools hocking these phones set to retail approx $229. Who’s heavily invested in safesurfer? Oh only one Mr Stephen Tindall- the OG trans maniac himself. Good God there is even a sex therapist who is part of the b416 gang who advocates getting naked with your child and encouraging them to ask about porn. You think I’m joking. I’m not . Every trustee, and nearly every member of this sloppily disguised astroturf has a huge financial interest in digital ID, age verification software, SaaS and digital regulation. Also why did the Govt take down their ‘digital framework’ website on Feb 25th this year ? You know the one that explained how the govt was considering digital ID and CBDC ? I think this could be final nail in that dropkick Luxon’s political coffin. Smoke him out, make him get support for it from Labour and the greeens TPM and watch National bleed to death.

Holyhekatuiteka

49,451 次观看 • 1 年前

you saved up $3,000 to fly out some mid girl in economy while telling yourself you're a player i flew out 5 dubai models in emirates first class last month and it cost me exactly $0 not because i'm rich. because i understand math that you don't let me explain how to turn your business expenses into a harem marketing system that prints money: most dudes are out here sending $500 cashapps for "uber money" to girls who screenshot it and laugh in the group chat. flying them spirit airlines if they're lucky. splitting the fucking holiday inn. acting like they did something meanwhile i'm converting facebook ad spend into first class tickets here's what actually happened. i had $100k in ad spend coming up this quarter. was gonna pay it anyway, money straight to zuckerberg's pocket. instead i put it all on my amex platinum. boom, 150k points instantly plus another 150k from the signup bonus 300k amex points = 3 emirates first class tickets to dubai retail value of those tickets? $45,000 what i actually paid? nothing. zero. fuck all but i didn't fly out one girl. i flew out five when you fly one girl out, she owns you. she's doing you a favor. you're just another trick trying to impress her. but when you fly FIVE girls out? the entire dynamic flips. they're competing for your attention. they're creating content for you. they're selling you without even knowing it the psychology is fucking beautiful. these girls have never been in first class. probably never will be again. fourteen hour flight with champagne and caviar, their own private suite. they're taking 50 instagram stories before the plane even takes off and they're all tagging me girl #1 posted 52 stories from the flight alone. her 30k followers all sliding in asking who the fuck i am. girl #2 made a whole reel about the experience that hit 2.3 million views. the comments are just hundreds of dudes trying to figure out what i do by the time they landed in dubai i had 400+ dm requests here's where shit gets disgusting. they think this is a "brand trip" because i position it as a creator collaboration. technically they're right. they're creating content. i'm collaborating. the brand just happens to be me lmfao five models, seven days in dubai. they're posting from the villa, from the restaurants, from the yacht. every single post tags me. their combined reach? 4.8 million impressions. organic, authentic, impossible to buy those dudes sliding in their dms asking about me? they find my profile. see i teach funding and travel hacking. realize i'm giving away the exact system. they buy my program last dubai trip generated 42 clients at $5k each. that's $210,000 in revenue from a trip that cost me nothing. actually less than nothing because i was gonna spend that money on ads anyway you think this is about girls but you're missing the entire fucking point every expense in your business can be arbitraged. every dollar you spend can work twice. ad spend becomes points. points become experiences. experiences become content. content becomes clients. clients become more ad spend. infinite loop the girls aren't the product, they're the distribution channel and before you get all moral about it, everyone knows what this is. these aren't naive girls getting tricked. they're influencers who want content. i want marketing. we both get what we want. they fly first class to dubai, i get organic reach. capitalism at its finest the funniest shit is when they go back to dating regular dudes. guys taking them to cheesecake factory, splitting the bill, flying them southwest if they're lucky. they're comparing every experience to dubai first class i own real estate in their head forever and it didn't cost me a fucking dollar your favorite guru is doing this. every dude with a lambo is doing this. they just pretend they're above it while running the exact same game difference is i'm telling you exactly how it works q1 miami trip, 7 models, 300k points, resulted in 31 new clients q2 mykonos, 5 models, 250k points, 27 new clients q3 dubai, 5 models, 300k points, 42 new clients q4 planning maldives with 10 models, gonna break the fucking internet this isn't about flexing, it's about understanding leverage. you're trading time for money. i'm trading points for time for money for more points. every dollar does multiple jobs. every expense becomes an asset stop thinking linearly. your ad spend shouldn't just buy ads. your business expenses shouldn't just buy things. everything should compound i learned this from a 55 year old real estate developer who's been flying models to his properties since the 90s. he calls it "animated marketing material" and swears it's the only advertising that actually works he's worth $500m now so maybe the old fuck knows something anyway, keep saving up your pennies to impress one girl who doesn't even like you. keep flying coach. keep wondering why successful dudes seem to have infinite resources or realize that money isn't real, points are infinite, and everything is marketing if you're smart enough to see it the game is rigged but at least now you know the rules ps. if this triggered you, you're thinking too small. this isn't about women. it's about understanding that everything is leverage and nothing costs what you think it does. your competition doesn't know this. that's your advantage. fucking use it

hunter

598,014 次观看 • 8 个月前

Israel Flipped Out And Killed 45 Palestinians After Running Over Their Own Bomb In today’s news, Israel’s stupid fucking genocidal rapists ran over an unexploded ordnance from their own evil carpet bombing campaign, blamed Hamas for the explosion, started bombing the fuck out of Gaza again, killed scores of civilians, said they were once again cutting off aid to the enclave, and then quietly backed down on urging from Washington. Rather than report that Israel violated the ceasefire agreement as blatantly as any agreement could possibly be violated, the western press have been referring to this as a “test” of the ceasefire. Killing Palestinians is so normalized and accepted as a baseline expectation in the western press that CNN called it the “first major test” of the ceasefire after Israel killed people in Gaza every single day since the ceasefire agreement was signed. I hope the “WHY AREN’T YOU CELEBRATING?” crowd have gotten their answer by now. We weren’t celebrating because we know more than you. We’ve actually been paying attention, so we know Israel is going to seek out every excuse to kill Palestinians and torch this fake “ceasefire”. The Israeli government keep issuing statements making it explicitly clear that Israel will not consider the “war” over until Hamas is fully disarmed and Gaza is fully demilitarized, terms that the Palestinian resistance has explicitly refused. These mutually contradictory positions place Gaza on a collision course toward full-scale reignition of the genocide. ❖ Whenever I talk about the IDF massacring civilians for inadvertently traveling into zones Israel has banned them from in Gaza I’ve been getting Israel apologists bleating “but they crossed the Yellow Line!” at me, which I guess is the new hasbara narrative. Imagine thinking this is a good argument. Imagine thinking it’s perfectly reasonable to blow up a car full of children if they cross a made-up invisible line. Think about how dehumanized Palestinians would have to be in your mind to believe this is a sane and reasonable position to have. To feel that deadly force via heavy war machinery is a perfectly fine way of administering crowd control. Imagine if that was happening in your country. If police just blew up your vehicle if you accidentally turned onto a one-way street or made an unauthorized U-turn. If they could send a drone to go pick you off if you were walking down a street they didn’t think you should be on. You’d never stand for it. You’d demand they find other ways to direct traffic besides deadly force. “How about some signs?” you would say. “How about using verbal warnings and loudspeakers? How about road blocks? How about just not fucking murdering a vehicle full of kids for moving in an unauthorized way?” But because it’s Palestinians, it never occurs to them that this should be the expectation. Palestinians deserve to be executed for the slightest transgression against the most arbitrary restriction. Israel does this all the time, and its defenders are fine with it. During the aid distribution at GHF sites Israeli soldiers have told the Israeli press that they were ordered to fire upon anyone who moved in an unauthorized way, killing starving civilians every single day for seeking food. During the last “ceasefire” at the beginning of the year civilians would routinely get murdered for taking a donkey cart down the wrong road or whatever. That’s the sort of thing people support of they stand by Israel. Supporting Israel is an innately racist and murderous position, because you support murdering Palestinian civilians for reasons you would never accept your own people being killed for. ❖ Israeli right wingers have been filmed literally pushing their babies in front of aid trucks in order to block food from getting to starving civilians. I mean, fuck. Israelis are something else. ❖ Israel cannot stop murdering and abusing and sowing chaos and destruction for even one fucking day and the western empire cannot stop supporting it for even an instant, but if you say anything about this people start making up weird stories about you hating the religion of Judaism. ❖ The Trump administration has ordered the repatriation to Colombia and Ecuador of the survivors of its attack on a boat in the Caribbean Sea, which punches some major plot holes in its claim that it has been blowing up these boats because they are full of Venezuelan “narco-terrorists”. The US isn’t generally in the habit of sending terrorists home, so it’s clear they targeted innocent people and had no case against them. Anyone buying into the war propaganda about Venezuela is a fucking moron. The lies are dumb even by usual US warmongering standards, and US regime change interventionism is consistently disastrous. People who say they want Trump to remove Maduro are admitting they never grew up. Reading by Tim Foley.

Caitlin Johnstone

176,235 次观看 • 9 个月前

Two air forces started the Pacific war. One trained its pilots, then kept them fighting until they died. The other trained its pilots, then often pulled many of its experienced combat pilots out to teach everyone else. This is one of the reasons America won the Pacific air war, let's dive in.. Japan's Elite Aviators At the start of the war, Japan had some of the finest fighter pilots in the world. The aviators who attacked Pearl Harbor were elite. Many had hundreds of hours in the cockpit and real combat experience from the fighting in China. Flying the nimble A6M Zero, they cut through Allied opposition in the early months of the war and earned a fearsome reputation. But Japan made a fateful choice about these men. It kept them in combat, more or less indefinitely. Japanese pilots flew mission after mission with no real system to rotate them home. They fought until they were shot down, crippled, or killed. It seemed ruthless and efficient. In reality, it was a slow-motion disaster. The Difference in Philosophy Because every time Japan lost one of those veterans, everything he knew died with him. America did the opposite. It regularly rotated many of its experienced combat pilots back home once they had done their share of fighting. There, they became instructors, pouring everything they had learned in real air combat directly into the next generation of pilots. So the two systems pulled in opposite directions. Japan's pool of skill drained away with every ace it buried. America's pool of skill grew, as each returning veteran multiplied his knowledge across hundreds of students. One nation was teaching. The other was simply dying. The Training Gap The gap became a chasm, and it was made worse by sheer scale. By 1944, the United States was training around 8,000 new aviators every month, each of them getting well over a year of instruction and hundreds of hours in the air before they ever saw combat. Japan could not come close. As its veterans vanished, its training program collapsed, and it was crippled by something else, too. Fuel. Japan was running so short of it that many trainees could barely fly enough hours to learn their trade. By the later part of the war, Japanese pilots were being rushed into battle with barely 100 hours of flying time, and sometimes far less. They were teenagers with almost no training, being sent up against American veterans who had been taught by the best combat pilots in the fleet. The outcome was no longer a contest. It was a slaughter. The Great Marianas Turkey Shoot Nowhere was that clearer than in the skies over the Mariana Islands in June 1944. When the Japanese launched hundreds of aircraft against the American fleet, they flew into a wall of Hellcat fighters, guided by radar and expert fighter direction that positioned the Americans at the perfect height and moment to strike. The green Japanese pilots in their now outdated Zeros never had a chance. In and around that battle, Japan lost nearly 480 aircraft, while the Americans lost only a few dozen. It was so one-sided that the American aviators nicknamed it the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot. Japan's naval air power, once the terror of the Pacific, was broken in a matter of days. Better Aircraft, Better Technology It was not only the pilots. It was the machines too. America kept producing better and better aircraft, like the tough, heavily armed F6F Hellcat, designed after studying a captured Zero and built to beat it. It could take punishment, out-dive and out-gun its opponent, and it was forgiving enough that even a less experienced pilot could survive his first fights and become a veteran. Over the war, Hellcat pilots claimed more than 5,000 enemy aircraft for a tiny fraction of that in losses. Japan, meanwhile, kept sending men up in the aging Zero, a plane that had been revolutionary in 1941 but was now underpowered, fragile, and outclassed. It was fast and agile, but a single burst of American fire could tear it apart, because it had traded armor and protection for maneuverability. Better pilots, in better planes, backed by better technology. The advantages stacked on top of one another. The Spiral Ends By the end, Japan had reached the final, desperate stage of the spiral. With almost no trained pilots left, and no way to make more in time, it turned to the kamikaze. A pilot did not need 500 hours of training to crash his aircraft into a ship. He only needed to take off, aim, and die. It was the last resort of an air force that had run out of the one thing it could never mass produce. Experienced men. America won the Pacific air war for many reasons. Its factories out-built the enemy. Its radar and intelligence gave it eyes the Japanese lacked. Its aircraft grew deadlier every year. But underneath all of it was something simpler. America treated its best pilots as a resource to be protected and passed on. Japan treated them as fuel to be burned. One of those choices built an air force that kept getting stronger. The other burned brightly, and then burned out. This was why America won the Pacific air war. I post a story like this every single day. Most people never see them. Follow so you don't miss the next one.

Untold War Stories

155,561 次观看 • 1 个月前

250717 #ATEEZ #Hongjoong talks about Mingi’s health, renewed contract and why ATEEZ stayed, TOKTOQ pop (voice) live (rough translation): Anyway, those were some behind-the-scenes stories. I hope that since each member’s solo performance has its own unique color, you’ll also look forward to mine and find something exciting in it. I’ll keep working hard so there’s always something for you to anticipate. Honestly, for these solo stages to be meaningful, they need to be just as captivating and focused as our group songs. That’s why I keep pushing myself to stay on edge and come up with new intro ideas and experiments - it’s part of my mindset. So, that’s what I’m doing. 💬 My captain is in Tennessee. 🐿️ Yes~ 💬 Will you try Jersey (? t/n I’m not sure) next? 🐿️ (laughs) The weather’s been so nice lately. Really nice. I think we’re in more of a city area of Tennessee. 💬 Cowboy Captain 🐿️ (laughs) 💬 Europe soon? 🐿️ Ah, about the Insta post - I originally meant to upload it with music added, but it ended up just getting posted as-is. I really liked that photo, so I had it saved in drafts and re-uploaded it. But once I deleted the post, the draft disappeared too, so I was like, “Ah…” and just uploaded another one instead. Still, when I think of Nashville, there’s a certain song and artist that come to mind, so I wanted to use their music. I was already excited before getting on the plane, and when I saw the Nashville sign I thought, “Oh!” and took a picture. (laughs) I haven’t eaten yet. As for our condition, overall the members are okay, but Mingi has a bit of conjunctivitis right now. He’s the type who often gets allergic reactions or eye-related symptoms, so during yesterday’s performance he kept wearing sunglasses. Honestly, we all probably have little aches and areas that aren’t in great shape, but since Mingi’s is more visible, it’s more noticeable. Also, now that we’ve all renewed our contracts together and shared it with all of you, I feel like we’ve become even more affectionate toward one another. We’ve always talked about doing this for a long time, so it wasn’t a huge issue for us, but now that it’s been officially announced, I think it feels a bit different, somehow. It definitely feels like something special. To be honest, for the past few years - maybe from just under two years ago - every time we had a comeback, we were always asked about contract renewals. And internally, we would think, “Why doesn’t this question feel like such a big deal to us?” Of course, if we don’t say anything, people won’t know what we’re thinking. But we found ourselves wondering why that question never really hit us hard. We can’t share all the details, but when it came to the contract period, from the very beginning the members were in agreement: if we’re going to do this, let’s do it long-term so we can feel secure and stable. That was something we all agreed on early on. We had a lot of conversations at the start because this isn’t something you take lightly. That’s part of why we took our time before telling you. But choosing to go long-term - honestly, all of us felt that was the right decision for ATEEZ and ATINY. Of course, if we had made the announcement earlier, maybe it would have been more comfortable for both us and the fans. But now that it’s timed with everything else we’re doing, and now that we’ve been able to share it with you all in this moment, I actually think it turned out better this way. It wasn’t something we took lightly or prepared casually. We seriously talked about it for a long time among ourselves. And now, talking with all of you like this, I feel even more confident that this decision - choosing to stay on our path as ATEEZ - is the right one. I’m really happy about it. And honestly, since we’ve already built our foundation, starting over somewhere else was never really a viable option for us.

Irene | AhgaTiny🍋

29,761 次观看 • 1 年前

Stargate trivia: "200" (The BIG breakdown) SG-1 was about to attain the loftiest of broadcast heights – its 200th episode – and we wanted to do something special. Something unique. Something everyone on the production would enjoy as much as the longtime fans watching at home. The initial idea pitched was something called “Remember When…”, a trip down memory lane in which our characters’ reflections would form the frames of the varied flashbacks to outrageous missions. While everyone loved the idea of the outrageous missions, the premise of the episode felt too diffuse. We wanted an actual story that would form the heart of the episode. After much discussion, we elected to pay tribute to the franchise by referencing our last milestone – episode 100 – and bringing back Martin Lloyd and the show within a show, Wormhole X-Treme. But the fun we poked at the franchise through that spoof production was nothing compared to what we had in store for 200… WE FINALLY GOT TO MEET THE FURLINGS! Sort of. Even though it never really happened and we end up getting them killed in the end. Back in the show’s fourth season, not long after joining the production, I was summoned to Exec. Producer Robert Cooper’s office. He was doing his pass on our first script, Scorched Earth, and needed something from me: the name of an alien race. When pressed, he admitted naming alien races was not his forte and, as evidence, offered up “the Furlings”. I have to admit that whenever I heard the name, I always imagined a cosmic version of the Care Bears, giggling and snuggling their way through various adventures. As evidently, did everyone else on the production. The fans, however, were all sorts of curious and nary a week would go by without a fan posting a message board request for a glimpse of the elusive beings. Time wore on and those requests continued so, at one point, Brad suggested an episode in which we actually did get to meet them: a race of gaunt, towering, hairless, grey-skinned creatures. But that idea was quashed and the production went on its merry way, choosing to keep the race a mystery. But with 200 came the opportunity to honor those fan requests, and the viewers at home finally got to see those lovable furry creatures who turned out to be a cross between an ewok and a deranged koala. And then SG-1 went and got their planet blown up. Of course, we quickly reveal that the incident never actually happened and it was part of a pitch for a revival of the defunct Wormhole X-Treme t.v. series, a show that lasted an inglorious three episodes before being cancelled. But thanks to an impressive second life on dvd (following in the footsteps of Family Guy and Futurama) the show is being revived – and General O’Neill, in a desire to maintain a cover of plausible deniability for the Stargate program (and, let’s face it, screw with his old teammates) charges SG-1 with the task of creatively contributing to the production. MITCHELL TAKES ON THE LIVING DEAD! Every once in a while, actor Ben Browder would drop by the offices to pitch out an action sequence for his character – so I thought it appropriate that, given the opportunity, his character would pitch out an action sequence for – uh – his character. And, really, nothing says action like zombie hordes. Just ask fans of The Walking Dead. This sequence also allowed us the rare opportunity of witnessing Walter/Norman getting his head eaten. Double bonus! Mitchell’s idea is shot down and Martin gets on the phone with a representative of the studio. He is clearly frustrated and Mitchell asks: “Studio executives, huh?” Martin responds: “What? Oh, no Charlie? He’s a great guy. He’s the only one I trust.” This was a reference to longtime MGM President of Television and Stargate supporter Charles Cohen, one of the smartest, kindest studios executives I’ve ever had the pleasure to work with. As much as he was a fan of the show, we at the production were fans of Charlie. Martin is outraged because they lost their lead. How, he wonders, can they do the show without their lead. “You just bring in a character to replace him,”suggests Mitchell – an obvious reference to the introduction of Cam Mitchell which followed soon after the departure of longtime SG-1 lead Jack O’Neill. Carter then throws out some alternate ideas for keeping the lead alive: “Well, you could have the other characters refer to him all the time. Maybe, get him on the phone once in a while.” Yep. Been there; done that during SG-1’s seventh and eighth seasons. And then, someone references that time O’Neill was invisible… THE ADVENTURES OF INVISIBLE O'NEILL! The idea of doing an Invisible O’Neill segment was actually a joke I threw out...That ended up making the script. That happened a lot in this episode. As with all the segments, we went off and wrote them individually, and then everyone weighed in and they were tweaked. I always found the scene of O’Neill spying on Carter in the shower a tad creepy. Anyway, the Invisible O’Neill idea was embraced because we wanted Richard Dean Anderson to come back and do a cameo on this all-important episode, but didn’t know if he’d be able to work in an appearance. So, we figured we’d get the next best thing: his voice. As it turned out, he was able to swing the appearance, making 200 all that more special. THE GETAWAY Martin then pitches out a tale of high adventure, placing our heroes (SG-1) in an impossible position – and then simply cutting to them escaping through the gate. This was a tip of the hat to the many fans outraged by a similar scenario in a past episode (don’t remember the name) in which our heroes (SG-1) are surrounded by Lucian Alliance soldiers only to effect some miraculous unseen escape. During the ensuing argument over the merits of the pitch, Martin attempts to come up with a reasonable window of time for the team to reach the gate and dial. Ten seconds is too short and thirty seconds is too round a number. He decides on 38! Which, coincidentally, is the same number (of minutes) a stargate can stay open. Timing is, of course, everything, and nothing says action like a ticking clock. Which prompts the following gem from Martin: “Trust me, jeopardy plus ticking clock is box office. It’s the E equals M C squared of the entertainment world. Ask any executive.” Indeed. If there were two notes we received more than any other during Stargate’s long run, they were: “More jeopardy!” and “We need a ticking clock!”. Having a character race a timer to defuse a bomb? Didn’t get much better than that. THEY'RE OFF TO SEE THE WIZARD! Next to The Simpsons, The Wizard of Oz was probably the most referenced piece of pop culture over SG-1’s decade-long run. The fans certainly took notice and resulted in one particularly memorable piece of artwork being sent to studio depicting the original team as the cinematic classic’s adventurous foursome. So, I suppose, it made perfect sense to reference the constant references by including a little Wizard of Oz sequence in the episode as well. Mitchell’s line: “Now, how can something work perfectly fine for ten years, then all of a sudden, it doesn’t work anymore?” was an in-story reference to the gate suddenly stopping operations – and, in hindsight, could have been interpreted as a comment on the the show’s cancellation. DESTROYING STARGATE COMMAND This also episode gave us the opportunity to do something we’ve always wanted to do: blow up Stargate Command. It’s part of the story Martin Lloyd pitches the team. Mitchell, however, points out a potential problem. They’re alive in the next scene. How is that possible. To which Martin replies: ” I’m thinking I can back-sell it and say you were beamed out at the last second.” Teal’c’s rejoinder neatly sums up the feelings of many on the production: “Is that not too convenient?”. Yep, nobody hated the Earth ship beaming technology more than I did – with possible exception of actor Ben Browder. In the original version of this scene, the fun we poked at ourselves was a little more pointed: DANIEL: Beamed out. MARTIN: By the Prometheus. TEAL'C: Convenient. MARTIN: True. But c'mon, you got Asgard technology, why not use it? As long as it doesn't become a crutch. DANIEL: Small problem. The Prometheus was destroyed. MARTIN: Really? By who? MITCHELL: Kind of a long story. MARTIN: In battle? MITCHELL: Yes. MARTIN: Wow. So how'd you get out of that one? Beat. DANIEL: We, uh... we were beamed out. Soon after, Martin fields yet another call, this one from the network. "So, trouble with Nora"assumes Mitchell, to which Martin replies: "No, Nora—she's great." A shout-out to the late Nora O'Brien who was our network point-person for many years before she moved on to another position with NBC. A sharp executive and just a lovely woman. SG-1 DOES STAR TREK We all grew up with the original Star Trek (except Rob Cooper who preferred The Six Million Dollar Man) so we (and by we I mean Brad) couldn’t resist the opportunity to do an SG-1 version of the television’s most famous SF series. Paul McGillion was originally supposed to do the one-line cameo of the ship’s beleaguered Scottish engineer, but when that fell through, series co-creator and Executive Producer (not to mention former stage actor) Brad Wright stepped into those shiny black boots. THE YOUNGER, EDGIER TEAM Look closely and you can catch the late Cory Monteith as one of the young and edgy team-members. “Young” and “edgy” were buzzwords we kept on hearing a lot of (and continue to hear a lot of in the business), so Rob Cooper served up his version of what a younger, edgier Stargate would look like complete with stylized shots and dreamy cast members. Vala continues to pitch out ideas, offering up an SF version of Gilligan’s Island (“We were in a cloaked cargo ship on a simple, three-hour reconnaissance mission…”) that was one of the scenes we lost for time at the script stage… VALA (VO): We were in a cloaked cargo ship, on a simple three hour reconnaissance mission... TILT DOWN to reveal a planet. VALA (V)): But on the way we encountered a severe electromagnetic storm and lost all power. We were forced down on an uncharted, deserted planet... EXT. TROPICAL ISLAND -- DAY We see the cargo ship washed ashore on this deserted island, looking very much like the damaged S.S. Minnow. VALA (VO): We washed ashore and were forced to survive for weeks in the most primitive of conditions. No phone, no lights, no motor cars. Not a single luxury. EXT. ISLAND -- DAY Landry comes out of a hut, dressed like the Skipper. VALA (V): General Landry was with us on the mission, and let me tell you, he was in a foul mood. LANDRY: Mitchell! Mitchell runs out, dressed like Gilligan. MITCHELL: Yes, sir. LANDRY: Where's Carter? She was supposed to be done by now. MITCHELL: Oh, uh...(looks around) She's not here. Landry whacks him with his cap. LANDRY: I can see that. DANIEL: Over here... PAN TO Daniel (as the Professor) and Carter (as Mary Ann) carrying a large device out of another hut. Vala (as Ginger) trails behind them. The device looks like something constructed from bamboo and coconuts. CARTER (to Landry): I think we may have something, sir. VALA:Not a moment too soon. I must get out of this place. I have a photo shoot this afternoon. Landry stares at the device. LANDRY: What is this thing? CARTER:Well, I managed to construct a basic subspace transmitter out of coconuts, bamboo and our old subspace transmitter. DANIEL: A long shot, but it just might get us off this island. MITCHELL: That's great! Mitchell eagerly moves in for a closer look, but trips, falls and smashes the damn thing.Before Landry can whack him with his cap again -- TEAL'C emerges from the trees, dressed like Mr. Howell. He casually puffs a pipe. TEAL'C: Was I not traveling with a companion? A female by the name of... Lovey? MARTIN: Alright, enough already. FARGATE I had really enjoyed Farscape and, with both Ben Browder and Claudia Black on the show, I couldn’t resist the opportunity to do a little tribute, SG-1 style. Originally, Ben was supposed to play the part of Crichton and Michael the part of Stark, but they suggested it might be more fun to switch up the roles. SG-1 SUPERMARIONATION! Brad Wright, Robert Cooper, Paul Mullie and Carl Binder are huge fans of Team America: World Police, so I suppose it should come as no surprise that they jumped at the chance to do their own, SG-1 version. As it turned out, years ago Paul and I had worked with The Chiodo Bros. who had created the puppets and effects for Team America (as well as work on a Davey and Goliath claymation parody for The Simpsons and the Willice and Crimbles parody segment on The Simpsons). We called them up and they ended up delivering kick-ass puppet versions of our team – and supporting players. So, okay. Fess up. Which one of you fans is now the proud owner of one of these? In the writer’s draft of the script, yet another idea is pitched out… MITCHELL: Death is always dramatic. CUT TO: INT. INFIRMARY -- DAY Daniel lies on the bed. Carter, Mitchell, Vala and Landry stand around him. Vala reaches out and touches his hand - VALA: Goodbye, Daniel. The heart monitor FLATLINES. The rest of the group can barely control their emotions. Suddenly, a bright GLOW starts to emanate from under the sheets on the bed. Slowly, Daniel's body TRANSFORMS into a glowing ribbon being like in Meridian. As it rises above the bed, the sheets collapse. Amazement plays on the faces of everyone in the room. The glowing being hovers high above them for a moment then - MARTIN: No, no, no. BACK TO: INT. BRIEFING ROOM -- DAY Martin shakes his head. MARTIN: We did that twice in the series. DANIEL: You only made three episodes. How many times did we kill off Daniel again? Whenever we offed guest stars, we would invariably send them off with the heartening: “This is science fiction. Nobody ever dies in science fiction!” And, many times on Stargate, that was proven true. Then, someone pitches out the fishing segment. Martin’s response: “And what’s the twist…no fish?” is, of course, a reference to the twist at the end of Moebius I and II. THE WEDDING How couldn’t we? There was something there for the shippers – and something there for the slashers as well when O’Neill, waiting for Carter, turns to Daniel who utters the memorable: “You know, if she doesn’t show, people are gonna think that you and I –“. My favorite part of this segment is Jack referring to Carter as, well, Carter. Not Sam or Samantha but Carter. I guess old habits die hard. Martin’s response to the pitch ” Yeah, right, if I want to torture the audience on purpose!” echoes a quote from a fan letter we received that was critical of the ship. A classic line. The episode ends with a bunch of interviews teeming with inside jokes. I mean, I know we did 10 years but, dammit, we were still on a roll!

Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️

26,828 次观看 • 11 个月前

For those that are having a hard time understanding what is in Iran & what we indirectly funded... Check out this video. Remember Iran is the deep state, cabal's proxy. The central bankers = the City of London's control could only go so far as there had to be a plan B. They also knew President Donald Trump was going to eventually dismantle their financial arm & build up our Military stronger. They knew there would come a day when those Military Generals that they couldn't buy (the White Hat Alliance) said no more & their own militarily/weapons plan would be needed for their final attack on us. With the US being the Military Arm how would they accomplish this... Hence their proxy, Iran which is why no other President in history ever took it down & those that tried were eliminated. Enter Obama their puppet & many others that helped to get the American people to turn against their own country with Soros, NGOs, the fake programs for the needy, USAID, & fake wars. All money laundering schemes to systematically siphon our resources & tax money to help fund the demise of America, (the leader of the Free World👈) all while weakening our only defense, our Military & the People! The only things that stood in their way of full world dominance, where Freedom of the People was a distant memory; was We the People (under every blade of grass) and our Military. This explains why they infiltrated from within with every facet of our lives including our government, our military, big tech, education indoctrination, the food industry, big pharma, our weapons makers, outsourcing all our resources slowly stripping our independence away, trafficking our children, getting our youth addicted to drugs & porn, all while they'd eventually have every person under Mass Psychosis & on their side through psychological warfare; which became their crown jewel or so they thought!💥 Enter President Donald J.Trump who had been groomed for this position for a very long time, was in possession of the Tesla files & was personally asked to run for President by those WH Generals, all while Trump continued playing the life of a playboy & infiltrating their circles to teach himself more about what the enemy was & what he'd be up against. Read the book "The Sun Tzu The Art of War to understand this better. A book photographed on President Trump's desk. Didn't you ever wonder why he was so strong on his opinions on Iran dating way back to the 1980's? He was gaining the full understanding of the plan & how best to help dismantle the Cabal & every weapon they used to destroy our country & the free world as we know it! This does not take into consideration what Gene Decode specializes in & talks about, which is clearing out those Deep Underground Military Bases (DUMBs) not only for what this video shows you, but also for the crimes against humanity, that they have been committing underground with the torture, trafficking & rape of women & children & infants as well as bio labs, harvesting organs & many other sick crimes against humanity. This is why before President Trump left in 2021 he wrote those EOs pertaining to crimes against humanity & seizing assets. Think about that, if him leaving for a short time to help the people wake up was not part of the plan, why didn't Biden (captured) dismantle those EOs, that were detrimental to bringing down the DS Cabal & their puppets legally & by the book! Meanwhile as the DS grew in their knowledge that they were inevitably going to be fighting for their existence, they were busy funding & building what you are going to see in this video all with our money! After watching this you'll understand more why the B2 Spirit was sent in by our CIC, when many thought it antiquated, not knowing the depth of these DUMBs I hope with all this being said it'll help those that watch the video & read this post understand why this Military Operation in Iran is vital to the success of this overall mission to Free Humanity!

Capt Kyle

38,036 次观看 • 2 个月前

"Tell us this isn't true." "They had a live being out [near Area 51]." "There were human experiments that went on." 👽🛸 Roswell: A Non-Human Craft or a Darker Secret? 🤫😶 (Transcript is shorter than clip. I don't have room to type more in this post so I'll just wait for replies.) ~ Lex Fridman: "In your book on 'Area 51,' you propose an explanation that I think some people have criticized, at the very end. That this might have been a disinformation campaign from, I guess, Stalin, that the Roswell incident was a remotely-piloted plane with a quote 'grotesque, child-sized aviator.' Just looking back at all that now, years later, what's the probability that it's true? What's the probability it's not?" Annie Jacobsen: (AJ): "So, you know, I've never revealed who that source is." Lex: "Yes." AJ: "You know that? Want me to tell you?" Lex: "Okay, who was the source?" AJ: "So, before I say anything on that, let me speak to the question that you asked, right? So, you asked me, 'What's the probability that that is still standing as an idea, 12, 13, 14 years later,' right? So, I continued to work with that source for years, afterwards. We talked about this. Look, I mean, his whole family knew it was him. And I knew his family because I was an integral part of, you know, I was at his house, met all his kids, grandkids." Lex: "And we should say, the source is the main expert advisor behind the story that it was. Maybe you can explain what the story is that your report in the book, that it was a disinformation campaign created by Stalin to cause mass hysteria in the United States. The very kind that we've been speaking about with the CIA and so on." AJ: "Yes! Predicated on the narrative of the 'War of the Worlds,' right? And the 'War of the Worlds,' when it was a radio program in the United States, made people go crazy. 'Oh, my God, we're being invaded by aliens!' Well, the government was always interested in the story and Joseph Stalin was, too. We know that from declassified documents, right? "And so, the source told me that the reason for this program, and that the real Roswell crash remains, were in fact, it was a black-propaganda hoax infiltrated, you know, or rather, predicated at this idea that you were gonna overwhelm America's early-warning, air-defense system, cause mayhem and maybe be able to attack the United States. That was the plan. And Stalin was also messing with the United States, messing with Truman, who sort of, you know, turned his back on him, right? At Potsdam. "And so, this idea, and the reason that the source is important... And unlike, you know, a lot of people, 'I saw this, I saw that, I learned that.' Was, according to the source, once it was determined that this was a hoax and that Stalin was able to get a craft over the United States, and it crashed. And it had, you know, people inside of it, they were people that were sort of deformed and meant...surgically altered to look like aliens. "The United States government decided that it needed to know what on earth that was all about, and if it was possible for us to have the same program. This, according to this source, right? And so, it sounds preposterous, and if it was just someone saying, 'I...,' you might say, 'Well, it's ridiculous, get them onto another subject.' But, the difference was, is this source, who was very well placed, and friends with all of the other 75 people, you know, told me this as a confession, right? A real, tearful confession, because what he said is he was involved in the American program to do the same thing. And people died, because there were human experiments that went on." "And I write about this in the last 12 pages of 'Area 51.' It was an explosive, you know, revelation, and I felt very confident in writing this because the source wanted it written. Why? Because he said, 'I'm dedicated to my country. I know about being committed to national security, and this kind of thing must never happen. And if you give people too much power, they will take advantage of it.' And he wanted it on the record. "And his wife of 60 years did not know until after the book published. Nor did His children, okay? So, after the book published, I was called to his house and sat there with his family. And they said, 'Tell us this isn't true.' And he said, 'It is true,' right? (We need a tape of this confession or...for his family to confirm they heard this from him.) AJ: "Now that source is Al O'Donnell, who is the nuclear-weapons engineer who armed, wired and fired 186 nuclear weapons, okay? So if you wanna talk about someone..." Lex: "Woooooow." AJ: "You're the first person I've told that on the record, but it's kind of about time." Lex: "Woooooow. Well, you received a lot of criticism over this story, and it confused me why, because it's...given the context of everything you've described with the CIA and other intelligence agencies, it is reasonable that such action would be taken. AJ: "And, the source is extraordinarily credible, right? If you wanted to take the position, 'Well, that person isn't very reliable,' then you have to ask yourself, 'Why did they have Top-Secret clearances that are higher than any in the United States whatsoever?' Because he was responsible for arming nuclear bombs. He was called the trigger man. "And by the way, he told me that I could tell the world who he was. There's a lot of details that are really dark, involving that program. And when is it appropriate, right? Well, it feels appropriate now. First of all, because you and I have been talking for several hours. So this is what is truly a long-form conversation and it's the outcome of, you know, a very long time of my reporting, and also being judicious about what, you know, closing the loop on that, right? Because I do think it's important for people to know that sources have revelations." Lex: "And, like you said, the programs, both on the Soviet side, and the American side, conflicting, I think's the term we used previously? Ethically, morally, on all fronts. People have done some horrible things in the name of security. In your book, 'Surprise, Kill Vanish,' you write about the CIA." ~~~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "So, today, I want to focus on a really important story that you once told me, that has never been told all the way [from the] beginning, to all the way to the end. And I just think it's just so cool we get to do this today. So, the question I want to ask is: After you got hooked on the UFO thing, with Bob Lazar, and you as a journalist said, 'I'm gonna start getting sources.' Like, 12 people coming at you, people shut down by the government. You can tell that. But you finally, finally got to a credible individual who had direct, firsthand knowledge about UFOs, exploitation, reverse engineering, and beings. And, oh my God, I want the world to hear this story. Tell us the story." George Knapp: "I've shared some of it in very broad strokes over the years- little bits and pieces of it - without ever actually referencing, in my statements, the guy the source. But this will be the first time I've told it in totality. "And it takes me back to when I first started in this. It's 1989 KLAS-TV, we put together, we spent eight months working on this project called 'UFOs: The Best Evidence.' Nine-part series. It airs on television, it's the biggest thing that's ever been produced for local TV, to this date, and still. "And, along the way, as I'm trying to find...telling the story about Bob Lazar, and his allegations about what was out there at S-4, near Area 51 - recovered discs, alien technology being reverse engineered - I'm looking for people who would support that. And I found about two dozen people, witnesses who had worked out there, who had seen bits and pieces, who could corroborate parts of what Bob had said about these kinds of craft being out there in the Nevada desert. But there wasn't anybody big picture who knew as much as Lazar claimed to have known, so I was still looking for them. "In 1990, I started working on a follow-up series to Best Evidence, looking for new witnesses. And I got a hint from an elected official that I had known, I'd covered him in Nevada politics. He says, 'You know, you should talk to my dad one of these days.' 'Your dad?' 