正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Well, that unravelled quite quickly... Remember when Trump claimed he would end the Russia/Ukraine war in 24 hours? Now his administration says they might move on, and the war might not be able to be ended. "We came here yesterday… to try and figure out very soon whether or... show more

Ed Krassenstein

1,097,793 subscribers

289,849 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治喜剧科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Nikos Unity 的头像

Nikos Unity1 年前

Trump’s peace plan was always a bluff. The moment it required substance, it collapsed because that’s what happens when slogans meet geopolitics.

greg cantwell 的头像

greg cantwell1 年前

All that’s required for the war to end is for Russia to go home. And yet, the Trump crew never mentions this simple fact.

Trump Tracker 的头像

Trump Tracker1 年前

Promises made. Promises broken.

Slingshot News 的头像

Slingshot News1 年前

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Here’s How Donald Trump Can Break China’s Battery Monopoly What do YOU think about this idea? Let us know in the comments ⬇️ Be sure to follow @NewsSlingshot for more exclusive reports!

Evaristus Odinikaeze 的头像

Evaristus Odinikaeze1 年前

Trump’s 24-hour peace promise was never a plan. It was a punchline for his concept of a plan. Now his team is quietly walking it back, admitting what anyone serious about diplomacy already knew: ending the war isn’t about bravado, it’s about leverage, realism, and commitment. Saying “we’re done” because peace is hard isn’t leadership, it’s surrender dressed up as strategy. Trump definitely lied. Again. And the world sees it.

MemberBlasts (they/them)🐀 的头像

MemberBlasts (they/them)🐀1 年前

More lies from Felon Trump that the MAGA Morons fell for, hook line and sinker.

Akash Maniam 的头像

Akash Maniam1 年前

Even if we assume they were acting in good faith, this would rank among the most incompetent pieces of foreign policy in history. So, they have to choose - genuine incompetence or conscious collusion.

AnatolijUkraine 的头像

AnatolijUkraine1 年前

“End the war in 24 hours”? More like wave the white flag in 24 weeks. Trump’s fantasy just hit a wall called reality—Putin’s war doesn’t end with slogans.

Austin Rogers 的头像

Austin Rogers1 年前

We aren't sending billions to that pointless war anymore regardless if the retards keep fighting each other. Get wrecked, Ed.

Cool Christian Engineer 💡 的头像

Cool Christian Engineer 💡1 年前

Trump isn’t out here sending our kids to die for a useless cause. His strategy? End the war no endless spending, no dragging us in deeper.

Masculine Based 的头像

Masculine Based1 年前

Ed, you’re mistaking realism for retreat. Trump said he’d try to end it in 24 hours by leading. Not dragging it out like Biden with a blank check. If peace’s off the table, Trump cuts losses. That’s America First. not Kyiv first.

相关视频

Vance: “We should be able to move beyond the mistakes that have been made in the past…If Russia is not willing to do that, then we’re eventually just going to say, ‘This is not our war. It’s Joe Biden’s war, it’s Vladimir Putin’s war. It’s not our war.’"

Vance: “We should be able to move beyond the mistakes that have been made in the past…If Russia is not willing to do that, then we’re eventually just going to say, ‘This is not our war. It’s Joe Biden’s war, it’s Vladimir Putin’s war. It’s not our war.’"

The Bulwark

685,652 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump not even 24 HOURS after ending the Iran war just spoke with Putin and Zelensky to try and end the UKRAINE war This man is going all-out for peace! "Very good conversation yesterday with President Zelensky and President Putin. And I see maybe we can do something that I really do. I think they're both open to it." "So now that this is finished, we're going to be focusing on that! Let's see if we can get that one done. 25,000 people a month dying, mostly soldiers. And that shouldn't happen."

🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump not even 24 HOURS after ending the Iran war just spoke with Putin and Zelensky to try and end the UKRAINE war This man is going all-out for peace! "Very good conversation yesterday with President Zelensky and President Putin. And I see maybe we can do something that I really do. I think they're both open to it." "So now that this is finished, we're going to be focusing on that! Let's see if we can get that one done. 25,000 people a month dying, mostly soldiers. And that shouldn't happen."

Eric Daugherty

224,900 次观看 • 3 个月前

SECRETARY RUBIO: We’re the only country in the world that can mediate and bring a conclusion to the war between Russia and Ukraine. The President wants to see the war end and if there’s something we can do to help it end, we are going to do it.

SECRETARY RUBIO: We’re the only country in the world that can mediate and bring a conclusion to the war between Russia and Ukraine. The President wants to see the war end and if there’s something we can do to help it end, we are going to do it.

Department of State

73,143 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rogin: We give them the weapons, we're funding this war, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. Who's going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we're going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi? And the war is going to go on for a very long time. In the end, we’re going to find out who wears the pants in this bromance.

Rogin: We give them the weapons, we're funding this war, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. Who's going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we're going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi? And the war is going to go on for a very long time. In the end, we’re going to find out who wears the pants in this bromance.

Acyn

33,709 次观看 • 6 个月前

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on only signing players who genuinely improve Arsenal: “I think the purpose has to be to be better than we were last year, or to be different and evolve in a different way that can increase our probability of winning again. “We have now four players in the squad, probably very soon, that we believe are going to be the case. “And if we can add more, we will try to do that, but only if that’s the case, because they are the right reasons to sign, not for any other reason. “Because otherwise, we’re not going to get better and we’re going to regret it.”

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on only signing players who genuinely improve Arsenal: “I think the purpose has to be to be better than we were last year, or to be different and evolve in a different way that can increase our probability of winning again. “We have now four players in the squad, probably very soon, that we believe are going to be the case. “And if we can add more, we will try to do that, but only if that’s the case, because they are the right reasons to sign, not for any other reason. “Because otherwise, we’re not going to get better and we’re going to regret it.”

Connor Humm

19,834 次观看 • 1 个月前

Scott Jennings says we have no say over Israel’s actions in Iran. I disagree. “We are the senior partner, they’re the junior partner. We have the weapons, we give them the weapons. We’re funding this war. We’re the great power. They’re our client state. So in theory, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. And it’s pretty clear from what President Trump said today about the war he wants to get out very soon. He keeps saying it. He wants to get out very soon. And it’s pretty clear from what Netanyahu said today that he doesn’t want to get out very soon.” “So both of those people can’t win. One of them is going to be right, and one of them is going to be wrong. So who’s going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we’re going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi, the war is going to go on for a very long time? Both of them can’t be right, Scott. And in the end, we’re going to find out who really wears the pants in this bromance.”

Scott Jennings says we have no say over Israel’s actions in Iran. I disagree. “We are the senior partner, they’re the junior partner. We have the weapons, we give them the weapons. We’re funding this war. We’re the great power. They’re our client state. So in theory, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. And it’s pretty clear from what President Trump said today about the war he wants to get out very soon. He keeps saying it. He wants to get out very soon. And it’s pretty clear from what Netanyahu said today that he doesn’t want to get out very soon.” “So both of those people can’t win. One of them is going to be right, and one of them is going to be wrong. So who’s going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we’re going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi, the war is going to go on for a very long time? Both of them can’t be right, Scott. And in the end, we’re going to find out who really wears the pants in this bromance.”

Josh Rogin

38,678 次观看 • 6 个月前

⭕️ Joe Kent, former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center: “There’s no military solution there. So at some point — whether it’s after we fight a bloody 20-year war or it’s relatively soon — we’re going to have to just deal with the Iranians. And I think the sooner that we can get over that, and realize that Iran is not going to be exactly as we want it to be — however, Iran has proven to be pragmatic. They are not the insane jihadis, they’re not the Persian version of ISIS. They can be dealt with. So I think the sooner that we realize that… the better off we’ll be.” “I truly hope that the president also understands that.. even if the status quo is to work, he’s got to do more to restrain the Israelis.” Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti | Joe Kent

⭕️ Joe Kent, former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center: “There’s no military solution there. So at some point — whether it’s after we fight a bloody 20-year war or it’s relatively soon — we’re going to have to just deal with the Iranians. And I think the sooner that we can get over that, and realize that Iran is not going to be exactly as we want it to be — however, Iran has proven to be pragmatic. They are not the insane jihadis, they’re not the Persian version of ISIS. They can be dealt with. So I think the sooner that we realize that… the better off we’ll be.” “I truly hope that the president also understands that.. even if the status quo is to work, he’s got to do more to restrain the Israelis.” Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti | Joe Kent

Drop Site

181,689 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rogin: I think we would be remiss if we didn't mention the fact that the Trump administration is making preparations to attack another country, Cuba, as if this didn't they didn't learn one thing. So they're going to start a third war. That's a very bad idea. We should not do that.

Rogin: I think we would be remiss if we didn't mention the fact that the Trump administration is making preparations to attack another country, Cuba, as if this didn't they didn't learn one thing. So they're going to start a third war. That's a very bad idea. We should not do that.

Acyn

42,193 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chancellor Merz: "This war could be ended within 24 hours if Ukraine stopped fighting and handed the country over to Russia. But then we can be quite certain that the next country would be attacked by Russia tomorrow."

Chancellor Merz: "This war could be ended within 24 hours if Ukraine stopped fighting and handed the country over to Russia. But then we can be quite certain that the next country would be attacked by Russia tomorrow."

Anton Gerashchenko

308,711 次观看 • 11 个月前

'This would be a new step of aggression' — Trump told Zelensky that he would not give him 'Tomahawks' until he talks to Putin about it. - Maybe we will have to talk to Russia about the 'Tomahawks.' Do they want the 'Tomahawks' to fly their way? I don't think so. To be honest, I told Zelensky this because the 'Tomahawks' are a new step of aggression. - You say you will talk to Putin first, right? - Maybe I'll say: 'Listen, if this war is not settled, I'll send them the 'Tomahawks.' It's an incredible weapon, made for attacks. And, honestly, Russia doesn't need it. They don't need it. Yes, I can tell them that if the war is not settled, we might very well do that. - SK

'This would be a new step of aggression' — Trump told Zelensky that he would not give him 'Tomahawks' until he talks to Putin about it. - Maybe we will have to talk to Russia about the 'Tomahawks.' Do they want the 'Tomahawks' to fly their way? I don't think so. To be honest, I told Zelensky this because the 'Tomahawks' are a new step of aggression. - You say you will talk to Putin first, right? - Maybe I'll say: 'Listen, if this war is not settled, I'll send them the 'Tomahawks.' It's an incredible weapon, made for attacks. And, honestly, Russia doesn't need it. They don't need it. Yes, I can tell them that if the war is not settled, we might very well do that. - SK

Zlatti71

78,572 次观看 • 11 个月前

2023: Donald Trump to Nigel Farage, "If I was president I'd end that war in one day, it'll take 24 hours. It would be easy" 2025: Marco Rubio, "If it's not possible to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine then we're at a point where President Trump is at a point where he'll say we're done" The way you end the Russian invasion of Ukraine is to stop Russia from invading Ukraine, not by taking away support from Ukraine that is trying to defend itself from Russia

2023: Donald Trump to Nigel Farage, "If I was president I'd end that war in one day, it'll take 24 hours. It would be easy" 2025: Marco Rubio, "If it's not possible to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine then we're at a point where President Trump is at a point where he'll say we're done" The way you end the Russian invasion of Ukraine is to stop Russia from invading Ukraine, not by taking away support from Ukraine that is trying to defend itself from Russia

Farrukh

63,850 次观看 • 1 年前

JUST IN: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has invited former President Donald Trump to Ukraine. The comments from Zelenskyy came during an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker. Zelenskyy was responding to a comment from Trump who claimed that he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. “Former President Trump said that about 24 hours, that he can manage it and finish the war. For me, what can I say? So he’s very welcome as well.” “President Biden was here and I think he understood some details which you can understand only being here. So I invite President Trump. If he can come here, I will need 24 minutes.” “He can’t bring peace because of Putin. If he’s not trying and if he’s not ready to give our territory to this terrible man, to Putin, if you are not ready to give it, if you are not ready to give our independence, he can’t manage it.” The clip below was when Trump met with Zelenskyy in 2019.

JUST IN: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has invited former President Donald Trump to Ukraine. The comments from Zelenskyy came during an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker. Zelenskyy was responding to a comment from Trump who claimed that he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. “Former President Trump said that about 24 hours, that he can manage it and finish the war. For me, what can I say? So he’s very welcome as well.” “President Biden was here and I think he understood some details which you can understand only being here. So I invite President Trump. If he can come here, I will need 24 minutes.” “He can’t bring peace because of Putin. If he’s not trying and if he’s not ready to give our territory to this terrible man, to Putin, if you are not ready to give it, if you are not ready to give our independence, he can’t manage it.” The clip below was when Trump met with Zelenskyy in 2019.

Collin Rugg

2,710,437 次观看 • 2 年前

Sarah Palin just pushed the idea of a civil war and encouraged Trump supporters to “get angry” and “rise up to take our country back.” This rhetoric needs to end. This stuff is just going too far. We are America. We are one! Stop calling for civil war. Stop implying that we are on the brink of Civil War. We are not. Just Stop! Specifically Palin said: “Do you want us to be in a civil war? Because that’s what’s going to happen.We’re not going to keep putting up with this, and Eric, I like that you suggest that we need to get angry. We do need to rise up and take our country back. I would say the RNC thought, that’s what’s lacking when it comes to collective anger that can be health, and it can be useful… What do they want as an outcome of this? Civil War?” Why do some people seemingly want to have a Civil War in this country?

Sarah Palin just pushed the idea of a civil war and encouraged Trump supporters to “get angry” and “rise up to take our country back.” This rhetoric needs to end. This stuff is just going too far. We are America. We are one! Stop calling for civil war. Stop implying that we are on the brink of Civil War. We are not. Just Stop! Specifically Palin said: “Do you want us to be in a civil war? Because that’s what’s going to happen.We’re not going to keep putting up with this, and Eric, I like that you suggest that we need to get angry. We do need to rise up and take our country back. I would say the RNC thought, that’s what’s lacking when it comes to collective anger that can be health, and it can be useful… What do they want as an outcome of this? Civil War?” Why do some people seemingly want to have a Civil War in this country?

Ed Krassenstein

4,998,989 次观看 • 3 年前

In 2024 Jeffrey Sachs warned that a war with Iran WILL be WW3: "Iran is not alone and it will not remain alone. And so if we go to war with Iran we are expanding the war with Russia." "With Russia we are at a possibility of peace but we are also at a possibility of nuclear war. They are both very close." "If we go to war with Iran we make the war a nuclear war all the more likely."

In 2024 Jeffrey Sachs warned that a war with Iran WILL be WW3: "Iran is not alone and it will not remain alone. And so if we go to war with Iran we are expanding the war with Russia." "With Russia we are at a possibility of peace but we are also at a possibility of nuclear war. They are both very close." "If we go to war with Iran we make the war a nuclear war all the more likely."

Defiant Ghost

17,003 次观看 • 6 个月前

We are going to RESIST. We are going to STAND here, and we are going to take REVENGE. Trump thought that if he KILLED the IRANIAN SUPREME LEADER, everything would be finished .. ‘NO’ .. this is going to be a LONG war, and IRANIANS are going to LEVEL UP !!

We are going to RESIST. We are going to STAND here, and we are going to take REVENGE. Trump thought that if he KILLED the IRANIAN SUPREME LEADER, everything would be finished .. ‘NO’ .. this is going to be a LONG war, and IRANIANS are going to LEVEL UP !!

Mustafa

30,154 次观看 • 6 个月前