Wesley Huff Gets Debunked About Catholic Bible.

Why is Voice of Reason allowed anywhere on the internet? He’s a friggin predator

He’s gone through the biblical act of repentance and is being held accountable to living a holy life. You’re allowing a demon to speak through you. Satan is the accuser.

@TARSRel0aded The biggest accusers are usually the ones with skeletons in their closet. You cannot deal with the actual arguement is what you are really saying.

Its amazes me how Protestants literally refuse the Greek in favor of the masoretic.

Yes it’s odd indeed. More affirmation as to how shaky their foundation is and they know it.

Grifters trying to own another grifter, IMO.

This Huff loves to hear himself talk.

This was from Lila Rose? The anti abortion grifter who remains quiet on the killings of children in Gaza?

Is VOR’s rebuttal to Wes Huff in your opinion accurate? That’s clutch here. Lila Rose will be held accountable for her actions if she is in the wrong. That’s a separate issue.

His accent is really tough to listen to.

Wes shows you proof, he goes, he learns and analyses. Where’s your evidence?

Try refuting Alex here with facts. I’m curious what you come up with.

He’s just saying things without showing proof. Wes has the receipts but hey at the end of the day the salvation truth is, do you believe Jesus is God and that He died and resurrected and that it is by faith and not by deeds and that the faith grows the deeds we do. We’ll find out

The catholic vatican church is a big cult. Why do they have secrets kept from the public

What are the “big secrets” and where did you obtain this info?

You do onow they have a huge room where they store historical stuff like books/artifacts. That they keep from the people. You do not do much research if you did not onow this. This is well known.

Prot-speak. You got nothing.

Btw to my Knowledge, We know there is 1 historical Tradition that even Christ Participated, mainly because of 1 of those book that protestant rejected, meaning those Books are literally Credible but they still reject it regardless..

They didn’t fit Luther’s novel ideology.

This has been debunked a thousand times. The last Hebrew book was added to the Hebrew Bible around 300 BC. It has not changed since.

You did nothing to debunk his argument. Engage with the information presented in the video.

Is this recent? Why is this guy still around?

Jewish folklore is "canon" in the Roman Catholic church.

“debunked” based on a Catholics opinion? No ~ just shows your bias

Embarrassing, this Catholic was handled by Ryan Hemelarr. Wes Huff would also school this Catholic in a debate. He honestly thinks he knows more than Wes Huff?😂

Wes won’t debate Alex. He’d get cooked and he knows it.

No public record or announcement shows Catholic apologist Alex Jurado (often known as "Alex the Catholic" or "Voice of Reason") officially challenging or asking to debate Protestant apologist Wes Huff. And if it did happen, more people on the planet would hear the gospel, and not the heresy preached by the Catholic Church.

Actually Wes is correct. The Apocrypha—Jerome’s title for them—was never considered to be Scripture and for 1500 years that was the almost UNIVERSAL understanding of the church.

Surely the apostles quoted the catholic books in the Bible.

No such thing as “Catholic books.” only 73 books of Scripture. ⚔️

why do Catholics keepjesus on the cross if he died for our sins and defeated the cross

:P @WesleyLHuff

Isn't this the same guy who said when he gets to Heaven He wants Jesus to say "My mom told me all about you"? Hahaha

Really good point being made. Amazing this hits my stream now. I've been looking at this topic all week, working on a illustration on the deuterocanonical books and came across the same perspective.

Makes sense that Lila Rose would have a groomer on her platform. Glad I blocked her

Whether one uses the 73 or 66 book canon doesn't make a true or false convert. It doesn't change the gospel message and who Christ is. It's a pointless argument.

It’s not pointless. The Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church to discern and ratify a 73 book canon not 66. A man (Luther) excommunicated made a decision to decide which books were inspired and which were not. That’s man acting in the place of God.

Im sick of this guy and his fake deep voice

Well… that’s his voice. Cope. Maybe try countering his argument.

Nah shits fake

Anything but engage with his argument. You’ve got nothing.

Why were the deuterocanonical book canonized in the 1500's at the Council of Trent? Why do they have a different name and designation than the rest of biblical canon?

This guy is retarded. Is he actually saying Jesus God in the flesh didn’t know what books were cannon and that he didn’t affirm that to the apostles. Who guided the early church which knew what was scripture at the end of the first century. Keep spreading those lies to hold up your false teachings and tradition.