Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

WelBeast the hardest objective question to exist

utdZaiire's profile picture

utdzaire🇨🇩

2,281 subscribers

42,091 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Comments

WelBeast's profile picture
WelBeast4 months ago

Arteta at 44. Vs. Évra at 45

Ebere not Eze AFC🔴⚪️'s profile picture
Ebere not Eze AFC🔴⚪️4 months ago

@WelBeast Keep your CL Nothing special about it, Ajax and forest have 2 each

Dapper Arsenal's profile picture
Dapper Arsenal4 months ago

@WelBeast

Tuyo_baddest's profile picture
Tuyo_baddest4 months ago

@WelBeast Why'd he say the ARSENAL like dat ARRSEENAAAL FC

Goals Station's profile picture
Goals Station4 months ago

@WelBeast Mutuals? Fb😀

John Kennedy jr's profile picture
John Kennedy jr4 months ago

@WelBeast Legendary question

Related Videos

The hardest question to answer
1:16

The hardest question to answer

Sir Pickle

12,891 views • 26 days ago

1. If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist. 2. Objective moral values and duties do exist. 3. Therefore, God exists!
5:00

1. If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist. 2. Objective moral values and duties do exist. 3. Therefore, God exists!

Reasonable Faith

150,020 views • 1 year ago

The prefect answer to the absurd question: does Israel have the right to exist?
1:46

The prefect answer to the absurd question: does Israel have the right to exist?

Rania

206,842 views • 1 year ago

Tisha Campbell answers the hardest question ever
1:53

Tisha Campbell answers the hardest question ever

Blackish Press

40,137 views • 8 months ago

The hardest question to answer... How do you know you're making something great?
1:38

The hardest question to answer... How do you know you're making something great?

Founders Inc

35,523 views • 1 year ago

My answer to the robotic question: “Do you, Dr.SHIVA, support Israel’s right to exist.”
6:50

My answer to the robotic question: “Do you, Dr.SHIVA, support Israel’s right to exist.”

Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email

95,849 views • 2 years ago

Peter Drury the poet
1:52

Peter Drury the poet

WelBeast

216,341 views • 10 months ago

The English Premier league.
0:20

The English Premier league.

WelBeast

3,368,637 views • 2 years ago

The English Premier League rivalry
0:20

The English Premier League rivalry

WelBeast

1,112,470 views • 5 months ago

Greene: There aren’t multiple truths. There is just one. For civilization to exist, objective truth must exist, be embraced, be protected… despite many attempts to whitewash it, truth will prevail
0:38

Greene: There aren’t multiple truths. There is just one. For civilization to exist, objective truth must exist, be embraced, be protected… despite many attempts to whitewash it, truth will prevail

Acyn

252,758 views • 1 year ago

Tucker gets asked the Zionist trap question: “Do you believe in Israel’s right to exist?”
3:39

Tucker gets asked the Zionist trap question: “Do you believe in Israel’s right to exist?”

Henri Fjord

312,856 views • 6 months ago

Tough question, because they’re all tough, but sport would you say is the hardest to play professionally?
0:20

Tough question, because they’re all tough, but sport would you say is the hardest to play professionally?

LC

772,511 views • 3 years ago

The late, great Robert Fisk dismantles the trap question of ‘do you accept Israel’s right to exist?’
1:46

The late, great Robert Fisk dismantles the trap question of ‘do you accept Israel’s right to exist?’

Going Underground

364,022 views • 5 months ago

Excuse me while I use my own birthday to force you all to witness the hardest version of ‘Happy Birthday’ to ever exist! 11/17 🎂
0:39

Excuse me while I use my own birthday to force you all to witness the hardest version of ‘Happy Birthday’ to ever exist! 11/17 🎂

Poll The Crowds

49,093 views • 10 months ago

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."
3:18

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

116,326 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇺🇳🇮🇱 UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese tears apart the question about Israel's "right to exist"
0:59

🚨🇺🇳🇮🇱 UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese tears apart the question about Israel's "right to exist"

Mario Nawfal

1,619,069 views • 6 months ago

The people who resisted Swift the hardest were the Objective-C gurus. They didn't want to be a newbie again. Chris Lattner says the exact same thing is happening with AI right now.
1:24

The people who resisted Swift the hardest were the Objective-C gurus. They didn't want to be a newbie again. Chris Lattner says the exact same thing is happening with AI right now.

Scott Hanselman 🌮

35,423 views • 7 months ago

.Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt perfectly deconstructs the bad faith question “does Israel have the right to exist?”
0:58

.Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt perfectly deconstructs the bad faith question “does Israel have the right to exist?”

Abby Martin

1,093,876 views • 1 year ago

The end is killing me 😂😂😂
1:40

The end is killing me 😂😂😂

WelBeast

115,673 views • 4 months ago