Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

What are the difference between the radioactive contaminated wastewater from Fukushima, and the wastewater from nuclear power plants? British Nuclear Expert Shaun Burnie, says that it is disingenuous and incorrect for the Japanese government to basicly say this is the same as routine discharge.

16,659 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von running leopard
running leopardvor 2 Jahren

@chenweihua western medias are totally double standard to Japan's contaminated wastewater problem.

Profilbild von Keep Reading
Keep Readingvor 2 Jahren

Obviously,TikTok is more objective than X

Profilbild von thedreamchazer™
thedreamchazer™vor 2 Jahren

Need to bring to tribunal and charge Japan for the worse crime to human’s property.

Profilbild von tingwei cao
tingwei caovor 2 Jahren

@JLAwakening TEPCO the holding co. of Fukushima nuclear power plant, has its first major shareholder in BlackRock in USA, Vanguard Navigator as 2nd largest shareholder and Japan gov as its 3rd largest shareholder.

Profilbild von Kuo ZHAO - Alaska Freezer Salesman
Kuo ZHAO - Alaska Freezer Salesmanvor 2 Jahren

2020 Greenpeace Germany Report

Profilbild von Paul.B
Paul.Bvor 2 Jahren

We know why it was allowed.

Profilbild von kenr ob b
kenr ob bvor 2 Jahren

The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor of the United States and invaded China. Japan should have destroyed the country and did not deserve to live until now

Profilbild von Common Sense
Common Sensevor 2 Jahren

I understand that natural occurring tritium in the ocean is at a higher level than that released by the Japanese.

Ähnliche Videos