Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

what a slut

jason

2,025 subscribers

20,661 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Apple has a serious problem if technologists who are not price sensitive don’t even know what version of iPhone they’re on!

Apple has a serious problem if technologists who are not price sensitive don’t even know what version of iPhone they’re on!

@jason

141,442 次观看 • 2 年前

What is this women thinking right now — wrong answers only.

What is this women thinking right now — wrong answers only.

@jason

238,983 次观看 • 6 个月前

I loved the ending of white lotus — don’t know what y’all are talking about 🪷

I loved the ending of white lotus — don’t know what y’all are talking about 🪷

@jason

185,741 次观看 • 1 年前

Happy 70th Birthday, Steve Jobs Can you imagine Steve in the age of AI -- what would he have built?

Happy 70th Birthday, Steve Jobs Can you imagine Steve in the age of AI -- what would he have built?

@jason

363,635 次观看 • 1 年前

The dust is settling and the data is showing the election was decided by the confluence of four factors: 1. Inflation: not unemployment, the stock market or GDP; the cost of a hamburger and fries being 2-3x the price it was four years ago is what matters. 2. Peak Wokeness: as demonstrated by this advertisement, which people are claiming was the most effective of the cycle (and that has $100m+ in ad spend behind it) 3. Young men deciding to vote 4. Podcasts Rank them, debate them… and what is missing?

The dust is settling and the data is showing the election was decided by the confluence of four factors: 1. Inflation: not unemployment, the stock market or GDP; the cost of a hamburger and fries being 2-3x the price it was four years ago is what matters. 2. Peak Wokeness: as demonstrated by this advertisement, which people are claiming was the most effective of the cycle (and that has $100m+ in ad spend behind it) 3. Young men deciding to vote 4. Podcasts Rank them, debate them… and what is missing?

@jason

585,648 次观看 • 1 年前

I've never been involved in a political campaign, but like most of you, I've been hoping for some new choices in 2024... hopefully, a choice that is under 80 years old, and preferably, I'd like a candidate who isn't under indictment. Dean Phillips is a founder, he's young, and he's smart. I've decided to check in with him while he's on the road campaigning so I can learn about the process and hear directly from Dean what he's* hearing from Americans. Here's our first conversation. Could use a title for these... suggestions are welcome! #2024

I've never been involved in a political campaign, but like most of you, I've been hoping for some new choices in 2024... hopefully, a choice that is under 80 years old, and preferably, I'd like a candidate who isn't under indictment. Dean Phillips is a founder, he's young, and he's smart. I've decided to check in with him while he's on the road campaigning so I can learn about the process and hear directly from Dean what he's* hearing from Americans. Here's our first conversation. Could use a title for these... suggestions are welcome! #2024

@jason

598,944 次观看 • 2 年前

What a shameless asian slut.

What a shameless asian slut.

Isabella Moody

23,771 次观看 • 7 个月前

Steve Jobs, Aspen 1983 ================ I'm not a natural artist. I can create simple drawings, cut them out, and paste them into documents. This allows me to combine images and text before sending them electronically. Anyone in Aspen can then access their mail and see the drawing by dialing a phone number. We're at the beginning of a revolution. The personal computer is a new medium, and society and computers are truly converging for the first time in the 1980s. In the next 15 years, this initial phase of widespread tool adoption will be complete. During this time, we have a real opportunity to do this well, or to do it poorly. Many of us at Apple are dedicated to doing it well. I want to discuss one final concept before we open the floor to questions. What is a computer program? It's a strange concept. Like an electron, you can't see or touch it. Computer programs have no physical form; they are simply ideas expressed on paper. They are archetypal. Let's compare computer programming to television programming. If you watch tapes of JFK's funeral, you'll likely experience similar emotions to those you felt when you watched it live. Through television programming, we are adept at capturing and recreating experiences. It's expensive and somewhat limited, but we can do it effectively. You can truly feel the excitement of Neil Armstrong landing on the moon. Computer programming does something different. It captures the underlying principles of an experience, not the experience itself. These principles enable countless different experiences that adhere to those rules. A perfect example is a video game. It follows the laws of gravity and angular momentum, creating, for instance, a simple Pong game. The ball always obeys these laws. No two Pong games are ever identical, yet every game follows these fundamental principles. Another example is a program called "Hamurabi." Seven-year-olds play this game where they become King Hamurabi of Sumeria for ten years. The game presents scenarios: "King Hamurabi, in year one, you have 1,000 bushels of wheat, 100 people, and 100 acres of land. Land trades at 24 bushels an acre. Do you want to buy or sell land? How much do you want to plant or feed?" If you don't plant enough, people starve. If you plant a lot, people from neighboring villages will come to your prosperous village. It's a crude macroeconomic model, but these children will play for hours, learning. We need to develop better and more sophisticated models, but this is an interactive learning experience none of us had growing up. Again, thousands of individual experiences, all based on one set of underlying principles. In school, I had a few great teachers and many mediocre ones. Books were my salvation. I could read Aristotle or Plato directly, without an intermediary. A book is phenomenal; it goes straight from the source to the reader. The problem is, you can't ask Aristotle a question. Looking ahead 50 to 100 years, if we can create machines that capture an underlying spirit, set of principles, or way of looking at the world, then when the next Aristotle arrives, perhaps they will carry one of these machines. After they're gone, we could potentially ask the machine, "What would Aristotle have said about this?" We might not get the right answer, but we might. That's incredibly exciting and one of the reasons I do what I do. Now, what would you like to discuss?

Steve Jobs, Aspen 1983 ================ I'm not a natural artist. I can create simple drawings, cut them out, and paste them into documents. This allows me to combine images and text before sending them electronically. Anyone in Aspen can then access their mail and see the drawing by dialing a phone number. We're at the beginning of a revolution. The personal computer is a new medium, and society and computers are truly converging for the first time in the 1980s. In the next 15 years, this initial phase of widespread tool adoption will be complete. During this time, we have a real opportunity to do this well, or to do it poorly. Many of us at Apple are dedicated to doing it well. I want to discuss one final concept before we open the floor to questions. What is a computer program? It's a strange concept. Like an electron, you can't see or touch it. Computer programs have no physical form; they are simply ideas expressed on paper. They are archetypal. Let's compare computer programming to television programming. If you watch tapes of JFK's funeral, you'll likely experience similar emotions to those you felt when you watched it live. Through television programming, we are adept at capturing and recreating experiences. It's expensive and somewhat limited, but we can do it effectively. You can truly feel the excitement of Neil Armstrong landing on the moon. Computer programming does something different. It captures the underlying principles of an experience, not the experience itself. These principles enable countless different experiences that adhere to those rules. A perfect example is a video game. It follows the laws of gravity and angular momentum, creating, for instance, a simple Pong game. The ball always obeys these laws. No two Pong games are ever identical, yet every game follows these fundamental principles. Another example is a program called "Hamurabi." Seven-year-olds play this game where they become King Hamurabi of Sumeria for ten years. The game presents scenarios: "King Hamurabi, in year one, you have 1,000 bushels of wheat, 100 people, and 100 acres of land. Land trades at 24 bushels an acre. Do you want to buy or sell land? How much do you want to plant or feed?" If you don't plant enough, people starve. If you plant a lot, people from neighboring villages will come to your prosperous village. It's a crude macroeconomic model, but these children will play for hours, learning. We need to develop better and more sophisticated models, but this is an interactive learning experience none of us had growing up. Again, thousands of individual experiences, all based on one set of underlying principles. In school, I had a few great teachers and many mediocre ones. Books were my salvation. I could read Aristotle or Plato directly, without an intermediary. A book is phenomenal; it goes straight from the source to the reader. The problem is, you can't ask Aristotle a question. Looking ahead 50 to 100 years, if we can create machines that capture an underlying spirit, set of principles, or way of looking at the world, then when the next Aristotle arrives, perhaps they will carry one of these machines. After they're gone, we could potentially ask the machine, "What would Aristotle have said about this?" We might not get the right answer, but we might. That's incredibly exciting and one of the reasons I do what I do. Now, what would you like to discuss?

@jason

112,272 次观看 • 1 年前

What a time to be a slut for Daddy Steel

Sensitive content

What a time to be a slut for Daddy Steel

Mr.DaddySteel

100,869 次观看 • 2 年前

With this video, Harold Daggot has done more damage to unions than Jimmy Hoffa and Lee Kuan Yew — combined. Threatening fellow Americans with losing *their* jobs if “his guys” don’t get a 77% raise while average Americans try to keep up with inflation is the peak of cutthroat behavior. Disastrous approach. The obvious strategy: give him what he wants in the short term, then automate everything you can and break the monopolies these unions have over our economy so he can never make good on his threats.

With this video, Harold Daggot has done more damage to unions than Jimmy Hoffa and Lee Kuan Yew — combined. Threatening fellow Americans with losing their jobs if “his guys” don’t get a 77% raise while average Americans try to keep up with inflation is the peak of cutthroat behavior. Disastrous approach. The obvious strategy: give him what he wants in the short term, then automate everything you can and break the monopolies these unions have over our economy so he can never make good on his threats.

@jason

4,914,517 次观看 • 1 年前

How did this not win a Tony #safespace

How did this not win a Tony #safespace

@jason

43,504 次观看 • 1 年前

I'm a huge OnlyFlans fan

Sensitive content

I'm a huge OnlyFlans fan

@jason

232,669 次观看 • 7 天前

There’s a reason the All In podcast is the number one podcast in the world — NOSTRACANIS!!! 🧞‍♂️🧞‍♂️🧞‍♂️ 😂😂😂😂 Going to be a spicy episode this week! Speed run coming!

There’s a reason the All In podcast is the number one podcast in the world — NOSTRACANIS!!! 🧞‍♂️🧞‍♂️🧞‍♂️ 😂😂😂😂 Going to be a spicy episode this week! Speed run coming!

@jason

308,899 次观看 • 2 年前