'Yeah.' And he told me what the dad's name was and what he had done, what job he had had. And I said, 'Ah.' So I started stalking the guy. I just started showing up at events where I knew he would be. One of those events was a reunion for employees of EG&G." Corbell (JC): "So I'm assuming that this source was working within EG&G in some capacity, which is, by the way, who Bob [Lazar] said, hired him to go out to Site-4, S-4 at Area 51. So you're like, 'Okay, I can now find out if this is bullshit, or if there's an element of truth to it.' Do I have that right?" Knapp (GK): "Pretty much correct, yeah. So, I'm looking for someone whose credentials are impeccable. Unlike Bob, whose credentials were questioned, and people still attack him on where he went to school and where he worked, and was he at Los Alamos? This guy is documentable. There's a paper trail of where he worked, what he did. There's no question that he was in a position to know. He was the first general manager of EG&G in Nevada. His name was Al O'Donnell, and he has a prominent family. "When I heard that EG&G was having a reunion, I went there. We took a camera [and I figured], 'This is a great chance to get him on camera before I start asking him the questions I really want to ask.'" JC: "And when you say he is a general manager, like, does that give him certain roles and responsibilities that would give him insight? Like, he's not a secretary, so what does that mean?" GK: "He's the boss. He was the boss of the Nevada office. And I'll tell you a little bit about EG&G. So, it was a company that was created in Boston, right around the end of World War Two. Al O'Donnell had been in the Navy, serving during the war. He got out of the Navy while the war was still underway and went to work for a company called Raytheon, which became this massive, gigantic defense contractor that's still around today, still in Nevada in fact." JC: Yeah, they've got a big connection to the UFO topic, right? But, when you say Boston, like, where in Boston was it created?" GK: "Well, MIT is where the company was born. Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier were the three guys, the EG&G in that. They were at MIT. Scientists, engineers, they created this company there. And Al O'Donnell, who had been working for Raytheon, working on the Manhattan Project. He didn't know he was working on the Manhattan Project, but they were building these devices, complex triggers, that allowed them to detonate nuclear weapons. He learned later what he was doing was part of the Manhattan Project. "He goes to MIT, starts working with EG&G. Their company in those days had, I think, 15 employees, Al said. So it was a very small startup. But it suddenly exploded because the American atomic program exploded in those years. In 1950, Harry Truman decides that we need a permanent, nuclear testing site somewhere in the continental U.S., so they looked at a bunch of places, and they settled on Nevada. "Prior to that, Al O'Donnell had been sent out to the Pacific. They had five of these massive, atomic bomb tests out in the Pacific, and they decided to move it into a continental U.S. location and Nevada's Test Site - it was called the Nevada Test Site in those days - was chosen. Al O'Donnell leads the exodus from Boston, out to Nevada. They start hiring engineers and scientists, physicists and other security, spies." JC: "What are they working on at this time when they make that move?" GK: "Atomic bombs. They're building, testing atomic bombs. EG&G was a really precise organization that was created in order to detonate, measure and photograph atomic weapons. If you look in the history of photography, you'll see some of these amazing photos that they took of, you know, water drops dropping in water and...they're pretty famous shots because of these cameras that they developed. And it was perfect for use and testing atomic weapons and documenting what the process was. "So, EG&G comes out to Las Vegas, they are the managers of the Nevada Test Site. They, subsequently, years later, become the managers of Area 51 when it opens in 1955. So Al O'Donnell is the top guy. He oversees the nuclear testing program out there, manages it for EG&G, works with the Atomic Energy Commission. He has a Top-Secret security clearance and he can go anywhere and see anything. There's, basically, no restrictions, nothing that is outside of his ability to find out and see." JC: "So, this is an impeccable resume. This is somebody who was in position to know, and would know if someone like Bob Lazar was telling the truth or not telling the truth. I find it, personally, humorous that EG&G was, its genesis, its seed, came from MIT, right?" GK: "So, late 1990 or early 1991, I'd have to look up the dates. But somewhere in there is this event, this EG&G reunion. I go there, we got a camera, I interview Al O'Donnell, introduce myself, and say, 'Hey, I'm really interested in this, can we continue this conversation?' So he invites me to his home. He says, 'Come on over, we'll arrange to come over on a Saturday or something. We'll sit down, I'll go through my scrapbooks and show you some documents and memorabilia and photos from that era.' I was like, 'Great.' "So I go to his house and meet this wife. And we sit down, he opens up these big scrapbooks, and he starts showing me all the stuff that he had done. Photos that had been taken out in the proximity of these gigantic nuclear tests. They had great stories about the camaraderie that developed among the engineers and scientists. And he's going through all this stuff and showing me all this. And I love it, I loved every bit of it. I've never had a bad day at the Nevada Test Site, by the way. Every time I've gone out there to do a story, it's just a terrific way to spend some time." JC: "Secrets should be kept, secrets are kept, and you are a proponent of keeping secrets when it's that kind of thing." GK: "Sure, absolutely. And I respected the boundaries that they set up for us in doing these kinds of stories. So I did go out to the Nevada Test Site a lot over the next 40 years or so and put together a lot of different stories. And they knew of my interest in that area that's just outside what the Nevada Test Site, a place called Area 51. In 1955, Area 51 was, basically, created and EG&G got the contract to manage Area 51, and had kept it for the next 30, 35 years. So, whatever went on out there, they had an inside knowledge of what was going on." JC: "So, you meet this guy, Al O'Donnell, for the first time when he's at this public thing. You probably say something like, 'Your son told me to talk to you,' or something. Whatever. It ends up, he invites you to his home, and you're going through scrapbooks, and he's showing you all this atomic testing stuff that he was involved in. GK: "Yeah, and I'm telling him, 'Boy, this is really interesting. That's fascinating. I'd love to do a story on it.' And after we're there for maybe two hours, he closes this one big scrapbook and he goes, 'You're not here to talk about this, are ya?' I said, 'Well, not exactly.' He says, 'I know what you're here to talk about. I know what you want to ask about.' And right about that point, his wife walks in and she says, 'Don't start telling them that stuff! Don't even tell him!' And he kind of joked about it.' JC: "What were you there to talk about?" GK: "UFOs, UFOs. Area 51, Bob Lazar, crashed saucers, reverse engineering, to see if he had any knowledge of that, because I'd been led to believe that he did. So he closes that book and he says, 'We'll have we'll get together another time and we'll talk about it in private.' And over the course of the next two years or so, he and I would meet at coffee shops and talk about it. And I would ask him questions, and really, it was like pulling teeth. He wanted to tell me stuff but he made me work at it." (AJ says his family was there for the confession. Knapp has over two years of meetings with him. A bit confusing.) GK: "And the condition was, I couldn't take any notes. I couldn't record it, I couldn't take any notes. So each time I'd meet with him, I'd rush back to my car and start scribbling notes on pieces of paper so I'd remember everything that he said. And the story that he told me, that evolved over those couple of years was pretty fantastic. "He said that they did have a flying saucer that had been recovered from New Mexico. I think he indicated that it had been taken from New Mexico to Wright Patterson Air Force Base, which is... He never said Roswell, but I think it was the Roswell incident is what he [was] talking about. And it confirmed some of the details about what we know, likely, happened with the Roswell craft." JC: "When he's telling you, 'We have recovered a craft,' did he say it like, this is secret, don't tell anybody?" GK: "Yeah, it was just for my knowledge, my background and information. It wasn't a story I could do then. We were negotiating about how, or when, or if I could ever use that information or make it public. He told me the details about this craft. He said that it had been stored at Indian Springs. Indian Springs is an Air Force Base that's been there for a long time. It's now called Creech. Indian Springs existed before Area 51 was made. "But he says it was there, they kept it there. It might have been in an underground facility, I'm not quite sure. But then when Area 51, after it opened in 1955, they moved it to an adjacent facility. He didn't say it was S-4, he didn't say it was Papoose, but I think that's what he's talking about. Papoose Lake is where Bob Lazar said he worked, and where they had built nine hangars underground, disguised to look like the desert, and where they had other recovered craft. "He says they worked on this recovered craft, reverse engineering, trying to figure out how it worked, who built it. Whether or not they could duplicate the technology because, apparently, they thought this was pretty advanced, and they'd like to be able to build more of 'em. "And he says it was a very closed program, very small. It was only, I think, five of them that were aware of it, at least in the early stages, that were working on this project. And it was very hush hush, and they didn't share it with anybody else in the company, or anybody else in the area, or the military. They just kept it to themselves. "So, after we're having these meetings - and I go back and write down all these notes and stuff, details about what he had shared with me - we have another meeting at a coffee shop, and I said, 'Well gosh, you know, aren't you worried that it would get out, that the word would get out?' "And he says to me, 'We were worried It would get out?' That's right. 'I mean, what...it? What do you mean, it?' It. Meaning a live being, they had a live being out there. I go, 'You had a live being, an alien as well?' [O'Donnell said], 'Tell you the truth, we didn't know what it was.' I said, 'You know, maybe it came from millions of miles away, out in space, and you're keeping it in a cage near Area 51?' He said, 'To tell you the truth, we couldn't communicate with it in the beginning. We didn't know what it was, we didn't know where it was from, and we didn't know what to do with it.'" JC: "When Al O'Donnell says to you, 'We had a live alien, a being,' obviously from another world, what was your feeling?" GK: "Well, I was overwhelmed, because it was, in effect, confirmation of things that I had come to believe, because of the reporting we'd already done. And then the evidence of cover ups and lies that had been told to the public. Here's this guy in a high position, with a high security clearance, telling me that it was true. That they really did have a craft and they had a being. "My second feeling was, one of overwhelming sadness for the being, whatever it was, you know, that was kept out there. I asked him, you know, what had happened to it, what became of it? He says, 'I don't know. I don't know whatever happened to it.' But it was out there for a while, alive, and eventually they figured out a way to communicate with it. "And so I asked him, 'Well, what did it look like?' And he made me guess, as he did with all these questions. He made me guess. He said, 'Well, it kinda looks like a certain political candidate.' I said, 'Well, who? A political candidate? Who?' And at the time, Ross Perot was running for president. He said, 'It looks like Ross Perot. A little skinny guy with a big ears and tiny head.' Not a classic Gray-looking alien, but a very odd-looking creature with really big ears, that looked like Ross Perot. And I laughed. "And so we had these conversations for a while, and I was blown away by the information that he shared. I took all these notes. I was hoping that someday, I might be able to get the information out. And I asked him, 'Look, you're getting up there in age. If I can't record something with you, could you record a statement to the effect of telling me the story on camera, and then when you pass on, I can have the tape?' And he said, 'Yeah,' he would do it." JC: "You know, look, I've heard a lot of wild stories that I can't verify. A guy's telling you something, and you get a sense as a journalist, when you go down a road with somebody, and you take your time and you vet it... Did you feel...I mean, is there any world where he's trying to f*ck with ya? Or is there a world where he's trying to, you know, dissuade...kind of put crazy information into your brain? Like, how did you feel when he was telling you this? Was he like, straight with you?" GK: "Yeah, he was very straightforward. And again, this was not information he was giving up, willingly. I mean, I had to really dig and coax and arm twist to get him to cough things up. And it was very slow-going over about a two-year period, maybe a little bit longer. And I know that this...you always have to be wary of people with different agendas and people that just make stuff up. I didn't get that sense from him because of his standing in the community. He had shared this story with members of his own family." JC: "And that's why they came to you, is because they kind of [gave] you a tip. And these members of his family, they're serious people, too." GK: "Yeah. One of his sons is an FBI agent, or was, he's passed on now. One was an elected official in Nevada. That was the one that gave me the tip." JC: So, I just want to nail this [down] so I understand. You were approached because he had shared this with his family, privately, and then you had to kind of coax to get through to him about the story?" GK: "Right." JC: "I think that's important because look, these things don't happen, like, people [don't] just come to us and say, you know, crazy stuff, and we're like, 'Hh, yeah, cool. Sounds good.' Like, the dynamic of that, socially, as a journalist, like getting in there, taking time. You know, we have to verify if what he said is true, and there are some major bombs coming about that. But it's like, that process is so important. "So here you are, you're sitting with him, he tells you now, they have a live alien. And you felt sad because you're an animal-rights activist, you love animals. I know with your cats at home and you've done horse stories and all the stories about like, the inhumane stuff to animals. So it made you personally sad, makes me sad, too now thinking about it." GK: Yeah. Well, we had these series of meetings, and then the last time we met, after he'd agreed to go ahead and record a tape - and give it to me after making an arrangement so I got it after he passed on - he said that he had been told to not talk to me anymore. He said he had been given a warning [and] it was not a good idea for him to talk to me any more about anything. Not just that topic, but anything." JC: "Well, who knows that you're talking? Who would warn him?" GK: "I don't know. I don't know. But you recall, back in those days, there was surveillance. We had our phones tapped at KLAS-TV. There were guys following us around. Me, Bob Lazar, Gene Huff, maybe Robert Bigelow." JC: "People were also coming to your news station, OSI. And they would come in and try to like, get to you and then they'd show you their card...and take it back. And you know your phones are tapped. So it's like, because of this story, all of a sudden you're on high alert. So, anybody could have called him, been watching you, had meetings with the guy. So what you're saying is one day he just said, 'I can't...I'm not allowed to talk to you any more.'" GK: "Yeah, I've been told not to talk to you anymore. I've been told not to."

Joe Murgia

47,660 次观看 • 16 天前