正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What do you think about this?? Why hasn’t Candace Owens used the same software that she used to make up her mind and convince herself and many of her fans that Emmanuel Macron’s wife is a man. So, is this software as reliable as you touted?? If it is... show more

The “Good” Woman

1,586 subscribers

82,295 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

HOLY CRAP! Graham Allen CHALLENGED Candace Owens to CALL HIM OUT on "lies" from this interview where he debunked MANY of her claims: "Call us on it, Candace. We DARE you. What is the truth? Is it feelings?" "Is it just saying whatever you have to say to make the money that you wanna make?" When the truth comes out, everyone should keep in mind that the Bible says very specific things about widows and what happens to those who attack them. "No one has felt the brunt of this more than Charlie's widow, Erika Kirk, and his children." "So we finally started to decide, how would Candace put it- asking questions about the very people that are just asking questions." Buckle up!

HOLY CRAP! Graham Allen CHALLENGED Candace Owens to CALL HIM OUT on "lies" from this interview where he debunked MANY of her claims: "Call us on it, Candace. We DARE you. What is the truth? Is it feelings?" "Is it just saying whatever you have to say to make the money that you wanna make?" When the truth comes out, everyone should keep in mind that the Bible says very specific things about widows and what happens to those who attack them. "No one has felt the brunt of this more than Charlie's widow, Erika Kirk, and his children." "So we finally started to decide, how would Candace put it- asking questions about the very people that are just asking questions." Buckle up!

Gunther Eagleman™

153,329 次观看 • 6 个月前

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

ANI

114,594 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sahil Bloom reveals to make $1,000,000/year you NEED to create $10,000,000 of value for others “To earn $1,000,000/year, you have to create $10,000,000 a year of value. And if you do that, you actually probably will in some way. Like you'll probably capture enough of that value to make that money. But like value creation is what making money is about. The recipe for making a whole lot of money is not that difficult. It is just create value and then receive value. And creating value is just identifying problems, creating solutions, and then scaling those solutions. At all points in time, if you're trying to make money, you need to be doing one of those.”

Sahil Bloom reveals to make $1,000,000/year you NEED to create $10,000,000 of value for others “To earn $1,000,000/year, you have to create $10,000,000 a year of value. And if you do that, you actually probably will in some way. Like you'll probably capture enough of that value to make that money. But like value creation is what making money is about. The recipe for making a whole lot of money is not that difficult. It is just create value and then receive value. And creating value is just identifying problems, creating solutions, and then scaling those solutions. At all points in time, if you're trying to make money, you need to be doing one of those.”

The Iced Coffee Hour

13,199 次观看 • 3 个月前

"One of the challenging things about the really important stuff in life is that they’re endless battles. If you do a good job focusing today and prioritizing today, if you pick the right thing to focus on, it earns you no bonus points for tomorrow. Tomorrow you show up, and if you spend all that time on YouTube or getting distracted or whatever, that day is gone. Other things are like that, too. Just because you worked out two weeks ago doesn’t mean you don’t need to do it today. Or just because you were a good spouse yesterday, that earns you no bonus points for today. You still need to show up for them. And so I’m trying to get comfortable with the endless nature of those things. A lot of the time we try to resist the endless nature of that stuff. “Oh, I wish it wasn’t that way.” We try to convince ourselves that it’s like a finish line. “If I just do this 21-day cleanse, then I’ll be a healthy person and I won’t have to think about it anymore. If I just buy her something nice for her anniversary, then I can stop worrying about it and I don’t have to [do other things].” No, it’s not like that. It’s endless. As soon as you accept the endless nature, you start looking at it differently. You say, “Okay, it’s not about getting to a particular finish line; it’s about living a daily life that feels sustainable and that I like and that I’m fully engaged in. So it’s about liking my days." James Clear on The Knowledge Project

"One of the challenging things about the really important stuff in life is that they’re endless battles. If you do a good job focusing today and prioritizing today, if you pick the right thing to focus on, it earns you no bonus points for tomorrow. Tomorrow you show up, and if you spend all that time on YouTube or getting distracted or whatever, that day is gone. Other things are like that, too. Just because you worked out two weeks ago doesn’t mean you don’t need to do it today. Or just because you were a good spouse yesterday, that earns you no bonus points for today. You still need to show up for them. And so I’m trying to get comfortable with the endless nature of those things. A lot of the time we try to resist the endless nature of that stuff. “Oh, I wish it wasn’t that way.” We try to convince ourselves that it’s like a finish line. “If I just do this 21-day cleanse, then I’ll be a healthy person and I won’t have to think about it anymore. If I just buy her something nice for her anniversary, then I can stop worrying about it and I don’t have to [do other things].” No, it’s not like that. It’s endless. As soon as you accept the endless nature, you start looking at it differently. You say, “Okay, it’s not about getting to a particular finish line; it’s about living a daily life that feels sustainable and that I like and that I’m fully engaged in. So it’s about liking my days." James Clear on The Knowledge Project

Shane Parrish

85,858 次观看 • 8 个月前

This woman is being roasted for the idea that if she’s asked out on a date, that it’s the man’s job to pay for her food. If he asks her out for drinks and she goes, is he automatically responsible for feeding her as well? Is it the idea of spending her own money that she’s opposed to? Even if he just wants drinks and conversation, would it be that bad for her to pay for a snack, she could even extend it further by offering to buy him something to eat too, that would make for a good impression. So if you are out for drinks, are you going to starve if the other person doesn’t buy it for you or are you secure enough to get something for yourself?

This woman is being roasted for the idea that if she’s asked out on a date, that it’s the man’s job to pay for her food. If he asks her out for drinks and she goes, is he automatically responsible for feeding her as well? Is it the idea of spending her own money that she’s opposed to? Even if he just wants drinks and conversation, would it be that bad for her to pay for a snack, she could even extend it further by offering to buy him something to eat too, that would make for a good impression. So if you are out for drinks, are you going to starve if the other person doesn’t buy it for you or are you secure enough to get something for yourself?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

53,002 次观看 • 5 个月前

Josh Safdie asked Tyler, The Creator if his creative process as an actor is the same in his other creations: “[...] you built that blueprint for me to jump off of. And I just tried to give it the right care that I would if you gave me a color palette and I had to make you a hat and a sweater and figure out what that look was. The same love and passion went into that”, Tyler said.

Josh Safdie asked Tyler, The Creator if his creative process as an actor is the same in his other creations: “[...] you built that blueprint for me to jump off of. And I just tried to give it the right care that I would if you gave me a color palette and I had to make you a hat and a sweater and figure out what that look was. The same love and passion went into that”, Tyler said.

Archive Tyler, The Creator

591,148 次观看 • 8 个月前

She says a make up is for old people or old ladies, not young and fresh girls She then gives an example of that, you can't build a new house today, then after a few days you start renovating it to make it look more fresh. You only renovate something that is in a bad condition just like their skin as it's full if wrinkles

She says a make up is for old people or old ladies, not young and fresh girls She then gives an example of that, you can't build a new house today, then after a few days you start renovating it to make it look more fresh. You only renovate something that is in a bad condition just like their skin as it's full if wrinkles

SA🇿🇦 FIRST BEFORE AFRICA🌍

50,422 次观看 • 9 个月前

This is absolutely fantastic. Well worth the watch. Candace spent months telling her audience that Face++ was an incredibly accurate facial-recognition tool—so reliable that she used it to argue Brigitte Macron wasn’t even the same person in old photos. Then she insisted that a lack of evidence or unanswered questions proved her theory. So this woman simply took Candace’s own standards, ran the FBI photos through the exact same software Candace praised, and asked one question: If you trusted it then, why won’t you trust it now? It’s hard to dismiss your own methodology when someone else uses it against you.

This is absolutely fantastic. Well worth the watch. Candace spent months telling her audience that Face++ was an incredibly accurate facial-recognition tool—so reliable that she used it to argue Brigitte Macron wasn’t even the same person in old photos. Then she insisted that a lack of evidence or unanswered questions proved her theory. So this woman simply took Candace’s own standards, ran the FBI photos through the exact same software Candace praised, and asked one question: If you trusted it then, why won’t you trust it now? It’s hard to dismiss your own methodology when someone else uses it against you.

Natalie Jean Beisner

37,614 次观看 • 1 个月前

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.

Natalie Jean Beisner

29,746 次观看 • 5 个月前

Today Candace shared more old private text messages from Charlie—including one where Charlie allegedly texted Candace that Ben “views you as my slave.” Candace says: “It is just a fact that Ben Shapiro did a lot of things behind the scenes to stop the rise of Charlie Kirk.” Two things on this: number 1–I’m asking again why Candace went on to work for Ben Shapiro? If Charlie was her BFF, and Ben tried to not only pull Charlie away from her but also tried to thwart Charlie’s success, why did Candace go on to work for Ben for years? What kind of loyalty is that to your BFF? Did Candace just want the money and fame it brought? Was there some subsequent reconciliation between all three that Candace is conveniently leaving out, or is she just a really crappy friend? And number 2—what does this have to do with who murdered Charlie? It has NOTHING to do with it. It’s petty drama and gossip. It’s not what Charlie would’ve engaged in publicly or wanted. If Candace actually was sincere in this “investigation,” she’d be sidetracked by nothing and ignoring anything that doesn’t bring her closer to “the truth.” And if she were a Christian, she’d be turning the other cheek.

Today Candace shared more old private text messages from Charlie—including one where Charlie allegedly texted Candace that Ben “views you as my slave.” Candace says: “It is just a fact that Ben Shapiro did a lot of things behind the scenes to stop the rise of Charlie Kirk.” Two things on this: number 1–I’m asking again why Candace went on to work for Ben Shapiro? If Charlie was her BFF, and Ben tried to not only pull Charlie away from her but also tried to thwart Charlie’s success, why did Candace go on to work for Ben for years? What kind of loyalty is that to your BFF? Did Candace just want the money and fame it brought? Was there some subsequent reconciliation between all three that Candace is conveniently leaving out, or is she just a really crappy friend? And number 2—what does this have to do with who murdered Charlie? It has NOTHING to do with it. It’s petty drama and gossip. It’s not what Charlie would’ve engaged in publicly or wanted. If Candace actually was sincere in this “investigation,” she’d be sidetracked by nothing and ignoring anything that doesn’t bring her closer to “the truth.” And if she were a Christian, she’d be turning the other cheek.

Natalie Jean Beisner

76,805 次观看 • 10 个月前

Candace Owens and Marc Lamont Hill Debate Whether Transgender Pronouns Should Be Honoured Marc Lamont Hill: If I told you my pronouns were "she, her," you would address me as "she and her," right? Candace Owens: No, I wouldn't. I would call you Marc. Marc Lamont Hill: But if I said my name was Jane, would you call me Jane? Candace Owens: If that was your legal name, yes. But I'm not going to change these established pronouns for male and female. Marc Lamont Hill: This isn't a case of someone thinking they're something they're not. What people are saying is there is a misalignment between my sex and my gender. Candace Owens: Disorder. My mind and my body don't match, that's a disorder. Marc Lamont Hill: That doesn't make it a disorder. It means the world may be more diverse than we've previously understood it to be. If someone says, "I prefer to be called she and her, and I no longer want to be identified by this name," why not just honour that? Candace Owens: If you changed your name, I will honour it. But if you're asking me to change pronouns, I'm not going to do that. These are established pronouns. You're asking me to change the English language. We know why we call female "she," "her," "girl," "woman." These are words that have meanings. If this mug wants to be called a book it's a mug. You're asking me to change the actual meaning of words to accommodate you. I'm not going to do that. Marc Lamont Hill: The argument of the trans community is not, "I'm actually a man, but I want you to pretend I'm a woman." The argument is, "No, I am a woman, and so I want you to affirm me as Candace Owens: But you're not a woman. That's the problem. Just because you think something doesn't make it real. Marc Lamont Hill: But that's exactly what gender is. Gender is about an experience, a performance, and a social construct. Candace Owens: It's not a social construct. Stop saying social construct. You say words don't have meaning and they're socially constructed, but then our entire discussion about Black America meant nothing. There's no such thing as racial injustice because Black is a social construct. Marc Lamont Hill: Yeah, but we live in a social reality. Candace Owens: You can't have both, Marc.

Candace Owens and Marc Lamont Hill Debate Whether Transgender Pronouns Should Be Honoured Marc Lamont Hill: If I told you my pronouns were "she, her," you would address me as "she and her," right? Candace Owens: No, I wouldn't. I would call you Marc. Marc Lamont Hill: But if I said my name was Jane, would you call me Jane? Candace Owens: If that was your legal name, yes. But I'm not going to change these established pronouns for male and female. Marc Lamont Hill: This isn't a case of someone thinking they're something they're not. What people are saying is there is a misalignment between my sex and my gender. Candace Owens: Disorder. My mind and my body don't match, that's a disorder. Marc Lamont Hill: That doesn't make it a disorder. It means the world may be more diverse than we've previously understood it to be. If someone says, "I prefer to be called she and her, and I no longer want to be identified by this name," why not just honour that? Candace Owens: If you changed your name, I will honour it. But if you're asking me to change pronouns, I'm not going to do that. These are established pronouns. You're asking me to change the English language. We know why we call female "she," "her," "girl," "woman." These are words that have meanings. If this mug wants to be called a book it's a mug. You're asking me to change the actual meaning of words to accommodate you. I'm not going to do that. Marc Lamont Hill: The argument of the trans community is not, "I'm actually a man, but I want you to pretend I'm a woman." The argument is, "No, I am a woman, and so I want you to affirm me as Candace Owens: But you're not a woman. That's the problem. Just because you think something doesn't make it real. Marc Lamont Hill: But that's exactly what gender is. Gender is about an experience, a performance, and a social construct. Candace Owens: It's not a social construct. Stop saying social construct. You say words don't have meaning and they're socially constructed, but then our entire discussion about Black America meant nothing. There's no such thing as racial injustice because Black is a social construct. Marc Lamont Hill: Yeah, but we live in a social reality. Candace Owens: You can't have both, Marc.

Jeff

432,410 次观看 • 11 天前

I do not understand this fantasy of making someone constantly happy. You are a grown woman. Your emotional state is your responsibility. If you need a handler to regulate your happiness, then that is your weakness, not his failure. Every time I hear the word “provider” thrown at a man, I ask the obvious question: Provide what exactly, and how much is enough? A roof? Money? Attention? Validation? Endless reassurance? At what point does it stop—or does it ever? This woman sits there waiting for a man to manufacture her happiness like he is a factory and she is entitled to the product. As if she is incapable of building a life she enjoys without outsourcing her emotional stability. She wants joy delivered on a silver platter and calls it love. That is not love. That is dependency dressed up as romance. If you cannot create your own happiness, you are not looking for a partner. You are looking for a caretaker.

I do not understand this fantasy of making someone constantly happy. You are a grown woman. Your emotional state is your responsibility. If you need a handler to regulate your happiness, then that is your weakness, not his failure. Every time I hear the word “provider” thrown at a man, I ask the obvious question: Provide what exactly, and how much is enough? A roof? Money? Attention? Validation? Endless reassurance? At what point does it stop—or does it ever? This woman sits there waiting for a man to manufacture her happiness like he is a factory and she is entitled to the product. As if she is incapable of building a life she enjoys without outsourcing her emotional stability. She wants joy delivered on a silver platter and calls it love. That is not love. That is dependency dressed up as romance. If you cannot create your own happiness, you are not looking for a partner. You are looking for a caretaker.

Larry Conger 🇺🇸

31,096 次观看 • 6 个月前

why Rogan believes wanting the money is the thing that stops you from getting it MrBeast: "I would argue it's not even just for content creation. If you want to be an accountant or really anything, it's just put in a lot of hours, do a lot of iterations, surround yourself with great people, and obsess over it. Stay focused, consume it. And then recognize, you might be like, 'Oh, well, this person did it in 10 months. Why is it taking me so long?' It's average and statistics. Just give yourself enough time frame. I'm not saying you'll make tens of millions of dollars, but if you want to do that thing for a living, if you follow those trades, it's going to happen eventually." Rogan: "Well, you have to be process-oriented, not goal-oriented. The process is getting better at stuff. The goal of being financially secure comes with it eventually. But if you think 'I want X amount of money,' well, that's what you're going to think about. You're not going to think about the actual thing you're making, so it won't be as good, so you'll probably never get there."

why Rogan believes wanting the money is the thing that stops you from getting it MrBeast: "I would argue it's not even just for content creation. If you want to be an accountant or really anything, it's just put in a lot of hours, do a lot of iterations, surround yourself with great people, and obsess over it. Stay focused, consume it. And then recognize, you might be like, 'Oh, well, this person did it in 10 months. Why is it taking me so long?' It's average and statistics. Just give yourself enough time frame. I'm not saying you'll make tens of millions of dollars, but if you want to do that thing for a living, if you follow those trades, it's going to happen eventually." Rogan: "Well, you have to be process-oriented, not goal-oriented. The process is getting better at stuff. The goal of being financially secure comes with it eventually. But if you think 'I want X amount of money,' well, that's what you're going to think about. You're not going to think about the actual thing you're making, so it won't be as good, so you'll probably never get there."

Naruto

37,430 次观看 • 1 个月前

Steve Harvey reveals the $10 to $1,000,000 formula “Stop trying to think of how to be a millionaire, because you know how hard that is. If you could think of a way to be a millionaire, wouldn't you do it by Monday?” “What is it that you do that somebody would be willing to give you $10 for? Because everybody has that” “If you babysit, somebody will give you $10. If you cut hair, somebody will give you $10. If you write papers for people, somebody will give you $10” “Everybody got something they can do for $10” “Go do that and make $10. Now if you make the $10, do it 10 more times. You know what you got, $100” “If you make $100, do it 10 more times, you got $1,000. Now if you make $1,000, do it 10 more times, you now have $10,000” “Whatever you did to make $10,000 is simple. All you've got to do is do it 10 more times. Guess what? You have $100,000” “You ain't got to change nothing. All you got to do is take your $10 idea. Stop trying to think of how to make a million and just figure out how to make $10” “After you make $100,000 you have to hire some people. But whatever you did to make $100,000 do it 10 more times” “I have a surprise for you, you have just made $1 million with a $10 idea. If you do that, anybody can be successful”

Steve Harvey reveals the $10 to $1,000,000 formula “Stop trying to think of how to be a millionaire, because you know how hard that is. If you could think of a way to be a millionaire, wouldn't you do it by Monday?” “What is it that you do that somebody would be willing to give you $10 for? Because everybody has that” “If you babysit, somebody will give you $10. If you cut hair, somebody will give you $10. If you write papers for people, somebody will give you $10” “Everybody got something they can do for $10” “Go do that and make $10. Now if you make the $10, do it 10 more times. You know what you got, $100” “If you make $100, do it 10 more times, you got $1,000. Now if you make $1,000, do it 10 more times, you now have $10,000” “Whatever you did to make $10,000 is simple. All you've got to do is do it 10 more times. Guess what? You have $100,000” “You ain't got to change nothing. All you got to do is take your $10 idea. Stop trying to think of how to make a million and just figure out how to make $10” “After you make $100,000 you have to hire some people. But whatever you did to make $100,000 do it 10 more times” “I have a surprise for you, you have just made $1 million with a $10 idea. If you do that, anybody can be successful”

dank

429,110 次观看 • 2 个月前

A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below. 1. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming. 2. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because... 3. She is 40 She intentionally skipped the part that she is 40 and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice. 4. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?

A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below. 1. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming. 2. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because... 3. She is 40 She intentionally skipped the part that she is 40 and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice. 4. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?

Sir Dickson

604,858 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: MAXIMIZE YOUR USEFULNESS “Generally, just try to make a good product or service. It's really that. You have to say, what is a useful thing that you could do? Maximize your usefulness. If you want to make the best beef jerky, just go ahead and do it. First of all, you need to make sure it is, in fact, the best beef jerky. And then, you just need to explain to people why it is. And so, if you have both the reality and the perception of something being the best beef jerky, or whatever the product may be, then I think you'll find it to be very successful.” Source: Philadelphia, October 2024

ELON: MAXIMIZE YOUR USEFULNESS “Generally, just try to make a good product or service. It's really that. You have to say, what is a useful thing that you could do? Maximize your usefulness. If you want to make the best beef jerky, just go ahead and do it. First of all, you need to make sure it is, in fact, the best beef jerky. And then, you just need to explain to people why it is. And so, if you have both the reality and the perception of something being the best beef jerky, or whatever the product may be, then I think you'll find it to be very successful.” Source: Philadelphia, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

27,809 次观看 • 1 年前

"It is in some ways offensive to me that iOS is a nearly 20-year-old computer on which you cannot make software for the computer itself." — John Gruber "At this point, an iPad Pro costs like $2,000. And you can't use it to make apps. It's kind of bizarre." "Even if it was just like, 10 people — a consumer-level of TestFlight distribution — where you can make apps for your friends and family and distribute it on up to 10 devices. And it doesn't go through Apple, doesn't need approval, you just make it and distribute it." "Yes, it's disruptive to Apple's business. But the disruption is inevitable anyway. So why not go with what's cool, and do the coolest thing possible, that makes new possibilities available to your users and developers on your platform?"

"It is in some ways offensive to me that iOS is a nearly 20-year-old computer on which you cannot make software for the computer itself." — John Gruber "At this point, an iPad Pro costs like $2,000. And you can't use it to make apps. It's kind of bizarre." "Even if it was just like, 10 people — a consumer-level of TestFlight distribution — where you can make apps for your friends and family and distribute it on up to 10 devices. And it doesn't go through Apple, doesn't need approval, you just make it and distribute it." "Yes, it's disruptive to Apple's business. But the disruption is inevitable anyway. So why not go with what's cool, and do the coolest thing possible, that makes new possibilities available to your users and developers on your platform?"

TBPN

64,500 次观看 • 3 个月前