正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 “We’ve obviously hidden her somewhere incredibly well.” That sentence has always stood out. Statement analyst Peter Hyatt breaks down Gerry McCann’s wording and what he says is buried inside the language is seriously uncomfortable. 👀🧠 Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️ #MadeleineMcCann #McCann #StatementAnalysis #PeterHyatt

craig_c83's profile picture

Craig Campbell

7,251 subscribers

27,608 次观看 • 26 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 ‼️ MADELEINE MCCANN: THE FORGOTTEN INTERVIEWS 🚨 ‼️ This is one of the most revealing McCann interview moments you’ll see. They’re asked directly: ‘Did you kill your daughter?’ Watch where the answer goes from there… #MadeleineMcCann #McCann Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️
0:58

🚨 ‼️ MADELEINE MCCANN: THE FORGOTTEN INTERVIEWS 🚨 ‼️ This is one of the most revealing McCann interview moments you’ll see. They’re asked directly: ‘Did you kill your daughter?’ Watch where the answer goes from there… #MadeleineMcCann #McCann Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️

Craig Campbell

13,519 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 MADELEINE McCANN: THE FORGOTTEN INTERVIEWS 🚨 Interviewer: “Somebody knows what happened?” Kate: “It’s just not too late… tell us where she is… tell us what’s happened.” Watch the pause. Listen to the tone. Then ask yourself why interviews like this are rarely shown today. Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 #MadeleineMcCann #McCann ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️
2:29

🚨 MADELEINE McCANN: THE FORGOTTEN INTERVIEWS 🚨 Interviewer: “Somebody knows what happened?” Kate: “It’s just not too late… tell us where she is… tell us what’s happened.” Watch the pause. Listen to the tone. Then ask yourself why interviews like this are rarely shown today. Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 #MadeleineMcCann #McCann ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️

Craig Campbell

629,182 次观看 • 2 个月前

I don’t believe Madeleine McCann was abducted. And clips like this are exactly why. “That’s not logical, that’s not a forensic way of looking at it” Colin Sutton 🇬🇧🩵 Watch it, then tell me the official story still makes sense. 👇 Sonia Poulton Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️ #MadeleineMcCann #McCann
0:43

I don’t believe Madeleine McCann was abducted. And clips like this are exactly why. “That’s not logical, that’s not a forensic way of looking at it” Colin Sutton 🇬🇧🩵 Watch it, then tell me the official story still makes sense. 👇 Sonia Poulton Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️ #MadeleineMcCann #McCann

Craig Campbell

70,171 次观看 • 3 天前

🚨 One of the most uncomfortable moments in the Madeleine McCann case. During the reconstruction, Jane Tanner is challenged over a key detail. Seconds later, she becomes visibly emotional. Watch the clip and decide for yourself… 👀👇 Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 #McCann #MadeleineMcCann
1:22

🚨 One of the most uncomfortable moments in the Madeleine McCann case. During the reconstruction, Jane Tanner is challenged over a key detail. Seconds later, she becomes visibly emotional. Watch the clip and decide for yourself… 👀👇 Sonia Poulton 💕💫DivineRisingGoddess💎🕉🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 #McCann #MadeleineMcCann

Craig Campbell

188,255 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 MADELEINE MCCANN: The forgotten interviews 🚨 🔴 The way Kate McCann describes the abduction has always stood out to me. 🔴 A perfectly timed offender… 🔴 A tiny window… 🔴 A strange clicking sound to demonstrate the moment… Watch the clip and make your own mind up. Sonia Poulton Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️ #McCann #MadeleineMcCann
1:00

🚨 MADELEINE MCCANN: The forgotten interviews 🚨 🔴 The way Kate McCann describes the abduction has always stood out to me. 🔴 A perfectly timed offender… 🔴 A tiny window… 🔴 A strange clicking sound to demonstrate the moment… Watch the clip and make your own mind up. Sonia Poulton Madeleine Case Tweets🌐 ✬ ᴺᵃᵗᵃˡⁱᵉ ✬™️ #McCann #MadeleineMcCann

Craig Campbell

17,219 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 “Something Big Is Being Hidden… 3IATLAS” – Congresswoman Luna Breaks Silence 🚨 Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has spoken out about the mystery of 3I/ATLAS, showing her full support for Harvard scientist Avi Loeb’s investigation. She’s now teaming up with Loeb to uncover what the government might be hiding about non-human life forms, and why access to key footage is being blocked from the public. Luna says this fight for UFO and ET disclosure is a bipartisan battle, but warns that powerful forces inside the intelligence community and the Department of Defense are pushing back hard to keep the truth hidden. Meanwhile, sources claim that NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) captured rare images of 3I/ATLAS on October 2–3, but those pictures still haven’t been released — adding even more mystery to the case. Could this be the moment the truth finally breaks through? 👀 #3IATLAS #interstellarobject #AviLoeb
3:33

🚨 “Something Big Is Being Hidden… 3IATLAS” – Congresswoman Luna Breaks Silence 🚨 Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has spoken out about the mystery of 3I/ATLAS, showing her full support for Harvard scientist Avi Loeb’s investigation. She’s now teaming up with Loeb to uncover what the government might be hiding about non-human life forms, and why access to key footage is being blocked from the public. Luna says this fight for UFO and ET disclosure is a bipartisan battle, but warns that powerful forces inside the intelligence community and the Department of Defense are pushing back hard to keep the truth hidden. Meanwhile, sources claim that NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) captured rare images of 3I/ATLAS on October 2–3, but those pictures still haven’t been released — adding even more mystery to the case. Could this be the moment the truth finally breaks through? 👀 #3IATLAS #interstellarobject #AviLoeb

Astronomy Vibes

217,443 次观看 • 10 个月前

Karen Read Megyn Kelly is looking for the truth in the case below. Read and her minion, blogger Aiden Kearney, are accused of defamation. There are many of us who know the facts inside and out. We have followed the case from the beginning. People make mistakes. This attorney posted a falsehood recently and took his post down when he realized what he tweeted was patently false. He acknowledged the mistruth he stated. Here he makes another such false statement. I am hoping he will research and issue an apology soon. So many who know this case hope that huge accounts like Megyn's will find the truth and broadcast it. Obviously Megyn has the moxie and won't fear the Read/Turtle trolls. Dave Aronberg knows this case better than any attorney on SM. He is a criminal attorney not a personal injury lawyer. Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder, the firm that earned the largest defamation suit in history, is backing the 4 witnesses whose lives have been ruined by false accusations accusing them of murder. I look forward to Megyn's continued coverage. The truth is there, buried beneath misrepresentations. The only person that said what this lawyer told Megyn was Alan Jackson, Read's attorney. Those were Jackson's words, not anyone else's. Show me the text string between Jen McCabe (mom/coach), Colin Albert (minor), Brian Albert (Boston Police Officer), or Brian Higgins (ATF), who were all friends with the decendent John O'Keefe, where anyone texted the words this lawyer regurgitated. It didn't happen. #KarenRead #AidenKearney
0:22

Karen Read Megyn Kelly is looking for the truth in the case below. Read and her minion, blogger Aiden Kearney, are accused of defamation. There are many of us who know the facts inside and out. We have followed the case from the beginning. People make mistakes. This attorney posted a falsehood recently and took his post down when he realized what he tweeted was patently false. He acknowledged the mistruth he stated. Here he makes another such false statement. I am hoping he will research and issue an apology soon. So many who know this case hope that huge accounts like Megyn's will find the truth and broadcast it. Obviously Megyn has the moxie and won't fear the Read/Turtle trolls. Dave Aronberg knows this case better than any attorney on SM. He is a criminal attorney not a personal injury lawyer. Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder, the firm that earned the largest defamation suit in history, is backing the 4 witnesses whose lives have been ruined by false accusations accusing them of murder. I look forward to Megyn's continued coverage. The truth is there, buried beneath misrepresentations. The only person that said what this lawyer told Megyn was Alan Jackson, Read's attorney. Those were Jackson's words, not anyone else's. Show me the text string between Jen McCabe (mom/coach), Colin Albert (minor), Brian Albert (Boston Police Officer), or Brian Higgins (ATF), who were all friends with the decendent John O'Keefe, where anyone texted the words this lawyer regurgitated. It didn't happen. #KarenRead #AidenKearney

Jennifer Coffindaffer

22,006 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BOMBSHELL: The Deep State is "Freaking Out": Candace Owens Implicates SEARS in Paying CIA Operatives! 😱 The deep state is "freaking out" right now because she is revealing the hidden financial network funding the CIA's operations connected to BYU. You will not believe who she says is involved. The latest name to emerge from her investigation? Sears. Yes, that Sears. Candace states she has received proof that the Sears company is implicated in paying CIA operators connected to the very BYU-Jerusalem pipeline she exposed. This isn't speculation; she says, "you can take all this information to the bank." This revelation exposes a deeply buried infrastructure. It suggests that a major American corporation was potentially used as a financial front to funnel money to CIA assets, all while maintaining a veneer of normalcy. It's a classic deep state tactic: hiding in plain sight. Candace says that since she named the CIA's alleged recruiting front, "Metro One Talent," and now Sears, people inside the deep state are panicking. She is pulling back the curtain on the money trail. She connects this back to the 2012 Romney campaign, when figures like Andrew Zenger and other key players were stationed in Jerusalem, being vetted and initiated into this network. The question now is: Was this corporate money flowing to support the political operation as well? This is how the machine works. It's not just about government agencies. It's a tangled web of corporations, political dynasties (like the Romneys), and intelligence operatives, all working together. The fact that Candace is taking a week off specifically for deep research on this tells you how massive this story is. They are connecting the dots between a retail giant, the CIA, a major university, and a presidential assassination attempt. Why would Sears be involved in paying CIA operatives? This is the question that has the deep state terrified. What do you think this means? FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked down below.👇
1:09

🚨BOMBSHELL: The Deep State is "Freaking Out": Candace Owens Implicates SEARS in Paying CIA Operatives! 😱 The deep state is "freaking out" right now because she is revealing the hidden financial network funding the CIA's operations connected to BYU. You will not believe who she says is involved. The latest name to emerge from her investigation? Sears. Yes, that Sears. Candace states she has received proof that the Sears company is implicated in paying CIA operators connected to the very BYU-Jerusalem pipeline she exposed. This isn't speculation; she says, "you can take all this information to the bank." This revelation exposes a deeply buried infrastructure. It suggests that a major American corporation was potentially used as a financial front to funnel money to CIA assets, all while maintaining a veneer of normalcy. It's a classic deep state tactic: hiding in plain sight. Candace says that since she named the CIA's alleged recruiting front, "Metro One Talent," and now Sears, people inside the deep state are panicking. She is pulling back the curtain on the money trail. She connects this back to the 2012 Romney campaign, when figures like Andrew Zenger and other key players were stationed in Jerusalem, being vetted and initiated into this network. The question now is: Was this corporate money flowing to support the political operation as well? This is how the machine works. It's not just about government agencies. It's a tangled web of corporations, political dynasties (like the Romneys), and intelligence operatives, all working together. The fact that Candace is taking a week off specifically for deep research on this tells you how massive this story is. They are connecting the dots between a retail giant, the CIA, a major university, and a presidential assassination attempt. Why would Sears be involved in paying CIA operatives? This is the question that has the deep state terrified. What do you think this means? FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked down below.👇

Project Constitution

121,185 次观看 • 6 个月前

#EastEnders #Mauren WHAT A DUFF DUFF!! 😱😬 Tense scenes at the Vic between Mark & Lauren and their families where Mark has a change of heart and decides to stay in Walford after all as Lauren puts fire with fire and commits to her affair with Mark. 🔥😬 There's no way that Mark returned to Walford just so he could finish what he started with Lauren 🤔👀 So he was going to make a flying visit just to give Lauren a choice and then fly back to Florida without a care in the world. Surely Mark has to be running away from something hence why he's making the pitstop in Walford. The last time we heard he's still in hot water with Sonny and Deleney and I don't think this is well and truly the end of all the car lot stuff for Mark and Lauren either - I definitely think all that stuff is going to revisited again at some stage. We knew Mark was staying anyway as he's in the Flashforward but whether Mark and Lauren are still keeping up their affair at this stage remains to be seen as I can imagine that Peter, Max and Cindy will be aware of the affair at this stage and with tensions reaching all time high between Peter and Max by NYD I'm unsure if Mark and Lauren will be able to keep things going between them but only time will tell. Now there could be a slight possibility that Lauren might end up pregnant with Mark's baby after they slept together and began their affair last night - I actually don't want this in a way - mainly because Lauren already has 2 kids and 2 members of the Branning family expecting kids would just make things more messy and complicated then what they already are especially with Max still being unaware that Priya is pragnant with his child. I think a pregnancy is on the cards for Lauren but possibly later on beyond the Flashforward and into 2027 although it would be interesting to see if Peter and Lauren do get divorced off the back of her affair being revealed. Lauren cheated on Peter once with Zack and they overcome it but the fact she's done it twice - surely there's no coming back from this for Peter and Lauren once shit hits the fan. I wish Lauren would take her own advice when it comes to affairs and playing away - she lectures Max about the car crash of a life he's creating for himself yet Lauren is putting it all on the line sleeping with Mark when she's a married woman with 2 kids and has responsibilities. The family moments with Peter Lauren Cindy and Oscar were brilliant. Oscar flirting with Mark, Cindy forced to bury the hatchet with Lauren whilst Peter remains totally oblivious to the drama that is imploding around him. I wish Lauren would just make life easier for herself and cut her loses with Peter. I know family means everything to Lauren and it's something she's worked so hard for she's a good mum who doesn't want to lose her kids but surely the right thing to do is to be honest with Peter. Lauren is bored with how things are going between her and Peter she said as much at the start of the ep - if that's the case why not just end things go ahead with a divorce and keep things amicable for the kids sake and then commit to Mark if that's what Lauren really wants. She's making things harder for herself by dragging things out. That moment at the end was awkward yet equally hilarious. Lauren caught between the 2 men in her life torn between her stability with Peter and her spontaneity with Mark. Mark's final line to Peter. " I'll have what your having"🤣😭 - Well mate you're having his wife so I think you're having more then enough. God this felt so awkward for Lauren. I don't feel sorry for Peter because of the way he treats Lauren and always glorifies Cindy above his own wife however I do feel the most sorry for Louie and Jimmy who are caught up in the middle of all this. The fallout will be massive for them 😱😢💔 I just hope that Lauren knows what she is doing. 💫 - Who will be first to clock Lauren & Mark's affair? 💫 - How will Mark and Lauren be drawn into the Flashfoward?
2:09

#EastEnders #Mauren WHAT A DUFF DUFF!! 😱😬 Tense scenes at the Vic between Mark & Lauren and their families where Mark has a change of heart and decides to stay in Walford after all as Lauren puts fire with fire and commits to her affair with Mark. 🔥😬 There's no way that Mark returned to Walford just so he could finish what he started with Lauren 🤔👀 So he was going to make a flying visit just to give Lauren a choice and then fly back to Florida without a care in the world. Surely Mark has to be running away from something hence why he's making the pitstop in Walford. The last time we heard he's still in hot water with Sonny and Deleney and I don't think this is well and truly the end of all the car lot stuff for Mark and Lauren either - I definitely think all that stuff is going to revisited again at some stage. We knew Mark was staying anyway as he's in the Flashforward but whether Mark and Lauren are still keeping up their affair at this stage remains to be seen as I can imagine that Peter, Max and Cindy will be aware of the affair at this stage and with tensions reaching all time high between Peter and Max by NYD I'm unsure if Mark and Lauren will be able to keep things going between them but only time will tell. Now there could be a slight possibility that Lauren might end up pregnant with Mark's baby after they slept together and began their affair last night - I actually don't want this in a way - mainly because Lauren already has 2 kids and 2 members of the Branning family expecting kids would just make things more messy and complicated then what they already are especially with Max still being unaware that Priya is pragnant with his child. I think a pregnancy is on the cards for Lauren but possibly later on beyond the Flashforward and into 2027 although it would be interesting to see if Peter and Lauren do get divorced off the back of her affair being revealed. Lauren cheated on Peter once with Zack and they overcome it but the fact she's done it twice - surely there's no coming back from this for Peter and Lauren once shit hits the fan. I wish Lauren would take her own advice when it comes to affairs and playing away - she lectures Max about the car crash of a life he's creating for himself yet Lauren is putting it all on the line sleeping with Mark when she's a married woman with 2 kids and has responsibilities. The family moments with Peter Lauren Cindy and Oscar were brilliant. Oscar flirting with Mark, Cindy forced to bury the hatchet with Lauren whilst Peter remains totally oblivious to the drama that is imploding around him. I wish Lauren would just make life easier for herself and cut her loses with Peter. I know family means everything to Lauren and it's something she's worked so hard for she's a good mum who doesn't want to lose her kids but surely the right thing to do is to be honest with Peter. Lauren is bored with how things are going between her and Peter she said as much at the start of the ep - if that's the case why not just end things go ahead with a divorce and keep things amicable for the kids sake and then commit to Mark if that's what Lauren really wants. She's making things harder for herself by dragging things out. That moment at the end was awkward yet equally hilarious. Lauren caught between the 2 men in her life torn between her stability with Peter and her spontaneity with Mark. Mark's final line to Peter. " I'll have what your having"🤣😭 - Well mate you're having his wife so I think you're having more then enough. God this felt so awkward for Lauren. I don't feel sorry for Peter because of the way he treats Lauren and always glorifies Cindy above his own wife however I do feel the most sorry for Louie and Jimmy who are caught up in the middle of all this. The fallout will be massive for them 😱😢💔 I just hope that Lauren knows what she is doing. 💫 - Who will be first to clock Lauren & Mark's affair? 💫 - How will Mark and Lauren be drawn into the Flashfoward?

Ryan Glendenning ✨

26,186 次观看 • 9 天前

Since I’m already here in the Outro: Tear hole and have been for about 12 hours now. I may as well use this opportunity to point out one of the very distinct reasons Outro: Tear evokes such visceral reactions from all us who hear it. The meaning behind it is defintely one of the reasons. But another is the structure of the song itself. Outro: Tear is not one song with 3 verses saying the same thing. It’s 3 different reactions changing hands as the song moves from Namjoon to Yoongi to Hoseok. And along with the lyrics, the melody is doing the same thing. It’s weaving from Namjoon’s conflict to Yoongi’s despair to Hoseok’s fear. It’s 3 different reactions in response to the same inevitable end. Namjoon’s reaction being internal interrogation of his self. His relationship with identity has always been threaded through questions of sincerity. Kim Namjoon vs RM. Leader vs person. The person carrying everybody versus the person who is also exhausted and frightened and occasionally has absolutely no idea what he’s doing. It’s inward conflict. Was it real? Was the goodbye always inevitable because of his own insincerity him? Then yoongi comes in with his verse that says, fine. Destroy it. His reaction is pure rage. And it’s not rage at the people who are important to him. No. It’s rage at the fact it has come to this. So he wants it all scorched. Bc if all of it has to go, then he wants it gone completely. No lingering. No halves. No hope. And then Hoseok’s verse. His whole verse is grappling with fear through his words. But it’s also fear as a physiological language. It’s one of the truly unique things about his verse. How the melody literally starts with hard breaths. You can hear it in the song. Gasping. Forcing. Almost choking. And then his flow breaks out of its contained rhythm. He’s panicking. He’s fearful bc “ending” was always just a concept. But now it’s here in present time. He spends the final verse driving his body and the song towards a state that feels increasingly unsustainable. The breaths are shorter, his delivery gets more frantic, rhythm breaking out of confinement, and then his repetitions like geol geol geol and byeong byeong byeong lose structure within the song and becomes a fixation almost. So now you as the listener who has been experiencing that transition from conflict to rage and despair and now to fear and panic, you are naturally expecting a sort of resolve. But it doesn’t happen. What does happen is the song quite literally cuts. The composition of the flow itself finally does what it’s meant to do. It ends without allowing for a resolve. That part. That abrupt end. That is why Outro: Tear has that reaction on us all. Because the very last thing you experience with the song is an interruption. All of that confusion and pain and rage and fear carries with you into Hoseok’s verse where as the panic crescendos, you expect him to arrive emotionally somewhere. But he doesn’t. He is still inside the panic when the song takes him away from you. So now you’re the one left holding all of that with you. That’s what’s almost cruel about the song itself. There’s no completion. Hoseok’s verse just escalates and escalates and then cuts. That’s it. You don’t get closure. You don’t get the emotional luxury of watching the pain taper away. The songs just rips from you.
0:30

Since I’m already here in the Outro: Tear hole and have been for about 12 hours now. I may as well use this opportunity to point out one of the very distinct reasons Outro: Tear evokes such visceral reactions from all us who hear it. The meaning behind it is defintely one of the reasons. But another is the structure of the song itself. Outro: Tear is not one song with 3 verses saying the same thing. It’s 3 different reactions changing hands as the song moves from Namjoon to Yoongi to Hoseok. And along with the lyrics, the melody is doing the same thing. It’s weaving from Namjoon’s conflict to Yoongi’s despair to Hoseok’s fear. It’s 3 different reactions in response to the same inevitable end. Namjoon’s reaction being internal interrogation of his self. His relationship with identity has always been threaded through questions of sincerity. Kim Namjoon vs RM. Leader vs person. The person carrying everybody versus the person who is also exhausted and frightened and occasionally has absolutely no idea what he’s doing. It’s inward conflict. Was it real? Was the goodbye always inevitable because of his own insincerity him? Then yoongi comes in with his verse that says, fine. Destroy it. His reaction is pure rage. And it’s not rage at the people who are important to him. No. It’s rage at the fact it has come to this. So he wants it all scorched. Bc if all of it has to go, then he wants it gone completely. No lingering. No halves. No hope. And then Hoseok’s verse. His whole verse is grappling with fear through his words. But it’s also fear as a physiological language. It’s one of the truly unique things about his verse. How the melody literally starts with hard breaths. You can hear it in the song. Gasping. Forcing. Almost choking. And then his flow breaks out of its contained rhythm. He’s panicking. He’s fearful bc “ending” was always just a concept. But now it’s here in present time. He spends the final verse driving his body and the song towards a state that feels increasingly unsustainable. The breaths are shorter, his delivery gets more frantic, rhythm breaking out of confinement, and then his repetitions like geol geol geol and byeong byeong byeong lose structure within the song and becomes a fixation almost. So now you as the listener who has been experiencing that transition from conflict to rage and despair and now to fear and panic, you are naturally expecting a sort of resolve. But it doesn’t happen. What does happen is the song quite literally cuts. The composition of the flow itself finally does what it’s meant to do. It ends without allowing for a resolve. That part. That abrupt end. That is why Outro: Tear has that reaction on us all. Because the very last thing you experience with the song is an interruption. All of that confusion and pain and rage and fear carries with you into Hoseok’s verse where as the panic crescendos, you expect him to arrive emotionally somewhere. But he doesn’t. He is still inside the panic when the song takes him away from you. So now you’re the one left holding all of that with you. That’s what’s almost cruel about the song itself. There’s no completion. Hoseok’s verse just escalates and escalates and then cuts. That’s it. You don’t get closure. You don’t get the emotional luxury of watching the pain taper away. The songs just rips from you.

Livheartt⁷ met hobi | ㉧㉣㉣ | 🦢🤍

58,618 次观看 • 1 个月前

This broadcast of the Moriah & Berko talk show on Channel 13, from July 27, is a perfect example of the grotesque, genocidal gaslighting circus that is the Israeli media today. I broke it down for you. In the video, you can find some of the most outrageous sound bites, but I've decided to write a summary of absurdities from the entire first hour of the show, which dealt with issues concerning Gaza. ******************************* Moriah "no uninvolved" Asraf leads a discussion about the "fake starvation campaign", as the panel calls it, which has become a major "Hasbara problem". The panel's general consensus is that there is no famine in Gaza - but if there is, it's Hamas's fault. While denying that Israel is engaged in intentional starvation, the panelists appear to agree that the genocidal practice poses no ethical problem, only a public relations one. The one voice that hesitantly raises the issue of morality is being repeatedly shut down by the others. Co-host Eyal Berkovic, who has repeatedly said that Gaza should be wiped out, responds by saying that if it was up to him, he wouldn't let a drop of water into Gaza, and when Asraf says that "none of us likes to see starving children", Berkovic starts telling her repeatedly that he feels nothing towards the children in Gaza. Israeli-French journalist Emmanuelle Elbaz-Phelps is supposed to be the "leftist" of the panel, and was brought to the show to counter Berkovic. She's the only one on the panel who thinks that there's a moral problem with what Israel is doing in Gaza, and not just a "Hasbara problem". She tries to respond to Berkovic by saying that for the sake of "our children" Israel needs to prevent hunger in Gaza. Berkovic, talking to her in a blatantly disrespectful and dismissive manner, tells her that if she has mercy for the children in Gaza, she "already forgot October 7". Shay Golden, who earlier in the genocide made numerous deranged monologues ("We are coming to annihilate you") and even specified once that "we are ready to go into international isolation", now sings a different tune. He talks about how Israel's current situation on the international stage is an "existential threat", and complains that Israel is being unfairly shunned, framed for a famine it has nothing to do with. On the contrary, Golden claims, the amount of aid supplied to Gaza is "unprecedented in the entire history of human wars". Golden says that there's no question that "Israel is not starving Gazans intentionally", and that "only an idiot" would consider such a possibility. When Elbaz-Phelps tries to tell him that Berkovic literally just now said he wants to do just that, Golden hushes her. Interrupting Golden, Berkovic himself says he disagrees with him, and asks him whether he would support a hypothetical decision by Netanyahu, to prevent life essentials from entering the Strip, "until my hostages are returned". Elbaz-Phelps later tries to reflect to Berkovic the full meaning of his genocidal words, and asks him if he wouldn't react in case he was shown some foreign TV show with someone stating that "all Jews should be killed". In response, Berkovic suddenly plays dumb, asking, "Did I say something like this? I want the war to end." Asaf Cohen, a former deputy commander of Unit 8200, attempts to explain Israel's "Hasbara problem" and in the process says that "there's no starvation campaign in Gaza". Nevo Cohen, another panelist, is a former advisor to Itamar Ben Gvir and Naftali Bennett, who thinks Israel's been too soft on Gaza, and views the Strip as WWII Japan & Germany. Cohen cuts the other Cohen by loudly protesting - "What? What? What do you mean there's no starvation campaign in Gaza?" But all is well in the end - the two Cohens realize it was all a misunderstanding: Asaf Cohen was trying to say that there's no Israeli policy to starve Gaza, while Nevo Cohen thought he's denying a media campaign of staged starvation by Hamas. They both agree that, as the former Cohen puts it: "There is a marketing and publicity campaign claiming that we are starving Gaza." Asraf concludes that if Israel had decided on a policy of starvation, it would've been OK to deal with international pressure, and that the "biggest tragedy" is that Israel is being blamed for causing starvation despite putting, supposedly, large efforts in preventing a humanitarian disaster. ******************************* At a certain point, a clip is played, featuring a genocidal statement by Minister Amichay Eliyahu, said on the radio a few days earlier - "All of Gaza will be Jewish, it won't be fenced-up settlement... The government is racing to erase Gaza. Thank god, we're erasing this evil, and erasing the population that was raised on Mein Kampf". Similar genocidal statements had been made by members of the same panel - including during this very broadcast. Yet the caption on the screen reads "Amichay Eliyahu's horrible statement". Berkovic ridicules Minister Eliyahu's words, calling the minister "a joke" and saying that his plan to settle Gaza is unrealistic - it would be too expensive. ******************************* Avida Bachar then joins the panel. Bachar is a resident of the Gaza Envelope who was injured on October 7 and lost his wife and son. Since then he's often been invited to be interviewed by Israeli media, where he repeatedly spreads his insane genocidal fantasies, about Gaza (and the West Bank) being completely wiped out. So once again Bachar starts ranting, saying Israel needs to exterminate "every last one of them". When Asraf asks him: "Who do you want to exterminate?" he immediately responds "The Palestinians, all of them", but then stops and says "Wait... Hamas." This momentary realization doesn't prevent him from later saying that the "enemy" needs to "disappear" and that everyone in Gaza, including a baby born today ("In Rafah" - I guess he doesn't know Rafah has been completely erased) is an enemy. With complete lack of self-awareness, Asraf complains about the language Bachar uses - she says that words like "annihilation" and "erasure" are terms the enemy uses, and "we're not them". When Bachar is asked about the option of settlement in the Gaza Strip, he first raises opposition, and says that, "Daniella Weiss is not good.", but later it turns out that he's totally cool with settling the Gaza Strip, but only after every single Palestinian there has been expelled or murdered. No one in the panel speaks up against Bachar's murderous ravings, but Elbaz-Phelps comes closest - she can be heard gasping while Bachar describes how he proposes to "push" Gazans into Egypt, by bringing up his memories from the kibbutz cattle farm, where he used to poke the cows with an electric cable to make them move. Panelist Ilan Lotan, ex-Shin Bet, responds to that by saying "I know the Egyptians, it's not going to happen". As if the problem with this unhinged sadism is merely a practical one.
3:46

This broadcast of the Moriah & Berko talk show on Channel 13, from July 27, is a perfect example of the grotesque, genocidal gaslighting circus that is the Israeli media today. I broke it down for you. In the video, you can find some of the most outrageous sound bites, but I've decided to write a summary of absurdities from the entire first hour of the show, which dealt with issues concerning Gaza. ******************************* Moriah "no uninvolved" Asraf leads a discussion about the "fake starvation campaign", as the panel calls it, which has become a major "Hasbara problem". The panel's general consensus is that there is no famine in Gaza - but if there is, it's Hamas's fault. While denying that Israel is engaged in intentional starvation, the panelists appear to agree that the genocidal practice poses no ethical problem, only a public relations one. The one voice that hesitantly raises the issue of morality is being repeatedly shut down by the others. Co-host Eyal Berkovic, who has repeatedly said that Gaza should be wiped out, responds by saying that if it was up to him, he wouldn't let a drop of water into Gaza, and when Asraf says that "none of us likes to see starving children", Berkovic starts telling her repeatedly that he feels nothing towards the children in Gaza. Israeli-French journalist Emmanuelle Elbaz-Phelps is supposed to be the "leftist" of the panel, and was brought to the show to counter Berkovic. She's the only one on the panel who thinks that there's a moral problem with what Israel is doing in Gaza, and not just a "Hasbara problem". She tries to respond to Berkovic by saying that for the sake of "our children" Israel needs to prevent hunger in Gaza. Berkovic, talking to her in a blatantly disrespectful and dismissive manner, tells her that if she has mercy for the children in Gaza, she "already forgot October 7". Shay Golden, who earlier in the genocide made numerous deranged monologues ("We are coming to annihilate you") and even specified once that "we are ready to go into international isolation", now sings a different tune. He talks about how Israel's current situation on the international stage is an "existential threat", and complains that Israel is being unfairly shunned, framed for a famine it has nothing to do with. On the contrary, Golden claims, the amount of aid supplied to Gaza is "unprecedented in the entire history of human wars". Golden says that there's no question that "Israel is not starving Gazans intentionally", and that "only an idiot" would consider such a possibility. When Elbaz-Phelps tries to tell him that Berkovic literally just now said he wants to do just that, Golden hushes her. Interrupting Golden, Berkovic himself says he disagrees with him, and asks him whether he would support a hypothetical decision by Netanyahu, to prevent life essentials from entering the Strip, "until my hostages are returned". Elbaz-Phelps later tries to reflect to Berkovic the full meaning of his genocidal words, and asks him if he wouldn't react in case he was shown some foreign TV show with someone stating that "all Jews should be killed". In response, Berkovic suddenly plays dumb, asking, "Did I say something like this? I want the war to end." Asaf Cohen, a former deputy commander of Unit 8200, attempts to explain Israel's "Hasbara problem" and in the process says that "there's no starvation campaign in Gaza". Nevo Cohen, another panelist, is a former advisor to Itamar Ben Gvir and Naftali Bennett, who thinks Israel's been too soft on Gaza, and views the Strip as WWII Japan & Germany. Cohen cuts the other Cohen by loudly protesting - "What? What? What do you mean there's no starvation campaign in Gaza?" But all is well in the end - the two Cohens realize it was all a misunderstanding: Asaf Cohen was trying to say that there's no Israeli policy to starve Gaza, while Nevo Cohen thought he's denying a media campaign of staged starvation by Hamas. They both agree that, as the former Cohen puts it: "There is a marketing and publicity campaign claiming that we are starving Gaza." Asraf concludes that if Israel had decided on a policy of starvation, it would've been OK to deal with international pressure, and that the "biggest tragedy" is that Israel is being blamed for causing starvation despite putting, supposedly, large efforts in preventing a humanitarian disaster. ******************************* At a certain point, a clip is played, featuring a genocidal statement by Minister Amichay Eliyahu, said on the radio a few days earlier - "All of Gaza will be Jewish, it won't be fenced-up settlement... The government is racing to erase Gaza. Thank god, we're erasing this evil, and erasing the population that was raised on Mein Kampf". Similar genocidal statements had been made by members of the same panel - including during this very broadcast. Yet the caption on the screen reads "Amichay Eliyahu's horrible statement". Berkovic ridicules Minister Eliyahu's words, calling the minister "a joke" and saying that his plan to settle Gaza is unrealistic - it would be too expensive. ******************************* Avida Bachar then joins the panel. Bachar is a resident of the Gaza Envelope who was injured on October 7 and lost his wife and son. Since then he's often been invited to be interviewed by Israeli media, where he repeatedly spreads his insane genocidal fantasies, about Gaza (and the West Bank) being completely wiped out. So once again Bachar starts ranting, saying Israel needs to exterminate "every last one of them". When Asraf asks him: "Who do you want to exterminate?" he immediately responds "The Palestinians, all of them", but then stops and says "Wait... Hamas." This momentary realization doesn't prevent him from later saying that the "enemy" needs to "disappear" and that everyone in Gaza, including a baby born today ("In Rafah" - I guess he doesn't know Rafah has been completely erased) is an enemy. With complete lack of self-awareness, Asraf complains about the language Bachar uses - she says that words like "annihilation" and "erasure" are terms the enemy uses, and "we're not them". When Bachar is asked about the option of settlement in the Gaza Strip, he first raises opposition, and says that, "Daniella Weiss is not good.", but later it turns out that he's totally cool with settling the Gaza Strip, but only after every single Palestinian there has been expelled or murdered. No one in the panel speaks up against Bachar's murderous ravings, but Elbaz-Phelps comes closest - she can be heard gasping while Bachar describes how he proposes to "push" Gazans into Egypt, by bringing up his memories from the kibbutz cattle farm, where he used to poke the cows with an electric cable to make them move. Panelist Ilan Lotan, ex-Shin Bet, responds to that by saying "I know the Egyptians, it's not going to happen". As if the problem with this unhinged sadism is merely a practical one.

B.M.

231,213 次观看 • 1 年前

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)
1:40

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)

Joe Murgia

19,680 次观看 • 2 个月前

🔴JK🌟Was LIVE | 6.28.26 | 4 hours As one of the lucky ones who was able to watch JK’s four-hour live last night, I wanted to share what I took away from it. Fair warning: this is a long one… but he did give us four hours of content. 😅 Read if you’d like! First, and most importantly, Jungkook wants us to see him for who he is: a responsible adult who is capable of making his own decisions. He wants people to stop questioning every choice he makes, every word he says, and every aspect of how he lives his life. He is happy. He told us himself, “I’m so good.” He takes his health and well-being seriously, and he knows what works for him. He works hard, and like many adults, enjoys winding down sometimes with good food, alcohol, or both. He’s naturally nocturnal and thrives on the schedule that suits him. He doesn’t need unsolicited advice about how he should sleep or live. After the show, he went out to eat with the members, before returning to his hotel to film the dance challenge, which took over 50 takes. It was another reminder of how much pride he takes in his work. He always wants to show us, and himself, the very best he can do. Right now, he’s immersed in dance. He’s studying locking, krumping, and other house styles because he genuinely wants to become an even better dancer. He wants keep sharing dance challenges with us, because that’s one of the ways he can give us something new right now. He said he doesn’t actually listen to music that often, unless it is connected to a dance video, but when he does, he’s been enjoying a lot of music from his fellow idols, especially girl groups. He even shared a few songs he’s been playing on repeat lately. He’s also been enjoying anime, talking about several series he’s been watching and how excited he is for the next season of Cyberpunk: Edgerunners. He spoke honestly about learning English. He has a teacher, and he wants to improve, but it’s difficult and he simply doesn’t have enough time to devote to it. At the same time, he made it clear, again, that he doesn’t want people constantly asking or telling him to speak English. As he has said so many times: “I don’t speak English. I’m Korean.” If you choose to watch his lives, stop asking for it! One of the most candid moments was hearing him talk about big brand events. He admitted that they make him uncomfortable, saying Taehyung loves them and is much better at them. Small talk doesn’t come naturally to him, and he gets shy with all the eye contact. But, like the professional he is, he has learned how to do it well, because it’s part of his job, and because he genuinely appreciates the brands he works with, speaking warmly once again about his Calvin Klein collaboration. And then there’s what has always been part of Jungkook’s core: singing. He simply loves to sing. He loves exploring his voice, learning new techniques, experimenting with different genres, and constantly improving. He watches YouTube vocal tutorials to keep growing. Karaoke isn’t just fun for him, it’s practice, exploration, and another way to become a better artist. Listening to him sing throughout the live was a gift. Beautiful, playful, effortless, and unmistakably Jungkook. His performance of “Into the Sun” was my personal highlight, with perfectly placed vocal runs, delicate high notes, and emotion woven into every line. This is only a small part of what Jungkook shared with us over those four hours. I’m incredibly grateful that he gave us so much of his time, his thoughts, his laughter, and his music. My biggest takeaway is this: if you choose to log into his lives, then let him live. Keep your cringy comments to yourself. He doesn’t want to see them, and neither do we. Listen to what he’s actually telling you, trust him to know what’s best for himself, and simply enjoy the rare privilege of spending time with him. Thank you, Jungkook. We love you. 💜
7:09

🔴JK🌟Was LIVE | 6.28.26 | 4 hours As one of the lucky ones who was able to watch JK’s four-hour live last night, I wanted to share what I took away from it. Fair warning: this is a long one… but he did give us four hours of content. 😅 Read if you’d like! First, and most importantly, Jungkook wants us to see him for who he is: a responsible adult who is capable of making his own decisions. He wants people to stop questioning every choice he makes, every word he says, and every aspect of how he lives his life. He is happy. He told us himself, “I’m so good.” He takes his health and well-being seriously, and he knows what works for him. He works hard, and like many adults, enjoys winding down sometimes with good food, alcohol, or both. He’s naturally nocturnal and thrives on the schedule that suits him. He doesn’t need unsolicited advice about how he should sleep or live. After the show, he went out to eat with the members, before returning to his hotel to film the dance challenge, which took over 50 takes. It was another reminder of how much pride he takes in his work. He always wants to show us, and himself, the very best he can do. Right now, he’s immersed in dance. He’s studying locking, krumping, and other house styles because he genuinely wants to become an even better dancer. He wants keep sharing dance challenges with us, because that’s one of the ways he can give us something new right now. He said he doesn’t actually listen to music that often, unless it is connected to a dance video, but when he does, he’s been enjoying a lot of music from his fellow idols, especially girl groups. He even shared a few songs he’s been playing on repeat lately. He’s also been enjoying anime, talking about several series he’s been watching and how excited he is for the next season of Cyberpunk: Edgerunners. He spoke honestly about learning English. He has a teacher, and he wants to improve, but it’s difficult and he simply doesn’t have enough time to devote to it. At the same time, he made it clear, again, that he doesn’t want people constantly asking or telling him to speak English. As he has said so many times: “I don’t speak English. I’m Korean.” If you choose to watch his lives, stop asking for it! One of the most candid moments was hearing him talk about big brand events. He admitted that they make him uncomfortable, saying Taehyung loves them and is much better at them. Small talk doesn’t come naturally to him, and he gets shy with all the eye contact. But, like the professional he is, he has learned how to do it well, because it’s part of his job, and because he genuinely appreciates the brands he works with, speaking warmly once again about his Calvin Klein collaboration. And then there’s what has always been part of Jungkook’s core: singing. He simply loves to sing. He loves exploring his voice, learning new techniques, experimenting with different genres, and constantly improving. He watches YouTube vocal tutorials to keep growing. Karaoke isn’t just fun for him, it’s practice, exploration, and another way to become a better artist. Listening to him sing throughout the live was a gift. Beautiful, playful, effortless, and unmistakably Jungkook. His performance of “Into the Sun” was my personal highlight, with perfectly placed vocal runs, delicate high notes, and emotion woven into every line. This is only a small part of what Jungkook shared with us over those four hours. I’m incredibly grateful that he gave us so much of his time, his thoughts, his laughter, and his music. My biggest takeaway is this: if you choose to log into his lives, then let him live. Keep your cringy comments to yourself. He doesn’t want to see them, and neither do we. Listen to what he’s actually telling you, trust him to know what’s best for himself, and simply enjoy the rare privilege of spending time with him. Thank you, Jungkook. We love you. 💜

TaeKook USA 🇺🇸 #김태형 #정국

36,906 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨TUCKER CARLSON - GREAT TAKE!!! 🚨What comes next?! A forecast from a man who has never before given an interview to Russian media. 🚨EXCLUSIVE #60MINUTES 🚨How will the mercenary and tyrant Zelensky meet his end? 🚨What should the West thank Putin for? 🚨What is stopping Russia from destroying Europe and the US? 🚨Why did Tucker fall out with Trump? 🚨What does an American consider the best habit of Russians? 🚨Only here: political predictions that come true—featuring American journalist Tucker Carlson. 📑So, what happens next? A prediction from a person we trust and whom every single conservative in the U.S. trusts as well. An exclusive for 60 Minutes. The most famous American journalist, Tucker Carlson, the author of the renowned and widely publicized interview with Russia's President Putin. Tucker Carlson himself never gives interviews. He has never publicly appeared in Russia, but for the first time, he agreed to talk to us, choosing 60 Minutes to discuss Ukraine and the US Tucker Carlson loves the Russian banya, he believes that Russia and the US, as superpowers, don't have to go to war. He is shocked that Brussels leaders don't care at all about Europe's demise. And Europe is already dead. Carlson is ready to come back to Moscow as soon as tomorrow, but not to Kyiv. He knows for sure they'd just kill him there. 🚨He calls Ukraine a police state, Zelensky a murderer. 🚨Tucker Carlson also fell out with Trump. So, why does Zelensky send people to die in this war, a war in which Ukraine cannot win? And when is the next big battle? How will the war end? When will the war end? Key answers. So, what happens next? Ukraine is a despotism, a tyranny, a police state whose people are dying. The people making decisions there do not plan to stay in the country, if everything collapses. I believe they have money offshore, and if it all falls apart, they'll leave. These are not national leaders, they're mercenaries. Very few tyrants retire and live out their days peacefully in their beds, surrounded by grandchildren. It just doesn't happen. 🚨🤡And Zelensky is a tyrant. 🚨He canceled elections, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of movement, and he also sends people to die in a war, in which victory is impossible. That is the very definition of tyranny. 🚨🤡He is a tyrant. On top of that, he is corrupt, and I cannot recall a single case when such behavior ever went unpunished. I do not know the solution to this problem, unless Western countries stop supporting Ukraine and thereby force it to seek a settlement through negotiations. Ukraine has never been a sovereign state, because it is within the sphere of influence of great powers. It does not possess independence in the sense that Americans or Russians understand it. But Ukraine does not necessarily have to wage a war that destroys most twenty-five-year-old men or wipes out the nation's future. This war can be stopped immediately. I met him in the president's office. At that time, I didn't know anything about cocaine, but I was very surprised by his behavior. His eyes were shining, he was both very happy and sluggish at the same time, he tried to joke in ways I couldn't understand at all. I thought, what a strange person. Zelensky imposed sanctions against his former press secretary, a woman I know personally, and who, by the way, is very smart and a huge patriot. She loves Ukraine, but considers Zelensky a despot and a cocaine addict. She worked with him for many years, and that's the opinion of someone from the inside. And for voicing this out loud, specifically, in my show, sanctions were imposed on her. This means she cannot visit her own country, that her assets there are frozen, that if she returns, she faces arrest, and it could also have consequences for her family, who remain in Ukraine. Such behavior is unworthy of a democratically elected leader. So why does my government and the governments of Western European countries support Zelensky? If you think about it, it's frightening. 🚨This war could destroy Europe. 🚨I want to make it absolutely clear—the destruction of Europe would be the greatest tragedy, one that can be imagined. 🚨💔My heart clenches at the very thought of it. 🚨I love Europe. My ancestors came from there. I am against war in Europe and against its destruction. I'm saying this because I believe we are close to both of these scenarios. And it seems to me that European leaders do not care about this. 🚨🤡Like Zelensky, they are not connected to their own countries. They belong to the international class of people who will leave if anything happens. If the ship goes down, they'll just run away. That is exactly why they behave so recklessly. Western media are united in their hatred of Russia and Putin. And the main reason is that the Russian government supports the Russian Orthodox Church. It's true, but no one wants to talk about it. It sounds strange, but it's a fact. I've worked in the media all my life and I know that's what angers them most. But there are also geopolitical reasons. 🚨As is well known, Zbigniew Brzezinski said: if Russia is in a permanent alliance with Ukraine, then by definition, we are dealing with a superpower. After all, Ukraine is the largest country in Europe, which has the most fertile land and enormous resources. 🚨Russia is, of course, the largest country in the world with colossal resource reserves. Together, they form an unbreakable bloc and, of course, pose a threat to Europe and NATO. 🚨Our leaders are literally infuriated that Vladimir Putin supported the revival of Christianity in Russia. Imagine if, in the year two thousand, Putin had said: You know, the only thing I liked about the Soviet Union, was their atheistic stance. Russia will continue to be an atheistic country. 🚨And now there would be no war in Ukraine, the Maidan in two thousand fourteen would not have happened. This is exactly the scenario western leaders would have preferred. By the way, Russia and the West are both products of one civilization, the Western Christian civilization. 🚨Let's take, for example, Russian literature. 🚨I'm American, I was born here, but when I read Tolstoy, whether it's Pushkin or Dostoevsky, I understand all the references and meanings. Why do I understand them? Because we share a common cultural foundation—Christianity. That's why I hope and believe that someday these ties will be restored. After all, those who started this war, who have been calling for it for twenty-five years, of course, would want to see Europe destroyed. Among Western leaders, there is deep hostility toward Europe, as the cradle of Christian civilization. That is a fact. You know, it wasn't easy, but not because of Peskov or the press service. Actually, everything on their end went very smoothly. The problems came from the U.S. government and their allies. They hacked my personal correspondence and leaked it to The New York Times. Huge efforts were made to prevent me from conducting this interview. And they came from the direction of NATO. President Putin is one of the most pro-Western leaders in your country. Many people would like to see a confrontation between Russia and NATO, and only thanks to President Putin's restraint and patience, that has not happened. That is why I often tell people in the United States, including politicians: You claim you do not like Putin. 🚨Putin is the most pro-Western and moderate leader Russia has ever had. And you should be grateful that he is in power. If he were not there, we would already be fighting a full-scale war, which we would lose. 🚨I am sure that the Republicans will lose control of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and I believe that a wave of investigations into the activities of the Trump administration will follow, related to business. 🚨There will be many corruption scandals, perhaps even an attempt at impeachment. But I don't believe any of this will necessarily change our foreign policy direction. I think Trump was upset. I've known him for twenty-five years. I've always liked him a lot, and I still do. 🚨He's an interesting, very amusing and intelligent person. He was angry at me because of my criticism, because he put Israel's interests above those of his own country. I feel sorry for Trump. 🚨It was Israel that dragged him into the war with Iran, and it is Israel that prevents Trump from getting out of it. The country is run by entrenched, unelected interest groups, including intelligence agencies and other structures. This situation is unacceptable. I think for us as a nation, it would be important and useful to have the opportunity to vote for a party, that would represent the interests of the people and act accordingly, just as they wish. And right now, there is no such party. So if such a party appears, it will serve the people, living in the United States, regardless of race or religion. 🚨I am an American, my ancestors come from Britain and Scandinavia. 🚨I'm not sure if I will ever fully understand what the Russian soul is. Although I have dined with Russians many times, we ate Russian food, smoked, and talked about what it really is. This question fascinates me greatly. The Russian soul feels both history and God deeply, and believes in the redemptive power of suffering. What I like most about Russia is the idea that being outdoors even in bad weather is good for you. This is a society that has known suffering and understands the tragic nature of life. Society is very resilient, believing in endurance. We go through trials, but we will definitely come out victorious. And finally, it is an educated and well-read society. Most importantly, it is a society that honors the banya. If there is anything I love in Russia, it's the banya. I even have one at home. I go there every day. In short, I hope I can return. 🚨I could come to Moscow as soon as tomorrow, but I wouldn't be able to go to Kyiv. 🚨They would kill me there. 🚨And that's a fact.
11:45

🚨TUCKER CARLSON - GREAT TAKE!!! 🚨What comes next?! A forecast from a man who has never before given an interview to Russian media. 🚨EXCLUSIVE #60MINUTES 🚨How will the mercenary and tyrant Zelensky meet his end? 🚨What should the West thank Putin for? 🚨What is stopping Russia from destroying Europe and the US? 🚨Why did Tucker fall out with Trump? 🚨What does an American consider the best habit of Russians? 🚨Only here: political predictions that come true—featuring American journalist Tucker Carlson. 📑So, what happens next? A prediction from a person we trust and whom every single conservative in the U.S. trusts as well. An exclusive for 60 Minutes. The most famous American journalist, Tucker Carlson, the author of the renowned and widely publicized interview with Russia's President Putin. Tucker Carlson himself never gives interviews. He has never publicly appeared in Russia, but for the first time, he agreed to talk to us, choosing 60 Minutes to discuss Ukraine and the US Tucker Carlson loves the Russian banya, he believes that Russia and the US, as superpowers, don't have to go to war. He is shocked that Brussels leaders don't care at all about Europe's demise. And Europe is already dead. Carlson is ready to come back to Moscow as soon as tomorrow, but not to Kyiv. He knows for sure they'd just kill him there. 🚨He calls Ukraine a police state, Zelensky a murderer. 🚨Tucker Carlson also fell out with Trump. So, why does Zelensky send people to die in this war, a war in which Ukraine cannot win? And when is the next big battle? How will the war end? When will the war end? Key answers. So, what happens next? Ukraine is a despotism, a tyranny, a police state whose people are dying. The people making decisions there do not plan to stay in the country, if everything collapses. I believe they have money offshore, and if it all falls apart, they'll leave. These are not national leaders, they're mercenaries. Very few tyrants retire and live out their days peacefully in their beds, surrounded by grandchildren. It just doesn't happen. 🚨🤡And Zelensky is a tyrant. 🚨He canceled elections, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of movement, and he also sends people to die in a war, in which victory is impossible. That is the very definition of tyranny. 🚨🤡He is a tyrant. On top of that, he is corrupt, and I cannot recall a single case when such behavior ever went unpunished. I do not know the solution to this problem, unless Western countries stop supporting Ukraine and thereby force it to seek a settlement through negotiations. Ukraine has never been a sovereign state, because it is within the sphere of influence of great powers. It does not possess independence in the sense that Americans or Russians understand it. But Ukraine does not necessarily have to wage a war that destroys most twenty-five-year-old men or wipes out the nation's future. This war can be stopped immediately. I met him in the president's office. At that time, I didn't know anything about cocaine, but I was very surprised by his behavior. His eyes were shining, he was both very happy and sluggish at the same time, he tried to joke in ways I couldn't understand at all. I thought, what a strange person. Zelensky imposed sanctions against his former press secretary, a woman I know personally, and who, by the way, is very smart and a huge patriot. She loves Ukraine, but considers Zelensky a despot and a cocaine addict. She worked with him for many years, and that's the opinion of someone from the inside. And for voicing this out loud, specifically, in my show, sanctions were imposed on her. This means she cannot visit her own country, that her assets there are frozen, that if she returns, she faces arrest, and it could also have consequences for her family, who remain in Ukraine. Such behavior is unworthy of a democratically elected leader. So why does my government and the governments of Western European countries support Zelensky? If you think about it, it's frightening. 🚨This war could destroy Europe. 🚨I want to make it absolutely clear—the destruction of Europe would be the greatest tragedy, one that can be imagined. 🚨💔My heart clenches at the very thought of it. 🚨I love Europe. My ancestors came from there. I am against war in Europe and against its destruction. I'm saying this because I believe we are close to both of these scenarios. And it seems to me that European leaders do not care about this. 🚨🤡Like Zelensky, they are not connected to their own countries. They belong to the international class of people who will leave if anything happens. If the ship goes down, they'll just run away. That is exactly why they behave so recklessly. Western media are united in their hatred of Russia and Putin. And the main reason is that the Russian government supports the Russian Orthodox Church. It's true, but no one wants to talk about it. It sounds strange, but it's a fact. I've worked in the media all my life and I know that's what angers them most. But there are also geopolitical reasons. 🚨As is well known, Zbigniew Brzezinski said: if Russia is in a permanent alliance with Ukraine, then by definition, we are dealing with a superpower. After all, Ukraine is the largest country in Europe, which has the most fertile land and enormous resources. 🚨Russia is, of course, the largest country in the world with colossal resource reserves. Together, they form an unbreakable bloc and, of course, pose a threat to Europe and NATO. 🚨Our leaders are literally infuriated that Vladimir Putin supported the revival of Christianity in Russia. Imagine if, in the year two thousand, Putin had said: You know, the only thing I liked about the Soviet Union, was their atheistic stance. Russia will continue to be an atheistic country. 🚨And now there would be no war in Ukraine, the Maidan in two thousand fourteen would not have happened. This is exactly the scenario western leaders would have preferred. By the way, Russia and the West are both products of one civilization, the Western Christian civilization. 🚨Let's take, for example, Russian literature. 🚨I'm American, I was born here, but when I read Tolstoy, whether it's Pushkin or Dostoevsky, I understand all the references and meanings. Why do I understand them? Because we share a common cultural foundation—Christianity. That's why I hope and believe that someday these ties will be restored. After all, those who started this war, who have been calling for it for twenty-five years, of course, would want to see Europe destroyed. Among Western leaders, there is deep hostility toward Europe, as the cradle of Christian civilization. That is a fact. You know, it wasn't easy, but not because of Peskov or the press service. Actually, everything on their end went very smoothly. The problems came from the U.S. government and their allies. They hacked my personal correspondence and leaked it to The New York Times. Huge efforts were made to prevent me from conducting this interview. And they came from the direction of NATO. President Putin is one of the most pro-Western leaders in your country. Many people would like to see a confrontation between Russia and NATO, and only thanks to President Putin's restraint and patience, that has not happened. That is why I often tell people in the United States, including politicians: You claim you do not like Putin. 🚨Putin is the most pro-Western and moderate leader Russia has ever had. And you should be grateful that he is in power. If he were not there, we would already be fighting a full-scale war, which we would lose. 🚨I am sure that the Republicans will lose control of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and I believe that a wave of investigations into the activities of the Trump administration will follow, related to business. 🚨There will be many corruption scandals, perhaps even an attempt at impeachment. But I don't believe any of this will necessarily change our foreign policy direction. I think Trump was upset. I've known him for twenty-five years. I've always liked him a lot, and I still do. 🚨He's an interesting, very amusing and intelligent person. He was angry at me because of my criticism, because he put Israel's interests above those of his own country. I feel sorry for Trump. 🚨It was Israel that dragged him into the war with Iran, and it is Israel that prevents Trump from getting out of it. The country is run by entrenched, unelected interest groups, including intelligence agencies and other structures. This situation is unacceptable. I think for us as a nation, it would be important and useful to have the opportunity to vote for a party, that would represent the interests of the people and act accordingly, just as they wish. And right now, there is no such party. So if such a party appears, it will serve the people, living in the United States, regardless of race or religion. 🚨I am an American, my ancestors come from Britain and Scandinavia. 🚨I'm not sure if I will ever fully understand what the Russian soul is. Although I have dined with Russians many times, we ate Russian food, smoked, and talked about what it really is. This question fascinates me greatly. The Russian soul feels both history and God deeply, and believes in the redemptive power of suffering. What I like most about Russia is the idea that being outdoors even in bad weather is good for you. This is a society that has known suffering and understands the tragic nature of life. Society is very resilient, believing in endurance. We go through trials, but we will definitely come out victorious. And finally, it is an educated and well-read society. Most importantly, it is a society that honors the banya. If there is anything I love in Russia, it's the banya. I even have one at home. I go there every day. In short, I hope I can return. 🚨I could come to Moscow as soon as tomorrow, but I wouldn't be able to go to Kyiv. 🚨They would kill me there. 🚨And that's a fact.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

35,113 次观看 • 13 天前

🔴 I listen to the pro-regime side a lot. That means I do not just painfully listen through hours of what the regime lobbyists talk about in podcasts and interviews, but also to what the Woke Right says. I listen to their lies and try to get an understanding of the truth. Remember: Propaganda is always a mix of both. I listen to projection, deflection, and try to detect which accusation is a confession. Sometimes it's one word. Between two hours of coordinated propaganda, the truth seems to slip through. One word that caught my attention, that nobody else listening to this might have caught. In his recent interview with Russian agent "America is a cancer," Elizabeth Lane (or whatever her real name is), Tucker has a moment where he talks about how disappointed he is that he couldn't deliver on his (assigned) job: to prevent Trump, through his personal relationship and manipulation, from starting a war with the Islamic Republic. Tucker failed, and he is still not over it. He has talked about it multiple times and always displays how this personal failure gets to him. Then Tucker explains what he thinks Trump's plan or vision was when he started the war: kill the Ayatollah, the regime would collapse, and then a pro-Western leader - he corrects himself, "king or something" - would be in Iran. You tell me who Tucker was referring to when describing Trump's vision for a free Iran. I take from this detail the following things: ▪️Trump is aware of the Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi's popularity and massive political base inside Iran. He is aware that a free Iran after elections will include the Crown Prince leading Iran. And he was counting on that part of the equation when he started the war to be the outcome. ▪️All of the noise the regime lobby made up - that Trump called him the "loser prince," that Trump doesn't like the Crown Prince, doesn't take him seriously - we all knew that it was regime propaganda, but I want to reiterate that it was, and continues to be, all just lies. ▪️The part that remains open in my head to this day is: what changed? How did people inside the White House (Vance including regime lobbyists as Vance's friends and advisers) change Trump's mind? Regarding the rest, here is my assessment: ▪️Everything they describe here that the pro-Iran side is doing (vs. the pro-regime side they are both on) is what THEY are doing themselves. They had placed certain "operatives" in Trump's orbit, and they thought they could control/manipulate Trump and put him in The Truman Show. ▪️They did fail in part. Trump did and does listen to people like the late Lindsey Graham, Mark R. Levin, and Laura Loomer. They keep naming these people specifically over and over again. They hate that they can't get rid of them. They are all glad that Lindsey Graham is no longer with us. ▪️They do mention Charlie Kirk as well - as part of "their allegiance". I could write a novel about how I think all of this fits together, what truly happened and what didn't. I did write a long text explaining it, but I deleted it again. It's a different topic for a different time. I'll just repeat the obvious: Nobody has profited politically more from Charlie's death than the Woke Right. And again: Russia, the regime, and the Woke Right are all joining forces to get Tyler Robinson to walk free. Nobody is trying harder to save the man who killed Charlie by blaming everyone else (especially Israel) for his death. They put the deflection campaign out there one hour after his death (narrative control). ▪️There is one part of the interview where the Russian agent talks about how you can control Trump (anyone, for that matter) by the intel you present him with and the decisions that person makes based on that intel. I agree with her 100%. It is what I've been saying the entire time: This is a war of information, with some people surrounding Trump telling him the truth and these people surrounding Trump manipulating him in favor of saving the regime. ▪️Tucker emphasizes again how mad he is that he/they can no longer feed Trump false intel ("he lives in a biosphere where no new information comes in"). Their frustration about losing this power to some degree is a good sign. ▪️Tucker also put Marco Rubio on that list of people he considers problematic. After naming Mark Levin, he directly names Rubio. My observation is that they left Rubio out of their 'campaign of taking people down' until they saw that Vance was losing support and Rubio was gaining it instead. Now the regime's media is producing LEGO videos targeting Rubio. The Woke Right will, this is my guess, start escalating its attacks against Rubio moving forward. ▪️Why? Because they are all politically united and aligned behind the following things: 1. blaming Israel for everything, 2. making Vance (their guy) president in 2028, and 3. saving the Islamic Republic.
6:16

🔴 I listen to the pro-regime side a lot. That means I do not just painfully listen through hours of what the regime lobbyists talk about in podcasts and interviews, but also to what the Woke Right says. I listen to their lies and try to get an understanding of the truth. Remember: Propaganda is always a mix of both. I listen to projection, deflection, and try to detect which accusation is a confession. Sometimes it's one word. Between two hours of coordinated propaganda, the truth seems to slip through. One word that caught my attention, that nobody else listening to this might have caught. In his recent interview with Russian agent "America is a cancer," Elizabeth Lane (or whatever her real name is), Tucker has a moment where he talks about how disappointed he is that he couldn't deliver on his (assigned) job: to prevent Trump, through his personal relationship and manipulation, from starting a war with the Islamic Republic. Tucker failed, and he is still not over it. He has talked about it multiple times and always displays how this personal failure gets to him. Then Tucker explains what he thinks Trump's plan or vision was when he started the war: kill the Ayatollah, the regime would collapse, and then a pro-Western leader - he corrects himself, "king or something" - would be in Iran. You tell me who Tucker was referring to when describing Trump's vision for a free Iran. I take from this detail the following things: ▪️Trump is aware of the Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi's popularity and massive political base inside Iran. He is aware that a free Iran after elections will include the Crown Prince leading Iran. And he was counting on that part of the equation when he started the war to be the outcome. ▪️All of the noise the regime lobby made up - that Trump called him the "loser prince," that Trump doesn't like the Crown Prince, doesn't take him seriously - we all knew that it was regime propaganda, but I want to reiterate that it was, and continues to be, all just lies. ▪️The part that remains open in my head to this day is: what changed? How did people inside the White House (Vance including regime lobbyists as Vance's friends and advisers) change Trump's mind? Regarding the rest, here is my assessment: ▪️Everything they describe here that the pro-Iran side is doing (vs. the pro-regime side they are both on) is what THEY are doing themselves. They had placed certain "operatives" in Trump's orbit, and they thought they could control/manipulate Trump and put him in The Truman Show. ▪️They did fail in part. Trump did and does listen to people like the late Lindsey Graham, Mark R. Levin, and Laura Loomer. They keep naming these people specifically over and over again. They hate that they can't get rid of them. They are all glad that Lindsey Graham is no longer with us. ▪️They do mention Charlie Kirk as well - as part of "their allegiance". I could write a novel about how I think all of this fits together, what truly happened and what didn't. I did write a long text explaining it, but I deleted it again. It's a different topic for a different time. I'll just repeat the obvious: Nobody has profited politically more from Charlie's death than the Woke Right. And again: Russia, the regime, and the Woke Right are all joining forces to get Tyler Robinson to walk free. Nobody is trying harder to save the man who killed Charlie by blaming everyone else (especially Israel) for his death. They put the deflection campaign out there one hour after his death (narrative control). ▪️There is one part of the interview where the Russian agent talks about how you can control Trump (anyone, for that matter) by the intel you present him with and the decisions that person makes based on that intel. I agree with her 100%. It is what I've been saying the entire time: This is a war of information, with some people surrounding Trump telling him the truth and these people surrounding Trump manipulating him in favor of saving the regime. ▪️Tucker emphasizes again how mad he is that he/they can no longer feed Trump false intel ("he lives in a biosphere where no new information comes in"). Their frustration about losing this power to some degree is a good sign. ▪️Tucker also put Marco Rubio on that list of people he considers problematic. After naming Mark Levin, he directly names Rubio. My observation is that they left Rubio out of their 'campaign of taking people down' until they saw that Vance was losing support and Rubio was gaining it instead. Now the regime's media is producing LEGO videos targeting Rubio. The Woke Right will, this is my guess, start escalating its attacks against Rubio moving forward. ▪️Why? Because they are all politically united and aligned behind the following things: 1. blaming Israel for everything, 2. making Vance (their guy) president in 2028, and 3. saving the Islamic Republic.

diana bloom

16,535 次观看 • 2 个月前