Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

What are the difference between the radioactive contaminated wastewater from Fukushima, and the wastewater from nuclear power plants? British Nuclear Expert Shaun Burnie, says that it is disingenuous and incorrect for the Japanese government to basicly say this is the same as routine discharge.

16,663 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

running leopard profil fotoğrafı
running leopard3 yıl önce

@chenweihua western medias are totally double standard to Japan's contaminated wastewater problem.

Keep Reading profil fotoğrafı
Keep Reading3 yıl önce

Obviously,TikTok is more objective than X

thedreamchazer™ profil fotoğrafı
thedreamchazer™3 yıl önce

Need to bring to tribunal and charge Japan for the worse crime to human’s property.

tingwei cao profil fotoğrafı
tingwei cao3 yıl önce

@JLAwakening TEPCO the holding co. of Fukushima nuclear power plant, has its first major shareholder in BlackRock in USA, Vanguard Navigator as 2nd largest shareholder and Japan gov as its 3rd largest shareholder.

Kuo ZHAO - Alaska Freezer Salesman profil fotoğrafı
Kuo ZHAO - Alaska Freezer Salesman3 yıl önce

2020 Greenpeace Germany Report

Paul.B profil fotoğrafı
Paul.B3 yıl önce

We know why it was allowed.

kenr ob b profil fotoğrafı
kenr ob b3 yıl önce

The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor of the United States and invaded China. Japan should have destroyed the country and did not deserve to live until now

Common Sense profil fotoğrafı
Common Sense3 yıl önce

I understand that natural occurring tritium in the ocean is at a higher level than that released by the Japanese.

Benzer Videolar