Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Werksman Jackson & Quinn LLP Please consider taking on this case! Pro hac vice. 🙏🙏🙏 This case is worse than Karen Read, as hard as that is to believe. I've followed both cases closely and Kohberger's is THE MOST ridiculous case I've ever seen in my life. You would...

19,092 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

Kyle Becker

5,835,202 просмотров • 2 лет назад

‼️UPDATE ON THE CASE AGAINST BILL GATES, ALBERT BOURLA (PFIZER CEO) AND THE DUTCH STATE‼️ 🔥THE NARRATIVE ON TRIAL THE FIGHT CONTINUES🔥 For those asking what happens next in the Dutch Covid litigation; the main case is moving forward and a full hearing on the merits is scheduled for 22nd October 2026 in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. This is NOT the procedural appeal hearing from March - which was a second, separate (though connected) case. This is the main case itself! The claimants - who were coerced through fear campaigns, relentless propaganda and instituional deception into taking covid injections that injured them - will have the opportunity to present their case in full, submit evidence, and bring forward expert testimony in open court. Peter Stassen has stated that he will bring the proposed experts (who appear in this short video) into court and that he requires no permission from the court to do so, because this is a procedural right embedded in procedural law. He has also confirmed that new evidence can still be introduced up until one month before the hearing and says he intends to present even more conclusive evidence! Despite the attempt to shut down the separate evidentiary appeal on procedural grounds, the core case remains fully alive. Nothing has been decided yet on substance. The 22nd October is when this fight continues, and I will be attending and covering in full! Please see links in comments for previous coverage and to understand this case in full! Video Credit: Recht Oprecht

Fiona Rose Diamond

20,610 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад