Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

We're making Extract even better! It's now twice as fast, more accurate, and a fraction of the cost. What's new: → Faster v4 model with better schema adherence & up to 99% citation coverage → Flat 2¢/page pricing, all-in. No added parse costs. → Upcoming MCP tools to help...

19,202 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

21 Kommentare

Profilbild von Arjun Chaliha
Arjun Chalihavor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ Lfg you guys are helping us cook

Profilbild von Adit
Aditvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ 🫡 we'll keep pushing

Profilbild von Adit
Aditvor 4 Tagen

You can try the v4 model in studio today: If you're using another document processing solution, we're offering up to $5000 in migration credits:

Profilbild von adel 🌟
adel 🌟vor 4 Tagen

@donaldwu_ @reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ my steak too juicy my lobster too buttery

Profilbild von Donald
Donaldvor 4 Tagen

Twice as fast has to be the biggest part for us here. There are so many real-time use cases that I think will be a huge unlock from this release. If you haven't given /extract a try, now is a great time.

Profilbild von Adit
Aditvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ I nearly leaked the next extract launch as a reply to this comment But instead I will stick to this vaguepost

Profilbild von Apurv Gandhi
Apurv Gandhivor 4 Tagen

@reductoai I think it’s gotten even faster from the time this video was filmed :)

Profilbild von palak
palakvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ the best just keeps getting better 🚀🚀

Profilbild von Vineeth
Vineethvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ Interesting 🤔

Profilbild von Jeremy Bosma
Jeremy Bosmavor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ MCP tools turn extraction from a feature into infrastructure.

Profilbild von meg hildreth
meg hildrethvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ excited about your mcp - we should talk getting you guys into the marketplaces + mcp analytics bc @manufact can help with that ;)

Profilbild von mangi
mangivor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ good stuff, lets connect!

Profilbild von Hatef | AGINAZ
Hatef | AGINAZvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ Schema adherence is the bigger win here. I keep seeing extraction look valid even when the source does not support a required field.

Profilbild von Sebastian Bugal
Sebastian Bugalvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ Does this apply to extract and deep extract?

Profilbild von Adit
Aditvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ deep extract is also shifting to simpler/lower pricing! it's 4c/page vs 2c for base extract

Profilbild von Sebastian Bugal
Sebastian Bugalvor 3 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ Ok sick! btw love what yall did with deep extract fixed 90% of the problems I had with extract

Profilbild von Adit
Aditvor 3 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ cc: @ArthBohra

Profilbild von Tony Hu
Tony Huvor 3 Tagen

The upcoming schema tools sound especially useful. A faster model helps, but making the setup easier can matter just as much. Clear citation coverage also makes the output easier to check.

Profilbild von Sylvain Perrier
Sylvain Perriervor 3 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ The operating leverage is the real edge here: predictable per-page pricing plus stronger schema adherence turns extraction from a bespoke task into a repeatable workflow.

Profilbild von Jason傑森 🇭🇰 | 🛠️
Jason傑森 🇭🇰 | 🛠️vor 3 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ 这么多好的地方价格两美分划算吗

Profilbild von Chen
Chenvor 4 Tagen

@reductoai @TheOtherGandhi_ SaaS problems, classic

Ähnliche Videos

ChatGPT o1 is the most "intelligent" AI model and it's not even close! Full o1 generates thinking steps ~50 faster than preview. It's more accurate, reliable, and got better on harder tasks that require advanced reasoning and knowledge. I ran a few tests on it already. Here are my observations: Full video with examples & explanations: Strengths - impressive at math, code, and knowledge-intensive tasks. Weakness - it only failed on a cross-word puzzle but I think it might be solvable when a web search becomes available. In the end, while very efficient with complex knowledge use, it's still constrained by data it's trained on. Speed - the thinking steps are generated a lot faster! Not a fair comparison with the open alternatives but I think this improves the overall user experience. "Knowledgeable and highly intelligent" - as mentioned in the demo by OpenAI researchers, o1 is great at dealing with ambiguity and filling in knowledge gaps. I was impressed by how it implemented an agentic solution (with lots of details) from a basic diagram of architecture (with minimal details). Check out the sample video. Better Task Coverage - Due to the speed and the ability to make sense of instructions and intent (i.e., know when to response fast and when to "think" deeply) much better, it feels like it might be more useful for a broader range of tasks. Image understanding - the image understanding capability is mysterious (often leads to faster responses but no thinking) but impressive. More experiments and notes soon. Stay tuned!

elvis

102,643 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Big moment for Postgres! AI coding tools have been surprisingly bad at writing Postgres code. Not because the models are dumb, but because of how they learned SQL in the first place. LLMs are trained on the internet, which is full of outdated Stack Overflow answers and quick-fix tutorials. So when you ask an AI to generate a schema, it gives you something that technically runs but misses decades of Postgres evolution, like: - No GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (added in PG10) - No expression or partial indexes - No NULLS NOT DISTINCT (PG15) - Missing CHECK constraints and proper foreign keys - Generic naming that tells you nothing But this is actually a solvable problem. You can teach AI tools to write better Postgres by giving them access to the right documentation at inference time. This exact solution is actually implemented in the newly released pg-aiguide by Tiger Data - Creators of TimescaleDB, which is an open-source MCP server that provides coding tools access to 35 years of Postgres expertise. In a gist, the MCP server enables: - Semantic search over the official PostgreSQL manual (version-aware, so it knows PG14 vs PG17 differences) - Curated skills with opinionated best practices for schema design, indexing, and constraints. I ran an experiment with Claude Code to see how well this works, and worked with the team to put this together. Prompt: "Generate a schema for an e-commerce site twice, one with the MCP server disabled, one with it enabled. Finally, run an assessment to compare the generated schemas." The run with the MCP server led to: - 420% more indexes (including partial and expression indexes) - 235% more constraints - 60% more tables (proper normalization) - 11 automation functions and triggers - Modern PG17 patterns throughout The MCP-assisted schema had proper data integrity, performance optimizations baked in, and followed naming conventions that actually make sense in production. pg-aiguide works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and any MCP-compatible tool. It's free and fully open source. I have shared the repo in the replies!

Avi Chawla

187,076 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten