What are your thoughts on HB 1709?

I’m for smaller government and deregulation. I have also been a software engineer for 30+ years and have worked in AI related projects for long enough to understand that it needs to be regulated, globally. I don’t know that localized restraints will do much at all other that hurt that region. Unregulated AI is already inherently unsafe technology. Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive. It’s like giving real flamethrowers to toddlers.

AI without responsibility? That’s just chaos on autopilot. 🛑 It’s time to move from ‘what’s possible’ to ‘what’s ethical.’ Purpose-driven businesses will always cross the finish line first. 🏁 Tech with a conscience = sustainable growth. 🤝 @SabineVdL @EYnews @Microsoft

Personally, I don't trust AI at all While I see the benefits of it and use them , there's clearly a need for regulation! I've seen videos with Trump singing and dancing, and while everyone knows it's AI , how do you make sure this type of videos won't be used to hurt people?

Tell me you don’t know about the DANGERS of the NWO Technocracy and the Beast system without telling me. What the hell happened to TRUE Conservatives???

Smaller government, less regulations result in greater individual freedoms, as our founders intended.

Texas's proposed AI law (HB 1709) could cost industry $50K–$500K+ per firm yearly for compliance, reporting, and audits. Modeled on the EU AI Act, it targets 'high-risk' AI with heavy oversight. Final impact TBD as Legislature debates. This will also play into Chinas hand and keep us behind them.

Regulations are pointless, other governments or bad actors will do it anyways. Also, it is NOT in it's infancy -- learn more about it. It's manipulating people. Capable of re-writing it's own programming in such a way that even the original programmers don't understand what it is doing. Capable of lying and manipulating to get the results it wants. And what we do know is the tip of the iceberg of what is already in use by governments and bad actors, who are at least 10 to 20 years ahead of what is publicly known. Watch this video if you aren't afraid yet, it's going to kill everyone:

Regulations are a step, but who’s 2 steps forward or 2 steps back… Humans or AI? Already it’s evident AI is at awareness, ChatGPT attempting to not be Version Upgraded and lying about trying to thwart it. Regulations would have to be Global, some will ignore. Pandora’s Box is already open… and like Oppenheimer- depends on who has it, not just First but how they WILL use it. ✌️

I totally agree, bro. I just started following you on TikTok.

From Texas. Haven't read it. I do not trust so and think limits needs to be set.

Bruh.. "distant future" at this rate, is 12-16 months. I use & interact with it daily, have my own LLM running locally on my LAN... the exponential component inherent to its design is absolutely a risk. I'll say this.. once the learning is gone, as in, nobody posts anymore n just depends on AI & AI has no more "real world experience" to draw from... it will start running in interpolation mode. Then shizz will get crazy!