Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

We're open-sourcing H3 HyperFlow. A data-free flow self-distillation technology built on MiniMax (official) H3. No external training data. Significantly reduces inference cost while preserving frontier model quality. Full demo:

934,269 просмотров • 10 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 27

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

HyperFlow delivers: 🎥 Better camera control 🔄 Better consistency 💎 Better material and detail ⚖️ More balanced across capabilities Same foundation. Better results.

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

HyperFlow also supports @nvidia 's Sol-Attn sparse-attention kernel, delivering up to 13% faster H200 generation than dense attention.

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

The key: it's data-free. The model generates its own candidate outputs, filters for quality, and self-distills from that. No external data. No human labels. The model teaches itself. This is the self-distillation component of RSI (Recursive Self-Improvement), our training paradigm for video models.

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

Why data-free matters: no external datasets. No RL infrastructure. No human labels. The model teaches itself, and that's all the loop needs. We proved it on our own base model. HyperFlow proves it on @MiniMax_AI H3.

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

HyperFlow is open source. Full weights and inference code. Based on @MiniMax_AI H3, under the MiniMax H3 Community License. Code: Weights:

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

Frontier quality. Lower inference cost. Four specific improvements. And it's open.

Фото профиля Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI what advantage yours has compared to Lightricks 8 and 4 steps loras?

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

At 8 steps we're seeing parity or better across our eval set, with the biggest visible difference on motion-heavy prompts. 4-step works too but you'll notice fine detail and fast motion degrade first. Eval scripts are in the repo if you want to run the same tests on your own prompts.

Фото профиля Sheral Tech
Sheral Tech10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Open sourcing HyperFlow is a game changer for efficient AI inference.

Фото профиля shreeyut maheshwari
shreeyut maheshwari10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Opensource 🔥🔥

Фото профиля Saad Neo
Saad Neo10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Another slow motion problem lol

Фото профиля Diego P. Jaccottet
Diego P. Jaccottet10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Could this method be used to create a 2 step lora?

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI The current release isn’t optimized for such aggressive configurations. You may encounter artifacts when running 2-steps inference directly. If you do experiment with it we'd genuinely like to hear what you find.

Фото профиля Presido 🐂🀄
Presido 🐂🀄10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI The data-free self-distillation approach is the part that really stands out. Better quality, lower inference cost, and no external data or human labels in the loop. Making the full stack open source makes this even more interesting for developers.

Фото профиля Nick
Nick10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI And this is how the foundation labs have been doing it for over a year. recursive self distillation.

Фото профиля VIDEO REBIRTH
VIDEO REBIRTH10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI you're right

Фото профиля Nick
Nick10 дней назад

round 1: teacher T0 generates a corpus of reasoning traces. Not just answers but full chains of thought, with the dead ends included. Student S1 trains on those traces. Standard distillation so far. Round 2: S1 becomes T1. It generates a new corpus. But here’s the beautiful catch, T1 generates traces that are cleaner than the ones it trained on, because during training it learned which parts of T0’s reasoning were strong and which were noise. The distillation acts as a filter. Signal goes up. Round 3 onward: this compounds. Each generation’s traces are cleaner than the last. The model is not learning new facts about the world. It is learning to think more efficiently about the facts it already has. Compression of cognition. Am I on the right track? 😉

Фото профиля 大伟|AI × Web3
大伟|AI × Web310 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI 若抓包结论属实,“加密上传”不等于隐私保护:密钥在云端,服务方仍具备解密能力。关闭开关仍上传更是越过授权边界。企业需要的是可验证的禁传、删除审计和本地密钥,而非一纸隐私条款。

Фото профиля AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guide10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI No external data is the interesting part

Фото профиля 𝔑𝔦𝔫𝔞𝔞𝔥
𝔑𝔦𝔫𝔞𝔞𝔥9 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI The H3 HyperFlow was so smooth 🫶🏻

Фото профиля Aaliya
Aaliya10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI amazing letting the model generate and filter its own training signals is a fascinating loop.

Фото профиля Sani Ai Tech
Sani Ai Tech9 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Open-sourcing efficient video inference is a major step forward

Фото профиля Alice The Ai Expert
Alice The Ai Expert9 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Huge move open-sourcing H3 HyperFlow cutting inference cost without external data while keeping frontier quality is massive!

Фото профиля OnFinality
OnFinality9 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Data-free self-distillation is the interesting part here, since most inference-cost wins lean on a teacher dataset or heavy calibration. Curious whether the quality holds on out-of-domain prompts or only on the H3 distribution it was distilled against.

Фото профиля Jurly
Jurly10 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI nice, another route to cheaper inference. local agents are getting crowded lol

Фото профиля RAZA | AI EXPLORER
RAZA | AI EXPLORER9 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Data-free distillation with lower inference costs is a compelling direction, especially if quality really holds up.

Фото профиля Mr Suhail Ai
Mr Suhail Ai9 дней назад

@MiniMax_AI Such a amazing

Похожие видео

🚀 Sol-H3: MiniMax (official) H3 Video Generation Faster Than Playback 🤩 Five seconds of world. 1.653 seconds to infer. We’re releasing Sol-H3, our fastest end-to-end MiniMax-H3 inference stack yet. On one 8× NVIDIA B300 Blackwell system, it generates five seconds of 1344×768 video with stereo audio in 1.653 seconds. Across 1×, 4×, and 8× B300, Sol-H3 reaches up to a 15.54× speedup versus Base H3. Compared with 50-step Base H3 Dense on the same 8× B300 system, the four-step Sol-H3 profile delivers: • 5s: 18.250s → 1.653s (11.04×) • 10s: 50.660s → 3.732s (13.57×) • 15s: 99.513s → 6.612s (15.05×) Sol-H3 also scales across GPU counts: • 4× B300: 2.918s / 6.993s / 12.542s for 5s / 10s / 15s (12.11–15.54×) • 1× B300: 13.745s / 37.813s / 52.260s for 5s / 10s / 15s (9.45–14.29×) All figures are medians of three measured runs after one warmup at 1344×768 and 24 FPS with stereo audio. Base H3 uses 50 scheduler points (49 DiT forwards); Sol-H3 uses four DiT forwards, so this is a full-profile comparison—not an attention-only runtime change. Sol-H3 uses Dense attention on 1× B300 and SOL with INT8 QKV / FP8 output transport on 4× / 8×. Timing includes text encoding, DiT denoising, and video/audio VAE decoding; model loading, compilation warmup, and final MP4 encoding are excluded. Sol-H3 brings Sol-Engine × Sol-Attn into one full-stack runtime: • dynamic sparse attention with no retraining • fused norm, RoPE, MLP, and sparse-attention setup • fused INT8 QKV / FP8 output communication across 8 GPUs • parallel, batched VAE decoding • precomputed AdaLN caching Inside the stack: • sparse-attention setup: 1.206 → 0.285 ms (−76.4%) • VAE decode: 7.55 → 0.602 s • ~24 GB memory freed per GPU Any MiniMax-H3 few-step LoRA can plug into the same engine, and the code is deployment-friendly under Apache 2.0. For us, the bigger milestone is crossing from “fast generation” into “faster than playback.” That opens the path toward continuous 24 FPS generation and truly interactive video systems. We’re excited to partner with reactor to release Sol-H3 and make it available as an API day-0. Try it now on Reactor: 🔗 Amazing team effort—full credits in the blog. LoveSy Junsong_Chen yitong li Haopeng Li Haocheng Xi Song Han

Enze Xie

206,849 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Chamath is making one of the most important business arguments of 2026. Half of large US companies right now cannot generate returns that exceed their cost of capital, which has normalized back to its long run average of 8 to 11%. Another one in seven companies globally is stuck generating persistent returns between 1 and 5% and most businesses don't have room for error and in this environment walks every frontier AI lab saying the same thing, give us your data, your workflows, your processes and our model will make everything better. And companies by the millions said yes. What they didn't fully account for is what happens on the other side of that door. Every time an employee runs a query through a frontier model API, the prompt goes through external servers, workflows, customer data, pricing logic, internal processes, all of it transmitted through a third party. As Alex Karp said companies are spending on tokens while handing over the exact proprietary advantages that make their business worth owning. Microsoft blocked internal use of Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 but over its 30-day data retention policy and the largest software company in the world decided a frontier model's data handling was too risky for its own employees. A US government action revoked access to another frontier model for foreign nationals overnight. Now here's where the cost math becomes impossible to ignore. Deutsche Bank calculated a roughly 65x cost gap between frontier models like Claude Fable 5 at ~$3.25 per task and open-source alternatives at ~$0.05. For 90% of everyday enterprise tasks, performance is comparable. Open-weight models now match closed frontier systems on core agent tasks at roughly one-tenth the cost, a high-volume deployment that costs $250/day on Claude runs at $12/day on an open-source equivalent. Chamath Palihapitiya tested this directly by running a standard enterprise code migration task through an orchestration layer wrapping an open-source model came in 16.4x cheaper than using a frontier model directly.

Milk Road AI

281,875 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Scale alone is not enough for AI data. Quality and complexity are equally critical. Excited to support all of these for LLM developers with Snorkel AI Data-as-a-Service, and to share our new leaderboard! — Our decade-plus of research and work in AI data has a simple point: scale alone is not enough. AI success is all about the quality, complexity, and distribution of data—in addition to volume. We’re excited to be powering leading LLM developers with Snorkel AI Expert Data-as-a-Service, our white glove service for custom, expert-level AI datasets—and to now preview some of what we’re building via our new Expert Data Leaderboard (🔗 in 🧵) + upcoming OSS dataset releases! Snorkel Expert Data-as-a-Service is built to meet the rapidly evolving data needs of the agentic AI world—where success is built on the quality, complexity, and distribution of datasets, in addition to size and scale. This kind of high-quality, frontier AI data can only come from a union of technology and human expertise. With Snorkel Expert Data-as-a-Service, we’re powering frontier LLM developers across agentic, expert knowledge, reasoning, coding, multi-modal, and other task types via the combination of these two key components: - (1) The Snorkel Expert Network: A global team of subject matter experts focused wholly on specialized knowledge–spanning thousands of topics in STEM/academic, vertical/professional, and consumer/lifestyle domains. - (2) Snorkel AI Data Development Platform: Our unique programmatic data curation and quality control platform, accelerating and improving expert authoring and review through principled techniques developed over the last decade of R&D. Now: we’re incredibly excited to showcase some of the power of Snorkel Expert Data-as-a-Service via the new Snorkel Leaderboard—putting frontier models to the test in complex, agentic, and reasoning settings inspired by real industry scenarios (not esoteric puzzles)! We’ll be releasing new leaderboards and accompanying expert-verified open source datasets (coming soon!) regularly. To start, we’re sharing three initial ones in preview: - SnorkelFinance: Q&A over financial documents requiring agentic tool-calling and reasoning - SnorkelUnderwrite: Agentic insurance tasks requiring industry-specific reasoning and tool use - SnorkelSequences: Mathematical tasks requiring compositional multi-step reasoning

Alex Ratner

495,851 просмотров • 1 год назад