正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

What are Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) 🧐

20,813 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

45 条评论

James A Freeman 的头像
James A Freeman14 天前

You have such good material on this, my friend. I've been looking for these sorts of things, that take what is in the book, and explain it in video. This is awesome! 🔥 👀 🚨 For those of you who see this, think it through. Why did metallic *parts* cars melt, which were blocks away? What would vaporize steeI, but not burn paper? Why were the 'smoldering f1res' actually cool, and not hot? Why did things rust in hours, something that normal f!res would not do? As in the video, why would the remaining steeI girder turn to dust without anything else acting upon it? ...and why indeed would there be so little left, especially of 500K *tons* of steeI? ...and look at the remains: there were huge holes going through the surrounding buildings, going down all floors to the ground (but stopping there)? ...and why were so many jumping even when they were not directly in the f1re: what were they feeling? (Hint: that which turned things to dust felt so agonizing they could no longer take it.) Dem0 is a red herring, purposefully floated to distract you from the real mechanism, because that mechanism reveals the who, and then the why. Read the systematic evidence, friends. When you see it end-to-end, it's undeniable. It was worth every penny...

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited14 天前

I'm trying to send you a DM @JamesAFreeman, but where does one find a X profile's number - This is shitty stuff X has introduced on DM's...

kathie 的头像
kathie15 天前

Mini nukes in the elevator shafts and also explains why so many wound up with thyroid cancer from exposure to radiation! Not dying DEWS weren’t used as well it’s very possible. We also know it’s was the Mossad along with help from our government. Well the deep state!

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited15 天前

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 @kathie96397011 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. 90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11. Watch it now: 9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article:

BondGetsitDone 的头像
BondGetsitDone15 天前

The toasted and twisted cars look just like the mangled objects in Hutchinson’s lab.

Olivoï Olivoï 的头像
Olivoï Olivoï15 天前

@KJ_11septembre

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited15 天前

@KJ_11septembre We work together @olivoiolivoi. I know @KJ_11septembre well.

Edwin N 的头像
Edwin N15 天前

We Are Living In A Very Bad Movie!

The TDS Doctor 的头像
The TDS Doctor15 天前

These were 2 of the strongest buildings on the entire planet too, with a remarkable core as well as exterior reinforcement.

corko 的头像
corko12 天前

When will justice come

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited12 天前

Why do we still have a cover-up @Virgili78903924? There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. 90 Minutes that will change the way you look at the destruction at the WTC on 9/11. Watch it now:

FreddyFentanyl 的头像
FreddyFentanyl15 天前

They hit thoes buildings with everything they had. I dont care how they did it. But who did it. Jews did it.

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited15 天前

Really interested in finding the truth @FeddyFentanyl? A 9/11 "crash course", that covers all three sites. Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality Rumble Link:

Gary W 的头像
Gary W15 天前

Hmmmmmm, melted cars just like in Hawaii

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited14 天前

It's important to differentiate between "Hot DEW" and "Cold DEW" - the tech that destroyed the WTC on 9/11 generates little to no heat, whereas in the Maui and California fires, it's a bit different - with much more evidence of heat, but anomalous fires. @Matadordoc It's important not to speculate and mix together different bits of evidence because it looks similar. Some folks do this to a much greater extent.

Brandon Cunningham 的头像
Brandon Cunningham14 天前

And further more there is t nothing in that building hat could burn to get that hot not even jet fuel…. The government acted with Mossad to destroy the towers

Non-subverted patriot 的头像
Non-subverted patriot14 天前

@grok Is there any truth to this video?

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited14 天前

Are you seriously thinking Ai will give you an honest answer about 9/11 @nonsubverted? Are you that naive? Here is your homework. Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality Rumble Link:

Non-subverted patriot 的头像
Non-subverted patriot14 天前

@grok I just wanted to see what it would say. So if you think the towers came down from directed energy weapons, explain to me how they did that. It’s not like you can see any lasers or anything. How do you even know these weapons exist?

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited14 天前

Start with this article @nonsubverted, after you listened to the clip. Tesla, the Military Industrial Complex Weapon Technology & 9/11 What did Tesla have available for the MIC in 1943? Article:

michael brannan 的头像
michael brannan14 天前

Water evaporates. Steel, glass, etc do not.

RANTING TEXAN 的头像
RANTING TEXAN12 天前

It was jet fuel! Didn’t you know? The government said so!

Hezekiah Mendoza 的头像
Hezekiah Mendoza13 天前

This woman is a very intelligent individual and speaks truth

X…009 的头像
X…00912 天前

#NIKOLATESLATECHNOLOGY FOUND IN HIS HOTEL ROOM WHERE HE DIED. WHO FOUND HIS DOCUMENTS?!

Lauren Furbee 的头像
Lauren Furbee14 天前

The only other place I’ve seen that looks comparable to 911 is Gaza. The destruction of debris, the smoke the crumbling of the building materials. It’s all eerily familiar to 911.

Brad Deal 的头像
Brad Deal12 天前

Don’t believe your lying eyes The towers fell at free fall speed And barely made a rubble pile While the cars parked around the towers were badly burned And piles of uncombusted paper are everywhere I called bullshit when it happened And then day I call it a coup t etat today

Hezekiah Mendoza 的头像
Hezekiah Mendoza13 天前

Thermite

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited13 天前

2025 - Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe @Hamendoza777 With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed. Article:

Jerubbaal Cole 的头像
Jerubbaal Cole12 天前

I know of something thermite

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited12 天前

Bought into the bullshit you have @ColeJerubbaal Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis The 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis and over 15 years of lies Article:

X…009 的头像
X…00912 天前

#WTC911

Cáit Ruiséal 🇮🇪 🇵🇸 的头像
Cáit Ruiséal 🇮🇪 🇵🇸14 天前

The music, Jesus.

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited13 天前

Is this more to your liking @mskatierussel?

Hezekiah Mendoza 的头像
Hezekiah Mendoza13 天前

YouTube the lost century

Texans Take Action Defending Our Rights & Liberty 的头像
Texans Take Action Defending Our Rights & Liberty13 天前

Directed energy weapons are magnifying glasses, and lasers and radar and sound canons. So, what's the mystery, dumbass.

Brandon Cunningham 的头像
Brandon Cunningham14 天前

All that steel don’t evaporate I have Ben working with it for 30 years in building very large buildings I can without any hesitation that this wasn’t an airplane, them two buildings would have with stood 10 of them planes without ever falling. Someone is lying

Redleg 的头像
Redleg14 天前

Whut?

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited14 天前

Who is Nikola Tesla @PhilBendon?

Hezekiah Mendoza 的头像
Hezekiah Mendoza13 天前

Exactly free energy exists that the electric companies use and charge the public for for profit. YouTube @ the list century by doctor Steven Greer who has the CE5 application

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited13 天前

9/11 DEW Cover-Up in UFO Circles @Hamendoza777 Scalar Weapons, Greer & the Missing Electro-Gravitic Truth Article:

Ginger GQ 的头像
Ginger GQ15 天前

free energy

Mark Gramling 的头像
Mark Gramling12 天前

Hawaii fires same

Matt C 的头像
Matt C12 天前

This seemed kinda ridiculous, never expected to see the towers appear in a DEW vid. I thought the demolition seemed adequate. Now idek. Why go this far? To minimise collateral for financial reasons? Was it an underground DEW beneath each tower activated during each fall? Honestly I thought this was really stupid when it started playing but after watching 3 times... Why did the cars get so rekt if the explosives/planes were up above? Why did some of them fly almost mile away? Could a falling building that lost much of it's mass already from disintegration do that? Why did so much of the building's mass disintegrate before hitting the ground? Why did it cause barely any seismic activity for it's size? Why was there so much EM resistant combustible paper everywhere afterwards? Are demolitions capable of vaporising 1200ft of building materials? More questions than answers

9/11 Revisited 的头像
9/11 Revisited12 天前

Here you will find the answers you seek @Cazzacker Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein. A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go?

Valerie Haven 的头像
Valerie Haven14 天前

Yes matter just disappears all the time

相关视频