Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 Wes Streeting published his WhatsApp exchanges with disgraced Mandelson. They show Mandelson was privately advising Streeting on pharma policy, lining up tech company meetings & shaping decisions about YOUR healthcare. We need full transparency. Share if you agree!

14,444 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Left: Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer make the BMA doctors strike about pay Right: Susanna Reid, "More than half of year 2 doctors have no job to go to next month" Labour are pitting the public against doctors on the grounds of pay, when the strikes are about more than pay, they're about the lack of jobs for doctors In this case, it's a lack of jobs in hospitals. But it's also about a lack of GP jobs, because Wes Streeting has limited the ability of GP practices to hire more GPs (while giving them budgets to hire other staff) We have a shortage of hospital doctors, we have a shortage of GP doctors, and it is Labour policy under Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting has worsened this problem The worst part, Streeting and Starmer both using the rise in flu cases to suggest that strain in hospitals is the doctors fault But when you look at the data, there have been nearly 1,000,000 patients treated in corridors this year It didn't just happen overnight, Labour, like the Conservatives before them, continue to underfund the NHS And with at least 10% of the NHS budget goes to private contracts, instead of investing in the NHS, by using private services, Labour continue to spend more on private health services than on the NHS: how is it efficient to pay more for the same service? Sorry Labour voters, but if you go with the line it's all about pay, you're missing the bigger picture, and you're putting your loyalty towards Starmer and Streeting who are misrepresenting what's going on, and distrusting the very people who spend their entire lives looking after other people, doctors

Farrukh

67,915 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

📣 BIG NEWS: We're launching our first synthetic show at Every 📧: TLDR. TLDR is a 3-5 minute AI-generated podcast that quickly catches you up on meetings you missed at your company. It takes any meeting recording and turns it into short, compelling (and sometimes 🌶️!) recap. It’ll tell you key decisions that were made and action items taken. It replays short clips of key moments from the meeting so you can skip the small talk and quickly catch up what’s going on at your company—hands-free. How synthetic shows work Every 📧 In the past, our writers and producers wrote and edited every story and podcast we published. Instead, with a synthetic show, they pour everything they know about making great podcasts into the prompts that become the show. Then, you bring the raw material—your company’s communications. Together, we make a story. It’s a way for us to spread Every’s storytelling to any business in the world. We believe every company has an epic story—and synthetic shows can tell yours. TLDR is an experiment, but if it works, we’ll produce more shows about your company for both internal and external consumption: Think Sunday strategy deep dives, How It’s Made-style explainers, or Acquired-style histories. Listen to our internal Every TLDR: We want you to get a sense of what TLDR is, so we’re making our internal Every TLDR available publicly for you to listen to. It tells the story of our weekly Every Studio standup where all of our entrepreneurs in residence (including Naveen Naidu, the Every 📧 entrepreneur in residence who built TLDR) meet to discuss what they’re working on. Listen to the first Every TLDR in this post—or listen to the whole 5-episode series on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple Podcasts.

Dan Shipper 📧

25,519 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why Is Healthcare Pricing Still a Secret? The government created two major rules in the early 2020s to help patients understand the actual cost of healthcare: 1️⃣ Transparency in Coverage Rule – Requires insurance companies to disclose negotiated rates. 2️⃣ Hospital Price Transparency Rule – Requires hospitals to publish their prices. The goal? To create a real marketplace where patients and providers could compare costs and make informed decisions. But here’s the problem: hospitals and insurers aren’t really complying. Instead of clear, easy-to-read pricing, they’ve published huge, unreadable data files called “machine-readable files.” These files are so big that even I can’t download them on my computer. 💰 Why would they do this? Because keeping prices a secret benefits them. If you don’t know what something costs until after treatment, you can’t shop around for better, more affordable care. Imagine going to a restaurant where there’s no menu with prices, and they just hand you the bill at the end. That’s how healthcare works right now. The government knows we need price transparency. But hospitals and insurers are making it as difficult as possible—because when you can’t see the cost, they control the system. If they were truly offering the best care, they wouldn’t need to hide their prices. But I want to know what you think? Should hospitals and insurers be required to provide clear, upfront pricing? Drop your thoughts below.

Elisabeth Potter MD

22,816 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

An angry caller confronts Dave Ramsey for calling “Infinite Banking” a scam only to walk directly into a brutal financial reality check. ​Caller: “I am calling in response to a video I saw recently that you claimed infinite banking concept was a scam and actually got quite pissed off about it. I do not agree with that, and certain points that you made in that video. And I have set up a policy for my son when he was 1 years old, he's 5 now. Has a 500 thousand dollar face value. We pay 5,373 dollars a year for 13 years, and it's paid up at that point. There's a few points that I wanted to discuss that I just didn't agree with. One of the main things was that... so you claim that the cash value dies with you, and you only get the face value paid out.” ​Dave: “That's true. That is.” ​Caller: “Well, it's not true if you reinvest the dividends back into the policy.” ​Dave: “Dividend reinvestment is not cash value. Dividend reinvestment is because you have a mutual company, and the policyholders are the owners of the company. And so the profits from the company come to the policyholder, and they use that to buy paid up additions. That is not the same as keeping your cash value. That's buying extra insurance with your overpayment.” ​Caller: “But it still works out to be having a cash value much greater than the $69,849 we put into it.” ​Dave: “But the actual cash value, not the paid up additions... the actual cash value dies with you.” ​Caller: “No, because—” ​Dave: “Yes it does. I think... oh, OK.” ​Caller: “But your death benefit is larger than your cash value, so for me, I looked at it—” ​Dave: “Because you bought more insurance! You know what a paid up addition is? A paid up addition is buying additional insurance. I understand that's why you're getting more at death. Not because you got your cash value, but because you used your policy dividends to buy additional insurance. Right? But that's different than getting your cash value. If you took those policy dividends and went and bought a term insurance policy for 100,000, well, you'd get 100,000. But that's not your cash value.” ​Caller: “Well, I have a term policy.” ​Dave: “I know, but you missed my point. You're talking about... you use the policy dividends. You use the money they send to you because you're in a mutual company to buy additional insurance.” ​Caller: “Yes, paid up additions, yeah.” ​Dave: “Yeah, if you'd buy a term policy on the side for $100,000 instead, with that same money, you would get $100,000 more than your face value. But that's not your cash value, that's additional insurance. They're different.” ​Caller: “But right... they are different. In term, you don't have cash value to borrow again.” ​Dave: “I'm aware of that. But your point was that you don't lose the cash value, and my point is 100% of the time, by definition, you lose the cash value.”

Mide

65,566 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 BEN HABIB CALLS FOR LABOUR INVESTIGATION — “THE ESTABLISHMENT IS ON TRIAL” Ben Habib, leader of Advance UK, is calling for a full investigation into the Labour government, accusing senior figures of protecting each other and shielding wrongdoing. Habib said of Peter Mandelson: “Mandelson has been doing this for 30 years… and he’s been allowed to get away with it.” He argued this points to something much wider: “That says to me that lots of other people within his circle are doing the same thing. They’re all backing each other up and they’re not calling each other out.” Habib then turned directly to Keir Starmer, saying Starmer was warned: “Starmer was in possession of security services files which advised against appointing Mandelson as ambassador to the US — but they still went ahead and did it.” His conclusion was blunt: “All these people are in bed with each other. It is deeply sick.” And he made clear this goes beyond one individual: “If Mandelson goes down, Starmer should go down. McSweeney should go down too. All the other people around them should have questions asked of them.” Habib framed it as a reckoning for the political class itself: “It’s the establishment that’s on trial.” He questioned why elites continue to defend figures tied to power and money, adding: “They flock off to Davos every year because they love money.” A direct challenge. A demand for scrutiny. And a warning that this won’t stop with one name. Kevin O'Sullivan Advance UK Ben Habib

Jim Ferguson

22,430 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten